P o l o
10.7K posts

P o l o retweetledi

P o l o retweetledi

@ObviousRises @MittenAnya "Seizing the Central Bank of Iran is about deleting the last off-grid gold reserves."
This is exactly what former Bush Assistant Secretary said in a recent interview with Tucker Carlson.
youtu.be/BvLz1bI2sXU?si…

YouTube
English

@Ajwritescrypto food for thought: You made everyone buy $jasmy . What happened "aj writes crypto" ? 🤣 the gayest username on the blockchain
English

Food for thought…
5 years ago today, Solana was $13.81.
That’s actually INSANE when you think about it.
Back then, most people thought it was dead and buried.
Cooked.
No second chance.
No redemption arc.
Just another project left for dead.
Then by January 2025, it had ripped over 2000%. 🚀
If you told people that was coming when SOL was sitting at $13, they would’ve laughed at you.
There’s a lesson here…
Because this is EXACTLY where altcoins are this very moment.
Sentiment is broken. Faith is gone. Most people have already mentally checked out.
Over the years, I’ve learned that the big money is NEVER made when everyone believes.
It’s made when the crowd is exhausted, crypto twitter is toxic, the chart looks dead, and conviction is the only thing left.
The people who win don’t wait for permission.
They don’t wait for headlines.
They don’t wait for it to feel safe.
You either have conviction, or you don’t.
When the tables turn, where will you be?

English

@RuneScape How much are bonds now ? If I for the annual yearly membership it don’t affect me ??
English

On April 9, the price of Memberships will be changing. Prices for New Memberships & Bonds have changed as of today, March 10.
Members on active Grandfather Rate monthly subscriptions will not be affected.
Find out more: secure.runescape.com/m=news/members…
English
P o l o retweetledi

Jack Dorsey just fired half his company.
Not gradually but all at once.
More than 4,000 people, gone.
And the stock didn't crash, it EXPLODED 22%.
Here's what's really going on.
Block, the company behind Cash App, Square and Afterpay, just announced the largest AI driven layoff in corporate history.
Headcount is being cut from 10,000 to under 6,000.
This was not a distress signal.
The company is profitable and the revenue is growing.
Dorsey chose this.
His exact words: "Intelligence tools have changed what it means to build and run a company."
"A significantly smaller team, using the tools we're building, can do more and do it better."
Translation: AI can do their jobs now. So they're gone.
But here's the part that should concern everyone.
Dorsey didn't stop there.
He said most companies will reach the same conclusion within a year.
"I'd rather get there honestly and on our own terms than be forced into it reactively."
He's not apologizing but he's warning.
The numbers tell the story Wall Street wanted to hear.
Block's 2026 profit guidance: up 54%.
Earnings per share projection of $3.66, crushing analyst expectations of $3.22.
Gross profit growing 18%.
The math is brutal but simple, fewer humans, more margins.
Inside the company, this has been building for months.
Block already cut 10% of staff earlier this month and 1,000 more last year.
Every remaining employee was required to use AI tools daily.
AI fluency was built into performance reviews.
If you couldn't keep up, you were next.
The internal AI platform is called "Goose."
It started as a small engineering test tool two years ago.
Now nearly every employee uses it.
Engineers are shipping 40% more code per person than they were six months ago.
That's the productivity gain that made 4,000 people expendable.
And here's the part nobody is talking about.
Days before this announcement, a research firm called Citrini published a fictional scenario:
AI tools so powerful they forced mass layoffs across America.
It rattled markets.
Then Block made it real.
Wall Street's reaction is the most dangerous signal of all.
A company fires half its people and stock rockets 22%.
Every board in America just watched that happen.
Every CEO just did the math.
Every worker should understand what that math means for them.
This is not one company's decision, this is a blueprint.
The question is no longer whether AI will replace jobs.
It's how fast.

Evan@StockMKTNewz
Jack Dorsey owned Block $XYZ just announced it is laying off roughly 50% of its workforce or 4,000 employees - CNBC Block stock is up by 20% 🟢 in after-hours
English

@Justin_Bons Ur either high as fuck. Or ur biased as fuck cus u have certain bags. Either way, u sound like a complete moron.
I didn’t read this whole thread either. Def wasn’t worth the 60 seconds of what I had already read.
English

We must reject all centralized "blockchains"!
This includes Ripple, Canton, Stellar, Hedera & Algorand
Centralization is not the future of finance; requiring permission from an authority is not decentralized!
Do not be fooled by their lies, as the truth will set us free: 🧵
Ripple: Has a "Unique Node List", which makes the validators effectively permissioned. As any divergence from this centrally published list would cause a fork, effectively giving the Ripple Foundation & company absolute power & control over the chain
Canton: The validator set is totally permissioned!
Stellar: A similar set-up to XRP, except that they call it "recommended Tier 1 organizations," which is published by the Stellar Development Foundation. However, just like XRP, a high overlap is required, or you risk forking off the network. Effectively putting the power in the hands of the list creator
Hedera: The validator set is totally permissioned!
Algorand: The "relay nodes" in ALGO are still totally permissioned. Despite validators being permissionless, anyone now has the option to run a "participation node" after they recently implemented a P2P network as an alternative means to propagate TXs. Which means the relay nodes can no longer act as gatekeepers. However, it is unclear how much removing them entirely would affect performance today. Possibly making them a necessary aspect of ALGO's current design
Forms of Consensus:
Within a blockchain context, there are only three forms of consensus: Proof of Stake, Proof of Work & Proof of Authority
If a blockchain does not use PoS or PoW, it is, by definition, PoA! As this was fundamentally an unsolved problem before blockchain came along, which solved this problem through the use of token-based incentives, either through stake or work
Anything that does not fit that consensus model is instead fundamentally based on authority/trust. In the case of XRP & XLM, it is important to keep in mind that choosing who we trust is not the same as trustlessness!
Binary Choice:
A blockchain is either fully permissionless or it is not. ALGO has permissioned elements in its design, so it is still "centralized". A crude way to use language, but we do still need understandable schelling points in crypto. As decentralization is a spectrum, permissionlesness is only one element of that bigger picture. However, personally, any permissioned elements are a deal breaker for me, as it is so anti-thetical to the ethos of crypto that it defeats its entire raison detre
Institutional Adoption:
Much like the early internet, big institutions are uncomfortable using fully permissionless, public & decentralized networks. So, much like the early internet, those institutions will be left behind. The big winners are the crypto natives. That is true historically & it will also be true in the future too. The big winners during the early internet were the newcomers, not the old guard, for the same reasons we see playing out in crypto now
Conclusion:
The future of finance is decentralized & permissionless. If you cannot understand that, it is fine. There are other options for you on the free market
But let's not pretend as if these chains are really playing a part in this revolution. Quite the opposite, centralized "crypto" is a distraction that only slows the goals of our movement down
So, if you care about crypto. Reject these permissioned chains & demand they decentralize. In the meantime, we should vote with our feet & support chains that carry our movement forward towards its intended goals instead
Credible neutrality, censorship resistance, privacy, immutability & more can only be achieved on a fully permissionless & decentralized blockchain
That is the revolution we were promised & that is the future we can now bring about with the choices we make collectively
Crypto is on the right side of history, disrupting power away from centralized authorities to help create a freer & more equitable world! 🔥
English

@shaggyrax 96% down. Cardano is over. All about gettin @IOHK_Charles locked up now 🎯
English
P o l o retweetledi

⚡️#BREAKING Latest Epstein files appear to list Illuminati Families and Associates, claiming Jeffery Epstein was a member of the Illuminati North American Group



English
P o l o retweetledi
P o l o retweetledi

Dead projects:
- Monad
- Starknet
- Zksync
- Srcoll
- Aleo
- Mina
- Linea
- Boba network
– Aptos
– Cosmos
– NEAR
– Rootstock
– Cardano
– Stellar
– Cronos
– Axelar
– Astar
– Bittensor
– Celo
– Zircuit
– EOS
– Sonic
– Injective
– Kaia
– Kava
– Lisk
– Metis
– Tezos
- Wormhole
- Movement
- Kinto
- Celestia
- Blast
- PIN AI
- Midas
- Kinto
- Metis
- 0G
- Polygon zkEVM
- Berachain
- Story
These chains were so popular at some point
English
P o l o retweetledi
P o l o retweetledi

BREAKING: Epstein did not just fund Bitcoin's rise. He funded the hijack. Maxis always screech "Which code did Epstein fund?" Here are the receipts: Straight line from pedo cash to small blocks, SegWit/LN gatekeeping, and US CBDC pilots. Wake up. BTC is Pedo Coin:
1/ Epstein drops $500k into Blockstream's 2014 seed round via Kyara Investments (co-owned with Joi Ito). Blockstream pushes sidechains/L2. Benefits massively from small blocks. Divested quick, but the stink remains. This sets the stage for the Blocksize Wars sabotage.
2/ About 8 months later (2015), Epstein's gift funds (about $525k to MIT DCI) rescue Bitcoin Core devs after Foundation collapse. Hires Cory Fields, Wladimir van der Laan, Gavin Andresen. Ito credits Epstein for letting them move quickly and win this round. Hijack begins.
3/ These devs? Straight-up gatekeepers. Cory Fields: Refactors net code for faster propagation (pre-SegWit), works on libbitcoinconsensus, SegWit testnet launch, build systems for reproducible builds. Key for secure small-block chain. Also on Brink grants committee now.
4/Van der Laan: Lead maintainer since 2014. Merges code, oversees releases. Gatekeeps consensus, pushes SegWit activation (2017). Still at MIT, focuses on wallet/privacy but enforces small-block conservatism. No big blocks? Blame this decentralization facade.
5/ Gavin? Starts at MIT but gets ousted 2016-17 for pushing bigger blocks (XT/Classic). Clashes with small-blockers. Proves gatekeeping: Dissenters sidelined. Now retired, critiques BTC's direction. Epstein cash solidified the small-block cartel that killed on-chain scaling.
6/ SegWit/LN: Epstein-funded devs execute. SegWit (BIP141) fixes malleability for LN, boosts capacity softly. No hard fork. Fields contributes to testnet, code reviews, builds. Van der Laan merges. LN? Needs SegWit. Turns BTC into settlement layer for elites, not P2P cash.
7/ Gatekeeping forks: Core devs control reference client. Reject big-block proposals (e.g., SegWit2x halted for no consensus). Rhetoric: Big blocks equal centralization attack. Result? BTC locked at 1MB, fees skyrocket, narrative shifts to digital gold (Epstein's 2017 pitch).
8/ The endgame? Cory Fields jumps from SegWit/LN to co-authoring Project Hamilton's 2022 CBDC white paper (Boston Fed/MIT). Designs transaction processor for digital dollar. UTXO-like but centralized. Epstein's hijack: From BTC sabotage to Fed CBDC blueprint. Coincidence? No.
9/ Maxis: Deny this? You are complicit in the hijack. BTC is not decentralized. It is Epstein-tainted, gatekept garbage.
English
P o l o retweetledi

@cryptorover where the hell has this guy been? there's plenty use-case, when the billionaires are done lining their pockets. how many eth has this guy sold in the past year lol. dude doesn't even believe in his own tech anymore.
English

















