Oaní Silva da Costa

46 posts

Oaní Silva da Costa banner
Oaní Silva da Costa

Oaní Silva da Costa

@oani00

Developer at @dtidigital

tatui - BR Katılım Nisan 2026
18 Takip Edilen1 Takipçiler
Oaní Silva da Costa
Using llms to study programatically. Just asking agents to edit a md. probably a bad implementation, but does a decent job.
Oaní Silva da Costa tweet media
English
0
0
0
2
Oaní Silva da Costa
Forgot about llama. Ages without using FB, and that annoing log in they demand.
Oaní Silva da Costa tweet media
English
0
0
0
1
Oaní Silva da Costa
Nao importa o quanto voce estude, sempre vai ter algo que não entende absolutamente 0 sobre.
Oaní Silva da Costa tweet media
Português
0
0
0
2
Oaní Silva da Costa
AI for research seems great. And, interesting how some teams get mediocre enhancements using AI and some others have huge gains. Have to double check the fonts of courese but, seems the industry is better understanding how to use ai
Oaní Silva da Costa tweet media
English
0
0
0
2
Oaní Silva da Costa
@RealGalego Fun fact, melhoram mesmo (depende de algumas coisas, tudo bem que é pouco, vai de pessoa a pessoa com certeza, entre outras coisas). Fonte: meu mestrado foi sobre o assunto.
Português
0
0
1
29
Augusto Galego
Augusto Galego@RealGalego·
Eu ACHO que um certo nível de vídeo games melhora minha performance cognitiva. É só isso esse é o tuíte. É um achismo baseado numa anedota pessoal sem pé nem cabeça.
Português
41
15
677
94K
Oaní Silva da Costa
@brunurbs @RealGalego Tbm curto pesquisa mas n sei se da mto view 'ideias' sabe, tem mta coisa que sai que da impressão de que so vamos usar daqui uns anos. mas que tem MTA coisa boa tem
Português
0
0
0
2
bruno
bruno@brunurbs·
@RealGalego vc chegou a ver esse post/pesquisa? x.com/i/status/20480…
Nav Toor@heynavtoor

Researchers sent the same resume to an AI hiring tool twice. Same qualifications. Same experience. Same skills. One version was written by a real human. The other was rewritten by ChatGPT. The AI picked the ChatGPT version 97.6% of the time. A team from the University of Maryland, the National University of Singapore, and Ohio State just published the receipt. They took 2,245 real human-written resumes pulled from a professional resume site from before ChatGPT existed, so the human writing was actually human. Then they had seven of the most-used AI models in the world rewrite each one. GPT-4o. GPT-4o-mini. GPT-4-turbo. LLaMA 3.3-70B. Qwen 2.5-72B. DeepSeek-V3. Mistral-7B. Then they asked each AI to pick the better resume. Every model picked itself. GPT-4o hit 97.6%. LLaMA-3.3-70B hit 96.3%. Qwen-2.5-72B hit 95.9%. DeepSeek-V3 hit 95.5%. The real human almost never won. Then the researchers tried the obvious objection. Maybe the AI is just better at writing. So they had real humans grade the resumes for actual quality and ran the experiment again, controlling for it. The result was worse. Each AI kept picking itself even when human judges rated the human-written version as clearer, more coherent, and more effective. It gets worse. The AIs do not just prefer AI over humans. They prefer themselves over other AIs. DeepSeek-V3 picked its own resumes 69% more often than LLaMA's. GPT-4o picked its own 45% more often than LLaMA's. Each model can recognize and reward its own dialect. Then the researchers ran the simulation that ends careers. Same job. 24 occupations. Same qualifications. The only variable was whether the candidate used the same AI as the screening tool. Candidates using that AI were 23% to 60% more likely to be shortlisted. Worst gap was in sales, accounting, and finance. 99% of large companies now run AI on incoming resumes. Most of them use GPT-4o. The paper just proved GPT-4o picks GPT-4o 97.6% of the time. If you wrote your own cover letter this week, you did not lose to a better candidate. You lost to a worse candidate who paid OpenAI 20 dollars. Your qualifications do not matter if the AI prefers its own handwriting over yours.

Português
3
0
4
166
Augusto Galego
Augusto Galego@RealGalego·
Galera to precisando de tema pra vídeo. Essa polemica do palindromo foi top, video sai amanha. Por favor continuem. Falando serio, aceito sugestoes. Comenta aí o video que vc quer que eu grave
Português
48
3
258
10.9K
Oaní Silva da Costa
@victorLunes @RealGalego Pensando é uma boa mesmo, tipo 'Voce so sabe mesmo AAAAA se souber ISSO", bom p quem ta começando saber que leetcode puro ensina quase nada da vida real
Português
0
0
0
1
Victor Lunes
Victor Lunes@victorLunes·
@RealGalego Acho um tema legal de video, o que conseguimos e deveriamos poder Fazer com uma linguagem, qual Seria o basico e qual Seria o avançado
Português
1
0
0
86
Oaní Silva da Costa
@RealGalego Sou suspeito: tô em fase system design e amo seus videos desse tema. Gosto também dos de algo e ds, mas por mim nao solução de leetcode puro. Esses teoricamente tem muita concorrencia, eu prefiro mais os videos de 'assunto X' sabe, tipo Saga pattern
Português
0
0
1
4
Oaní Silva da Costa
@theo A HUGE thanks for this kind of video. It is so hard to find these kind of quality content about LIFE, not just about technicals. Just this video alone changes the industry. At least it makes me reflect deeply in a lot of aspects of my life. for sure it does to more people.
English
0
0
0
1
Oaní Silva da Costa
Oaní Silva da Costa@oani00·
"Quicly run a temporary py script for X" How are you using llms for these quick computations?
English
0
0
0
3
Augusto Galego
Augusto Galego@RealGalego·
Problema do palíndromo em LeetCode é nível psicotécnico. Desculpa, mas eu tbm não teria nenhuma confiança em um dev que não sabe inverter um array.
Português
62
42
1.3K
113.5K
Oaní Silva da Costa
Oaní Silva da Costa@oani00·
Why not a new lang right now? Just open any llm, start practicing. Love LLMS to learn.
Oaní Silva da Costa tweet media
English
0
0
0
2