poingly

producer x becomes virtuosic with models. He can’t sing or play a traditional instrument so well but like all great producers searches for what he needs to hear and spends months producing a 4 track ep of a new sound. producer y learns on YouTube how to make generic beats from sample packs and pushes out a few a day Whose art is more human and whose art do you want to hear? A lazy assumption with ai is that the laziest people use it, and the most dedicated people use traditional tools that is silly why wouldn’t humans thirsty for new sounds use models that let you infinitely rabbit hole on creating sounds? Are software developers running claude code agents lazy or insatiable? I am insatiable. I want more sounds and opportunities to cut and mutate and intervene

It is necessary to filter soundspam and getting the language right for a policy like this is hard When they say that music "generated wholly or in substantial part by AI" is not welcome, that is understandable in the case of a bot posting 1000 generic songs a day. That is a spam issue. I am also compelled to push back against banning human artists for experimenting with an era defining medium

Dearborn is literally filled with inbred 7th century cavemen. Clear them out.

In Ireland, a new group called 'New Republican Movement' has claimed that local representatives are "legitimate targets". Mass immigration and indoctrination of children in schools are cited as reasons for these "legitimate targets".