Daniel B

6.4K posts

Daniel B banner
Daniel B

Daniel B

@phlerp

Tradition should be like a torch to pass on, not ashes to be admired. Learn from the past, plan for the future but live in the present. Nostalgia is a cancer.

Stockholm, Sverige Katılım Mayıs 2011
335 Takip Edilen647 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Daniel B
Daniel B@phlerp·
Autocracies don’t have any humor. This sketch from the Swedish Eurovision competition sparked calls from the Russian embassy for the actors to be jailed, though a formal protest was never made. Whatever irritates Russia is good so I’ll just leave this here youtu.be/e1ozCWyUlCg
YouTube video
YouTube
English
3
16
48
6.9K
Daniel B
Daniel B@phlerp·
@oplatsen Det skulle lämna det öppet för en AS2 och kanske en JS3 i framtiden?
Svenska
0
0
0
84
Observationsplatsen
Observationsplatsen@oplatsen·
Vän av ordning undrar nu vad den ska kallas; SS 1? SpaningsSatellit 1🤔
Svenska
13
0
15
4.2K
Daniel B
Daniel B@phlerp·
@bockfot Vem sa att den svenska vikingen inte är en gentleman?
Svenska
0
0
0
13
Daniel B retweetledi
Wiseman
Wiseman@wisemanswisdoms·
@EchoFox03 @GripenNews Bara Sverige och Finland har den djupare förmågan med logistiken som krävs etc. Andra länder kan absolut landa på en väg men inte försörja det bortom just landning, möjligen tankning och i bästa fall en enstaka omladdning.
Svenska
5
9
150
10K
Gripen News
Gripen News@GripenNews·
🇸🇪 Field exercise for conscripts at air base. Everyone has important tasks so as to enable continuous JAS 39 #Gripen flight operations - incl from short track. Base security, preparing runways, rearm/refuel/maintenance, cooking, etc. 📷 Jonas Holmberg/Försvarsmakten/F 17
Gripen News tweet mediaGripen News tweet mediaGripen News tweet mediaGripen News tweet media
English
8
44
329
14.2K
Daniel B
Daniel B@phlerp·
@1Burlington @eDrotning Drones and fighters are comparing apples and oranges. One moves in the littoral air space and the other one at cloud free altitude. You can’t say one cancel out the other one
English
0
0
1
24
Burlington 1
Burlington 1@1Burlington·
@eDrotning They aren't selling it properly. Its not one Gripen vs one Fxx It's 1 Gripen + 1000 radar destroying drones
English
2
0
0
583
Daniel B
Daniel B@phlerp·
@jenniesjoylab The Archer would have fired six shells and driven half a mile from the area and prepared to fire the next salvo.
English
0
0
1
17
Daniel B
Daniel B@phlerp·
@Bananpolo Trumpismen kommer falla i bitar efter honom. Faktum är att sprickorna har redan börjat bli synliga.
Svenska
0
0
0
25
Daniel B
Daniel B@phlerp·
Har fortfarande lite svårt att se vad det föreställer… det är inte en varg iaf 😜
Svenska
0
0
0
10
Robert Fahlström 🇸🇪 🇫🇮
Det här var faktiskt lite oväntat. Trevlig uppskattning för all tid man lagt ner. Kom även underfund med att chefen för MR M och jag legat på samma båt fast olika år, liten värld. 😃
Robert Fahlström 🇸🇪 🇫🇮 tweet media
Svenska
7
1
44
1.6K
Daniel B
Daniel B@phlerp·
@bockfot Det kan aldrig vara den enda sättet att detektera drönare. Jag tror väldigt mycket på den här metoden. Undrar om någon jobbar på det? youtu.be/m-b51C82-UE?is…
YouTube video
YouTube
Svenska
0
0
0
56
Daniel B
Daniel B@phlerp·
@SpaghettiKozak If the west had helped Ukraine bomb the Russian refineries in the first months of the war, the war would have stopped pretty fast. We’re Inadvertently boiling the Russian frog slowly and it’s not to our benefit.
English
0
0
9
281
Brian Butler
Brian Butler@comodco·
@TheEmohawk @ShiningScience My position is that you need isolate your variables if you want to begin distinguish between fact deduction assumption or opinion. Otherwise you’re just gazing through the steam rising off your own bs
English
1
0
10
134
Shining Science
Shining Science@ShiningScience·
🚨: Mia Heller, high school student, 18, invents water filter that eliminates 95.5% of microplastics.
Shining Science tweet mediaShining Science tweet media
English
411
3.2K
23K
14.1M
Erlend
Erlend@eDrotning·
The real question after the fantastic election results in Hungary is; What is going to happen to Orbans Zebras?
Erlend tweet media
English
1
1
10
296
Daniel B
Daniel B@phlerp·
@Bananpolo Jag tror det kan vara lite av ett misstag. Naturligtvis måste de prioritera, men behovet av bepansrade fordon har inte försvunnit. Det visade Ukrainas Kursk-offensiv. Det har tillkommit ett hot, men förr eller senare har vi ett visst mått av motmedel och då ändras balansen igen
Svenska
0
0
0
88
Sparven 🇸🇪🇪🇺 🇺🇦 🇫🇮
Estonia ställer in CV90 köpet för att fokusera på drönarförsvar istället. De förlänger livstiden på existerande fordon med 10 år. Det är förståeligt att ett litet land som Estonia inte har tillräckligt stor plånbok för att kunna göra båda. Tråkigt för oss dock.
(TCAG) Командир Бред Кроуфорд (CDR Brad Crawford)@evo1tactical

Estonia cancels €500M combat vehicle purchase, boosts drone defense. This is exactly the kind of decision that shows Estonia is paying attention to the reality of modern war. Legacy platforms and heavy armor still have a role, but their dominance is fading in a battlefield shaped by drones, AI, and persistent surveillance. Estonia understands that if you are serious about national defense, especially on Russia’s doorstep, you cannot afford to prepare for the last war. You have to prepare for the one that is already happening. This is a smart, disciplined move, and it deserves recognition. The rest of NATO needs to take a hard look at this and start making real changes. Investment has to shift toward drone and AI enabled capabilities at scale, not small test programs. Short range air defense must focus on fast, effective systems designed to defeat drones at low altitude. Not everything needs to be missile based. Radar guided gun systems in the 30mm range and below are going to be critical when facing mass drone threats. At the same time, we need to build depth. National level stockpiles of drone components, batteries, and repair parts are essential. Standardized training programs must be implemented across the force so every soldier understands how to operate drones, counter them, and survive under constant aerial observation. This capability cannot sit at the top. It has to be pushed down. We need company level attack drone teams as a standard, with that capability extending down to the platoon level. That is how you increase combat power without increasing manpower. Small, well trained drone teams are already delivering precision effects that used to require heavy weapons, indirect fire, or air support. When that capability is embedded directly into tactical units, leaders gain immediate options to find, fix, and strike targets in real time without waiting on higher headquarters. At the company level, these teams should be organized, trained, and equipped to conduct continuous operations alongside infantry, armor, and artillery. At the platoon level, smaller, agile drone elements should support maneuver in close contact. This creates layered capability across the formation and dramatically increases lethality, responsiveness, and survivability. This is not a future problem. It is happening now. The battlefield has already changed, and the window to adapt is closing. The nations that move now will be ready. The ones that wait will learn the hard way. Слава Україні. Героям слава. 🇺🇦 news.postimees.ee/8449574/estoni…

Svenska
18
5
120
11K
Daniel B
Daniel B@phlerp·
@evo1tactical This is a mistake. It’s not less of armoured vehicles they need. Its countermeasures added on top. Ukraines offensive into Kursk showed that armoured maneuver warfare is not dead, it has just changed.
English
0
1
1
90
(TCAG) Командир Бред Кроуфорд (CDR Brad Crawford)
Estonia cancels €500M combat vehicle purchase, boosts drone defense. This is exactly the kind of decision that shows Estonia is paying attention to the reality of modern war. Legacy platforms and heavy armor still have a role, but their dominance is fading in a battlefield shaped by drones, AI, and persistent surveillance. Estonia understands that if you are serious about national defense, especially on Russia’s doorstep, you cannot afford to prepare for the last war. You have to prepare for the one that is already happening. This is a smart, disciplined move, and it deserves recognition. The rest of NATO needs to take a hard look at this and start making real changes. Investment has to shift toward drone and AI enabled capabilities at scale, not small test programs. Short range air defense must focus on fast, effective systems designed to defeat drones at low altitude. Not everything needs to be missile based. Radar guided gun systems in the 30mm range and below are going to be critical when facing mass drone threats. At the same time, we need to build depth. National level stockpiles of drone components, batteries, and repair parts are essential. Standardized training programs must be implemented across the force so every soldier understands how to operate drones, counter them, and survive under constant aerial observation. This capability cannot sit at the top. It has to be pushed down. We need company level attack drone teams as a standard, with that capability extending down to the platoon level. That is how you increase combat power without increasing manpower. Small, well trained drone teams are already delivering precision effects that used to require heavy weapons, indirect fire, or air support. When that capability is embedded directly into tactical units, leaders gain immediate options to find, fix, and strike targets in real time without waiting on higher headquarters. At the company level, these teams should be organized, trained, and equipped to conduct continuous operations alongside infantry, armor, and artillery. At the platoon level, smaller, agile drone elements should support maneuver in close contact. This creates layered capability across the formation and dramatically increases lethality, responsiveness, and survivability. This is not a future problem. It is happening now. The battlefield has already changed, and the window to adapt is closing. The nations that move now will be ready. The ones that wait will learn the hard way. Слава Україні. Героям слава. 🇺🇦 news.postimees.ee/8449574/estoni…
English
51
565
2.1K
101.2K
Daniel B
Daniel B@phlerp·
@NS_Grateful @MeanwhileInUA Absolutely. It’s a good system, but for some reason people don’t seem to understand the difference between effective range and firing range.
English
0
0
1
26
Meanwhile in Ukraine
Meanwhile in Ukraine@MeanwhileInUA·
Not every answer to Russian drones has to cost a fortune. Sweden is sending Ukraine a smarter one. ㅤ Ukraine will receive modern Tridon Mk2 air defense systems as part of Sweden’s aid, with €400 million allocated for their procurement. The system uses a 40 mm Bofors automatic cannon, works day and night in all weather, can hit targets up to 12 km away, and uses programmable airburst munitions that are especially effective against drones and cruise missiles. Just as important, its cost per shot is relatively low, which matters in a war where cheap mass attacks are meant to drain expensive defenses. ㅤ This is what real support looks like: not words, but a practical shield Ukraine can keep using. ㅤ
English
63
850
4.2K
87.4K