One Guy's Style

@sostalksmoney @TuckerCarlson Adam, politics aren’t for you. Just take the L and try and retain a sliver of credibility

GOODNIGHT SWEET PRINCE @TuckerCarlson 📉📉📉

@SmithsonRobin I say so.

@oneguysstyle If you say so...

Raise your hand if you were over Megyn Kelly a long time ago.

Has he “made a habit of it”. Well, he kept Syria, Afghanistan and Yemen during his first term and now has started a massive conflict with Iran. He literally said, and I quote: “no new wars in the Middle East”. That was his campaign promise. And now he’s started a new war in the Middle East. You can twist yourself in knots to say this is aligned with what he promised but come on…. Iran is not a direct threat to the US - Trump’s own DNI testified to this two weeks ago in front of congress. They aren’t “murdering people all over the world” - that is absurd hyperbole. And even if they are, why start war now rather than the last 40 years? I will agree that he closed the borders - that is his biggest win. But he promised to deport more people than any president ever and Obama deported more. He uncovered waste but then his big beautiful bill didn’t stop the funding for much of it AND increased the deficit. The manufacturing he has brought back…. Do you have data to back that up? He’s keeping “an eye out for traitors and liars”? Lol, ok sure…. No liars in his cabinet at all…. Megyn Kelly disagrees with Trump’s governance as it doesn’t align with campaign promises. I feel th same way and I supported him in 2024. Many, many feel that way - just look at the absolute cratering poll numbers. This war is incredibly unpopular… Trump is less popular than W was after starting two unpopular wars and cratering the economy. You can try and ignore all this… but that’s just going to mean the GOP getting pummeled in the midterms and opening the door to the Dems, who are truly awful, winning back the presidency, the senate and potentially even the Supreme Court down the road.

Has he not made a habit of ending wars? Haven't we had enough of 40 years of Iran murdering it's own people and thousands of Americans and others around the world? Has he closed the borders, uncovered waste, fraud and abuse, brought manufacturing back to the U.S. all of while fighting off the wolves and once again keeping an eye out for traitors and liars? Why do you question my motives for changing my mind about Megyn but not question her motives for changing her mind about Trump? It's really just my opinion and my original post was aimed at other people that felt as I do, not to necessarily invite debate on whether or not I am right or wrong. I'm not the one making million of dollars influencing the minds of others without knowing all the reasons the President makes his decisions. I do trust completely that he has America's best interests at heart. Agree with me or not.

When you agree with her: journalist When you disagree with her: not a journalist. Got it. Having listened to her for years, there is no difference in terms of her approach. You just no longer agree with her views. Same with Tucker and Candace. And if you think Trump has "kept his promises" around any of the issues I outlined... I'm sorry but you have zero credibility. He actively ran on not starting new foreign wars in the middle east....

I was a big fan of Megyn when she was a journalist. I no longer am a fan and she is no longer a journalist. Same for Tucker, same for Candace. I do not agree with you about the President. He has kept his promises, they are just not covered by the media. Iran needed to be dealt with, look at the evil it is exposing world wide. You do not need to agree with me. It is only my opinion after all.

She does not “hate all things Trump for the sake of hating all things Trump”. If you listen to her podcast (which you clearly haven’t) her primary concerns are that Trump is governing directly opposite to how he campaigned (no new middle eastern wars, mass deportation, releasing the Epstein files….).

She seems obviously biased and more in tune to propaganda more than journalism, which used to be her strong suit. The truth in the storm. Now she just hates all things Trump for the sake of hating all things Trump. But that's just my opinion. She is very shiny though, I'll give her that.

@KirkLubimov I wonder if there is any way to FOIA this....

🚨Breaking: the Toronto Star is being sued for failing to publicly reveal that according to the RCMP, and according to this lawsuit, Justin Trudeau was watching kiddie p0rn. Holly f❗️

But this is an uncessary war, and one that clearly isn't going to plan (given the need the make these threats, and the closure of the Strait). This is much more akin to Vietnam than WW2, and it comes at a time where the U.S. is teetering in its power, and has far larger issues at home that it did at any point in modern history.

@oren_cass Well, Oren, war is hell. It is supposed to be. It isn’t supposed to be some sanitized and scripted dust up where everyone gets to walk away claiming victory. You either do it all the way or not at all. For peace to emerge, someone has to lose, and must know they have lost.

I mostly avoid commenting on what President Trump says from day to day, while pulling no punches in my assessments, whether positive or negative, of his policy. His Iran ultimatums feel different. Making such threats is a policy. If he were to follow through on them, the consequences would be immediate, irreversible, and catastrophic on a world-historical scale. So while some will inevitably insist he should be “taken seriously rather than literally,” or that he is executing a sophisticated “madman” strategy in a complex game of 5-D chess, or that he needs everyone’s steadfast support to maximize his leverage, now rather than later seems the time to say that the actions that he is proposing would be a disaster for our country, both strategically and morally, which makes the remarks themselves a terrible mistake. Simply put, what’s the point of all this? If these are empty threats that we all know he will not carry out, then they are ineffective threats (the Iranians are on X too!), merely making the president and our nation look foolish. If they are not empty threats, then the president is asserting the American position that such actions are acceptable in this situation and ones we are willing to take. We are not living in some quantum thought experiment where he simultaneously is and is not serious. We cannot expect the Iranians, but only the Iranians, will believe him. Whether the threats are empty or not, we should be willing to say: This is wrong. We should not establish a pattern of threatening escalation from a blockaded strait to elimination of a civilization. We should not launch strikes intended to devastate the lives of millions of people and take our nation to total war without indisputable justification, or before the American people have deliberated upon and assented to the path with full understanding of what total war might mean for them. Those principles are vital to our Republic, independent of whether the strategy could “work.” But it’s also worth emphasizing that the strategy is a dead end. This war is actively weakening American power, increasing the danger to American citizens, and frustrating the president’s important efforts at addressing our many domestic challenges. It has closed a strait that was previously open, strengthened the incentive for other nations to pursue nuclear weapons, and in this most recent rhetoric made more plausible their use. Our choices for continuing the war appear to be catastrophic escalation of the air war or extensive deployment of ground troops, neither of which were planned or had support at the outset. Stepping back from these threats and admitting such actions do not offer a path to resolving the conflict may be unpalatable, but it is by far the least unpalatable option available. Let us all hope cooler heads prevail.

@Robiethrice @ryangrim “Unbiased news” is of course not a real thing. Do you think Fox News, CNN, NY Times, NY Post, Mark Levin, Tucker Carlson, Rachel Maddow or anyone else is “unbiased”? Absurd…

@ryangrim You distract from actual unbiased news. You are unbelievably biased and act like you are not.

Yes, this freakout is designed to distract and also to try to stop Americans from reading news that cites non-US and non-Israeli sources. All through the Gaza negotiations, US-Israeli media kept pushing a narrative that Hamas was refusing to agree to terms even as Hamas was openly saying they would agree to terms while Israel was continuously killing the negotiators. Now the American and Israeli media is regularly filled with complete nonsense about negotiations that aren't even happening. Somebody tell me how that serves the American public? As for this specific bullet point in a roundup that the Post is upset about, anybody who reads our Twitter feed knows that we regularly report official and semi-official statements from governments and outlets linked to them, including the U.S., Israel, and Iran. In this case, as we always do, we clearly identified the claim as coming from "Iranian state-linked" media. Our readers have enough sense not to believe everything every government says, but they do want to know what they're saying in real time. Other readers, those not interested in knowing what governments adversarial to the U.S. are saying, have endless options to choose from, but we're not one of them.

What a comeback - imagine never making an argument, resorting to schoolyard name calling, and thinking you’re the voice of reason. You have a huge follower base to fall back on that you’re hemorrhaging. Enjoy the money now Judas - you’ll spend the last part of your life trying to tell yourself you sold the country out for money… but you were justified in doing so.

@megynkelly @TimJDillon A halfwit just like you.

.@TimJDillon - shoot it into our veins

@thegospelglow @ComicDaveSmith @sostalksmoney I still listen to sometimes but hit the “skip 30 seconds” button until he’s done talking.

@ComicDaveSmith @sostalksmoney I stopped watching PBD Pod because of how annoying Adam is. I love the other hosts. Adam turns everything into something it isn’t.

Wise choice @sostalksmoney

@7fignigg @ComicDaveSmith @sostalksmoney Imagine posting this and thinking anyone was interested or informed by it?

@ComicDaveSmith @sostalksmoney Hey Mr “comedian” when are you gonna start telling jokes and leave the politics to the adults?

@RealTraderJill @ConceptualJames So simple you forgot the argument.

@oneguysstyle @ConceptualJames I try to keep things simple for simple people. You're welcome!

Dear Tom, @ConceptualJames thinks he's smarter than you are because he IS. I know you're so weak-willed that you think you're representing the majority, but nope! We support our president against the terrorists who butchered ~50k of their own people and sponsor terrorism all over the world. Silly, little guy. Read it and weep:

@catturd2 No he won’t because Dan will never agree to debate. He has totally destroyed that ability by telling obvious lies.

lol - this loser beta cuck wimp. Dan will wipe the floor with you.

@TommyMacDonny @ggreenwald Cool, why don’t you do even the most basic of research before running your mouth against someone whose IQ has an additional digit as compared to yours?

@ggreenwald Cool, so why don't you see that when you have all the leverage, you dictate the terms?

You can tell Glenn is a journalist and has never negotiated anything in his life

@D51Commander @DineshDSouza @JGuandolo54271 Your theory is that Trump has paused banging pornstars to join Netanyahu in incinerating 9-year-old girls, thus becoming a vessel of God?

@DineshDSouza @JGuandolo54271 🤡

ENDGAME IN IRAN We’ve hit the point in this conflict where the interests of America and Israel are no longer aligned… U.S. troops are gearing up for a ground invasion of Iran—but we absolutely should not go. Special guest @jguandolo54271 (1:09) Exiting Iran Triumphant (4:45) The Regime Change Trap (9:21) U.S. And Israel Diverge (11:33) Time to Get Out (15:10) Guest John Guandolo (19:51) Jihad and Sharia Explained (24:16) The Muslim World Facade (28:40) What About Ordinary Muslims? (33:15) Islam as a Sleeper Cell (37:50) Why the Right Stays Blind (42:30) The Red-Green Alliance (47:30) How Islam Uses the Left (50:02) Why the West Keeps Losing (53:10) What Happens if Nothing Changes

At one point, yes. It's become clear that his views were very much evolving, per public podcast appearances leading up to his death, multiple private messages that have been authenticated and come to light, and also a number of friends/associates who have come forward having had direct conversations on this subject leading up to his assassination. Simply saying "Charlie was a Zionist" is like saying Saul/Paul persecuted Christians.... yah, true, but you're really missing the latter part of that story.

@GKaljian @oneguysstyle @SethDillon @JeremyDBoreing Charlie was a Zionist.

.@SethDillon tells @JeremyDBoreing that he personally informed Tucker that the Hamptons Hoax was utterly false- but Tucker lied anyway. “He told Carrie, ‘I know this for a fact.’ Tucker asked me about this personally- privately. He wanted my accounting of things, and I gave it to him, and he’s gone forward with the lie anyway.”

@PBDsPodcast Adam's implosion on @PiersUncensored by friend of the show @ComicDaveSmith. He was the debate version of the OceanGate submarine.

Gang, no podcast today due to our recent successful business conference. We’ll be back on Wednesday with lots to discuss. Let us know which 3 topics you’d like us to discuss when we return. Thank you for your patience. Future looks bright!