*tess

6.2K posts

*tess banner
*tess

*tess

@ptr

alea iacta est. my views are my own, don't take them they're all i have left!

🦋 Katılım Haziran 2008
920 Takip Edilen5.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
*tess
*tess@ptr·
build software factories
English
1
1
27
5.7K
*tess
*tess@ptr·
most people are too worried about slop, remember your codebase is legal as long as its plimsoll line is above the water
*tess tweet media
English
0
0
2
222
*tess
*tess@ptr·
creativity is the answer dream, dream
English
0
0
1
91
“paula”
“paula”@paularambles·
the original 7 girls of sf
“paula” tweet media
English
5
3
188
4.9K
*tess
*tess@ptr·
future anachronisms: - code - code review - programming language - architecture diagram - frontend design future synchronisms: - cost - latency - api contract - error rate - uptime if that makes you nervous, increase your time horizon it won't be long
English
1
0
7
483
*tess
*tess@ptr·
trying for a double troll post here (jk actually curious!)
English
0
0
0
96
*tess
*tess@ptr·
is a2a good or is this mcp all over again
English
2
0
1
153
*tess
*tess@ptr·
we were too early to write off the saaspocalypse
English
1
0
5
512
*tess
*tess@ptr·
i'm bored. we solved coding agents, it's done. what are people making that's actually interesting in the third quarter of the year twenty twenty six
English
41
3
109
19.9K
*tess
*tess@ptr·
@_lopopolo if we invented ai first and software second, everything about how software is managed and deployed would be different it's rife with anachronisms
English
0
0
3
139
josh friedman
josh friedman@yo_friedman·
@ptr What was most exciting consumer product experience in the before times
English
1
0
0
74
*tess
*tess@ptr·
@thenathancolo no no you don't get it, i'm asking *you* to be bored with small problems and solve bigger ones
English
1
0
0
343
Nathan Colosimo
Nathan Colosimo@thenathancolo·
@ptr If it’s solved then why do I spend all day reading code that doesn’t work Just solve bigger problems if small ones are solved, ofc continuing to solve small problems will be boring
English
1
0
0
408
Ankit Jxa
Ankit Jxa@kingofknowwhere·
@ptr Hard problems take time to solve with / without AI. Our perception of time needed to solve problems like this have reduced significantly
English
1
0
0
306
*tess
*tess@ptr·
@radshaan when oppenheimer achieved the trinity test, nuclear weapons were "done" that is the sense in which i mean the remaining blood, sweat and tears on the arc of coding agents are assured now i want a new arc
English
0
0
2
260
Ishan
Ishan@radshaan·
@ptr I don't think software engineering is fully solved A lot of blood, sweat and tears until we get there
English
1
0
2
623
alex peysakhovich
alex peysakhovich@alex_peys·
@ptr ai + science. drug discovery, materials science, bio engineering. ai + creative tools. not prompts but actual tools to help artists, musicians, etc make beautiful things. infinity stuff to do to improve the human condition outside saas to make more saas.
English
2
1
7
847
*tess
*tess@ptr·
@tszzl No offense to people who want to use ChatGPT for free, I just like medical breakthroughs more
English
0
0
2
142
roon
roon@tszzl·
tech companies often say they want to 'democratize access' which means 'we want a lot of users' as a sort of proxy metric for world conquest. FB cared about DAU more than revenue too. not quite a standin for virtue should use the earth's limited computational resources well
English
11
1
180
17.3K
roon
roon@tszzl·
i don't think ai companies are under any obligation to not dedicate its chips to the highest revenue per watt application, and there are strong arguments to be made that that's the most pro-social thing to do
English
68
13
756
142.5K
*tess
*tess@ptr·
@vijayiyengar so true i really am hoping we will see a pivot to harder things as ai saturates the constant multiplexing / context switching is a big barrier to that … if frontier ability was blazing fast it would be easier to marshal grey matter on hard things
English
0
0
1
728
Vijay Iyengar
Vijay Iyengar@vijayiyengar·
I think lower latency via better hardware and voice models will make all sorts of new experiences. Fable intelligence at sub-second iteration speed is likely worth a lot: - Less context switching - You'd be more in-the-loop which would yield better results - You could test explore more ideas thoroughly and rapidly At that point, I think we'd actually be creating 10x more useful software per unit time and need a rethink of all the surrounding systems (CI, analytics, etc)
English
1
0
8
919
*tess
*tess@ptr·
@tokenbender mmmm. it's a second derivative compression huh floor of interestingness rising and pool of people who can generate ideas in the remaining space shrinking
English
0
0
1
75
tokenbender
tokenbender@tokenbender·
@ptr it is hard to be impressed by a problem of choice now, what captivated one's attention one year back is a /goal now. so our own standards are only stimulated by something fresh and creative now.
English
1
0
2
93
*tess
*tess@ptr·
@tokenbender shrinking like, no more ideas or shrinking like, no more people working on them
English
2
0
1
560
tokenbender
tokenbender@tokenbender·
@ptr building interesting things is a rapidly shrinking market. but we’re primarily bottlenecked by creativity for the time being if one is outside of frontier labs.
English
1
0
3
851
*tess
*tess@ptr·
@benswerd this is so good thank you finally a credible retort for the replyguys who complain about claude code using react
English
0
0
1
78