PaddyOFitz

14.2K posts

PaddyOFitz banner
PaddyOFitz

PaddyOFitz

@patrickfitzg_o

Founder, Universal Edge AI, co-founder @dynamicplanner. AI software and education. All views strictly mine. https://t.co/xzuHzz7dhF

Brisbane Katılım Aralık 2012
1.3K Takip Edilen464 Takipçiler
PaddyOFitz
PaddyOFitz@patrickfitzg_o·
@AvidCommentator @AvidCommentator, that is one metric. What about the sunset clause restrictions that would have ended between 2025 and 2031? And Iran's deception on military dimensions? The deal's failure to cover ballistic missiles or support for proxy groups? It was a naive deal.
English
0
0
0
17
Tarric Brooker aka Avid Commentator 🇦🇺
The Iran nuclear deal was working for years, as illustrated below based on data from the International Atomic Energy Agency. Then Trump walked away from it and here we are. Dealing with a problem that he created. Chart: Statista
Tarric Brooker aka Avid Commentator 🇦🇺 tweet media
English
24
14
61
3.2K
PaddyOFitz
PaddyOFitz@patrickfitzg_o·
@matthewstoller No List, Hirschman, Gilpin, or Rodrik on the curriculum. The Chicago-school toolkit needs an update.
English
0
0
0
57
PaddyOFitz
PaddyOFitz@patrickfitzg_o·
This is our bet. There are simply not enough good techies around to sort each company organically. Many of Lotus Notes failures came down to the lack of decent network admins who understood how to use it.
Dustin@r0ck3t23

Mark Cuban just described the largest wealth transfer of the AI era. Almost nobody understood what he said. Cuban: “There are 33 million companies in this country. Aren’t going to have AI budgets. Aren’t going to have AI experts.” Not tech startups. The shoe store. The regional trucking outfit. The accounting firm with 12 employees. The businesses that actually run the physical economy. They know AI is coming. They have no idea what to do with it. Cuban: “You’ve got the head of Microsoft saying software is dead because everything’s going to be customized to your unique utilization.” Software is dead. The SaaS era ran on one rule. Build a generic product. Force millions of companies to bend their workflows around it. Charge rent forever. AI ends the contract. The business stops bending to the software. The intelligence bends to the business. But customized by whom. The third-generation manufacturer cannot tell Claude from Gemini. The county hospital is staring at a reactor asking where the light switch is. Cuban: “Who’s going to do it for them?” That question is worth more than the frontier models themselves. Hundreds of billions are being burned to build the foundation. The smartest engineers alive are locked in a bloodbath over who owns the base layer. Let them fight. Let them burn the capital. Let them drive the cost of raw intelligence toward zero. Because the wealth does not collect where the brain is built. It collects where the brain meets the business. Every ambitious kid in college right now thinks survival means a seat at OpenAI or Anthropic. Cuban is staring at the other 99 percent of the economy. Learn the models. Then learn the messy, unglamorous reality of how a 50-person company actually operates. Walk through the door. Understand their problems. Wire the intelligence directly into their revenue. That is not a job title. That is an entire economic class being born. You do not need to build the brain. You need to build the nervous system. The biggest winners of the electricity era were not the engineers who built the generators. They were the ones who walked into dark factories and showed the owners where to plug in. 33 million companies are standing in the dark right now. Silicon Valley is racing to build the god. The fortunes will belong to whoever teaches him a trade.

English
0
0
0
23
PaddyOFitz
PaddyOFitz@patrickfitzg_o·
@Jason They employ swarm tactics, hide along Iran's 1,500+ mile coastline, blend with fishing vessels, and are quick to replace, creating severe detection, tracking, and cost asymmetry challenges for high-value US helicopters, jets, and destroyers. Machine gun v mosquitos.
English
0
0
0
1.5K
@jason
@jason@Jason·
Someone educate me as to why the US Navy can't eliminate Iran's “mosquito fleet.” I get these are small, fast speedboats, but can't they be quickly eliminated by helicopters and jets, as well as ship-mounted guns? How many of these do they even have?!
English
687
54
2.1K
711.7K
Sophia ❣️
Sophia ❣️@KeruboSk·
Just out of curiosity… who out there has actually talked to someone born in the 1800s during their lifetime?
English
10.3K
319
11K
1M
PaddyOFitz
PaddyOFitz@patrickfitzg_o·
This is “decline of a Roman Empire” stuff. Like that empire, the main problem here is that all sides are doing it.
Amy Nixon@texasrunnerDFW

@WatcherGuru The insider trading is dishonorable behavior and annoys all normal US citizen taxpayers who are just trying to make an honest living

English
0
0
1
28
PaddyOFitz
PaddyOFitz@patrickfitzg_o·
@nnzp1730 We build it to have the next level of push hidden on a feature flag for a restricted set of users. Once they are happy, then we push it out. Rinse. Repeat. BCP doco must be built with the functionality.
English
0
0
1
14
NNZP
NNZP@nnzp1730·
@patrickfitzg_o I am unsure of how much it can do and how far we can push it……but we are firmly in the open eyes phase now.
English
1
0
1
30
NNZP
NNZP@nnzp1730·
I have just seen the results from our first implementation of AI in our factory. This is not just “machine learning”, but the next step. I was a skeptic, but supported the project. After my review today, I will be pushing this out to every plant this year. It will change how we do things. It’s incredible. It will not replace our skilled people, but it will allow us to react faster and better and will significantly improve output and quality. I am sold. 🤨
English
7
5
46
1.6K
PaddyOFitz
PaddyOFitz@patrickfitzg_o·
@ektrit As has always been: in China R&D stands for Replicate and Duplicate. And Win-Win is a panda in the Shanghai Zoo.
English
0
1
4
321
War Economy by Kris 📿
The suddenly famous Chinese professor literally copies my entire Substack content. I know that lots of influential people shadow read me, but this is blatant, no class. ektrit.substack.com
English
22
15
135
11.3K
PaddyOFitz
PaddyOFitz@patrickfitzg_o·
@bartczernicki @rohanpaul_ai I don’t think people mind paying for their compute. They mind paying on top of that for a seat for no added value.
English
1
0
1
52
Bart Czernicki
Bart Czernicki@bartczernicki·
@rohanpaul_ai I work at MSFT (caveat), but lets be real that makes sense. If a "digital worker" (AI Agent) is creating documents, saving videos, sending emails...it should be free? These are all resources that cost energy, internet bandwidth, storage, compute etc.
English
17
0
8
1.6K
Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai·
Microsoft just laid out a new way to keep enterprise software growing in an AI-heavy workplace: charge AI agents for software seats the same way companies pay for human employees. The old SaaS model was easy, a company buys 1 license for 1 worker, so revenue rises when headcount rises. AI agents threaten that model because 1 person might supervise 10 or 50 agents, which makes investors ask why a company would still need to pay for many separate licenses. So Microsoft executive Rajesh Jha’s answer is that an agent may become its own software user, with its own identity, login, email, permissions, and access to tools, which turns each agent into a possible paid seat. It shifts the pricing logic from “how many humans work here” to “how many active digital workers operate inside the company.” Basically his logic is, once an agent can read messages, call apps, update records, and take actions on its own, software systems may need to track it as a distinct actor for security, auditing, and workflow control. That gives Microsoft, Salesforce, and Workday a path to defend seat-based pricing even if AI reduces human hiring. --- businessinsider. com/microsoft-executive-suggests-ai-agents-buy-software-licenses-seats-2026-4
Rohan Paul tweet media
English
254
125
633
163.1K
PaddyOFitz
PaddyOFitz@patrickfitzg_o·
@valentino1101 That growth was spurred on under Deng, the pragmatist whom adopted a market economy. This was following the Marxist Mao impoverishing the country and killing 60 million of its citizens.
English
0
0
0
39
PaddyOFitz
PaddyOFitz@patrickfitzg_o·
@andrew_leach And Donald Trump has run the United States twice. Just because you have driven the car doesn’t mean you’re a good driver.
English
0
0
0
10
PaddyOFitz
PaddyOFitz@patrickfitzg_o·
This is overblown. Their share prices have been adjusted. If you think everyday corporate IT guys in mid-size companies are going to be writing really robust code to replace their existing stack, then ok.
shirish@shiri_shh

bro was right. Atlassian down 75%. HubSpot down 69%. Figma down 86%. Almost all of them down 30–70% from their 52-week highs. AI is literally eating software alive and repricing every company in real time. SaaS is cooked fr 😭

English
0
0
0
9
PaddyOFitz
PaddyOFitz@patrickfitzg_o·
For the GFC crap risk ratings -> crap collateral we have now “private” valuations -> crap collateral. A policy reminder that players in this sphere will always cut corners and hope they can get out before it all hits the wall.
English
0
1
2
222
PaddyOFitz
PaddyOFitz@patrickfitzg_o·
Citizens United to me was the worst decision ever of the Supreme Court. That will echo down hundreds of years and into the history books.
English
0
0
0
12