@KimToomey4 @BlakeSNeff It’s a pun of a very famous book written by Christian puritan Jonathan Edwards. Google is free. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinners_i…
English
kass
1.6K posts
@BlakeSNeff Hmmmm. I don't think you fully understand the power of words and the concept of being the prophet over your own life. You obviously haven't recognized we are in a season of God's justice. He will not be mocked.
English
We are starting an office pickleball league. I am not very good at pickleball but our team does have the best name by far.
English
@joyeck475804 @BlakeSNeff It’s a pun of a very famous book written by Christian puritan Jonathan Edwards. Google is free. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinners_i…
English
@BlakeSNeff Seek help Blake the guilt is clearly getting to you.
English
@Hagitha007 @BlakeSNeff @TPUSA It’s a pun of a very famous book written by Christian puritan Jonathan Edwards. Google is free. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinners_i…
English
@BlakeSNeff This is a very concerning post @tpusa Thou shalt have no other gods before me") is the first of the Ten Commandments in the Bible, found in Exodus 20:3. Itcommands exclusive worship of Yahweh, prohibiting idolatry and the placement of any person,object,or pursuit above God
English
@Shan4Truth @BlakeSNeff It’s a pun of a very famous book written by Christian puritan Jonathan Edwards. Google is free. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinners_i…
English
@BlakeSNeff Is this supposed to be funny? Angry God?? Is he angry at people that use the drug nicotine? 🤷♀️
English
@Jas0nCourne @BlakeSNeff It’s a pun of a very famous book written by Christian puritan Jonathan Edwards. Google is free. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinners_i…
English
@CristinaCrisp3 @houseinhabit @nickshirleyy @RealCandaceO “Infiltrate” is sensational YouTube language— hyperbole isn’t a crime. But Google similar phrases and you’ll see much smaller creators doing the exact same thing. It’s common knowledge that all you need is a local and some cash. The gangs there love showing how bad they are.
English
Hi, Jessica.
You can be a good kid and still be misled by the wrong people. Perhaps we should be investigating who is driving him and what THEIR intentions are.
@RealCandaceO was only pointing out what we can all sense: it is objectively ridiculous to think a 23-year-old kid with a camera crew was able to “infiltrate” a dangerous gang—a *legitimate* gang. It’s asinine.
None of this is to say he’s not a good young man at heart, he’s talented for how very young he is, and he is likely overwhelmed by so much attention and being boosted and glossed by some of the most prominent members of this administration.
You guys are reading this how you WANT to read it and it’s not at all what she meant or how most of us feel.
English
These are the type of DMs I occasionally receive from former teachers of @nickshirleyy —Glimpses into who he was long before we all knew his name. A driven, thoughtful kid who showed up to help wherever he was needed. It’s why Candace Owens is targeting him now. Nick is widely respected among conservative media, carrying forward what Charlie Kirk led with: proof you can build influence and make an impact without relying on crude rhetoric, shock tactics, and conflict. Instead of setting up in a sterile studio ranting about the state of the country, he’s on the ground taking action, infiltrating these scenes to uncover corruption other media won’t touch. And he’s polite.
Lived experience lends itself to quality journalism. Truth over spin. Something Candace isn’t capable of.
In the end, oldschool pursuit of truth will always outlive scripted trash talk.
English
@RavenGrace0613 It’s a false equivalency at its basis. She’s priming her audience for violence. Insane manipulation tactics.
English
Oh she’s crashing out. Erika is a psycho and dangerous and capable of cold blooded murder. Erika needs to get something going legally to stop this.
This woman is insane at this point.
She’s telling her crazies that Blake, Andrew and Erika are dangerous and void of any emotion. She’s trying to get them killed.
English
@houseinhabit No one else is doing the work on this case like you 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
English
The Suicide Note:
Mark Epstein Vs. Nick Tartaglione
Mark Epstein is highly skeptical of the newly released suicide note purportedly written in prison by his late brother Jeffrey. Mark disputes the authenticity of a jailhouse note unsealed this week, calling it “the work of a professional forger.”
The Note: “They investigated me for month — FOUND NOTHING!!!” the note reads. “So 15 year old charges resulted. It is a treat to be able to choose one’s time to say goodbye.. Watcha want me to do — Bust out cryin!! NO FUN – NOT WORTH IT!!”
Mark claims the note is forgery but does not dispute that it bears striking resemblance to his brother’s penmanship. “It wouldn’t be hard to get some pro forger to forge a note,” he told Business Insider. “That’s the easiest f***ing thing in the world to do.”
He had also acknowledged that the “bust out cryin” line is a reference to the “Little Rascals” TV show that they grew up watching in the 1960s.
The same phrase appears in multiple emails from Jeffrey to his brother and friends. “It’s public knowledge, it’s in the emails” he told the outlet. “So they stole it from me to make it sound like it was him.”
However, that timing doesn’t add up.
The emails Mark is referencing were only revealed by the Justice Department in the past year, as part of a larger release of files related to him, while the suicide note has been under seal by a judge this whole time.
The judge unsealed the note after NYT’s petitioned for its release.
Case in point: It’s highly unlikely Nick could have known Epstein was fond of this particular phrase.
English
Candace is on here bragging about spiked shop sales. The “Harass a dead friend’s wife” merch she peddles. I actually love this. I think everyone should sport their IQ on a cheap China made sweatshirt.
If you’ve seen her merch, you know it’s punishment enough. One thing no one has ever accused her of is good aesthetic.
English
@smokeprogramm @houseinhabit You say “she’s not on their radar” in the present-tense, but they’re currently citing her as their source. Maybe the truth was too inconvenient last year.
Nice name calling by the way, between that and lurking in comment sections of people you hate, you seem like a real hoot
English
@parteagirl @houseinhabit It’s a train wreck, you can’t look away 😂
That’s the whole point dumbass. They’re talking about it now, but they weren’t talking about it when she was talking about it because she’s not on their radar.
English
I broke the Epstein suicide note back in February 2025. MSM is complicit in shielding bombshell evidence that conflicts with decided narrative.
English
@JodyChaseTN If Erika’s dad’s first wife’s actions are a poor reflection on Erika, then Candace’s husband’s actions are a poor reflection on her.
This is the logic of her investigation.
English
Let’s say George Farmer actually does have a DUI—what exactly does that have to do with Candace Owens investigating who murdered Charlie Kirk?
Can someone please connect those dots for me… or are we just throwing out random distractions and calling it an argument now?
English
@JodyChaseTN @RogueZebraTMR @LauraLoomer @B5Lizzie @MEM_PoliceDept The birthday is correct according to Candace. Her son was baptized on her husband’s birthday, you can check her podcast last summer
English
@RogueZebraTMR @LauraLoomer @B5Lizzie @MEM_PoliceDept So how do you know if this document is legit if the birthplace is not even right 😂
His birthday is also wrong
English
🚨 LAURA LOOMER EXPOSED 🚨
Laura Loomer really said “trust me bro” when she posted “DUI documents" of George Farmer
…with Tennessee misspelled
…and Nashville as his birthplace
At least try to make the lie believable next time.
COMPLETELY FABRICATED!!. 😆
English
@houseinhabit Nobody cares about what you say. Trying to stay relevant isn’t working for you. Go with your twin @LauraLoomer and try to remain relevant. Two of the ugliest women on X.
English
@smokeprogramm @houseinhabit And yet you’re commenting on her post about it?
Plus MSM is talking about it now, just check the NYT
English
@houseinhabit good evidence for your lack of relevance and reach in this atmosphere.
English
@inspowithmoe @officer_Lew Candace will defend known pedophiles and rapists but openly mock a widow she “feels” isn’t acting right. Guilty until proven innocent. I hope no one treats you this way if you’re in the line of fire. Y’all are sick
English
@officer_Lew In candace’s defense.
we don’t think erika is an ‘innocent widow.’
candace’s reaction would be considered harsh if she thought she was.
but the deeper you dig into erika,the sketchier she gets.
it makes sense she would have a laugh at this bc she thinks she’s a snake .
English
WOW🚨: Candace Owens is laughing and promoting a cruel skit that viciously mocks Erika Kirk’s faith while she grieves her husband’s death.
No grieving widow should be treated this way…..I know the demon inside of her could not wait for something like this…
English
kass retweetledi
Charlie wrote a book about MAGA. Charlie stood with President Trump’s leadership. There are malicious actors who will try to tease apart Kirk and Trump to sell their story to the masses. Joe Kent is obviously one of those people.
It seems Charlie was generous enough with his time to make everyone who touched his life feel important to him.
But we’ve entered this new phase where his relationships are a topic that get woven into other topics.
Apparently Charlie used the term “moral blackmail”. The concept is fraught but I get what he means. Because when you invoke Charlie’s name into the crafting of a particular narrative you are pressuring people to not challenge the truth of the substance of what is said.
You are anticipating that due to our good nature, and strength of our moral principles —we would not even think about cross-examining your claims, out of sheer respect for Charlie. We are therefore supposed to accept any version of the truth because anything associated with Kirk takes on a sanctified meaning as if it was blessed by a Saint.
So I can see where the “blackmail” piece fits in: the abuser can say anything they want about Charlie, and we are coerced into silence because if we speak out we might face the wrath of the millions who mourn Charlie.
We are caught in this dynamic, by the virtue of having virtue. Speaking out therefore carries risks because of the emotional and political weight of Charlie Kirk in the public sphere.
If misinterpreted, as we surely would be, propagandists will imply we are contesting Charlie’s wisdom, grace, character, reputation. Therefore they can use Charlie Kirk as a shield from criticism while smuggling in falsehoods. They can use Charlie Kirk to convince the conservative audience they are on the same team while advancing an altogether separate agenda.
This is effective because Charlie was wise, and did good things, and made people in his life feel important and connected to an important mission. People have even called him a martyr. We treated it as a National Tragedy and it felt like that; because huge gatherings all around the country mourned him.
Now people like Joe Kent invoke his name to make claims about Trump’s agenda (a man Charlie wrote a book about and believed in) and Israel (a country Charlie believed was good). Joe used the same tactic yesterday by mentioning his dead wife in his letter.
We respect the dead: and Kent is using this — our respect —as blackmail against us to bypass serious criticism. And then all the huge grifting fruitcake accounts who also lack a conscience take advantage of this as well.
It’s absolutely rotten. So we must speak out against it. I applaud James for his message today. 🫡
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames
Listen you human pieces of garbage and anyone else here in the comments who wants to get this straight. First off, this isn't news. You're spreading salacious horseshit from propagandists, and we all know you're doing it on purpose and with malicious intent. That's nasty. Nasty, nasty. But now let's look at some things seriously, like you would if you had a responsible bone left in your sorry outfit. Charlie died in September of 2025. This conflict started in February 2026. Joe said this conversation happened in June 2025. Operation Midnight Hammer happened in June 2025. So we can establish that Charlie was talking to Joe in the context of Operation Midnight Hammer, but Charlie said those exact same things on camera to the world at the time. This isn't new information at all. It was always public straight from Charlie. Then Trump executed Operation Midnight Hammer, and a nervous Charlie Kirk said he supported President Trump 100%, though he didn't want a "regime-change war." He later said the operation was a success. Charlie Kirk backed President Trump 100%, even though he voiced his concerns before Trump made his decisions, both in public and in private. He supported Trump when he made these decisions and stood strongly with him, for him, and with and for the United States of America, even when he was nervous about it. Charlie's words in June of 2025 cannot be construed in any way to be applicable to the circumstances that led Trump to make these decisions in early 2026. It isn't hard to guess how Charlie would have felt about this situation, though, since he already demonstrated it for us in June last year. 1) He would be publicly and privately nervous about getting into such a war and would strongly caution against regime-change as a goal and boots on the ground as a strategy; 2) He would have voiced these concerns both on camera and in private and maintained a pro-Trump and pro-America, while "America First," messaging about the looming conflict; 3) Once things started in late February/early March, he would have backed President Trump 100% like he did on 100% of the other things he backed President Trump on 100%, 100% of the time; 4) He would have stood by the operation and President Trump's decision-making, even while voicing his anxieties, concerns, and beliefs about wanting the war/conflict to wrap up quickly and avoid boots on the ground and a deliberate strategy of regime change; 5) He would have reassured Americans that President Trump has the best intelligence, the best instincts, and the best capabilities to redefine conflict in the 21st century and to guide us through this war, consistently. To suggest anything else is to fail to have known Charlie Kirk or even to have paid attention to what he actually said in the relevant situation Kent is bringing up, standing on the silence of Charlie's coffin to do so. To tie this to Charlie's murder is nothing short of reckless and heinous, and it is likely so reckless that it will possibly interfere with bringing Charlie's murderer to justice, given the idiotic and opportunistic things he said. You are all vultures and skanks, and your judgment will be ruthless.
English
@nosoup4knowles Her employee has a public account with 17k+ followers. She posted the photo of her infant on that account. Not exactly private material there.
English
Candace claims she extended her Erika series bc people were going after her team. Obviously that's not true. She was going to milk this thing no matter what. But, it's pretty amusing to watch Candace essentially tell people to STOP asking questions about her employees.
English
@CinemaShogun The funny part is the episode doesn’t ask those questions. She simply poses them. So, the episode could have been a tweet.
English
Candace Owens new Erika Kirk “series” isn’t having the effect she intended for it to have.
There’s nothing to it.
After doing this much “investigating” and digging this is all she can manage to come up with.
“Was Lori in Afghanistan?”
“What exactly was Tyler Bowyer doing in Romania?”
Ummmm who gives a 💩.
Also why are you asking us questions when your “series” is supposed to have the answers?
If Erika Kirk was half as bad as Candace claims she is she wouldn’t be wasting time in her series talking about all of this irrelevant nonsense.
It’s getting ridiculously stupid at this point.
English
@leacarlson22 @yoalexrapz Girl delete the tweets!! The people you screenshotted are furious that you put them on blast from a private group. Maybe that’s why she blocked you?!
English
If you’re wondering why I can’t respond to @yoalexrapz anymore, it’s because she blocked me lol
English
@Ju1es24 @EvanAKilgore Candace’s fan’s lack of willingness to read is why we’re in this mess in the first place.
English
@EvanAKilgore You keep mentioning your vacation, but you are busy writing 10 pages paragraphs. We ain’t reading all of that 🤯
English
The level of gaslighting and semantics here is actually insane.
"I never said Erika Kirk was at the alleged assassination meeting."
Now that Candace realizes Mitch Snow's testimony is completely falling apart under scrutiny and that he's a shitty human being who she raised 150k for, she's changing her tone REALLY FAST about the implications behind what she recklessly platformed and allowed him to say to millions of people.
"I've always said we can't rely on Mitch's memory" and (along the lines) "I'm now trying to debunk Mitch and provide an alibi for the people he's accused, so we can move on."
That's not how it works and that's not the impression her fans were under, and everyone knows it.
Why, also, when I say the same thing about Mitch's reliability and credibility, do I get called a "pedophile fed who got the call from TPUSA."
Why when I say we shouldn't rely on baseless claims am I crucified and td by Candace not to look into his past and focus on what he alleges?
Notice, when she allowed Mitch to initially say he believes he saw Erika at the hotel lobby near Fort Huachuca (to imply she could have been in on the alleged assassination meeting), she IMMEDIATELY distances herself from it.
It's also not my job, or anyone else's, to debunk Mitch's ridiculous claims. They were ALWAYS ridiculous and allowing him to EVER make such reckless claims without more behind the scenes investigation was disgusting and wrong.
That's not bad journalism. It's retardation that will likely backfire.
Candace can only get by with her "technicalities" and word play/phrasing for so long. Many fall for the gaslighting when she tries to mince her words and re-explain herself after getting proven wrong.
Plausible deniability will get you so far with this one.
The reality is, nothing Mitch Snow has alleged about who he saw has been proven. It can not be because it didn't happen.
Yes, he was there. Nobody is disputing that.
But, it is not up to Erika Kirk, or Dan Flood, or Rep Amoedi, or Cabot Phillips to vindicate themselves over baseless smears.
Also, strongly implying that their "silence" relates to guilt is vile. "I don't know why they can't just say where they were to vindicate themselves and we can move on."
They don't owe anyone jack shit. Especially with something as stupid as this.
That's not how accusations work in a court of law. You prove guilt with evidence, photos, and facts, not baseless "Me Too" style accusations.
This whole Mitch Snow story is a mess and only the gullible are still eating it up.
This space was damage control.
I will get no apologies when it's all said and done for the character assassination and irreparable slander I've endured for telling you all the truth from the beginning.
That's the worst part.
It will be "well guys, we hit a dead end here. Sometimes that happens. Ive got things wrong along the way and our investigation continues" despite the vile hatred that has been spewed from her fans against everyone who called it from the beginning with 5 seconds of research into Mitch and some common sense.
Loving my vacation by the way, I'm in the hottub currently. 😎
English