JSV

2.3K posts

JSV banner
JSV

JSV

@pvpandroids

God first. Seeking truth. Uncovering patterns and insights beyond perception. Building in tech.

Dimension 12 Katılım Kasım 2023
569 Takip Edilen189 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
JSV
JSV@pvpandroids·
Only God could have granted me this success and delivered me from bad habits. #Grateful
English
2
1
15
1.7K
JSV
JSV@pvpandroids·
@cursor_ai and composer 2.5 the best thing that has happened this year.
English
0
0
0
22
Serenity
Serenity@aleabitoreddit·
Photonics is nuanced and using ChatGPT/Gemini makes you miss all of it: 1. $SIVE is actually a chokepoint and partially a bottleneck. The reason it's a chokepoint is leading CPO/optical hyperscaler players go through Sivers, likely: Ayar. Celestial. Lightmatter. Lightelligence. Poet. If you take out Sivers, you literally can't make some of their products + delay their roadmap by years. As many are sole/primary source but are heading the direction on multi-source. As for the bottleneck argument: Win Semi is the bottleneck for scaling laser production. But... the nuance is when you have capacity allocated for the next few years. You become part of the bottleneck itself if players fight you for allocation of finished lasers. That's the nuance people miss with capacity allocation dynamics. It's like saying $SNDK is not part of the NAND bottleneck when Kioxia makes all of it. But when Sandisk has the ultimate control of output supply, they become the bottleneck + have all the pricing power. Sivers controls output supply of CW lasers given allocations, and as seen with $LITE earnings, CW laser is currently bottlenecked as everyone seems to be stuck producing EMLs. 2. Like how LLMs always uses em-dashes. You can tell when people use AI when they always use the same "CW is a dumb interchangeable laser" argument or compare "power" specs after conflating different architectures. That's why your "analysts" using AI will get this wrong over and over. There's CW lasers... and then there's a specific architectural design that Sivers achieves with DFB lasers. If you compare power specs with $LITE vs. Sivers, Lumentum wins in isolation. But they're completely different laser architectures. All the leading CPO players like Ayar, chose $SIVE for an architectural reason for high power, low thermal, laser arrays. $JBL 1.6T LRO also made one of the most dramatic moats cited by their fireside chat, using Sivers lasers. If you think CW lasers are interchangeable with Sumitomo/Furukawa, and others. And can be plug-and-play... i don't know what to tell you? Again: $SIVE makes architecturally unique CW lasers for leading CPO players. 3. I'm not sure how many times I need to say this: $SIVE for 2024-2025 has been going through development contracts. People using TTM revenue or former P/S metrics are using completely the wrong metrics, when there's volume ramp in 2027. It's the same with $AAOI which volume ramps in H1 2027. $AEHR which volume ramps after qualification. $LPK that volume ramps after qualification. This is just missing qualification cycles in semiconductors and how to model financials currently. As for the $LITE comparisons (which was also my long last year): $LITE literally started off selling laser dies before acquisition of Cloud Lite and other downstream optical engine components. This is where $SIVE is at today with starting off in the laser chokepoint for CPO: People are modeling laser revenue off very isolated TAM projections. Meanwhile Sivers is targeting M&A to expand revenue for TAM projections. This is not a simple component FAU + ramp valuation modeling over with a Taiwanese company. Since Laser companies like $LITE, $COHR are known to downstream expand to make their lasers more valuable, then vertically integrate (fabs, assembly) afterward. Again, Sivers worked with Ayar and these types of companies before they all became billion dollar companies. I have high conviction knowing they know what to acquire down the ELS/optical engine stack + pluggable transceiver for TAM expansion. It's just annoying when I get people who don't understand the nuances backseat commenting wrong things about my longs. I got the same thing about $AXTI is not a bottleneck! InP isn't needed! China! back at $14. Now it's $140 I got the same thing about $AAOI "is going down 50%!" back at $65. or "AOI management is shady at $30". Now it's $170 I got the "there's nothing new with $SOI" back at $45. Now it's $170. I think I'm one of the few who actually understands the nuances with photonics, since I did call out $LITE, $TSEM, Innolight, $AXTI, $AAOI, $SOI, that outperformed both photonics markets and overall markets over the past year. And now I'm long on $SIVE.
English
167
236
2.9K
765.3K
JSV retweetledi
Ansem
Ansem@blknoiz06·
trading with limit orders is kinda sus what do you mean you're waiting for another man to fill you up
English
246
58
1.2K
72.1K
JSV
JSV@pvpandroids·
$HYPE will breakout towards $100 and begin a new trend of on chain spot, perp and stock trading. $ASTER will follow the trend and also breakout. #Binance cartel will not just sit around and watch.
English
0
0
0
72
JSV
JSV@pvpandroids·
Soon
JSV tweet media
English
0
0
0
29
Ahmad
Ahmad@TheAhmadOsman·
OpenClaw was such a weird phase in LLMs Glad that thing disappeared as fast as it took the spotlight
English
198
46
2.2K
231.4K
TJR
TJR@_TJRTrades·
How is hype at ath and btc is still down
English
141
17
699
55.5K
JSV
JSV@pvpandroids·
@elonmusk @JeffBezos He also mentioned that someone making $75k a year should not be paying $12k in taxes.
English
0
0
4
215
Anshu
Anshu@anshuc·
@github holy shit, how did the attackers find a large enough uptime window to get in?
English
178
707
14.6K
952.4K
GitHub
GitHub@github·
We are investigating unauthorized access to GitHub’s internal repositories. While we currently have no evidence of impact to customer information stored outside of GitHub’s internal repositories (such as our customers’ enterprises, organizations, and repositories), we are closely monitoring our infrastructure for follow-on activity.
English
1.7K
5.4K
25.6K
13.7M
jawz
jawz@sayinshallah·
is there an etf that is short crypto?
English
6
0
14
3.1K
JSV
JSV@pvpandroids·
@PhinTotten @coinbase I don’t understand why keep crypto on these platforms. Crypto was made to detach from the control of government. Send all your funds to self custody wallets.
English
0
0
0
221
JSV
JSV@pvpandroids·
@SenatorSlama Lol, wasn’t Elon just bragging about taking losses to provide Wi-Fi on airlines? Now we see where those losses are being subsidized from 😂
English
0
0
0
18
Julie Slama
Julie Slama@SenatorSlama·
Generally, I love Starlink. It’s fast, reliable, and my husband and I run our law firm from home with it. HOWEVER- it’s monopolized internet in rural areas. Today, we received notice our internet bill is going up another $500/year. Don’t like it? Too bad. You have no other options. Nebraska gave up $300 million in federal rural internet funding for fiber because “Starlink fixed it.” This was a mistake that will cost Nebraskans dearly in the long run.
Julie Slama tweet media
English
1.4K
516
4.2K
1.2M
JSV
JSV@pvpandroids·
@PGSA_IRAN Launch a coin 😅😂
English
0
0
0
15
JSV
JSV@pvpandroids·
@stogolp So I missed the bottom??
English
0
0
1
1.7K
JSV
JSV@pvpandroids·
@mcuban Won’t providers just pass along the cost to consumers and we’ll still have the same problem this is trying to fix?
English
1
1
54
13.8K
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban@mcuban·
We should federally tax Tokens at the Provider level. Not a lot. Less than 50c per million tokens. It will accomplish 4 things (at least ) 1. It will push the big AI players to optimize tokenization, caching , routing and localization Which will 2. Reduce energy usage. Saving them in energy costs more than what they paid in tax and reducing strain created by the growth in energy consumption Which will 3. Generate maybe 10 billion dollars a year to start, but over the next ten years could grow 30x to 100x Which will 4. Create a source of funding to pay down the federal debt or deploy, in response to the things AI brings that we don’t expect or don’t like At some point the models will pass it on to customers. Of course. That’s ok. Customers will have the ability to choose between providers. Or to do everything using open source models locally. Thoughts ?
English
2.2K
262
4K
1.2M
Mayhem
Mayhem@MayhemXBT·
@imfat And they are equally as educated.
English
3
1
89
2.2K
scar
scar@imfat·
crypto is the only place you see a 8 fig trader argue with a $30 nigga
English
73
135
2K
79K