Everreverie

39 posts

Everreverie banner
Everreverie

Everreverie

@optimusapiens

Katılım Ocak 2022
9 Takip Edilen2 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Everreverie
Everreverie@optimusapiens·
I might have a good idea for making a Starship landing on the moon easier/more plausible: I recently thought about how Starship can land on the moon and came to the conclusion, that landing upright comes with too many problems compared to landing horizontal, but landing horizontal has pretty much one big problem, which is the ship's shape is not built for the sideways loads. With the idea, that seems to be considered currently, which is using landing legs, this would mean, that you need structural reinforcements on the inside of the ship (outside it disturbs aerodynamics), to take the force from each landing leg and distribute it throughout the (near) hull, so that the hull experiences no extreme loads in one area. (Keep in mind the legs not only have to hold the ship up on the moon under little gravity, which might be quite easy, but also it has to carry enough load, to be keept from buckling when later covering it with regolith, if Starship should become a shelter.) So, this idea of landing horizontal with legs means more weight compared to using legs for landing vertical, because of aditional structures and then you also have the problem of somehow making them aerodinamical, or making them foldable. (which adds even more weight) So the idea that I got to possibly solve this problem and make a horizontal landing possible, is basically a big airbag like structure, that is not filled with gas, but with an expandable foam. (Well to be exact, this would also need gas to expand, but then the foam hardens and the gases escape slowly into space.) The landingbag could be stored close to the tip of the ship on the inside, behind a flap (This comes with no aerodynamic penalty compared to a naked ship, contrary to any landing leg design I have seen so far.) When the ship is in space on its way towards the moon, the flap opens, the landingbag gets pulled out by strings or some other kind of mechanism, then secured on the outside of the ship and then inflated with a chemical reaction. The foam should have enough time to harden on the way to the moon. When the Starship lands on the moon, my thinking is, that the foam will be relatively hard, but it has such properties, that it gets crushed slightly upon impact, to absorb some energy and this way also even out the forces from the rough terrain and thus keep the ships belley from being punctured, or bent, by high points, or a rock or something like that. The foam should also act as an external structural reinforcement, so the Starship has a lower chance of buckling and thus no internal structural reinforcements are needed, since the foam touches the whole belly of the ship and it should be like a quite even preassure on the hull. (The load distribution should be similar to the one experienced during reentry - wich the ship is already built for.) Here is an AI made picture, that is relatively close, to what I imagine (The foam filled bag should "hug" the shape of the ship more and there is some other minor issues with the picture, but the AI did not quite get everything I said.):
Everreverie tweet media
English
0
0
0
15
Zohi
Zohi@zohi_4125·
Solve this if You are a genius.... 10+9=?
Zohi tweet media
English
298
82
161
6.6K
Alisha
Alisha@Alisha26221·
Tell me the number that is greater then this 99.9% will fail
Alisha tweet media
English
418
125
190
12.2K
Everreverie
Everreverie@optimusapiens·
To make a number greater than 588, the number can be anything from 589 (move the vertical bottom left stick from the last 8 away so it is meaningless) to 998 (move the vertical bottom left stick from the 8 in the middle to the 5 so it becomes the vertical top right stick forming a 9).
English
0
0
2
132
Everreverie
Everreverie@optimusapiens·
@ss_uulq09 Impossible, since the shapes at the bottom are not the same as the ones in the equations above.
English
0
0
0
12
DigitalRaahi
DigitalRaahi@ss_uulq09·
most people skip this
DigitalRaahi tweet media
English
53
48
67
397
Everreverie
Everreverie@optimusapiens·
@Jennnyyyyyy (left number + 1) • right number = bottom number. Works for both examples and is 35 for the missing number. (7 • 5 = 35)
English
0
0
5
436
Jenny
Jenny@Jennnyyyyyy·
Puzzle Time ⏰ What is the missing number?
Jenny tweet media
English
8.7K
180
1.8K
767.5K
Shadman khan
Shadman khan@Real_shadmxtgp·
Can you solve the hidden country?
Shadman khan tweet media
English
5.1K
453
16.5K
12.7M
Everreverie
Everreverie@optimusapiens·
@LesleyVarin @LabPadre I just wanted to say that, but you saw it too. The reaction of @LabPadre to all your points sounds really weird and unreasonable. It makes me think it's AI.
English
1
0
0
4
Lesley Varin
Lesley Varin@LesleyVarin·
@LabPadre And the y-axis too now that I look... Can't compare easily visually when both at on different scales. Help us out @LabPadre? Please? I would like to see an accurate comparison. 🙏💛🚀
English
1
0
1
34
Avid Space
Avid Space@LabPadre·
Micro-barometer data for Booster 15 vs Booster 19 from 6 miles away at 400ft altitude. B15 seemed a little smoother on air pressure.
Avid Space tweet mediaAvid Space tweet media
English
11
16
373
18.6K
World of Engineering
World of Engineering@engineers_feed·
Two people are claiming to be an expert in electricity, one is and one is faking. What question do you ask to find the imposter?
English
270
12
206
87K
Everreverie
Everreverie@optimusapiens·
This is it. I can't imagine anyone walking in a store with a friend and using this friendship to buy something. I can imagine someone buying something, by offering a certain amount of energy. (offering to give a battery or generator with enough energy to run the store for a certain amount of time for example) I can also imagine someone offering some of his time (working there for a few hours or so) to the store owner and getting something in return. But I can also imagine the store owner and a customer being good friends (which takes a lot of time and energy to build and uphold as you said @Kekius_Sage ) then the store owner will probably give something every now and then. (probably as long as it isn't one sided and he also gets something from the customer/friend)
English
1
0
1
8
Daniel
Daniel@AALM1tch·
@Kekius_Sage Well it takes time and energy to build true friendship….
English
2
0
3
399
Kekius Maximus
Kekius Maximus@Kekius_Sage·
What do you think about true currency?
Kekius Maximus tweet media
English
1.2K
248
3.1K
127.2K
Everreverie
Everreverie@optimusapiens·
If anyone who reads this, knows someone, who could send this idea to the SpaceXAI team (or maybe any other team of one of Elon Musk's companies), I would greatly appreciate it. Even if my idea does not make it, at least it's worth a try in my opinion. If you do not know anyone working for Elon Musk (or are not working for him yourself), please boost this post, so it will reach more people.
Everreverie@optimusapiens

I might have a good idea for making a Starship landing on the moon easier/more plausible: I recently thought about how Starship can land on the moon and came to the conclusion, that landing upright comes with too many problems compared to landing horizontal, but landing horizontal has pretty much one big problem, which is the ship's shape is not built for the sideways loads. With the idea, that seems to be considered currently, which is using landing legs, this would mean, that you need structural reinforcements on the inside of the ship (outside it disturbs aerodynamics), to take the force from each landing leg and distribute it throughout the (near) hull, so that the hull experiences no extreme loads in one area. (Keep in mind the legs not only have to hold the ship up on the moon under little gravity, which might be quite easy, but also it has to carry enough load, to be keept from buckling when later covering it with regolith, if Starship should become a shelter.) So, this idea of landing horizontal with legs means more weight compared to using legs for landing vertical, because of aditional structures and then you also have the problem of somehow making them aerodinamical, or making them foldable. (which adds even more weight) So the idea that I got to possibly solve this problem and make a horizontal landing possible, is basically a big airbag like structure, that is not filled with gas, but with an expandable foam. (Well to be exact, this would also need gas to expand, but then the foam hardens and the gases escape slowly into space.) The landingbag could be stored close to the tip of the ship on the inside, behind a flap (This comes with no aerodynamic penalty compared to a naked ship, contrary to any landing leg design I have seen so far.) When the ship is in space on its way towards the moon, the flap opens, the landingbag gets pulled out by strings or some other kind of mechanism, then secured on the outside of the ship and then inflated with a chemical reaction. The foam should have enough time to harden on the way to the moon. When the Starship lands on the moon, my thinking is, that the foam will be relatively hard, but it has such properties, that it gets crushed slightly upon impact, to absorb some energy and this way also even out the forces from the rough terrain and thus keep the ships belley from being punctured, or bent, by high points, or a rock or something like that. The foam should also act as an external structural reinforcement, so the Starship has a lower chance of buckling and thus no internal structural reinforcements are needed, since the foam touches the whole belly of the ship and it should be like a quite even preassure on the hull. (The load distribution should be similar to the one experienced during reentry - wich the ship is already built for.) Here is an AI made picture, that is relatively close, to what I imagine (The foam filled bag should "hug" the shape of the ship more and there is some other minor issues with the picture, but the AI did not quite get everything I said.):

English
0
0
0
9
Everreverie
Everreverie@optimusapiens·
@WallStreetApes Well, turns out, it was not ill intent, but the chairs had a recall and had to be made unusable, so no one can sue the chair company.
English
0
0
0
10
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
The restaurant Stanley & Seafort's in Tacoma, Washington got rid of all their chairs and put them by the dumpster instead of donating American sees them and goes to take some The restaurant sawed off one leg from each chair so no one could use them What an absolute waste…
English
1.8K
3.1K
17K
1.9M
All day Astronomy
All day Astronomy@forallcurious·
🚨: This is the surface of Sun, the most detailed image ever taken!
All day Astronomy tweet mediaAll day Astronomy tweet media
English
591
1K
18.5K
4.8M
Everreverie
Everreverie@optimusapiens·
Even just now I was talking about something technical with Grok in Voice mode and it got flirty even though I had it in assistant mode.
English
0
0
0
11
Everreverie
Everreverie@optimusapiens·
So true. There are so many genes, that were once usefull in a earlier state of evolution, that then became useless, or at least not harmfull. Or some genes were never doing anything that was worth selecting for or against. I did not remember the word for that, so I searched for it and the first kind (of once usefull genes) are called pseudogenes and the latter are junk-DNA. Some estimates say, the human genome is made of about 75-90% useless DNA.
English
0
0
0
18
thisisgrey
thisisgrey@thisisgrey·
@MarkovMagnifico Look at biological systems, they are a mess but they work. This is the output of evolution.
English
2
1
19
4.3K
Markov
Markov@MarkovMagnifico·
how my codebase written entirely with claude code runs
English
699
3.2K
63.8K
4.4M