Pezantri

@TDalinkwent @HariSel57511397 She only had that stint as a hermit to leave a little victory for the rest of the world

@pezantri @HariSel57511397 She was also the best part of Korra. Old Toph was even better

It’s been so funny seeing Progressives *insist* that normal people hate this show because Korra is a woman, and it caused so much psychic damage that it radicalized pretty much every young Rightwinger against them. People just wanted good writing, but we weren’t allowed to have that conversation.

@TDalinkwent @HariSel57511397 Yeah, this is why you can't have a serious conversation with anyone who plays the 'muh sexism' card. ATLA featured a blind disabled tomboy as part of the main cast and she remains easily one of the most adored characters

@HariSel57511397 One of the stands out characters of Aangs show was Toph who was a blind women with a tough exterior

@realfrothyfriar Swaxearm?

Sword? Axe? Polearm? your guess is as good as mine

@CorpseKings How about 'Alerion'? Its a name used to refer to heraldic eagles

What's a cool name for a Race of Majestic Eagle Mages? 🦅

@ScrambledLlama @The_boy43 @Aceairdrop2 That would be the confirmation bias talking. It's subtle because it's part of a system designed to be as palatable as possible for Sung Jin Woo.

@pezantri @The_boy43 @Aceairdrop2 imo saying it's "not in your face" just hides the fact that the change was too subtle to be significant.

See the rubbish critic of solo leveling So you need to lose humanity before the show is better? Characters need more flaws to be better? People don't even know what good writing looks like. If he had more flaws these clowns would use it as a reason to justify the SL hate

@ScrambledLlama @The_boy43 @Aceairdrop2 They do follow through with that, actually. It's just neither in your face nor in what's been covered by the anime so far

@The_boy43 @Aceairdrop2 dude. I'm not arguing about the things he's done. all I'm saying is, they initiated this plot point of him losing himself, but never followed through with it. at least not to satisfaction.

@epichexmania @___Madotsuki @Hong_Doo_JV2jj Mangafire stays up to date

@___Madotsuki @Hong_Doo_JV2jj Where are you reading it? Mangadex stopped updating after 155

Naruhime Appreciation Post ⚡

@MelinShioto @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games Fire Immunity is a mechanic, and the name explicitly reveals what the mechanic does. I'm genuinely baffled by your continued struggle with the idea that someone having an immunity implies they're immune to something.

@pezantri @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games So you're going based on the vibes of the name and none of the mechanics?

DM's, how're we ruling on this? 🎲📚🧐

@MelinShioto @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games Yeah, no. You're the one making poor attempts to complicate the concept. I'm working on the assumption that fire immunity does in fact mean an immunity to fire.

@pezantri @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games See there it is again; your assumption is that the immunity is like a Bug Spray that keeps bugs away from you Like going into a tent filled up to the brim with mosquitos and thinking you'll be fine with that max-deet on It makes more sense that the element is absorbed

@MelinShioto @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games 'If the immune thing doesn't take damage, then the non-immune thing doesn't take damage' being your idea of a 'logical comparison' does explain a lot

@pezantri @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games This one doesn't understand logic comparison in conversation

@MelinShioto @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games Oh my bad, I didn't realize that you meant the exact opposite of what you said. Carry on.

@pezantri @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games No I'm saying if the weather isn't taking damage, then the kraken ain't. Because otherwise it'd imply the wearer is near a hot enough heat source to take damage; and the magical object makes the damage go away in the vicinity of the wearer

@MelinShioto @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games 'If the Kraken is taking the damage, then so is the wearer' are your words, not mine

@pezantri @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games That's not what I said at all! You're saying that the magical item allows the equipment you're wearing to get so hot that it would be injurious; despite it being the equipment that also grants the fire proof effect AND it being the result of a "Warding Effect" from abjuration

@MelinShioto @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games There are times to ignore RAW, but 'fire immunity doesn't protect you from fire' shouldn't be one of them. It's like saying 'Okay, the goblin's attack misses, so it deals this much damage to you'

@pezantri @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games That's only if you go by RAW; problem is, RAW is meant to be a simplification of every possible method of that thing. It's like saying "Dodge only Boosts AC, nothing more. Nothing less"

@FairyTailDragon @EconAdept @GaryD20Games See, that second paragraph really should have come up much sooner. Now you have a reasonable argument.

@pezantri @EconAdept @GaryD20Games Oh, it corrects the issue, because now the problem player needs to actually think about if his next plan will actually work against the DM. It sets boundaries, and it should only be used if the problem player has been talked to, and they keep acting up.

@MelinShioto @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games The armor makes the wearer immune to fire. Nothing more, and nothing less. It's fun to imagine why it works, but that 'why' shouldn't fundamentally alter it into something else.

@pezantri @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games If you imagine immunity as a bubble around your person, sure; but if you imagine it as an magical absorption ability instead, then it protects a personnstanding behind you ALSO

@MelinShioto @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games Weird, it's almost like the acid immunity in the meme suggests that fire immunity doesn't cover everything. Almost as if fire immunity means an immunity to fire or something

@pezantri @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games The fire immunity comes from lessening the effect of the fire. Not from making the wearer immortal

@FairyTailDragon @EconAdept @GaryD20Games Sure, but you can deal with problem players without being a problem DM. The angle taken by you and the original commenter seems like a sure route to escalate an issue rather than correct it

@pezantri @EconAdept @GaryD20Games Nobody likes the chaotic player who doesn't let anyone else play the game either. A battle that could have been a team effort was erased by the one player that decided he was more important than anyone else. Typically, DMs only go that extreme against problem players.

@MelinShioto @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games The wearer is wearing armor that grants them fire immunity while they wear it. The Kraken aasumedly is not. Really not sure why you're struggling with something this basic.

@pezantri @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games If the Kraken is taking the damage, then so is the wearer

@EconAdept @GaryD20Games Imagine making up new mechanics just to be a dick to your players.

@GaryD20Games "Fire immunity. You sir are in an induction oven. Tough shit" "But but but if its immunity to fire it must be immunity to heat!" "If it was technology? Sure. But this is magic baby. Its magically selective."

@MelinShioto @OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games ... Yeah, the Kraken is taking that damage. I'd swear you didn't even read the whole post

@OdahviingN7 @TitanofZ @EconAdept @GaryD20Games If there's no damage; then it doesn't heat up enough to do damage. If it heats up enough to damage, then somebody is taking that damage