Grumpy Sean Howie 🇦🇺🇮🇱

The assassination of Charlie Kirk will be seen as a seminal moment in history. Never before has such an event galvanised so much emotion, for so many, over such a large global footprint, in such a short time. His death rips away the fragile veneer of Right vs Left politics, and exposes fundamental questions of Good vs Evil. That battle, long simmering under the surface, has erupted .è

DIEversity would've ripped him apart at Lakemba mosque only 24hrs ago if he didn't have an entourage of security with him. What a donut.

Muslims can never be loyal to Australia, Britain, or America. Their loyalty is always to Islam. The sooner the West understands this, the sooner we can avoid a catastrophe.

Surely some hackers have seized control of Albanese’s pathetic X account. Because how else do you explain this absolute clown show? Less than 24 hours after he slinks into a sex-segregated mosque—where women are banned from the main area—and gets screamed at, abused, and chased out by a pack of radicals yelling 'Allahu Akbar' like it's a victory chant... right on the heels of Islamists slaughtering 15 innocent Australians at Bondi... this muppet has the gall to vomit out 'DIVERSITY IS OUR STRENGTH’ Seriously? Does our so-called Prime Minister genuinely believe Australians are that brain-dead, that we’ll just swallow this gaslighting garbage without gagging? Or is he so far up his own ideological bubble that he thinks reciting platitudes will magically erase the blood, the heckling, and the glaring hypocrisy?

Pauline Hanson spends her days mixing with all types of Australians Anthony Albanese spends his at mosques suring up the Islamic vote Australia, You know who you need to vote for Vote one nation 🇦🇺

One month ago Pauline Hanson was ridiculed for suggesting some people were not safe in Lakemba. In response the media ran puff pieces on the night markets. Tony Burke mocked her on Insiders for making the claim. Barely a month later she has been totally vindicated. With this incident taking place in the same mosque mentioned in the piece and featuring the same community leaders.

Anthony Albanese recently shut down an antisemitism investigation following the Bondi Beach massacre. He has defended unfettered Islamic immigration. He goes to mosques to say their prayers. Yet, it's still not enough. It will never be enough. There's a lesson in that.

If the "Far Right N@zis" shot more than 50 Australians and killed 15 of them a few months ago do you think he would join them for a bit of carpet kissing ? No because there is only about 100 of them and they wont win Labor any votes. This is probably the most repulsive arse kissing exercise he and Burka has ever done.

A Labor memo has circulated. Bang on repeatedly about Pauline using Gina Rinehart's plane. Well you knobs, keep it up. Because I can assure you, no one cares. It's no cost to taxpayers, unlike every meal you Socialist bastards sit down to.

The irony: after the hate preacher lectures his VIP guest, Australian PM Albanese, lambasting him for every ill in the world going back centuries, and for all their misery as an new immigrant minority in super-rich and welcoming Australia, he says, “Respect the place you’re in.” Quite. Imagine if an Australian Jewish father and son, well-known and active members of the community, shot up an Eid al-Fitr celebration, killing 15 Muslims. Imagine the levels of Jewish communal introspection. Jews would build monuments for the victims. The entire Jewish communal apparatus would be shifted to public anotement. Well, three months later, this is the opposite, whatever this disgrace is. But Australia and Albanese have let this happen; they need to grow up fast.

Our spineless maggot of a Prime Minister looked fuckin terrified when confronted with mob of inbred Western Sydney goat fuckers this morning while trying to appease them with a photo op at the Lekemba mosque. You need to grow a set @AlboMP, you sook, or stand aside and let someone with some take these fuckers on.

Every Australian should search #MukhlisMah (the crazy guy who screamed at Anthony Albanese in Lakemba Mosque) on Instagram and Tik Tok and see the sheer amount of support that everyday Muslims living in Australia are showing towards this man In summary, the comments are: 1. Fuck Albanese 2. Fuck NSW police 3. Mukhlis is a hero 4. Other Muslims at the mosque who were “standing by” as Mukhlis was “assaulted” by police should be ashamed of themselves Are these people Muslims or are they Islamists? Could you explain the difference to me? What I know is that they are technically, on paper, Australians, and they vote

This is how thousands of Gazan civilians surrounded Arbel Yehud, a female Israeli hostage held for 482 days, the day she was finally freed. Those savages spat on her, beat her, and tried to murder her right there. Never forget the barbarism of Gazans.

What I like about Diwali, Vaisakhi, Chanukah and Easter celebrations is that there is very little talk of beheading

This is the level of security that Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese needed to walk through the heavily Muslim Sydney suburb of Lakemba this morning. Islamist extremists straight up tried to mob him and lynch him. If he didn’t have twenty bodyguards and AFP agents around him, they would have straight up torn him to pieces right then and there. They would have bashed him and torn him limb from limb. Lakemba is such a beautiful suburb. Diversity is our strength.

@r3tarddownunder Unfortunately, this says more about the r3tarded voters in Australia than it does about the pollies 🥴

I genuinely think that Australian politicians have the highest level of retardation per capita than any other nation. Just look at some of these retsrds 👇🏼

Today Friday 20 March Weak PM sucks up to Muslims for Ramadan celebration & gets bood out of Lakemba Q. Why is the PRIME MINISTER of Australia hanging out at a known TERROR MOSQUE Vote One Nation 🇦🇺

According to the left, videos before the year 2000 are "right-wing propaganda." They actually just don't want you to remember what they stole from us.

A few days after Muslims take over Trafalgar Square a lone Christian preacher is arrested. The double standards are genuinely becoming scary

Islam in the West is the ring of power in The Lord of the Rings. Everyone thinks they can handle it. They think they can use it, moderate it, integrate it, tame it, or negotiate with it. The Ring serves only one master, and it is not the one wearing it. As long as the West thinks it can use Islam, Islam ends up using the West. Just like the Ring amplifies the worst impulses of the one who carries it, Islam reshapes whatever institution allows it inside: Human-rights language becomes a shield for illiberal politics. Free-speech norms become a platform for anti-free-speech doctrines. Religious liberty becomes legal cover for parallel legal systems. Democracy becomes a staircase to end democracy. This is the rule of the Ring: Whoever tries to wield it eventually becomes its servant. Even the well-intentioned fall. Especially the well-intentioned. The West keeps trying different strategies: "Support moderates, integrate communities, counter the extremists, not the ideology, dialogue will soften them, maybe they don’t really mean what they say, economic uplift will change their worldview, second and third generations will modernize." Every one of these is the Council of Elrond arguing that maybe someone, somewhere, might use the Ring differently. But Tolkien’s world and Islam world share the same truth: You can't reform an object built for domination. You can't tame an ideology constructed for supremacy. The Ring can't be debated, reasoned with, or negotiated into moderation. It was forged for one purpose, and it retains that purpose regardless of who wears it. Islam is the same. The only way to destroy the Ring is to take it back to the place where it was forged, the fires of Mount Doom, and burn it in its original source. The same is true for Islam: You can't defeat it with counterterrorism alone. You can't defeat it with border policy alone. You can't defeat it with intelligence operations alone. You can't defeat it through elections, speeches, or interfaith dinners. You must go to its Mordor, its theology, its texts, its jurisprudence, its political creed, its doctrinal foundations, and you must burn it there. Confront the doctrine of jihad. Expose the political blueprint. Discredit the historical narrative. Challenge the legal theory that divides humanity. Break the ideological architecture. Expose it's master. Only then does the Ring lose its power. Everything else is delay. The danger is not in extremism. The danger is in believing you can harness extremism for your benefit. Like the Ring, Islam corrupts even those who oppose it. It drags the center toward its worldview. It forces institutions to accommodate its demands. It shapes the political discourse through intimidation, guilt, or demographic leverage. The Ring does not want to be hidden. It wants to be worn. Islam does not want to coexist. It wants to rule. There is no path to victory that avoids the mountain. There is no shortcut around theology. There is no peace purchased through appeasement. There is no safety in pretending the ideology is harmless. There is no future if you refuse to confront the source of the problem. The West keeps walking in circles around Mount Doom, hoping for an easier route. But there isn’t one. If you want to destroy the Ring, you must go to Mordor. If you want to combat Islam, you must confront its theology. That is the fire in which the ideology was forged. And that is the only fire in which it can be destroyed.

Excellent article. Here are a few builds. First, it must be pointed out that Islam - not some extreme variant, but bog-standard orthodox Islam as preached and practised in Britain - rejects any notion of integration or ideological compromise with other religions or cultural norms that contradict its edicts. The doctrine of al-wala' wal-bara' commands loyalty to the faith and disavowal of non-Muslim ways. The Prophet's own hadith warns that "whoever imitates a people is one of them." Muslims are expected to reject man-made structures and "innovation," and to accept the barbarities of the Quran and the Hadith as divinely sanctioned prescriptions for how life must be lived. No radical fringe is required to reach these conclusions. The mainstream canon gets you there on its own. Second, when Muslims form a majority in a territory, they are divinely instructed to impose Islamic rule on everyone. If you belong to the "people of the book" - another Abrahamic faith - you may be permitted to live, provided you pay a poll tax (jizya) to the Muslim rulers in a state of, as the Quran specifies, humiliation. Ibn Kathir's commentary on this verse is unambiguous: the jizya exists to demonstrate the subjugation of non-Muslims to Islamic authority. If you are a Hindu, Islam considers you a pagan, and even under the most lenient schools of jurisprudence, your status under Islamic rule is one of codified subjugation - discriminatory taxation, legal inequality, prohibition on building temples, inability to testify against a Muslim in court, and periodic persecution. The "tolerant" version of Islam is tolerance in the sense of "we will permit you to exist under conditions we dictate," not tolerance in the sense of equal standing before the law. As for leaving Islam, the Prophet's instruction is plain: "whoever changes his religion, kill him." All four Sunni schools of jurisprudence agree. Abu Bakr's wars against apostates were fought within a year of the Prophet's death. The only reason we are not all living under these arrangements is that Muslims are - for now - a minority in Britain. Third, public Islamic prayer is, as Nick says, political - and has been since the Prophet's time. Islam does not recognise a distinction between religious and political life. The Friday sermon was historically the platform from which caliphs proclaimed authority and issued edicts. The call to prayer is prescribed to be heard by the community. The separation of church and state is a uniquely Reformation-driven Western achievement, and Islam explicitly repudiates it. Communal public prayer in a non-Muslim land is therefore an assertion of presence, of dominance, and of rejection of the norms of the host nation - whether every individual participant intends it as such or not. Fourth, we owe precisely zero explanations for why we resent this. Zero. We do not have to be rational about it. We do not have to draw comparisons with other religions. Any explanation we give is the right one, because it is our land, and we govern it as we see fit. But I will give you my reasons. While I am an atheist and regard all religion as a collection of mostly rubbish - and religious belief as a species of derangement - Britain's culture and values have been steeped in Christianity. This includes our laws, which are inseparable from our culture. We may not be as Christian as we were fifty years ago, but anyone born in this country who was not shielded from it (as a great many Muslims are, thanks to their parents) will have absorbed some of Christianity's gifts into their cultural DNA. Islam is the antithesis of all of this. Its canonical texts prescribe the striking of disobedient wives, value a woman's testimony at half a man's, mandate amputation for theft, flogging for fornication, and stoning for adultery. Its most authenticated hadith collections contain explicit antisemitism - including a prophecy that Muslims will hunt and kill Jews at the end of times, with even the stones and trees calling out to betray those in hiding. It is violently hostile to other faiths, to non-belief, and to apostasy. It rejects secular democratic rule as a matter of doctrine. It has resisted reformation for fourteen centuries. And it has produced decades of relentless terrorism - against us and, by an even greater margin, against fellow Muslims. From the Algerian civil war to the sectarian slaughter in Iraq, from Boko Haram to the Taliban, from the Peshawar school massacre to the Manchester Arena bombing, the body count is staggering, and the majority of the dead are Muslim. The violence is structural. It is doctrinal. Western foreign policy did not create it. Islam is foreign to us. It is completely and utterly repulsive as an ideology. And the reason I happen to have Muslim friends, and have got on exceptionally well with Muslim colleagues, is that they were never hugely religious.