ProudAmericanGee 🗑️

29.9K posts

ProudAmericanGee 🗑️ banner
ProudAmericanGee 🗑️

ProudAmericanGee 🗑️

@proud_gee

One Nation...Under God

USA Katılım Eylül 2012
1.3K Takip Edilen538 Takipçiler
Patrick Bet-David
Patrick Bet-David@patrickbetdavid·
Seth Rogan on why he doesn’t want kids. To each his own but the greatest gift God ever gave us is the gift of having kids. All the money, fame and accolades in the world can replace having kids. If you’re able to, have kids. A ton of them.
English
888
117
2.5K
254.2K
ProudAmericanGee 🗑️
@glennbeck The pain comes from their delusion. And their delusion comes from their reps on the left. And the reps on the left promote this delusion because admitting Trump may just be successful would kill them.
English
0
0
0
3
Glenn Beck
Glenn Beck@glennbeck·
Charlamagne tha God said that “The Trump Administration has caused so much pain to people’s everyday lives, that some folks are fed up and willing to risk it all.” Honest question. What pain is this administration causing that would make people say, 'I want to kill the President?' Please indulge me.
English
735
1.3K
7.1K
152.4K
ProudAmericanGee 🗑️ retweetledi
ProudAmericanGee 🗑️ retweetledi
Greg Price
Greg Price@greg_price11·
Democracy is literally dying in America unless Democrats can draw congressional districts based on race, count illegal aliens in the census, and end requirements to show an ID to vote.
English
279
3.3K
20.1K
338.3K
Sue Altman
Sue Altman@suealtman·
So many have fought and died for equal representation for Black Americans, but Republicans would rather take us back to Jim Crow. We will not let that happen, and we won't let progress be destroyed. Congress must pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act now.
Democracy Docket@DemocracyDocket

🚨BREAKING: In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court guts a key tool that has been used to challenge racially discriminatory voting practices for fifty years. Combined with one of the Court’s 2019 rulings, today’s decision effectively declares all gerrymandering constitutional. democracydocket.com/news-alerts/sc…

English
544
20
95
30.3K
ProudAmericanGee 🗑️ retweetledi
🐺
🐺@LeighWolf·
There's a shockingly high number of idiots on this site who think the Supreme Court just made it illegal for black people to vote.
English
747
1.1K
15.1K
164.4K
ProudAmericanGee 🗑️
Why do too many people not realize that racism is not exclusive to only black, brown and other “colors” (other than the color white? )
English
0
0
0
19
ProudAmericanGee 🗑️ retweetledi
The Rational Animal 🤔
The Rational Animal 🤔@theobjectivist·
Everyone should unequivocally condemn the government-imposed racial discrimination Obama is pushing! Obama makes three errors in one post, all of them philosophical. First, the United States is a constitutional republic, not a democracy. The purpose of the Constitution is to protect individual rights from the majority, not to ensure "equal participation in our democracy." The Founders designed the system specifically to prevent what Obama is demanding: unlimited majority rule. Second, "protecting the rights of minority groups against majority overreach" sounds correct until you examine the premise. Rights belong to individuals, not groups. The moment you define rights by racial group membership, you have adopted the same collectivist framework that produced the discrimination you claim to oppose. Jim Crow categorized people by race and assigned rights accordingly. Modern voting rights activism does the same thing with different beneficiaries. Both are collectivism. Third, gerrymandering is a problem created entirely by the system Obama wants to preserve: a political structure where the drawing of district lines determines outcomes. His solution is not to fix the structure. It is to ensure his side draws the lines. The government must treat every citizen equally before the law. Everyone should reject Obama's framing entirely. He is not defending individual rights. He is defending group power, while using the language of rights to make collectivism sound like liberty.
Barack Obama@BarackObama

Today’s Supreme Court decision effectively guts a key pillar of the Voting Rights Act, freeing state legislatures to gerrymander legislative districts to systematically dilute and weaken the voting power of racial minorities - so long as they do it under the guise of “partisanship” rather than explicit “racial bias.” And it serves as just one more example of how a majority of the current Court seems intent on abandoning its vital role in ensuring equal participation in our democracy and protecting the rights of minority groups against majority overreach. The good news is that such setbacks can be overcome. But that will only happen if citizens across the country who cherish our democratic ideals continue to mobilize and vote in record numbers - not just in the upcoming midterms or in high profile races, but in every election and every level.

English
382
3.9K
11.7K
228.1K
Brandon Gill
Brandon Gill@realBrandonGill·
But without the ability to draw congressional districts solely on the basis of race and count illegal aliens in the census, the Democrat Party may be forced to win a House majority on the merits of their policies for a change.
English
620
3.8K
22.4K
170.3K
ProudAmericanGee 🗑️
Trump didn’t start the hate. He just hated you back. Big difference
English
0
0
0
7
ProudAmericanGee 🗑️
We’re told to hate the rich and strengthen the l/m class. But when the rich drive Toyotas ,eat at chipotle,or wear temu…. We still hate them. Seems the left can’t get their s*it together. Which is it?
English
0
0
0
5
ProudAmericanGee 🗑️ retweetledi
Lee Zeldin
Lee Zeldin@epaleezeldin·
Nothing infuriates an uninformed Congressional Dem more than when they realize they voluntarily triggered a debate with someone who actually knows what they are talking about, reads federal statute and adheres to Supreme Court precedent. Today’s self-implosion by @rosadelauro was quite remarkable to witness. Without apology or regret, I will always adhere to the best available reading of federal statute pursuant to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright.
English
14.6K
30.3K
160.7K
10.2M
ProudAmericanGee 🗑️
Another shining star 🌟 @epaleezeldin
Julia 🇺🇸@Jules31415

Lee Zeldin SCORCHES Democrat Rosa DeLauro when she loses it over the EPA's budget proposal, claiming it "reads like a climate change denier's manifesto" and screeches that climate change is "flooding our streets" and "poisoning our air": Zeldin: "Following the law...Where does it say anything about fighting global climate change? Loper Bright, Supreme Court case. You familiar with it?" DeLauro: "N-, no, maybe others are. I'm not." Zeldin: "But that's really important. As a member of Congress, Loper Bright says that we, as an agency, don't have the authority to get creative if Section 202 of the Clean Air Act-" DeLauro: "No, no...YOU DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT TO SAY CLIMATE CHANGE DOES NOT EXIST; THAT IT'S A HOAX! And that is where this administration is coming from!" Zeldin: "I understand you're upset that you don't know what Loper Bright is. Do you know what the Major Policies Doctrine is?" DeLauro: "I'm upset because...Lemme just say this to you!" Zeldin: "You're a member of Congress; you should know...You're very defensive about not knowing the two biggest landmark Supreme Court cases of the last year with regards to your question..." DeLauro: "You're here because you need money from us! SO HALT FOR THE SECOND AND WAIT FOR THE QUESTIONS AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS!" Zeldin: "Well, I answered your question and you didn't like my answer because you don't know what Loper Bright is, because you don't know the Major Policies Doctrine is. You're asking me about Section 202 of the Clean Air Act, and you don't read it. You don't know what it says...I actually read the law. I do my homework. You're just somebody who likes to have the microphone on. You know what I have to do? I read the law; I read the Supreme Court cases...You care about science; now you're threatening to defund it?" Brilliant job, EPA Administrator! 👏

English
0
0
0
6
Joey - Master of Wit and Sarcasm
So everyone is criticizing Pete Hegseth's wife. I guess she wore a 42 dollar dress to the gala this weekend. First of all she looked great in it, I would not be able to tell if it was a $42 dress or $2,000 dollars. It's nice to see people that understand the value of a dollar.
English
433
641
10.8K
70.8K