孤思

@runningnobody @nursenika1840 我在真功夫，哈哈哈

@nursenika1840 二三十年前的年轻人谈恋爱，约会地点都会选择肯德基或者麦当劳

讲个笑话，当年户子说中国人的年夜饭大概率不如麦当劳，很多人不服气，憋着气做了一桌子所谓的好菜，然后拍照告诉户子，你看我家菜多好。 结果滑稽的是，很多人刻意拍菜的时候，就忘了收拾一下桌椅板凳，菜色虽然不错（虽然很多还是很拉胯），但是桌椅板凳歪七扭八，外加一次性桌布，你非要说生活水平有多高，反正也是自己骗自己。 比如视频里的第一户人家，吃饭连张正经桌子正经椅子都没有，家里也是跟杂货铺一样乱哄哄，规矩还多，就很搞笑了，说难听点，一张破茶几，几把破板凳，吃饭分的出哪里是主座么？ 咋咋呼呼的。

@__Inty__ 这个白痴圣母婊，连评论都不敢开的废物！她就是信息茧房！

新西兰前总理称，错误信息正在降低疫苗接种意愿。她引用 GAVI 的研究称，围绕巴基斯坦 HPV 疫苗推广的热门 Facebook 疫苗相关视频中，超过四分之一含有错误信息；评论区40%为负面，17%为支持。

@ai_xiaomu 现在是 codex 但是未来几个月谁知道呢

不懂就问： 如果让你只能保留一个AI编程工具: Claude Code 还是 Codex？ 不要回答"看场景"，必须二选一。

@pathofexile I need PN

Ascendancy balance changes are coming to Return of the Ancients. ⏱️ Chronomancer gains new notables 💎 Gemling Legionnaire now receives additional effects from Skill Gem quality. Check out the changes in the video below!

@GuyThatDied This is the flourishing of the 0.1 season; isn't it good that players have more choices?

Tbh, GGG needs to nerf almost everything: Snipe one shots bosses Twister completely broken Oil barrage one shots bosses Grenades too op Bonestorm kills bosses in 5 seconds Hollow palm gives way too much dmg Shield wall does insane dmg I'm talking about campaign

@alanchen 牛逼，日记这么关键的证据都能规避，八百个人指控凹凸曼不诚实抵不过他自己一句，我是好人…

就结束了？老马败诉

@alanchen 或者他们觉得一换一不亏？哈哈哈

白宫哥你应该知道黑白照片在中国文化是啥意思吧

@AnthropicAI You've actually stooped so low as to accept money from Bill Gates?

We’re partnering with the Gates Foundation, committing $200 million in grants, Claude credits, and technical support to programs in global health, life sciences, education, agriculture, and economic mobility. Read more: anthropic.com/news/gates-fou…

@yangyi 你慢了

计划下个月取消Claude订阅转Codex的请在这里报名👇🏻 我先倒戈

@kiwijuicing kelly can you speak Chinese ？

🪧

@harrisonitsme 深有同感，我已经退了 cc 订阅了

一旦用上好的东西，就很难回得去了。 我现在基本只用 Codex，cc 几乎已经不用了。

@runningnobody 你下次想知道那个好用就私信我吧，我有私心的。真金白银买出来的经验不是很喜欢公开分享，主要那家好用，真的是变来变去，我现在的推荐只在这个阶段是真实的

@OldCheapMan 哈哈哈哈哈，好嘞，感谢推荐

不知是不是错觉，Gemini没有之前反应快，而且动不动就罢工

@alexnhyl @mubeitech 我无法想象你有多弱智才会说出这样的话，并且你居然获得了一个点赞。技术高和生命层级低，这种定义你是如何获得的？

@mubeitech 齁齁，人類文明才不是外星生命搞出來的，別看它們技術高，但生命層級低。像卡特這種史上最無知的總統才會相信。萬斯說過外星文明是邪惡的、不是好的。只有信神的總統，比如川普，就什麼都不畏懼。

美国总统无权查阅该国的最高机密。 众议员 Tim Burchett 揭露了一个荒唐的权力逻辑：在情报官僚眼中，总统只是一个“按需知情”的临时雇员。 这种信息封锁在肯尼迪之后成为定式，总统不再是情报权的顶点，而是一个被隔离的终端。 这解释了吉米·卡特著名的眼泪。 卡特曾承诺公开 UFO 真相，但在听完 CIA 的简报后，他低头痛哭并连续数周陷入精神恍惚。 前 NASA 研究员揭露了简报的残酷核心：人类的主要宗教其实是外星文明设计的社交工程程序。 外星文明通过这些程序防止人类在实验完成前自我毁灭，而人类只是实验对象。 这种沉默并非偶然。 小布什时期曾召集专家对披露真相的影响进行量化评估，给经济、宗教和社会稳定性打分。 最终数据模型显示，真相带来的系统性崩溃风险远超公开的收益。 决策层选择掩盖，本质上是认为现有的文明结构极其脆弱。 在这种官僚闭环下，总统和纳税人一起被关在了真相的门外。

我对这种女性没什么所谓，就和那些认为没所谓的女性一样，不过将来我看到需要救助的女性，那么未来不幸运的那个你啊，安息吧。

@elonmusk Bring back the dislike button. Politicians restrict replies to hide dissent. Removing dislikes didn't make the world better — it just let the powerful speak without consequence. People need a simple way to say: we disagree. That's free speech.

@haider1 Nobody likes to be treated like a fool.

pretty much clear to me google and xAI want anthropic to kill openai and i guess elon hates sam and openai more than google and anthropic now

@alanchen 是不喜欢，好歹没有骗他吧。山姆两个把他放傻子整。

老马和他不喜欢的公司联手了啊

🚨 BOTH ALTMAN AND BROCKMAN SELF-DEALING ON CEREBRAS >Greg Brockman acquires personal Cerebras ownership in 2017 >Altman, separately, invests in Cerebras >Brockman pushes OpenAI to merge with Cerebras that same month >Brockman never discloses his Cerebras ownership to Musk >December 2025: OpenAI signs $10 billion Cerebras deal + loans Cerebras $1 billion >February 2026: Cerebras valuation triples from $8B to $23B on OpenAI commitments >April 2026: OpenAI commitment expanded to $20+ billion through 2029 >April 2026: Cerebras files IPO at potential $26.6 billion valuation Brockman, under oath today: Q: When you were having discussions about a financial transaction between OpenAI and Cerebras, you were actually an owner of Cerebras, weren't you? Brockman: "There was some overlap between discussions and being an investor in Cerebras. Yes." Q: Can you point to an email in which you told Elon you were an owner of Cerebras at the same time you were advocating that OpenAI do this transaction with Cerebras? Brockman: "I do not believe an email that says that exists." Q: How about a chat? Brockman: "I did not." Q: A text? Brockman: "No." Q: And yet you stood to gain personally if there was a transaction between OpenAI and Cerebras. Brockman: "I suppose so, but it wasn’t something on my mind " Both co-founders. Both fiduciaries of a 501(c)(3) charity. They directed OpenAI to commit $20+ billion to a company in which they both hold personal undisclosed equity. Cerebras valuation tripled. The IPO is the cash-out. California charitable-trust law calls this self-dealing.

@runningnobody 如果找不到真爱，就是老老实实叫鸡比较好，维护一段感情真的很难

一个朋友，给女方办了身份，婚姻存续期女方未工作，离婚男方分了一半财产给对方。男方提的，因为女方花钱无节制。 目前女方一会同意离婚，一会又不同意。 男方问我为什么女方会这样。 我说因为对方既懒得工作，又懒得当单亲妈妈，而且还舍不得你那一半钱。