eve

Not entertaining someone who calls themselves a bimbo. Nope

@subaru23227 @jnoub_aliskandr @s0603w what people did historically doesnt mean anything about whats natural or commen sense you have yet to give any evidence for any of ur claims

@path2kill @jnoub_aliskandr @s0603w Another example, is how woman in the past world wide used to do the same. Its natural for woman to cover more, its just common sense. U would see vids of woman commenting and saying their op about revealing clothing and how disgusting it was, white western woman, like 50 or y ago

Reading this as a Muslim is different from how non Muslims read it. The kid has gheerah over his mother but they are clowning him. Poor guy at least he tried.

@subaru23227 @jnoub_aliskandr @s0603w again u would have to explain the differences in bodies and psychology that necessitates the differences in hijab if you want to use that as a justification that last part is just completely untrue lol

@path2kill @jnoub_aliskandr @s0603w Cuz men and woman have diff bodies, psychology etc. Real reason why is cuz God commands it and thats all that matters. But we can see the wisdom behind it, for example, a man is attracted to the whole woman, all her body. But a woman only really attracted to their private part-

@mofuwas @zu2jin languages go through lots of changes and words are often reshaped to make them look/sound more like other familiar words. we dont know the exact historical reasons but theres 0 evidence that “it was changed for/to involve men” , thats a claim u made & the burden of proof is on u

@path2kill @zu2jin okay my bad, english is not my first language. i mean maybe something more similar to “as is”, “if we look at it plainly”, basically just looking at the word and analyzing it. and regarding your other comment, i pose the question of why did the change in spelling have to be made?

Whys the word female offensive to some of u

@mofuwas @zu2jin ftr

@path2kill @zu2jin i didnt say its “inherently” male centered it’s just that the modern word has been changed FOR men so, the word female in its modern form, is different from its ancestors in the sense that its been changed to involve men. its from a linguistic perspective that i make this comment

@mofuwas @zu2jin that’s exactly what im disagreeing with, the spelling being influenced by the word male doesn’t mean it was changed “for men” from a linguistic perspective the evidence supports that the spelling was changed to resemble the existing word male. not to involve men

@mofuwas @zu2jin you’re right mb you said in itself which in this context means the same thing and the original post was about the word female generally, not a specific noun usage so saying the word is male centred “in itself”is still a claim about the word itself instead of specific manners

@path2kill @zu2jin i didnt use the word inherently i believe? and yes i know biology, i was talking about its use in every day life as a way to address women. i had not realized we were having a scientific discussion because there was no such context provided!!

@mofuwas @zu2jin the use of female as a noun is a different matter all together and next time you can say that, instead of making an obviously untrue claim

@path2kill @zu2jin + female as a noun, which i believe is unnecessary and would opt for a different word. obviously, as an adjective, it’s biologically correct. there is currently discourse about men calling women females so that’s what i responded about.

@mofuwas @zu2jin okay, then you dont know what inherently or male centered means, the spelling being historically influenced by the word male doesnt mean what u think it does and yes its centered on reproductive ability, bc male & female are biological categories defined by reproductive roles

@path2kill @zu2jin i dont mean the essence of the word is male centered, though it is centered on the ability of the ‘female’ to reproduce and breastfeed (?) its young. i mean the modern word structure has been purposefully changed to match with “male”. im responding to op concerning the use of +

@mofuwas @zu2jin to parallel the word as in it wasnt originally derived from the word male and “inherently male centered” makes no sense

@path2kill @zu2jin you almost got it

@mofuwas @zu2jin

@path2kill @zu2jin a 30 second google search btw

"superficial/artificial femininity". Most of it is surface level and based on the outfit/aesthetic alone, an aesthetic that can and is easily copied and taken on by male drag queens, femboys, and troons.

@mofuwas @zu2jin a male centered word ?? what are you even talking about

@zu2jin used by incels to demean women also is a male centered word in itself

@sunlight98765 People are so blind to the fact that only females are so micromanaged and policed like this males are not they can say and do whatever they want without some fucking freak around the corner ready to call out their “transphobic undertones” this is a constant attack ON WOMEN

@s0603w @Odecahedron ironic

@path2kill @Odecahedron Your worldview doesn’t always have to revolve around things being sexualized. This whole thread was not productive and nonsense. Think outside the box maybe you’ll see where the leak is.

@Odecahedron @s0603w difference is i can articulate my worldview and you cant because yours is completely inconsistent and unreasonable

@path2kill @s0603w ATP I think it’s obvious we simply have entirely different worldviews. We may use the same words but we have entirely different definitions of them. Why wouldn’t I feel jealousy? I wish to protect our honor. Idc about what other men outside my family do tbh

@pillowvibrator @GodofSyne @thebaddiegalore shes asking why other lesbians aren’t penetrating…

@GodofSyne @thebaddiegalore right, but what I’m wondering is why you’re replying with ‘not everybody wants penetration’ on a post where a lesbian clearly wants penetration

no but why aren’t dykes using dicks anymore? being back in the streets and constantly meeting dykes who don’t use a dick has truly been my biggest nightmare

we really can’t even use the word female without getting transphobia allegations 😭😭

@Odecahedron @s0603w not really how is it diminished u dont want it to be diminished (not that i accept that premise) so you feel jealous? you dont think ? do you know? or what about other men

@path2kill @s0603w Given context it’s understandable for me to assume you meant that instead of what you actually meant. It’s diminished, and because I don’t want our honor to be diminished. Yes, but I don’t think any women are licking their lips at him.