Pablo Derbez

:)

hypotheticalcels be like “what if something else happened” bro in the entire history of recorded time nothing else has ever happened.

@algunamariaa Lo pregunto porque me da curiosidad el mecanismo, si las personas específicamente están incentivadas a estudiar química para trabajar con el narco o si más bien es porque los salarios de químico aumentaron visiblemente.

@algunamariaa Tal vez está fuera del scope pero sabes qué tan integrados están los mercados legales e ilegales de empleo para graduados en química? Los salarios para químicos dentro de la legalidad también respondieron al shock?

This is my JMP! Stay tuned for the public draft in the next months

@ShuklaAngira Arrive a bit earlier to get settled. I didn't give myself enough time before math camp started and I regretted it!

What do people actually do the summer before a PhD? Close out current research? Burn through my TBR? Travel? Or just stare at the ceiling knowing it’s the last free summer of my 20s?

@Psychronia @Daniel86Cycles I always understood that not choosing was not an option. Not quite, the lethal dose is 2ml and there's no adverse effect from drinking any less: if at least 51 people choose to drink it everyone gets slightly less than 2ml so nobody dies.

@pablo_derbez @Daniel86Cycles I don't think poison maps too well, though, because dying should be the consequence for people who don't or can't choose anything. Also, the implication is that people who want to save others will die to do it instead of will only die if not enough do it?

The goal is to eliminate the idea that the red button has any active role.

@Psychronia @Daniel86Cycles I think the logic is the same for poison once you realize infants may be in the random draw. You should probably drink it to save any kids who chose to do so. I like both these reframings because they make more explicit the nature of the choice.

@pablo_derbez @Daniel86Cycles You and 99 other people selected at random, including potentially infants and the infirm are separately put in a building with a bomb. There's a switch to disarm the bomb on the wall, and no obstructions to walking out. The bomb goes off if 51 people leave the building.

@Psychronia @Daniel86Cycles You and 99 other people selected at random from the global population are given the choice to drink poison. The available 100 ml of poison will be distributed equally among those who choose to drink it. The lethal dose is 2ml and there are no side effects from drinking any less.

@Daniel86Cycles Never see people reframing the experiment including the fact that every Red choice increases the chance of Blue deaths.

@liz_love_lace Not trying to make a point I'm just thinking this alternate framing might be interesting.

@liz_love_lace You and 99 other people selected at random from the global population are given the choice to drink poison. The available 100 ml of poison will be distributed equally among those who choose to drink it. The lethal dose is 2ml and there are no side effects from drinking any less.

Very excited not to start an econ PhD.

1/ 📢 Call for papers: 4th Women in Central Banking Workshop 📍 CDMX, 6–7 nov 2026 🏛️ @Banxico, @DallasFed, Norges Bank, Banca d'Italia 🎤 Keynote: Ayşegül Şahin (Princeton) Para mujeres en doctorado y posdoc. Deadline: 3 julio 2026. #EconTwitter #WomenInEcon #EconMx

@marianagiac Plaza Inn: youtu.be/0HjdiohVOik?si…

siempre sueño con cosas perversas ocurriendo en plaza inn

@_marcos_c_b Felicidades!!!

Después de varios intentos, rechazos y aprendizajes, hoy puedo decir que fui aceptado en 2 propedéuticos en México 🇲🇽 y 2 maestrías en Barcelona 🇪🇸✨ Valió la pena no rendirse 🚀📚

@PhDPls @Banxico @CIDE_MX Muchísimas felicidades!!!!

Cuando se nos olvidó limpiar la cafetera antes de salir de semana santa y luego nadie la quería limpiar jajajaa

@wyrmze the reason it's called Castlevania is because it's a Metroidvania that takes place inside a castle

@MariGO2thepolls Rediscovering mexican classism from first principles

Quinceañeras feel Mexico b

Tbh stuff like this is why I believe—absent an aggressive regulatory regime—LLMs will triumph We’ve been on a steady trajectory for decades of seeing all social interaction as zero-sum, laborious demands on your time/energy/mental health. More people subscribe to more extreme versions of this idea every day. No, not *you*, of course. You’re still normal, if you insist. But the trendline is obvious and has been obvious for a long time, and so the prospect of finally replacing human social interaction entirely with a simulation that gives you exactly what you want whenever you want it, and which demands nothing in return—indeed, which lacks subjectivity and ceases to exist when you aren’t looking at it—will be too compelling for most to resist. It’s the perfect culmination of where we’ve been heading for decades. There’s no reason to believe we’ll stop before we get there, unless there’s a collective democratic effort to prevent total social annihilation.

why does macro, the bigger economics, not simply eat micro?

@maiamindel Connections categories tweet

farmer's, black, free, stock, flea, christmas