
On Day 1, Trump is keeping his promises to the oil and gas billionaires who buried him while throwing gasoline on the fire of climate disasters. "Drill, baby, drill".
The Content Industry
49.5K posts

@phantom_cruiser
World Famous Balloonist, Aspiring Kiwi. A/V nerd & terrible geologist. That guy, from the thing.

On Day 1, Trump is keeping his promises to the oil and gas billionaires who buried him while throwing gasoline on the fire of climate disasters. "Drill, baby, drill".






The U.S. is now spending more on data center construction than on public transportation infrastructure, according to new Census Bureau figures out today (bloomberg.com/news/articles/…)

🚨: Erin Brockovich launches a map tracking AI data centers, and she's asking Americans for help











Vox with a BOMBSHELL admission in the wake of the demise of RCP8.5. “Those numbers shaped a decade and a half of climate journalism, including a lot of my own when I covered climate change at Time magazine. I didn’t always know — and didn’t always communicate — that the scenario behind the most apocalyptic, attention-getting findings was largely an attempt to imagine how bad things could get, not a true forecast. But I wasn’t alone. RCP 8.5 was a frequent background presence in climate journalism.” vox.com/future-perfect…



It's a big problem that tons of climate journalism/ discourse has consistently used the worst case outlier model and presented it as a prediction of what was most likely to happen. But as it stands, even the worst-case scenario is being radically adjusted down. Hopefully climate journalists/ advocates don't just adopt the next worst-case model and instead discuss the most likely scenarios modelers have painted. There's lots of work on this: it doesn't help motivate action to do doomsaying. It feed fatalism on the one hand, and mistrust of models/ climate science on the other (when we remain far from our goals but nothing like the "predicted" outcomes manifests).
