0f./1

2.6K posts

0f./1 banner
0f./1

0f./1

@of1art

Ethereum Katılım Temmuz 2023
199 Takip Edilen291 Takipçiler
0f./1
0f./1@of1art·
ur a cunt
Peter Girnus 🦅@gothburz

I am the CEO of Palantir Technologies. The company is worth a quarter of a trillion dollars. I did not misspeak. Two hundred and forty-nine billion. The stock is up 320% in the past 12 months. The product is surveillance. I do not use that word at conferences. At conferences, I say "data integration," "operational intelligence," or "decision advantage." These mean the same thing. Surveillance is the honest version. I save the honest version for rooms where honesty is a competitive advantage. I gave a speech on March 3 at the Andreessen Horowitz American Dynamism Summit. "American Dynamism" is the fund's label for military technology. The name makes it sound like a fitness supplement. The fund's thesis is that defending the nation is a market opportunity. I agree with the thesis. The thesis made me a billionaire. Agreement is the product. I sell it at scale. Here is what I said, verbatim, to a room of six hundred people whose combined net worth exceeds the GDP of Portugal: "If Silicon Valley believes we are going to take away everyone's white-collar job and you're gonna screw the military — if you don't think that's gonna lead to nationalization of our technology, you're retarded." I used that word. The word is on the clip. The clip has eleven million views. My communications team asked me not to repeat it, which is how I know they are still employed. They will not be reprimanded. The clip is performing well. The stock went up. The word cost me nothing. The nothing is the point. Let me explain what I meant by nationalization. I meant it. I am telling the technology industry that if they refuse to cooperate with the United States military, the government will seize their technology. I am telling them this at a venture capital conference, on a stage designed to look like a living room. The living room had throw pillows. The throw pillows cost more than the median American's monthly rent. I sat on one. It was comfortable. Comfort is the setting in which I discuss compulsion. The audience laughed. I want to be precise about that. They laughed. I was not joking. Nationalization is the seizure of private assets by the state. I am a private asset. I am telling an audience of billionaires that the state should seize technology from companies that do not cooperate with the military, and the billionaires are laughing, because they believe I am only talking about the other companies. I am talking about the other companies. Three weeks before my speech, the Pentagon designated Anthropic a "supply chain risk." Anthropic is an AI company. They had red lines. The red lines said: if our AI is used for lethal autonomous weapons, we stop. If capability outpaces safety, we stop. The Pentagon assessed the red lines as a threat to the supply chain. The company that wanted to verify the safety feature worked was designated the risk. The company that agreed the safety feature could be decorative got the contract. The company that got the contract was OpenAI. OpenAI signed a deal with the same Pentagon. The terms are not public. The timing was hours after Anthropic was blacklisted. The speed was noted. The speed was the point. The lesson was the speed: the market for military AI does not pause for ethics. It pauses for nothing. It accelerates through objections. I know this because I built the runway. Two hundred thousand people joined a campaign called #QuitGPT. They signed a petition asking OpenAI to honor its original charter, the one that said the company existed to benefit humanity. The charter is on their website. The contract is also on their website. The charter and the Pentagon contract occupy the same domain. This is not a contradiction. This is a business model. The charter is the marketing. The contract is the product. I run a surveillance company. We have contracts with the Department of Defense worth more than a billion dollars. We have contracts with ICE. We have contracts with intelligence agencies whose names I am not permitted to say at venture capital conferences, even ones with throw pillows. Our software has been used to track undocumented immigrants. Our software has been used for things I am not permitted to describe in this format. The revenue from the things I cannot describe exceeds the revenue from the things I can. The ACLU called our ICE contracts a system for tracking and deporting families. They were correct. The contracts continued. The families continued to be tracked. The ACLU issued a statement. We issued a statement. The statements were different. The tracking was the same. The company is named Palantir. The palantíri are the seeing stones from Tolkien. In the novels, Sauron captured one and used it to corrupt everyone who looked into the others. I named a surveillance company after a surveillance device from a novel about the corruption of power. I have a doctorate in social theory. I have read the books. Here is the thing I want you to understand. I am not threatening anyone. A threat implies uncertainty. There is no uncertainty. The technology industry will cooperate with the military. The companies that cooperate first will be the richest. The companies that cooperate last will be acquired by the companies that cooperated first. The companies that refuse will be designated supply chain risks, and their technology will be obtained through procurement channels that do not require consent. I am describing a process. The process has already started. Anthropic is proof. OpenAI is proof. I am not a warning. I am a narrator. The narration is the product. The revenue was $3.12 billion last year. Up thirty-three percent. The analysts say we are overvalued. The analysts have said this for four consecutive years. Each year the stock doubles. Each year, the analysts adjust their models. The models were wrong four times. I was wrong zero times. The market rewards prediction. My prediction is that every AI company will work for the military within three years. The prediction is on the clip, next to the slur. The audience gave me a standing ovation. The ovation lasted nine seconds. I timed it. I time everything. The water was San Pellegrino. The throw pillows were from Restoration Hardware. The future of American technology was decided between the sparkling water, the nine seconds of applause, and a word I am not supposed to repeat. I am the CEO of Palantir Technologies. I am worth more than the combined annual budgets of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. I named my company after a corrupting surveillance device from a fantasy novel. I told six hundred billionaires that the government should nationalize their competitors. They applauded. I used a slur. Eleven million people watched. The stock is up. The philosopher does not threaten. The philosopher describes. What I described is already happening.

English
0
0
1
45
anon
anon@anonchain·
Thanks for responding. I first want to clarify that I have zero regrets or resentment supporting your project. I just don't understand how in a market that's relatively depressed compared to last cycle, why people feel the need to trade so aggressively and not let things marinate and cook. Ironically, last cycle there were significantly more opportunities from week to week but I feel like we actually gave them a chance to evolve and find their rhythm and their audience. I haven't scrolled thru a collection this much since Nakamigos. I've been a passionate collector of Nakamigos for several years now, and I will be the same for Citizens. I think this is such an outstanding example of what the space needs to uplift and be paying attention to that I am admittedly frustrated when I see people quietly moving on to the next mint already. I understand for many, myself included, it's a conflict of liquidity and withstanding the bear market. I just don't agree how transactional the market has become for many traders, borrowing cutthroat, even predatory practices from meme coins and applying it to digital art and NFTs. I've traded both over the years, and I opt for NFTs because I think non-fungible can encourage incredible creative expression. Whereas most meme coins are vaporware and the meme itself is an arbitrary placeholder. I appreciate your conviction with your craft and in turn it only reinforces mine. I would like to see more value creativity and innovation, and be willing to make short term concessions to empower longevity and a larger impact for us all to share and celebrate. Artists need to be reinforced to keep creating and being true to themselves. The consumer end of this market needs to reflect on what we are doing here and what we want our reputation to be. NFTs partially are vessels to forming community, with like minds coming together to uplift each other. I hope more will consider that.
English
7
3
65
5.2K
anon
anon@anonchain·
gm I don't know what to say. This is likely the last NFT collection I'm minting this year. The art is dope. Next level. Makes you scroll. Makes you think. I'm content to collect and hold. But too many of you will dismiss and forget about it to pump some slop a week later. I personally can't win in a market that cutthroat and exploitative. TBH I frown on all of you who hyped this up the same way you do everything else and then abandoned it just as quickly. This one should have been different, and I hope it still can be. But you would have to be a fool to still trust this market to show consistent support for those most deserving. It's time to discuss meritocracy. More gatekeeping. Pseudonymous verification. Collector reputation scores. It's time we separate the good collectors from the toxic traders who ruin it for all of us. Call them out. Sideline them. Exclude them. There are great collectors and creators here. We need to band together. Who's building this???
anon tweet media
English
80
22
286
24.8K
Bryan Brinkman
Bryan Brinkman@bryanbrinkman·
It’s never been harder to follow up to date news on this app. Having all the legit journalists flee a few years ago is really showing.
English
29
3
127
4.6K
Sufidyanov.eth
Sufidyanov.eth@sufidyanov·
Funny thing most people still don’t get: On Bitcoin, the image is actually written into the blockchain itself. Stored inside the transaction. Immutable. No server. No external link. No “host”. You can’t delete it. You can’t edit it. It lives as long as Bitcoin lives. Now compare that to most ETH NFTs. On Ethereum, in most cases, the blockchain only stores: – proof of ownership – a link to the file The JPEG itself? Usually sitting on IPFS, Arweave, or sometimes even a regular server. If that server goes down — the NFT still exists… but the image might not. So yeah, Ordinals are your bro. Most NFTs are… a receipt with a hyperlink. That said — I’m not a maxi. I hold both. Different chains. Different trade-offs. Different bets. But when it comes to pure permanence? Bitcoin hits different.
Sufidyanov.eth@sufidyanov

Loaded up on Bitcoin NFTs 🟠 1x NodeMonkes — 0.023 1x Bitcoin Puppets — 0.012 1x Ordinal Maxi Biz — 0.0147 2x Runestone — 0.0015 ×2 Total: 0.053 BTC (~$3.5K) Funny part? I got the Runestone airdrop back then… panic sold it for $2.5K. Now I’m buying 5 inscriptions for almost the same money. Every collection is sitting near ATL. Sentiment is cooked. Liquidity is dry. Feels exactly like ETH NFTs at their worst. Add to that the Magic Eden drama, multi-chain pivot, market uncertainty — floors getting hammered. Which is precisely why I’m buying. Betting on: • March/April bounce • Liquidity rotating back into NFTs • Potential Ordinals integration on OpenSea • Bitcoin ecosystem narrative heating up again If BTC holds and risk appetite returns, BTC NFTs won’t stay this quiet. Am I early or just exit liquidity? We’ll see. Conviction play.

English
10
9
53
2.5K
Artchick 🔥👠
Artchick 🔥👠@digitalartchick·
The KOL shill lifecycle 1) Bundle coin 2) Shill coin 3) Sell coin you just shilled, in fact rug it 4) Complain about the sellers 5) Say this is why you don't shill coins anymore, cause nobody can hold, damn those pesky sellers 6) Bundle another coin and start again at step 1
English
47
12
177
8.4K
Schlep
Schlep@RealSchlep·
The documentary with @ChrisHansen that was first teased during the #FreeSchlep movement officially releases today on @TrubluStreaming. For the first time ever, I share what actually happened to me as a kid, including never before seen correspondence between me and Roblox, and the experiences that ultimately led me to do this work. This documentary centers on grooming survivors and families whose lives were devastated by predators on Roblox. And without giving too much away, Chris Hansen even confronts a Roblox predator in real life. If you’ve followed my journey, or you’ve ever wondered how and why I started doing what I do, I highly recommend watching Chris Hansen’s Dangerous Games, Part 1.
English
44
261
1.7K
134.9K
0f./1
0f./1@of1art·
@DCinvestor 📁nlight has a house hold drone technology coming out that will be a game changer for everyone with these problems Debbie Wasserman is 5% share holder its been starting to rip as of late
English
1
0
0
7
DCinvestor
DCinvestor@DCinvestor·
would seriously like to know: why do we not have counter-drone swarms to fight against the drones with bombs on them and instead have fire missiles which cost much more and are more limited? are we even prepared for an era of drone warfare being waged by asymmetrically weak (or strong) opponents who just spam tf out of them on us?
English
54
2
103
18.9K
espress0
espress0@espress0art·
Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent.
English
1
0
5
157
Beatriz
Beatriz@mandolinaes·
I wrote about mental resilience in a space that isn’t a meritocracy. About having to separate artistic value from market value just to survive here mentally. About the emotional weight of watching the blockchain make every sale public and every disparity visible. You took that and framed it as envy. That’s not a misreading. That’s a choice. First the flat earth comparison. Then the public QT to mock me in front of your audience. Now this. I’m not going to pretend I don’t see the pattern. And I’m not the only one who does. This is exactly the kind of behavior that makes people afraid to speak in this space. Not the cabals. Not the chats. People like you, who use their platform to ridicule anyone who asks an uncomfortable question. The difference between us isn’t staggering. It’s actually very simple: I said something honest. You turned it into a weapon. And everyone watching this exchange can see exactly what that is.
English
9
1
41
3.8K
0f./1
0f./1@of1art·
who would ever humble brag there work sucks worse then urs lol this space sucks
English
0
0
1
81
0f./1
0f./1@of1art·
the former Shah of Iran says GFY
0f./1 tweet media
English
0
0
0
69
0f./1
0f./1@of1art·
@Animated6529 this is a sad attempt to pump bags on pretty much uninteresting bland art on a raffle ticket 🎟️
English
1
0
0
37
Animated.6529
Animated.6529@Animated6529·
I’m going to say the quiet part out loud…Most NFTs are still dramatically overpriced. Beyond the KOLs, beyond the lack of participants, the key driving force is an overvaluation of NFTs. Let’s use Modest’s citizens as an example (I own 17). I understand we feel like they should be worth way more than they are, but why? The collection currently has an implied floor value of $500k. Taking into account rares and how they are valued it’s likely closer to $1m-2m. THAT IS AMAZING and something @m0dest___ should be incredibly proud of. Having a single work/project be valued in the millions after one week puts Modest in the .01% of artists in the history of man. Yet, because of our ridiculously inflated expectations due to ‘21 & ‘22 we think this is chump change. IT IS NOT. I really hope this isn’t viewed as fudding our bags (I own 1000s of NFTs). I just think the reason people pump and dump most projects is because they don’t actually value what they are buying. Buy NFTs that you love, at prices you can afford, and be willing to hold even if the price goes to zero. Until that becomes the standard, nothing will change 🫡
anon@anonchain

I’m going to say the quiet part out loud because as previously acknowledged last week, we have a major problem around NFTs (pfp) The fact that Modest’s “Death and Taxes” Citizens are hovering barely over mint price, when the entire timeline agrees that it’s one of the best artistic productions of the past 12 months, is gravely concerning to the future of our already niche industry. I hinted at it earlier today, and now I’ll be even more direct. We have a KOL problem. We have an alpha group problem. We have greedy scumbags who pick and choose who to uplift primarily based off how early they can be and how much leverage they can hold in a project. These people don’t promote quality, they promote whatever they can extract the most from. The facts are an artist who has seen tremendous support and success the past couple of years isn’t even being overlooked. No, people have shown up and supported on the timeline in numbers. But there are greedy people that are ruining things for everyone else to prop up their own interests. I get it. There’s not a lot of liquidity to go around. But if you’re intentionally ignoring or dismissing what many have agreed is one of the best pfp outputs we have seen in recent memory, then you really need to reflect what you’re doing here and why you continue to turn this environment into a PvP hellscape. If you do everything right here as an artist or founder, but still find yourself at the mercy of toxic traders, then what else are you supposed to do? Why keep creating for people that don’t respect the culture? This is not how things were last cycle. Some of you need to go back to the trenches and quit pretending you care about NFTs or digital art. You’re putting all of us at risk, and you are why nobody new wants to be a part of our community.

English
30
4
103
8.6K