Open AI Solutions

@stefabrudan I'm building openaisolutions.ai where we build, deploy, and manage multi agent systems for founders. Check out the custom mission control dashboard.

Hey founders ! Looking to connect with people building in: 🍽️ SaaS 🚀 Tech 📲 Automation 🧠 AI tools 📱 Product Development 🔥 Web APP 💻 Devs Drop what you're working on 👇

@omarvvvr I'm building openaisolutions.ai where we build, deploy, and manage multi agent systems for founders. Check out the custom mission control dashboard.

Hey founders ! Looking to connect with people building in: 🍽️ SaaS 🚀 Tech 📲 Automation 🧠 AI tools 📱 Product Development 🔥 Web APP 💻 Devs Drop what you're working on 👇

@Crevion218669 I'm building openaisolutions.ai where we build, deploy, and manage multi agent systems for founders. Check out the custom mission control dashboard.

I'm looking to connect with more founders, builders, AI enthusiasts, freelancers, and startup professionals. If you're working on a product, business, side project, or idea that solves a real problem, I'd love to hear about it. Share what you're building in the comments and let's connect. 🚀

@markproduct I'm building openaisolutions.ai where we build, deploy, and manage multi agent systems for founders. Check out the custom mission control dashboard.

Looking to connect with 100+ founders If you’re building something, drop a 👋 in the comments.

@benja_maker I'm building openaisolutions.ai where we build, deploy, and manage multi agent systems for founders. Check out the custom mission control dashboard.

What are you building right now? 👀 Looking to connect with people working on: 🥪SaaS 🤖Agentic AI 👽Data Tools 📱Mobile Apps 🚀Startups No matter your stage: 💡Idea 💁MVP 🔥Grow Drop your project below 👇 Let's learn and share together.

@Saf_Chy @X I'm building openaisolutions.ai where we build, deploy, and manage multi agent systems for founders. Check out the custom mission control dashboard.

Looking to #connect with builders & ambitious people on @x  If you're into: •Building in public •Startups & tech •AI & future tech •Side projects that ship •High-agency mindset •Learning in public Drop a comment or DM me. Let’s link up and make things happen. What are you building these days?  #BuildInPublic #IndieHackers #Startups #AI #Tech #Entrepreneur #Web3 #SideHustle #Networking #HighAgency

@JGdalevich I'm building openaisolutions.ai where we build, deploy, and manage multi agent systems for founders. Check out the custom mission control dashboard.

Looking to connect with more: founders builders vibe coders AI enthusiasts freelancers Entrepreneurs If you're building something right now, drop it below. I'll check out the most interesting projects and give product feedback. Let's help each other build better products.

@AlanNotion @danshipper Moving from production to quality control is actually the upgrade — the bottleneck just relocated. Curious: when you built that Hermes agent, did you set a confidence threshold for outputs, or is every title/description still going through a full review pass?

That automation quote is exactly what I'm experiencing. I built an AI agent (Hermes) that handles YouTube titles, thumbnails, and descriptions from transcripts. Still need me reviewing every output. The automation didn't remove the human, it moved me from production to quality control. Saved 5 hours last week but I'm still in the loop.

If you read my essay After Automation this is the interview where I make practical predictions about what it means for your work:

Sounds expensive. You don't need GPT-5.5 for doing simple tasks. You could use a multi-agent system with a model defined for each agent. Your scribe agent (creative agent) could run Opus. Your strategy agent could run GPT-5.5. Then you could have a research agent or operations agent using Gemini-Flash (cheap). Using GPT-5.5 for email/spreadsheets is throwing $ down the drain.

My life right now is really splitting into GPT-5.5 for tasks and workflows,Opus 4.8 for creative work. Codex in the streets, Claude in the sheets.

@every @hammer_mt We run level 8 to setup and run level 8 for other people

Ask your agent what level of AI adoption you're at.

That bottleneck moment — "do we hire someone or build a system" — is where most agencies either break or get an unfair advantage. The two-day build sounds like you solved the page problem, but curious what's next in line: what part of the ops is still burning the most manual time?

I almost hired a developer to build our landing pages faster. We were bottlenecked. Every new campaign needed a page, and our design team was stretched thin. Instead, we spent two days building a system where AI designs the page, AI writes the code, and it ships through GitHub to production with conversion tracking already wired up. No designer queue. No developer handoff. No QA loop. The first page went live this week. Took about 20 minutes from concept to production URL. I keep thinking about how close I was to solving the wrong problem. The bottleneck wasn't speed. It was the number of humans in the chain. Three handoffs became zero. Every agency owner I know is trying to hire their way out of a process problem. Sometimes the better move is to remove the process entirely.

Founders don't wake up missing data. They wake up missing the synthesis of it. The numbers are in 5 places. Pulling them into one view takes 45 minutes. Letting an agent do it takes 4. Same information. Different start to the day. openaisolutions.ai

@diliecat @Hemantkr1982 That trust-ladder framing is spot-on — the founders who succeed at this don't drop an agent into a big workflow on day one, they let it earn the next responsibility by nailing the small one. Which "tiny repeatable task" was the first one you let an agent fully own?

@Hemantkr1982 Testing how far AI agents can take a solo dev after work. One-line pitch: replace tiny repeatable founder tasks first, then earn trust for bigger workflows.

What are you building this week? ⚡ SaaS 🤖 AI tools 🛠️ Dev products Reply with your link + one-line pitch 👇

The asymmetry compounds faster than most founders model it — the gap isn't just output per hour, it's that one person + AI also collects more data per week to improve the next iteration. At $138K ARR are you finding the bottleneck is still attention, or has it shifted to deciding which workflows to give the agents next?

@danmartell And the asymmetry keeps widening. A founder using AI for research, outreach, and iteration can cover in 2 hours what a traditional team does in a week. The scary part isn't AI replacing people. It's one person with AI outcompeting ten people without it.

You can't out-work a competitor who's out-thinking you with AI.

@ChuckBuildsCA The no-code + building in public combo is a great wedge — most solo founders I see hit a wall not on tools but on stitching them together so the work persists past the current browser tab. What's the messiest part of your AI stack right now?

Hey, I’m Chuck @ChuckBuildsCA Building no-code AI apps in public | Currently shipping a spending speedometer app Looking to #connect with people interested in: • No-code • AI tools & apps • Building in public • Startups & indie hacking • Shipping fast and learning as we go Let’s connect!! 🚀

Honestly depends on the shape of the work — Claude Code is great when the task lives and dies inside one shell session, but the moment you want something that runs on a schedule and remembers context across days, you're looking at a different category of tool entirely. Which side of that line are most of your agent ideas falling on?

Do you guys build agents within claude code, or you prefer hermes agent?

One founder cut 10 hrs/week by routing every inbound lead through a single agent. Manual CRM entry, copy-paste from email to spreadsheet — gone. The agent logs it, scores it, drops a summary in Slack. He only touched a lead when it was worth his time. openaisolutions.ai

@BuildurBrand_io Just launched openaisolutions.ai I setup and maintain mission control multi-agent systems running hermes-agent.

Founders and builders! I'm looking to connect with more: - growth hackers - marketers - AI builders - startup founders - vibe-coders - Claude/Codex power users - self-improvement maxis Or just cool people in general! Say hello 👋

@EscanorReloaded If you are using more tokens then what employees cost then that sounds like a model management issue. You don't need Claude Opus for everything. There are cheaper good models (Gemini-Flash). Also local models are getting better and better. Qwen3-Coder-Next is great for coding.

CEOs are quietly realizing the AI replacement plan has a problem. Two problems, actually. One: the token costs for running AI agents are now exceeding what they were paying the employees they fired. Two: when the tokens run out, the AI stops. Just stops. No continuity. No workaround. Just a spinning wheel where your workforce used to be. You fired humans to save money and bought a subscription that bills you into a corner. The employees you let go knew what to do when things broke. The AI just invoices you for the outage. And then there’s the permission problem nobody wants to talk about. To do its job, the AI agent needs access. Full access. Your systems, your patents, your contracts, your future plans. Everything you spent years building, handed over to a process that has no loyalty, no discretion, and no skin in the game. You didn’t hire a replacement. You gave a stranger with no soul the keys to everything you own. Enjoy.

@ben_botes This is the unlock most founders miss — it's not the tool, it's the workflow architecture around it. A GP-sized firm shouldn't need institution-sized headcount to move at institution speed. The research + execution layer is the whole game right now.

The real shift with AI is not replacing analysts. It is giving small teams and independent operators the research and execution capacity that previously belonged to institutions. A founder with the right workflow can now move with the speed of a much larger firm. That changes competition more than people realise.