big pep

1.2K posts

big pep banner
big pep

big pep

@pepyakin

Protocols, databases, execution (wasm, RISC-V). Ex Irreducible, NOMT, Polkadot.

Berlin Katılım Kasım 2012
606 Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
big pep
big pep@pepyakin·
In this blog post I introduce a useful concept for reasoning about rollups, sharding, light clients and bridges, called State Commitments Arguments. pep.wtf/posts/sca-and-…
English
3
13
48
9.6K
Mr. Buzzoni
Mr. Buzzoni@polydao·
> be random guy on the internet > makes decisions purely on vibes > misses a few huge opportunities in crypto > wonders why his life keeps looking random > stumbles on a weird article about probability theory > realizes every decision has expected value > realizes markets are just Bayesian machines > realizes most "genius trades" are survivorship bias > realizes most people size bets completely wrong > realizes he’s been playing the game with no math at all > opens Polymarket > starts thinking in probabilities instead of opinions > suddenly the world starts looking like a giant EV calculator turns out most life outcomes are just probability problems people never bothered to model: > career decisions > investments > relationships > risk all of it is just EV + Bayes + Kelly > the crazy part? none of this math is complicated > you can literally learn the models in this article > use AI to help you apply them > and completely upgrade how you think in a few months but most people will keep making decisions the same way > vibes > emotions > scroll Twitter > one lucky success story and wonder why nothing compounds
Mr. Buzzoni tweet media
darkzodchi@zodchiii

x.com/i/article/2030…

English
57
506
6.1K
678.7K
big pep
big pep@pepyakin·
@geoffreylitt i vibe coded it. Not even sure if joking since it kinda lost its original meaning becoming “i worked with the agent” or so.
English
0
0
4
199
Geoffrey Litt
Geoffrey Litt@geoffreylitt·
We need a shorthand way of saying: "An AI did the work, but I vouch for the result" Saying "I did it" feels slightly sketchy, but saying "Claude did it" feels like avoiding responsibility
English
1.1K
257
7.8K
543.9K
erik.eth 🛡
erik.eth 🛡@programmer·
🚀 After millions of payments on x402, we’re excited to introduce x402 V2. Listening to community feedback, we’re releasing V2 to evolve internet-native payments with greater flexibility and power. What’s new 🧵
erik.eth 🛡 tweet media
English
215
266
1.5K
314.1K
big pep
big pep@pepyakin·
I happened to be involved in building Substrate. It's great, but it still constrains you in a box. I realized that it would've been better if the dev builds their chain from components specializing to their use where it matters and using off the shelf components where it makes sense. Then commonware was announced. x.com/_patrickogrady…
English
0
1
3
76
fucory
fucory@FUCORY·
@pepyakin @FigoETH Oh haha no happy to talk about commonware anytime though. What got you interested in it?
English
2
0
0
112
f1go.eth
f1go.eth@FigoETH·
"nethermind and go ethereum are both faster [than reth] in normal tests that can be run independently by anyone. nethermind is usually about 50 percent faster. [...] they still run faster since they have superior architectures and better written codebases." Also: a chain with only one client always lives under the Sword of Damocles of breaking down when this one client has a bug. Overall corp chains have nothing to do with permissionless L1s. - not decentralized - security grade of companies - low longterm scalability since not using L2 model - low network effects - higher friction when interacting with L1s like ETH vs. L2s. Less friction always wins That said appreciate them when becoming ETH L2s and for their role with onboarding mainstream.
Fede’s intern 🥊@fede_intern

congrats on the @tempo testnet launch. i want to point out one issue in the readme. it says that tempo is “the most performant evm execution client.” this is not correct when we compare it with real benchmark data. i don't get why @paradigm insist with this meme that reth is fast when it isn't. nethermind and go ethereum are both faster in normal tests that can be run independently by anyone. nethermind is usually about 50 percent faster. this is important because both clients use programming languages with garbage collectors, which should make them slower than rust. but today, they still run faster since they have superior architectures and better written codebases. @ethrex_client, our own execution client, is also a bit faster than reth, but the difference is not very big. in any case, the numbers do not support the claim that tempo is the fastest client. after the fusaka update, reth has also been using very high amounts of memory. on our servers, it stays around 80 gb of ram. in the last few months it also had several OOM crashes because of problems with concurrency and how tokio is used. my criticism has nothing to do with the @ethereum versus tempo debate. it's related with keeping objective engineering measurements in a technical subject. it's not ok to keep repeating things that are not true. one last note, commoware’s codebase is very well written and performs strongly. congrats for choosing it.

English
9
5
71
10.4K
big pep
big pep@pepyakin·
@FUCORY @FigoETH Ah right, I got confused in threads and thought we are talking about cw : )
English
1
0
1
60
fucory
fucory@FUCORY·
@pepyakin @FigoETH I’m using commonware myself. Good lib. What does it have to do with reth vs geth vs erigon vs besu vs ethrex though?
English
1
0
0
59
big pep
big pep@pepyakin·
@FUCORY @FigoETH It's a library of building blocks incl. consensus. For example, they also provide storage comonents which is similiar QMDB which is worth checking out.
English
1
0
0
56
big pep
big pep@pepyakin·
@protolambda Do you see any positive changes? what's your long-term stance?
English
2
0
0
95
proto
proto@protolambda·
@pepyakin just to name a few: - uncompetitive AI resources (500x scale difference) - anti-privacy (see ChatControl) - 1 in 5 jobs is for gov - Strong decline in social cohesion - tear-down of nuclear energy - situation with gov deficits and shared EUR issuance
English
1
0
6
284
proto
proto@protolambda·
EU decline continues to be more apparent every day
English
4
0
23
2.6K
Suhail Kakar
Suhail Kakar@SuhailKakar·
@mert true, q breaks ecdsa eventually but you still need quantum machines that are way powerful compared to what exists today and that’s before bitcoin even thinks about a post-quantum upgrade chamath throwing a 2 to 5 year timeline is straight fear bait
English
17
0
38
5.2K
Suhail Kakar
Suhail Kakar@SuhailKakar·
quantum computing will never break bitcoin seed words 12-24 word seed phrases have 2^128 to 2^256 entropy - that's more combinations than atoms in the universe even a quantum computer testing billions of combinations per second would take billions of years to crack one
Suhail Kakar tweet media
English
130
25
344
68.7K
Jim Posen
Jim Posen@jimpo_potamus·
Irreducible's time has come to an end. Long story short, @radi_cojbasic and I ultimately came to the realization that we couldn't sustainably build the kind of deep tech business in ZK that motivated us.
Jim Posen tweet media
English
46
14
248
64.3K
Not Jerome Powell
Not Jerome Powell@alifarhat79·
“The US dollar isn’t even backed by anything.” Me:
English
175
185
3.2K
231.9K