PostApocalyptic chicken

@Hassan1838029 @Acts17David I never watched a Jew behead someone with a kitchen knife and put it on the internet to show off. But I have seen multiple groups of Muslims do this.

@Acts17David Yep💯 it's a shame 🫠 that you know the truth but you can't say it

Alex Jones found out about Muhammad and the men of al-Zutt!

@RealAlexJones @Azharhkh He married a 6 year old* he consummated it when she was 9. Just for clarity.

@Azharhkh Mohammed married to a nine-year-old

MAJOR HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT: Researchers Have Discovered The Source Of The Prophet Muhammad's Super Human Strength! According To Holy Islamic Writings, The Prophet Muhammad Received A Powerful Injection From 30 Black Men That Gave Him The Strength Of 30 Men! 🔴WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE: x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@ProphetUnaziO @TheBabylonBee If you try to assassinate an American leader, you're gonna have a bad time

Which of those Old Testament men you mentioned attacked their enemies unprovoked? Which of them did not try to avoid war as much as possible? Name them and cite the verse, or keep quiet forever. You all, and bloodthirsty men, will end in the same eternal destination unless you repent.

Pope Leo Explains God Does Not Listen To People Who Wage War So Long As You Don’t Count Moses, David, Joshua, Elijah, Saul, Gideon, Samson, Or Anyone Else In Bible buff.ly/tWfpECv

@michaeljknowles @TrevorSheatz @benshapiro You demeaned his wife and her testimony of Christ saving power. Her husband didn't.

I suspect you didn’t intend to disrespect your wife, and so you might have been surprised that some people, myself included, criticized you for speaking in a way that is unbecoming of a husband. I think you made a mistake. But your points here are not sound. 1. I never said you used that word. I said that’s what you called her (while contrasting her sin with your own virtue). “Promiscuous” is an adjective, the nearest nouns for which are “whore” and “slut.” 2. They are all pejorative terms that refer to people who engage in sexual immorality. They all carry negative connotations because they refer to shameful acts. If the nouns are more evocative than the adjective, that owes more to their Saxon (rather than Latinate) origins than to their meaning. It’s the same reason “pulchritudinous” is less evocative than “hot.” The words all mean the same thing, and we should not refer to our wives in such a way—certainly not to millions of strangers. 3. My phrasing was not in the present tense but rather the past. (See: “called” versus “calls” or “is calling.”) But even my description of your wording does not imply the present tense. By way of analogy, “she was promiscuous” : “he called her a whore” :: “Jeter was a Bronx Bomber” : “he called him a Yankee.” (Derek Jeter does not currently play for the Yankees, and the final comment does not suggest that anyone thinks he does.) As I said, I don’t think you meant to disrespect your wife. You might have the best of intentions. None of that is my point. You made a controversial post, which included both admirable comments about grace and inappropriate language that in my estimation is unbecoming of a husband and not to be recommended to others—hence my public commentary on your own public statement.

Multiple times, @michaeljknowles said I called my wife a whore in my post (as did @benshapiro), even though I wrote "My wife was formerly promiscuous." To my surprise, upon checking the original video, the top comments are now overwhelmingly condemning their response to our story of God's redemption (screenshot below). Michael is now doubling-down on it on X by saying that me writing that she was formerly promiscuous is the same as calling her a whore (pic attached). Here's the three primary issues with them saying I called my wife a whore, and why Michael's argument is wrong. 1. It isn't true. I never used the word "whore," so he shouldn't be telling people I called my wife this. 2. We instinctively know that "she was formerly promiscuous" carries with it much more grace than "she's a whore," because "promiscuous" is an adjective describing her past, whereas "whore" is a degrading noun, a slur used to speak harshly of women. They're similar words, but different in meaning and intent. They are not the same. 3. Crucially, they spoke in the present tense: "He called her a whore" (implying this is a present-tense sin issue, something she still is). I spoke in the past tense: "My wife was formerly promiscuous." This tense difference matters immensely, especially when people greatly struggle to separate one's life before Christ from their life after Christ. The world can't fathom that such change can happen. But the Bible is clear: "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (1 Cor. 5:17). Or consider Galatians 2:20: "I have been crucified with Christ, and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me." That old Ashley is dead. It's because of these truths that my wife and I choose to boldly, confidently, and without giving loads of explicit details, share the sins that stained us before Christ with others (for I am indeed a great sinner and struggle in many ways, too). Our story isn't shared frequently, but at times and when fitting, so that other believers can be encouraged, other sinners can be given hope of redemption and forgiveness, and the lost can hear the good news of the gospel: that though all are headed for Hell for their sins (1 Cor. 6:9-10), anyone who repents and places their trust in the resurrected Christ will be saved (John 3:16, 18). Regardless of how much you've sinned, you can't out-sin the mercy of God. You can be washed clean, your shame and guilt removed, and you can have a brand-new identity in Jesus Christ (Titus 3:5-6). And we’re living proof of this! I have no ill will against Michael, Ben, @andrewklavan, or anyone else for their remarks and mocking, nor do I demand an apology. I forgive them. My greatest desire for them and anyone who's following this story, as well as God's, is for them to "be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth" (1 Tim. 2:4).

@MasterMaliq Jesus is perfect. Mohammed was a blasphemer and sex fiend who had sex with a child. If you can't see the difference...

Sometimes I wonder… why do some Christians speak so strongly about our beloved Prophet Muhammad, yet you rarely see a Muslim insulting Jesus? We hold Jesus in high honour as a mighty prophet and the Messiah. We believe in all prophets without picking and choosing. Is it too much to expect that same level of respect in return?

@KATUNews What? What are you saying?

Although state legislative races rarely get the national spotlight, Democrats across the country were positively euphoric at the irony of their Republican nemesis being represented by one of their own. katu.com/news/nation-wo…

@willenormous @smashbaals It's been 10 years. And immediate testimony of what Jesus has done is the picture we see in the Bible.

Seeing this happen more and more: 1. Women become big on OnlyFans 2. Realize how horrible it is 3. Get saved 4. Pivot to becoming a Christian influencer The issue is this is actually encouraged in the modern Evangelical church The “bigger the sin” the more impressive the testimony is Instead of living in genuine repentance many have found they can monetize their past sin while simultaneously being morally superior to others It is a humiliation ritual for young Christian men to be told they should pick the promiscuous girl because “Jesus wants the rose” and trot out their wife’s past sin like a trophy Praise God many are being brought to repentance but to immediately pivot to becoming a Christian influencer and platformed because of their past sin is an issue we need to fix in the church

@TorahMike @ThenIsaugh @smashbaals It's silly you think moms don't talk about their past sins with their children as they grow up. "I did this stupid thing when I was young and it hurt me deeply. You should also not do this very common thing for teens to do. Listen to Jesus instead."

Love for Christian influencers self-harming themselves and their children by providing too much information? No. Love for recklessly providing TMI on the internet to every Tom, Dick, and Harry, without screening from any audience? No. Love for discretion, the value of dignity, and protecting one’s family and children by keeping personal information out of the wrong hands? Yes.

An open letter to @benshapiro, @andrewklavan, and @michaeljknowles: You have publicly wronged a good man, Trevor Sheatz. Each of you is a conservative leader. Many of us respect you for your contributions to public life in different ways. However, you have failed to honor the truth in this instance, and you have brought great shame to a young husband and his wife. You have held them up publicly to severe scorn, and people have sadly followed suit. Here is the truth, men. Ashley Sheatz has shared her conversion testimony for years. As one example, the screenshot below is from an article she wrote in May 2020 for a website I edited (it was called Reformanda and is no longer operating). I refer you to it for clarity. Of her own volition, Ashley shared about her deliverance from promiscuity, the occult, and doing hard drugs. These things wrecked and ruined her life. Again, Ashley was clear as crystal about her sexual sin, and said more about it in the 2020 article she wrote than Trevor did in the X post you tore to shreds on air. She has publicly talked about her deliverance from sexual sin on numerous occasions. (Nor did Trevor call his wife derogatory words--it's really disappointing that you all collectively presented him as doing so.) Ashley does all this--from what I know--not to be salacious or get clicks. (Nor does Trevor.) She does so to warn others about the destructiveness of sin, and even more than this, the redeeming power of the blood of Jesus. Ashley, with her husband Trevor, is a born again believer. I won't speak for her, but as a friend of her and Trevor, I know that she lives to magnify the mercy of God in her life. This letter is not written in fury or pique. I write it in love to each of you men to ask you to correct the record and consider the ungraciousness of your remarks about Trevor Sheatz. You are each a respected public figure; your words get carry a great deal of weight, far more than I have or Trevor has or Ashley has. You have wronged a good man, and you simply do not have your facts right about Ashley Sheatz's willingness to testify publicly to the power of Christ over her sin. You have passed judgment on a sweet young couple without taking the time to back up your pronouncements with research. In sum, you need the same forgiveness we all do. You need the blood of Jesus to cover you. You do not need to be a slightly better person, or a more committed devotee of religion. You need to be born again, to trust Jesus as your Lord and Savior, and to repent of all your sin. You and I are no different; we are great sinners all, but Christ is a great Savior. May God work in your hearts to lead you to this place if he has not. Best, Owen Strachan

@justholyshit @Eric130_7 @samuel @jbendery Like originally stated, we pray he is crucified in Christ. It's killing the spiritual man that a new one is reborn. Christ said you must be born again. The new birth is as filled with turmoil over sin as the pressure of the first brth. The Bible verse is here, go read Galatians.

@Eric130_7 @samuel @jbendery You missed the “why” component of that question. The new covenant is definitionally not the same as the old covenant, love of enemy and neighbor being a major component of the new covenant.

New: Pete Hegseth’s pastor and close spiritual advisor says he wants Texas Democratic state Rep. James Talarico to die. “We want him crucified with Christ,” Brooks Potteiger said of Talarico, as the podcast host said he prays “that God kills him.” huffpost.com/entry/pete-heg…

@Proffessorq0n @Acts17David Despite Islam* Christianity goes on.

@Acts17David Without Islam, Christianity and your source of income die

On one side, we've got the Islamic Dilemma, which is about as airtight as arguments get. On the other side, we've got 40 generations of first-cousin marriage, which destroys people's ability to even understand arguments. It's the old paradox of the unstoppable force (irrefutable argument) vs. the immovable object (genetically programmed stupidity).

@nosoup4knowles It is his story, too. For the past few weeks I've seen it ramping up that men should only marry virgins. He was speaking into this mindset that calls born again women whores who are undeserving of marriage. And who called his wife a whore? Christian men.

Two things can be true at once. 1. It's OK to share a testimony about turning away from a promiscuous past for Christ 2. A husband volunteering that info online about his wife is kinda awkward

@PrayerGarden @idk_poor No he won't. Because he doesn't want to see how stupid his argument looks on paper.

@idk_poor Would you expand on the differences

These two scenarios are very different lol

@RealCalebKitson Male virginity is as important as female. Men who don't wait can infect their future virginal brides with life threatening, cancer causing diseases that never show up on him. Has sex Ed been such an utter failure!

Female virginity and male virginity are not even close to the same. Science and more importantly the Bible bear this out. I have no issue with men marrying women who have had sexual intercourse with men before their husbands. I do take issue with acting like virginity is meaningless and not of great value and difficult to maintain.

@TrevorSheatz Soli Deo Gloria

My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world ​— ​what is viewed as nothing ​— ​to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us ​— ​our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)

@Alex_Jones_2028 @AshleySheatz You don't start by attacking people who say how they sinned and that Jesus saved them. You start by raising your own sons and daughters to treat sex and marriage as sacred.

i'm very happy for you two, memes aside. I suspect a lot of the heat you're getting is a result of people who feel (rightfully, IMO) that this sort of post seems to excuse really degenerate and harmful behaviors that are unfortunately nearly ubiquitous among young single women in the current year. we need to bring back social shaming while still offering forgiveness and redemption for those who are truly repentant (which would seem to include you). how do we accomplish both?

Also, I will never stop proclaiming what God has done in my life. God took the worst (me) and made me clean. He blessed my life when I didn’t deserve it and changed me and continues to change me. I have an amazing marriage. Three beautiful children. A very wholesome life. ♥️

@reliantlane @AshleySheatz

God is truly amazing and can redeem anybody... but the more you talk about yourself (even the wrongs you've done) you're acting in pride “When you do good, say that you have done nothing; for even if you have done everything, you have done only what was commanded.” - St John Chrysostom

@aaronogre @AshleySheatz Lol, stop rewriting things in your head so you can be angry at someone. There's lots of people to argue with, doesn't have to be a Christian over their testimony of Christ redemption.

@AshleySheatz No one is telling you to stop proclaiming the glory of God. We are asking your husband to stop telling the lie that you being promiscuous in your past makes you "more pure" than most virgins. That is folly and slanderous.

@TheLunarSurfer @AshleySheatz "I was a lost sinner and sinned greatly. Jesus lifted me from these sins." Yes, so much shame. Not. Go read the Bible. Testimonial telling has been regular practice since Jesus rose from the dead.

@AshleySheatz The problem isn’t what God has done in your life. The problem is that you and your husband feel the need to publicly humiliate yourselves over and over and over again. Which also humiliates your children

@serenitynowhere @michaeljknowles @GrammarJedi01 She is openly talking about her testimony. You think she asked him to pull that down and he didn't?

In my mind, people who have repented and want to publicly come forward and talk about their former life and redemption is great. Talking about your sins is fine, talking about other people’s sin, not so good. Imagine a small group meeting. “Hi I’m Frank, this is my wife Linda, she’s an alcoholic.”

"Dad, what should I do if I want to have a good marriage?" "Well, son, my first piece of advice is to avoid calling your wife a whore, reformed or otherwise, to strangers on the Internet."