

PPE
77.6K posts

@planert41
Using Twitter as unusual flow journal. Also personal acct Politics, Psychology, Economics, Markets Event Driven Short Squeeze Trader RT are likely bookmarks





It's not just the United States: "Over 100,000 young Australian men are not in work, education, or training. University enrolments are 61% female. The manufacturing economy is gone. Young men in Australia are facing a bleak future."




CHINA IS RESTRICTING OVERSEAS TRAVEL FOR TOP AI PROFESSIONALS IN PRIVATE FIRMS SUCH AS ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING AND DEEPSEEK

CHINA IS RESTRICTING OVERSEAS TRAVEL FOR TOP AI PROFESSIONALS IN PRIVATE FIRMS SUCH AS ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING AND DEEPSEEK

Omg Korea is soooo savage. My friend failed her job interview in Korea and she said it's because she was overweight... apparently, the interviewer said "if you can't even manage your fat, how will you manage a job?" WTHHHHH Do they really say those things straight up to the job applicants?

This is one of the craziest stories ever. And it's full of insights you can apply in life and work. Chung Ju-yung started so poor that he ate tree bark as a kid to survive. Before he passed away, he was one of the ten richest people in the world. His autobiography describes how he escaped poverty, developed the mindset to succeed, founded Hyundai (one of the world's largest conglomerates), and lifted an entire country out of poverty. Every time I read this book, I'm inspired to go faster and further. Listen to his story here: • Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/1Y2afl… • Apple: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/out…



some intern at mckinsey is probably slopcoating a report on this but let me give you an insider news: most large corps are not happy with the agentic systems & POCs they’ve done this year. 2025 was supposed to be the year of agents. so far it’s been the year of letdowns.

Singapore's most senior diplomat just stood on Chinese soil and told the Chinese state directly: we cooperate with you because of shared interests, not because of shared blood. That sentence is more significant than it sounds. Lee Hsien Loong, Singapore's former Prime Minister and current Senior Minister, completed a five-day visit to China last week, meeting officials in Guangxi and Shanghai. Speaking to Singapore media on May 22, he was direct: "We are a Chinese-majority country, but we are a multiracial society. We are a separate country with separate sovereignty from China." He added that Singapore's ties with China are grounded in mutual benefit, not shared ethnicity or ancestry. This is a deliberate and pointed statement. The CCP has spent decades promoting the idea that ethnic Chinese people around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a special bond with the Chinese motherland. The concept of 同宗同源, meaning "same ancestry, same roots," is embedded in Chinese state rhetoric aimed at diaspora communities across Southeast Asia, including Singapore's Chinese majority. United Front Work Department operations, diaspora engagement programs, and state media all lean on this framing to cultivate affinity, influence, and loyalty among overseas Chinese populations. Lee Hsien Loong said that is not the basis of Singapore's relationship with China. Singapore cooperates with Beijing because it serves Singapore's interests. Full stop. The moment those interests diverge, the shared ethnicity changes nothing. Singapore has maintained this position since Lee Kuan Yew built the country. It rejects the "Third China" label. It maintains strong ties with the United States, Japan, and the West while trading extensively with Beijing. It is ethnically Chinese-majority and fiercely sovereign. That combination makes it a direct challenge to the CCP's narrative that Chinese ethnicity implies Chinese political alignment. Lee said it in Shanghai. In front of Chinese media. After visiting Chinese officials. The message was intentional and the audience was chosen carefully. #Singapore #China #CCP #LeeHsienLoong #Sovereignty #Geopolitics #SoutheastAsia #UnitedFront #Diaspora #ASEAN



Chris Camillo reveals SpaceX kicked him out at a $220B valuation right before the IPO "I invested in SpaceX at $33 billion. The fund I invested in claimed to have run out of money to pay their legal bills in California at $220 billion and forced us out of the stock" "I got pulled out of SpaceX at $220 billion and it really upsets me now watching this IPO. My plan was always to hold it through the IPO" "I did make 8x, but it would have made a lot more"
