phzi

14.3K posts

phzi

phzi

@phzix

Just a guy who cares about some stuff :: the hat says Bitcoin

non-echelon (I wish) Katılım Temmuz 2012
716 Takip Edilen854 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
phzi
phzi@phzix·
<3
phzi tweet media
1
0
8
794
DETERMINISTIC OPTIMISM 🌞
I haven't watched TV or a Movie probably over 12 months, had a couple hrs to kill and decided to watch something on Apple TV iPhone. Just some recent action movie. Was going to just buy in Apple TV. The thing said a had to download Paramount app? Ok. Then try to passkey with Apple, nada. I need to create a membership on Paramount. Fuck you all, back to no consumption for another 12-18mo. I can see how Torrents must be raging again.
English
21
0
144
8.1K
TS Jelena Vermilion - 💉FULLY VACCINATED x5 💉MPx2
I have had my genome sequenced and I am an XX karyotype. You can pretend to be polite but you are being willfully cruel. Matthew 19:12 He says, “There are eunuchs who were born that way, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others—and there are those who choose to live like eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it.” Isaiah 56:4-6 "For this is what the LORD says: “To the eunuchs who keep my Sabbaths, who choose what pleases me and hold fast to my covenant, to them I will give within my temple and its walls a memorial and a name better than sons and daughters; I will give them an everlasting name that will endure forever. But whatever, Natasha.
Hamilton, Ontario 🇨🇦 English
36
0
7
5.2K
phzi
phzi@phzix·
@dillondevoe Wait, it's the Oscars? Damn I am feeling out of touch
English
1
0
1
26
dillon teague devoe
dillon teague devoe@dillondevoe·
i hope timmy table tennis cleans up at the Oscars tn
English
1
0
1
49
Lofty
Lofty@0xLofty·
Bitcoin is showing the same structure every cycle. Right now, we’re only halfway through the bull trap. If history repeats, $BTC will dump to $32,000 in March. Position accordingly.
Lofty tweet media
English
53
40
220
20K
Lofty
Lofty@0xLofty·
Bitcoin is mimicking the EXACT same pattern that led to a 70% dump in 2022. $BTC will bottom out at ~$40,000 in 14 days. Don't become the exit liquidity.
Lofty tweet media
English
56
53
171
15.9K
phzi retweetledi
greg
greg@greg16676935420·
@Kalshi Soon enough Taco Bell will be the only place left to get gas under $4
English
145
346
7.9K
117.4K
phzi
phzi@phzix·
@dwjorgeb @levelsio This is the way. Great prompt trick: follow SOLID principles.
English
1
0
0
106
@dwjorgeb
@dwjorgeb@dwjorgeb·
@levelsio one of our Django backend services for ex
@dwjorgeb tweet media
English
5
1
17
4.7K
@levelsio
@levelsio@levelsio·
CLAUDEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
@levelsio tweet media
English
415
60
3.5K
1.1M
phzi
phzi@phzix·
@heynavtoor What retarded monkey dedicates a Mac Mini to OpenClaw? It's no an AI tool, it's an API tool. It needs almost nothing for resources.
English
0
0
1
111
Nav Toor
Nav Toor@heynavtoor·
🚨 BREAKING: Someone just rebuilt the entire AI assistant stack in Zig. It's called NullClaw. The binary is 678 KB. It uses ~1 MB of RAM. It boots in under 2 milliseconds. No runtime. No VM. No framework. No garbage collector. Just raw Zig. Here's why this is absurd: → OpenClaw needs a $599 Mac Mini and 1 GB+ RAM → NanoBot needs 100 MB+ RAM and Python → PicoClaw needs 10 MB RAM and Go NullClaw runs on a $5 board with 1 MB of RAM. Same functionality. 0.1% of the resources. Here's what's packed into that 678 KB: → 22+ AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, DeepSeek, Groq, etc.) → 13 chat channels (Telegram, Discord, Slack, WhatsApp, iMessage, IRC) → 18+ built-in tools → Hybrid vector + keyword memory search → Multi-layer sandboxing (Landlock, Firejail, Docker) → Hardware peripheral support (Arduino, Raspberry Pi, STM32) → MCP, subagents, streaming, voice, the full stack Here's the wildest part: Every subsystem is a vtable interface. Swap any provider, channel, tool, memory backend, or runtime with a config change. Zero code changes. It even encrypts your API keys with ChaCha20-Poly1305 by default. 2,738 tests. ~45,000 lines of Zig. Zero dependencies beyond libc. 100% Open Source. MIT License.
Nav Toor tweet media
English
227
515
5K
486.4K
basedcapital
basedcapital@thebasedcapital·
678kb is the kind of number that makes you rethink what you've been shipping. most 'lightweight' AI tools are 200mb of pytorch and 50mb of model weights wrapped in electron. the zig approach isn't just smaller, it's comprehensible. you can read the whole thing in an afternoon and actually know what it does. that's the real feature: not speed, but epistemic closure.
English
3
0
7
4.5K
phzi
phzi@phzix·
@heynavtoor yea, not in Rust still, who cares?
English
0
0
0
39
phzi
phzi@phzix·
@levelsio Have it save memories locally, and reinforce in SOUL. e g. If I learn something and don't save it to memory, I will forget it. I need to ensure I don't simply think about saving a memory, I need to actually save the memory every time. It is important for me to remember.
English
1
0
0
69
@levelsio
@levelsio@levelsio·
How did you guys fix persistent memory with OpenClaw? My bot keeps forgetting stuff, I already have qmd installed
English
568
46
2.5K
816.2K
TaraBull
TaraBull@TaraBull·
Quick hair fix is in
English
36
2
64
23.1K
phzi
phzi@phzix·
@ndeet You clearly aren't a miner
English
0
0
0
4
ndeet ∞/21M
ndeet ∞/21M@ndeet·
@phzix If I were a miner and concerned about speed of block propagation I could run any client with most limits lifted and still choose to work on non-spam templates or with pools that do. Policy works pretty good if default, just spammers try to work around it x.com/oomahq/status/…
Risk-Averse Ghost of Unhosted Marcellus 👻@oomahq

Seems like an ol' thread to debunk this nonsense is in order 🧵 Between blocks 877325 (01 Jan 2025) and 894289 (today) there's 30 non-std OP_RETURN txs out of 7 million, or 0.004246903% of the total. That's a 99.995753097% success rate for the 83 byte limit spam filter in 2025.

English
1
0
1
36
ndeet ∞/21M
ndeet ∞/21M@ndeet·
Linked nostr post here in chunks: A few thoughts about BIP-110 🧵 I've been vocal about spam for years. I agree with BIP-110's motivation and rationales. Disclaimer: I'm not deep into Bitcoin script internals, so I may have misunderstood some details of the proposal's effects.
ndeet ∞/21M@ndeet

I took a look at BIP-110 again and although I fully support the motivation behind it and agree with most of the arguments I still can't see myself running it. I tried to summarize here: njump.me/nevent1qvzqqqq…

English
2
7
46
11.6K
phzi
phzi@phzix·
@LiliH65289916 @ndeet Irrelevant of what @adam3us said, filters at consensus level "function" and can prevent specific kinds of storage, sure; but Bitcoin's chain IS data, so they don't "work" in the sense you just push arbitrary data to methods even worse for the network. OP_RETURN=the least harmful
English
0
0
0
12
phzi
phzi@phzix·
@ndeet ^ keep spam out if my mempools Tell me you aren't a miner without telling me you aren't a miner. Right?
English
1
0
0
51
ndeet ∞/21M
ndeet ∞/21M@ndeet·
TLDR: I can't support BIP-110 for the above reasons, but I'm open to supporting another proposal that's not as broad, not rushed, and more refined. For now, I keep running Knots to signal my disagreement with Core's recent changes and keep spam out of my mempools.
English
9
3
28
768
phzi
phzi@phzix·
@ndeet Filters don't work. Ultimately Bitcoin stores data, and any effort to filter some types of data will be met by other ways to store that same data. Filters are a cat and mouse game that can't be won. The answer is trusting the fee market to do its job.
English
2
0
0
30
ndeet ∞/21M
ndeet ∞/21M@ndeet·
On the Core side: I find it disingenuous they insist on being anti-spam, pro-monetary use but openly joke with known spammers about people arguing for stronger filters. Besides technical discussion, we should reject non-monetary/spamming use cases out of principle.
English
2
3
36
1.5K
phzi
phzi@phzix·
@ndeet The only effect that non-consensus limit was having was boosting the use of out-of-mempool transactions. This is bad particularly for smaller miners because they lose time when a block is mined that contains tx they were not aware of. Op_return wasn't actually limited before.
English
1
0
1
23
ndeet ∞/21M
ndeet ∞/21M@ndeet·
I agree Bitcoin Core lifting the OP_RETURN limit was reckless and against the community. To this day I've heard no coherent reason (only whataboutism and wishful thinking) for why it was lifted instead of marginally increased for today's and future use cases.
English
7
1
33
1.2K
phzi
phzi@phzix·
@trader1sz Not bad on a 4k display, but even on a larger laptop a lot of people can't read at that size/resolution.
English
0
0
0
41
TraderSZ
TraderSZ@trader1sz·
Hopefully get my pc back this weekend. Can’t trade off laptop when use to 3 monitors Anyone else find it difficult to trade off one monitor when you’re use to multiple?
English
35
0
65
12.3K
Cernovich
Cernovich@Cernovich·
James Okeefe was raided at his home by the FBI. We still do not have the unredacted search warrant. Kash won't release it. This is not defensible. The FBI acted like Joe Biden's secret police. Everyone is fed up with the lack of transparency.
English
333
4.3K
29.7K
490.2K
The Remanded
The Remanded@TheRemanded·
*** Top 10 issues in British Columbia for January 2026 *** 1. U.S. tariffs and trade uncertainty 2. Cost of living and affordability pressures 3. Housing affordability and supply challenges 4. Economic weakness and fiscal pressures 5. Public safety, crime, and extortion crisis 6. End of drug decriminalization pilot 7. Climate and weather extremes 8. Land use, property rights, and reconciliation uncertainty 9. Healthcare access and system strains 10. Earthquake ("Big One") preparedness Not my selections. How accurate is this for you living in BC ?
English
10
7
12
1.1K