💣🎇
4.1K posts

💣🎇
@playoffchard
#LetsGoOilers | #DallasCowboys | #MFFL Oilers 2026 Stanley Cup Champions
Katılım Eylül 2019
107 Takip Edilen90 Takipçiler

@dhockey13 Not even mad because it benefits us in the long run, but to lose in this way (horrible luck and bad play from our best players) hurts a bit
English

@EdmontonOilers @sentinelstorage Every bounce, every call, injury luck, it was never meant to be for us. A few coaching changes and we'll be back next year
English

@winnietheb23926 @JLazzy23 I remember something else like this happening with Campbell all the way in preseason but I couldn't find that video, this was the best I could find
English

@winnietheb23926 @JLazzy23 Here's something similar to what happened here, it's not exact but it's as close as I could find, you can visually tell the puck went in the net but you can't actually see it definitively @bardown/video/7497091830299872517" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tiktok.com/@bardown/video…
English

@spillymacgil @tyleryaremchuk Saying "because their biased" isn't a valid argument, do you have a photo where the puck visually crossed the line and you can actually see that it did?
English

@playoffchard @tyleryaremchuk The other people in the world saying it shouldn’t have counted are all wearing copper tinted glasses. The puck went in… you’ll go to bed angry, but it’s because you know it went in… tomorrow will be a better day. Probably because they don’t play.
English

@winnietheb23926 @JLazzy23 No, they wouldn't have called it a goal because you can't visually see it cross the line. That's how their ruling works, they don't draw lines to see if it went in
English

@playoffchard @JLazzy23 ok but even if they call it no goal … they review it … it’s a goal … i’m sorry i wanted the oil but cmon

English

@spillymacgil @tyleryaremchuk I'm not the only person in the world saying it shouldn't have counted. The call on the ice should've been no goal (because nobody saw it go in) and the final call should've been no goal because there wasn't any definitive evidence it went it. Drawing a red line isn't definitive
English

@playoffchard @tyleryaremchuk Clearly you don’t know how they make their calls considering the call they made and the fact that you don’t agree with it… the puck was in. You don’t have to like it, but it was in.
English

@minnStockBets @JLazzy23 There's no definitive proof to see it was over the line, especially considering not one of them had any chance of seeing it
English


@manholeassessor @JLazzy23 So they called it based off feel rather than what they saw
English

@playoffchard @JLazzy23 they didnt, dumb fuck. they had to stop play to determine if it was or not.
English

@spillymacgil @tyleryaremchuk That's not how their decision making works, if it's definitive then yes it'd be a goal, but there is 0 video evidence to indicate it'd be a goal
English

@tyleryaremchuk Even if they called it no goal, on the review, that’s in. You know it is…
English

@playoffchard @EdmontonOilers @sentinelstorage So what do you think McDavid and Tkachuk are gonna talk about on the 4th tee box on the course?? 🏌️♂️⛳️
English


@TheCity0fChamps @thackattack41 Logically it went in, but the NHL is all about video evidence, and is there video evidence? No, you can say inconclusive or whatever but still the call on the ice should not have been a goal, not one ref saw it
English

@tconn2 @EdmontonOilers @sentinelstorage That doesn't mean anything lmao, they played the same amount of series' in those runs
English

@playoffchard @EdmontonOilers @sentinelstorage Difference is Florida has 2 cups to show for it. Edmonton a goose egg. They’ll be with the panthers on the golf course shortly.
English











