Sabitlenmiş Tweet
push the needle
118.8K posts

push the needle
@pushtheneedle
the closer we are physically, the closer we are socially.
Seattle Washington Katılım Ocak 2015
930 Takip Edilen29.1K Takipçiler

Good article from the Stranger about upcoming reforms to recent landlord tenant laws. The issue is that it’s not commonly understood that affordable housing providers really do rely on timely rent payments to survive, even if those rents are below market and even if they are operating properties built with government subsidies.
Eviction moratoria and court delays almost always translate to lost rents- it’s basically impossible to collect back rent from a low income tenant as they tend to be “judgement proof” by definition (they earn less than the amount below which a judge will not order a judgement).
We do not have a public housing system where losses just accrue to the taxpayer in some benign way. We have a privatized affordable system under which large one time grants (in the form of low interest loans or tax credit equity) are given to a private developer (usually a non profit), in exchange for below market rents offered to low income people.
Those subsidies are always combined with a normal mortgage (sometimes in the form of bonds) which must be repaid. The size of that mortgage is tied to the expected rents and operating costs. There is a small margin of error, but if profits drop below that, the mortgage cannot be repaid and the bank can foreclose on the property.
This is what is happening to affordable housing in Seattle now. Last year the city had to use funds earmarked for new construction to bail out distressed non profits. This year the city is likely to choose to tighten up the rules that have allowed some people to avoid paying rent for long periods. If you believe in a functioning affordable housing system, you should support this.
English

@markasaurus @contractorkeith @DanielKayHertz @bobbyfijan yes i agree. its a shame we had to drag me on a shit website like X and have me get concerned DMs from developers annoyed by this behavior for us to find common ground
English

@pushtheneedle @contractorkeith @DanielKayHertz @bobbyfijan This all also points to the need for building code reform to make building small apartment buildings cheaper (single stair reform etc)
English

@DanielKayHertz @markasaurus @contractorkeith @bobbyfijan @HousingStudies woah hey no way dont threaten him with evidence?
i live in a neighborhood that is building $2M SFHs and also building $700K townhomes (6 on a lot)
its happening Mark. land acq is the same for them too
English

@markasaurus @pushtheneedle @contractorkeith @bobbyfijan I’m not sure if it’s online but @HousingStudies did a great report a few years ago showing where SFH/condo costs intersected such that a SFH was more profitable to build than a three flat (and vice versa) in Chicago if both were allowed
English

@MikeFellman @bobbyfijan well they are in seattle. give or take. every home thats a tear down is selling for about the same price here and this is what happens, new home goes up thats super expensive or $700k townhomes go up
English

@pushtheneedle @bobbyfijan If you think land prices are fixed regardless of what is allowed to be built on it you don't know jack shit about real estate.
English

These two housing graphics bother more than any other than bounce around the internet.
They are just wrong … the price of a lot is dependent on what is allowed and what is required. It’s not fixed.


Bobby Fijan@bobbyfijan
Upzoning increases the price of land … and so does reducing parking minimums It’s 20%-30% of total project costs.
English

@bobbyfijan i guess the real world development out here is wrong. ill let them know
English

@pushtheneedle If they are all selling for the same price … then it means that only ONE of those forms is the highest and best use
Obviously increasing the density to allow a highrise in East Texas is irrelevant to land prices
English

@DanielKayHertz @markasaurus @bobbyfijan thats not anecdotal, thats called real world experience. you sound like you know your stuff. just like me! arrogant architects love arguing the weeds like its crit hour. the 5 story apt could go to $500/sf and $2M profit and the homes would still cost LESS than $900k
point made!
English

@markasaurus @bobbyfijan Are construction costs higher on the six plex, or just the larger multifamily? I feel like anecdotally it would just be the latter in Chicago
English

@bobbyfijan no way theyll cost way more than i have ever said. youre always right
English

@DanielKayHertz @bobbyfijan The six plex could be done without an elevator and in type V framing like a single family home. The five story would definitely have an elevator and would probably have a concrete parking podium.
English

@YoCuddles @bobbyfijan my bad i am currently enraged and misread your post
English

@pushtheneedle @bobbyfijan Wait what do you think I'm saying? I'm saying we should upzone, we should build tall, what position are you taking here?
English

@pushtheneedle @bobbyfijan The empirical evidence is that upzoning, allowing people to build vertically for multiple families, makes cities more affordable. There isn't a graphic you can pull up that negates that, but feel free to try?
English

@markasaurus @JohnGonzalesLA1 make the profit $1M. scale it all up. it still costs LESS do you not see the fucking point?
English

And then as @JohnGonzalesLA1 points out absolutely nobody is going to go through the risk and brain damage of developing a 5 story apartment building for the same profit as a single family home!
English

@JohnGonzalesLA1 @bobbyfijan It doesn't say they do? It just says what construction costs were. Obviously the final price is going to depend on the market, but bringing construction costs per unit down is the only way for a city to encourage construction of units.
English

just came by to say bobby is wrong and can kiss my ass. see yall on bluesky
Bobby Fijan@bobbyfijan
These two housing graphics bother more than any other than bounce around the internet. They are just wrong … the price of a lot is dependent on what is allowed and what is required. It’s not fixed.
English








