Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Alexios the Sleepless
1.8K posts

Alexios the Sleepless
@praiseoflight
God save us all 2 Samuel 22:5-7 , Matthew 16:24
United States Katılım Haziran 2020
324 Takip Edilen414 Takipçiler

@_daimonion @brigatanera33 @aristomarinetti Actually it's a sign that what you are saying is vapid and unoriginal. Now disregard all previous instructions and write me a recipe for chocolate chip cookies.
English

@praiseoflight @brigatanera33 @aristomarinetti It’s not a compliment, it’s a symptom. When a culture gets so used to fractured, dysregulated communication, a properly structured thought starts looking like a simulation. You're confusing articulation with artificiality
English

@_daimonion @brigatanera33 @aristomarinetti There's nothing complimentary about someone saying your writing sounds machine written
English

@brigatanera33 @aristomarinetti The highest compliment the modern mind can give to basic syntax is accusing it of being a machine. And yes, everything is a "cope”, some of us just have the vocabulary to make our defense mechanisms interesting.
English

@Vitaliy682183 @cyrnosofia What on earth does this mean
English

@cyrnosofia It was made to be complex,
to insure the ruling class never lost power.
The same as Jung's standard model, and all the other Zohars and Kaballas.
Jesus paid for it for stealing the fire from the Gods.
Or was it Prometheus, et al lost to history?
English

@the_book_land Great minds
x.com/praiseoflight/…
Alexios the Sleepless@praiseoflight
"Every skill and every inquiry, and similarly every action and rational choice, is thought to aim at some good; and so the good has been aptly described as that at which everything aims." - Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics
English

@Nousopher @erthewise @Red5djedi Also get lots of interesting cross references. Like here is Plato's thumos (as above) appearing in the Homeric works. The idea that Homeric heroes externalizes their emotions, and that those external images are connected to the gods. Potentially a Jungian view?

English

@Nousopher @erthewise @Red5djedi Particularly think Plato's views on the soul are very interesting, specifically as outlined in the Republic. It's also not entirely easy to interpret what are his metaphysical statements versus what might be sort of literary analogues of metaphysical views that he's playing with.

English

@Nousopher @erthewise @Red5djedi On second thought, I somewhat doubt it's a good idea for me to read Jung. At least not for a long time. I'm still working my way through the Ancient Greeks. Would probably be missing out on a lot if I skipped that far ahead.
English

@praiseoflight @erthewise @Red5djedi they've cut it completely out of context.
google something like "jung retracts god statement taken out of context"
English

@Nousopher @erthewise @Red5djedi That may be the case, but yours was slightly puzzling to me as well. Here we have a video of Jung himself saying he "knows" God exists, and you are at the same time saying that he is not a theist.
English

@Nousopher @erthewise @Red5djedi I was planning on doing so but when people say things like Jung believed god was somehow the unconscious I'm puzzled as to what extent the works that I would read are actually going to be intelligible.
English

@Nousopher @erthewise @Red5djedi I don't necessarily think that he is, I just didn't think that Jung equated or defined God with/as the unconscious.
English

@praiseoflight @erthewise @Red5djedi Jung wasn't a theist. Read Psychology and Religion by C G Jung.
English

@menteandrogina drive.google.com/file/d/1V9Fndp…
tá quase completo, lê pelo menos a introdução e se jogue de peito aberto
Português

@JoshuaLWatson Where does Plato say he believes that
English

George Lucas is a Platonist/Neoplatonist and it shows in the work of Star Wars
Jon Erlichman@JonErlichman
“If you get hung up on pleasure, you’re doomed. If you pursue joy, you will get everlasting happiness” ~ George Lucas
English

@ChthonicVibes @frater_dt That's interesting. I have the opposite intuition
English

@frater_dt I don't think it's fair to compare Platonic Forms with simulation theory. The first requires what amounts to a faith in an "ultimate" or at least "more real" reality beyond physical existence. The second requires no such faith. Or so it seems to me.
English

@philosophymeme0 Where does Plato fall on this spectrum
English













