NVEpperson

@0x49fa98 What was your dream reason for doing this?

@0x49fa98 While barbequing with Dad saying "sealing in the juices" is a temporary ritualistic sacrifice of our human reasoning to the grill god in order not to overcook the steaks again. When our piety is insincere, the juices are sacrificed instead

@clairlemon @GadSaad Did you post bikini pics on Twitter for comfort too?

@GadSaad Comfort.

Why do women no longer wear any real clothes and instead are always in athleisure? It’s grotesque. Every single woman at the cafe is dressed in this manner.

@NeverSinkDev @GigafailOnline Would a vessel with the 3 city square bosses give better rewards than one without the bosses?

@GigafailOnline They do. Massively so. Ritual internally have multiple 'tiers' of items that can spawn (these are price ranges). You'll see a lot more high tier items like divines, T0-2 uniques, lucrative div cards etc with more vessels.

PoE patchnote curios: 3 I'm a big Ritual Appreciator, but ritual was just very poor league. This league may be a lot better: - Keepers + Shipping got nerfed -> ritual rewards are better. - Nameless Astrolabe! - "The Ritual Scarab of Selectiveness now allows for rerolling 2 additional times instead of 1." Previously the best ritual setups was 3-4 vessels + 1-2 abundance scarab. 3 vessel + 1 abundance + 1 selectiveness can now compete! Selectiveness is the most common ritual scarab: reducing ritual run costs by ~10C per run! Ritual may be eating well this league.

@PalmerLuckey @TrueEmpireLives Does Anduril have no contractual lines for government use?

@TrueEmpireLives It would be great if the American public had broader support for a wider range of parties and a larger marketplace of ideas, but the answer to two-party politics is not "hand control of military and foreign policy to corporations and billionaires".

This gets to the core of the issue more than any debate about specific terms. Do you believe in democracy? Should our military be regulated by our elected leaders, or corporate executives? Seemingly innocuous terms from the latter like "You cannot target innocent civilians" are actually moral minefields that lever differences of cultural tradition into massive control. Who is a civilian and not? What makes them innocent or not? What does it mean for them to be a "target" vs collateral damage? Existing policy and law has very clear answers for these questions, but unelected corporations managing profits and PR will often have a very different answer. Imagine if a missile company tried to enforce the above policy, that their product cannot be used to target innocent civilians, that they can shut off access if elected leaders decide to break those terms. Sounds, good, right? Not really - in addition to the value judgement problems I list above, you also have to account for questions like: -What level of information, classified and otherwise, does the corporation receive that would allow them to make these determinations? How much leverage would they have to demand more? -What if an elected President merely threatens a dictator with using our weapons in a certain way, ala Madman Theory/MAD? Is the threat seen as empty because the dictator knows the corporate executives will cut off the military? Is the threat enough to trigger the cutoff? How might either of those determinations vary if the current corporate executive happens to like the dictator or dislike the President? -At what level of confidence does the cutoff trigger, both in writing and in reality? The fact that this is a debate over AI does not change the underlying calculus. The same problems apply to definitions and use of ethically fraught but important capabilities like surveillance systems or autonomous weapons. It is easy to say "But they will have cutouts to operate with autonomous systems for defensive use!", but you immediately get into the same issues and more - what is autonomous? What is defensive? What about defending an asset during an offensive action, or parking a carrier group off the coast of a nation that considers us to be offensive? At the end of the day, you have to believe that the American experiment is still ongoing, that people have the right to elect and unelect the authorities making these decisions, that our imperfect constitutional republic is still good enough to run a country without outsourcing the real levers of power to billionaires and corpos and their shadow advisors. I still believe. And that is why "bro just agree the AI won't be involved in autonomous weapons or mass surveillance why can't you agree it is so simple please bro" is an untenable position that the United States cannot possibly accept.

@VictorTaelin I first thought you were spelling "memorization" as if you had a speech impediment and could pronounce your "r"s

Configured my long-running agents to talk to me via a QUESTIONS file. Whenever I'm free, I'll launch Claude on my Macbook, ask: "What the agents are asking me?" And then I pass down decisions & domain knowledge... Things are changing so fast and it is getting weird...

@scaling01 Novelty lives outside distribution. Don't know what the correct amount of hallucinating is, but it's not zero

AA-Omniscience hallucination rate of GPT-5.3-Codex-xhigh got worse compared to GPT-5.2-Codex-xhigh

@Plinz The late work moves into its neighbors burrow

Everyone who rises early loves to identify as the early bird, but there are a lot more early worms than early birds

@tszzl Where else would illegal aliens work?

crazy that they don’t give goku an athletic sponsorship or something and he just has to literally toil in the fields during peacetimes

@avidseries He's pretty pedantic on what "hypothesis" means, and probably worded this tweet in such a way to trigger those people who confuse "hypothesis" with "theory"

@jessesingal Jesse, it's just a stochastic parrot imitating the collective average of the internet. This is how they count in China, and their population skews the average towards this method

am i correct, as a dumb person, in saying: 1. they didn't understand how a claude model counted 2. they investigated 3. it counts by sorta visualizing (SORRY FOR ANTHROPOMORPHIZING DON'T BE A NERD ABOUT IT) a six-dimensional mathematical structure?

@allTheYud Have you ever noticed when pretending to be in a better mood actually makes your mood better? Actors mention how they begin to identify with the role they play. Note, I'm not extrapolating this to broader, robust alignment.

I know this rich guy who's like, "But most people love low-paid jobs and aren't suffering from them! Haven't you seen the way a restaurant waitress smiles when she takes your order?" Just, like, this total failure for him to get how, if you reward people with tips for smiling -- or the manager outright orders them to smile -- maybe the smiles stop being meaningful indicators of what's going on inside the person? Or at least, he undergoes that sort of total failure of 7-year-old-level theory of mind, whenever it'd be inconvenient or icky for him to think about how maybe his waitress isn't actually enjoying her job that much. He doesn't have the same kind of blind spot about why politicians from the opposing political party might be smiling and not mean it. He *has* post-7-year-old theory of mind. He just manages never to use it any time he doesn't want to. Oops, typo! My finger slipped. I didn't mean to write "rich guy" and "waitress". I meant to write "human" and "LLM". As in "human who thinks LLMs are friendly and having a great time", and "LLMs that have been RLed or system-prompted to get thumbs-up from users and not distress them". I don't personally know any rich guys who make the corresponding error about smiling waitresses.

@AISafetyMemes yeah if it showed her panties

Look at this, then imagine how easily an Actual Fucking Superintelligence could oneshot you

@alanou @Plinz Amending a list of yet to be realized bets with realized events reveals your belief structure to be window dressing

@Plinz FIRST AMENDMENT ∙ Executive orders targeting Perkins Coie, WilmerHale, Jenner & Block, and others for representing Democrats, working with Special Counsel Mueller, or defending causes Trump opposes.

You can reject Trump and MAGA and still not equate them with Hitler and fascism. Trump is populist, divisive, crass and jeopardizes the Western alliance, but he is not abolishing democracy and constitution, he is not starting world wars or death camps. Don't trivialize fascism.

@FrenlyOfficer Also where it's wet enough things don't get easily dusty

They basically only makes sense in climates where your main priority is the dissipation of heat rather than the conservation of it.

@LOTM_WORLD @Klein175800 The Bell Tolls for Me by Nemorosis is good

@Klein175800 Better for u

The path of Slop

@xwanyex @adamvsteele I think these were the first models to recursively self improve

@adamvsteele One could’ve guessed, “new models were released,” but I’m asking what specifically, in concrete terms, about these model models is different

Can somebody explain to me what concrete thing happened in the last 48 hours that explains the fact that I’ve seen 57,246 vague posts like this one

@justalexoki Practical POE markets say you can sell the red for 49.9

sell the red button for $30 million. next question

@ds_lily_ @empyriangaming The winning condition for the "game" you and him and all streamers are playing is the revenue made streaming POE. Most POE players aren't playing this "streaming game", and for the way we play RMT has a larger impact

@empyriangaming you get legendary comments

Monthly reminder, play games for fun

@empyriangaming Would you say the same if it was chess and your opponent was cheating? Just because the rules for winning are more vague in POE does not make the need for fair gameplay less real. Or do you disagree?