pooja

15 posts

pooja

pooja

@poojsngh

Building things @Microsoft 💻 | 📦 | 🔨 | 🛠️ | ☕️

Seattle, WA Katılım Kasım 2009
65 Takip Edilen4 Takipçiler
pooja
pooja@poojsngh·
@lufthansa Your new user creation workflow is also broken! Repo: 1. Register for travel ID -> Enter Email, Password -> Continue 2. Register with Miles & More -> Activate Later 3. Your personal details -> Enter details -> Consent to Communicate -> Enter 4. Activate from email -> Login 5. Enter Login Info -> Takes me back to entering Login info. (Btw your system doesn’t recognize users who already have an account) Please start using Social Authentication. You are losing business over problems that have been solved in the last century.
English
1
0
2
38
pooja
pooja@poojsngh·
@lufthansa Not a me problem, the API is broken, the error doesn’t show what the issue is. Do you not allow guest checkouts? The website is super frustrating to use.
English
2
0
1
41
Lufthansa
Lufthansa@lufthansa·
@poojsngh Hello there! I’m sorry to hear about the issues you are experiencing with our website. If you encounter any technical problems, please reach out to my colleagues from technical support: lufthansa.com/de/en/faq-onli…. They will be able to assist you further. /Livi
English
2
0
0
642
pooja
pooja@poojsngh·
@lufthansa FYI!!!! Your ticket booking system is broken. Tried multiple browsers, all required fields are correct, keeps showing the error, unable to "continue to payment".
pooja tweet media
English
7
1
5
696
pooja retweetledi
Min Choi
Min Choi@minchoi·
Claude Code users are quietly switching from Markdown to HTML. Specs, PR reviews, reports, prototypes, editors. HTML is becoming the new agent artifact. Bookmark this.
Min Choi tweet media
Thariq@trq212

x.com/i/article/2052…

English
72
90
819
197.4K
pooja
pooja@poojsngh·
@dudat3ch Either that or agents operate under scoped identities with predefined authority. The whole “YOLO mode” thing feels very hacky.
English
0
0
0
6
Duda Tech
Duda Tech@dudat3ch·
@poojsngh I like “ask once, then fail loud” more than --yolo for this. If a long run needs permission, it should leave a resumable checkpoint + exact command it wanted, not silently burn 6 hours at a prompt.
English
1
0
0
23
pooja
pooja@poojsngh·
Woke up at 3AM in panic. Forgot to add --yolo to my long-running agent. Somewhere in the dark, a terminal had been patiently waiting 6 hours for permission to continue.
English
1
0
2
71
pooja
pooja@poojsngh·
If you don’t feel strongly about accessibility, try using a screen reader for a day. It’ll change your perspective fast. So many products are nearly impossible to navigate, and most of it is fixable with small, deliberate choices. Adding jest-axe to unit tests and axe-core/playwright to E2E tests takes minutes. No good excuse not to.
English
0
0
0
32
pooja
pooja@poojsngh·
The agent is working remotely, yet somehow I still can’t leave the room.
English
0
0
1
36
pooja
pooja@poojsngh·
@lucasmeijer “What would have helped the agent reach its goal faster?” This stuck with me.
English
0
0
1
35
pooja
pooja@poojsngh·
@davidfowl Yes if approvals don’t count as steps. Azure Devops + Teams for notifications.
English
0
0
1
138
David Fowler
David Fowler@davidfowl·
How many of you have a single step, fully automated release process?
English
71
0
73
22.9K
pooja
pooja@poojsngh·
Shipping fast is the glamorous part everyone celebrates. Devs quietly fixing bugs and regressions, reducing customer frustration, and improving reliability are doing work that often goes unnoticed. It takes patience, product understanding, and empathy for customers you’ll never meet. There’s probably an engineer on your team doing exactly this right now. Tell them it matters.
English
0
0
0
60
pooja
pooja@poojsngh·
@shekkizh @Claude Reliability comes from validation pipelines and feedback loops, not from never making a typo.
English
1
0
0
35
sarath
sarath@shekkizh·
It’s 2026 and llms (@claude sonnet 4.6) still make grammar mistakes. crazy to let these things run wild. The rarest of mistakes but a reminder that these are still ML models, not magical reasoning systems.
sarath tweet media
English
1
0
0
43
Allen Braden
Allen Braden@allen_explains·
Andrej Karpathy could have packaged this into a $2,000 masterclass. Instead, he uploaded it to YouTube for free. Three hours covering how modern LLMs actually work: tokenization, neural nets, RLHF, hallucinations, tool use, reinforcement learning, and systems like AlphaGo and DeepSeek. This isn’t about prompts. It’s about understanding the machine behind the magic.
English
15
112
514
159.6K
pooja retweetledi
andy
andy@1a1n1d1y·
presented without comment
andy tweet media
English
295
101
2.5K
465.3K
pooja retweetledi
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
Jensen Huang just called out every CEO who’s been firing people “because of AI.” Jim Cramer asked him why companies are laying people off if AI is supposed to make everyone MORE productive. Jensen's answer: "For companies with imagination, you will do more with more. For companies where the leadership is just out of ideas, they have nothing else to do. They have no reason to imagine greater than they are. When they have more capability, they don't do more." Read that again. The man who built the most important tech company on Earth just told you that if your CEO is using AI to cut headcount, it means one thing: They have no imagination. They have no vision for what comes next. They got handed the most powerful tool in human history and their FIRST instinct was to fire people. This is the CEO of NVIDIA. The company whose chips power every AI system on the planet. If anyone on Earth has the right to say "AI replaces workers," it's Jensen Huang. And he said the OPPOSITE. He said every carpenter could become an architect. Every plumber could become an architect. AI elevates capability. It doesn't eliminate it. But here's where it gets really interesting... During the same interview, Jensen revealed something nobody's talking about: He said AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic are seeing their revenues increase by one to two billion dollars a WEEK. And he wishes these companies were public so the world could see what he sees. One to two billion per week. That's a $50 to $100 BILLION annualized run rate. For companies that most people think are burning cash and making nothing. The entire Wall Street narrative that "AI companies aren't profitable" might be completely wrong. Jensen sees their numbers. He sees their compute orders. He sees their growth. And he's saying the revenue is real. So if the money IS real, why are other companies firing people? Because they're not building AI products. They're not creating new revenue streams. They're not using AI to expand into new markets. They're using AI as an EXCUSE to cut costs because they ran out of ideas 3 years ago and need something to tell the board. Jensen's company added $500 billion in new orders in 5 months. He expects $1 trillion in cumulative revenue through 2027 from just two product lines. That number doesn't include the new chips, systems, or partnerships announced this week. And he's not cutting people. He's hiring. Because when you have imagination, more capability means MORE opportunity. Not less headcount. Meanwhile Salesforce cut thousands. Meta cut thousands. Amazon cut thousands. All blaming "AI efficiency." Jensen's response: You're out of imagination. He also said something that stuck with me. Cramer asked if he ever thought he'd build a $10 to $20 trillion company while waiting tables at Denny's. His answer: "I was just trying to make it through the shift." Biggest tip he ever got? Two, three dollars. Now he's building tech that increased computing demand by one million times in two years. He announced OpenClaw, which he says is as big as ChatGPT. And he's got 21 months of new business that isn't even counted in the trillion dollar figure yet. When asked how long he plans to keep working? "I'm hoping to die on the job. And I'm not hoping to die anytime soon." This is a man who believes every single thing he's building. And his message to every CEO using AI to justify layoffs is simple... You're not innovating. You're surrendering. The technology wasn't built to shrink companies. It was built to make them limitless. If your leadership can't see that, the problem isn't AI. It's THEM.
English
468
1.6K
7.7K
1.4M