Anh

477 posts

Anh

Anh

@pwign

@lumahq, he/him

Vancouver, BC Katılım Ekim 2012
1.3K Takip Edilen3.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Anh
Anh@pwign·
Anh tweet media
ZXX
14
3
240
23.6K
Anh
Anh@pwign·
Darshak Rana ⚡️@thedarshakrana

I accidentally broke my brain reading about Nobel Prize winners last month. There's this thing called "Janusian thinking" that basically explains why some people's minds work like magic while the rest of us think in straight lines. Named after Janus, the Roman god with two faces pointing opposite directions. The psychologist who discovered it, Albert Rothenberg, was trying to figure out what made breakthrough thinkers different. He interviewed dozens of Nobel laureates, major artists, revolutionary scientists. What he found sounds impossible. These people can hold two different ideas in their mind at the same time. They can explore both without switching back and forth or forcing a quick comparison. They can consider “yes” and “no” to the same question simultaneously and stay clear-headed. Einstein too talked about this when he described his relativity breakthrough. He was imagining riding alongside a beam of light while also standing perfectly still. Both perspectives at once. Mozart said he could hear an entire symphony "all at once," every note, every contradiction, every resolution happening in a single moment of awareness. Your average person's mind works like a courtroom. Evidence comes in, you weigh it, you reach a verdict. Case closed. But Janusian minds work more like... I don't know, like a quantum computer that can process multiple realities simultaneously until something new emerges from the overlap. I've started noticing it in conversations. When someone can genuinely see both sides of something without needing to pick one, it drives people nuts. They want you to land somewhere definite. The ability to live in that tension space reads as wishy-washy or indecisive. Most creative advice tells you to "think outside the box." But Janusian thinking is weirder than that. It's being inside and outside the box at the same time. It's thinking the box exists and doesn't exist simultaneously. Which explains why truly creative people seem slightly unhinged. They think they're choosing between realities. But, they're inhabiting multiple realities at once, mining the contradictions for insights the rest of us never see. Sadly, most of us have trained ourselves out of this ability. We've learned that holding contradictions feels unstable, so we rush toward resolution. We've been taught that changing your mind means you were wrong before, so we defend positions instead of exploring them. But the people changing the world have kept that childlike ability to hold impossible thoughts without needing them to make sense immediately. We just need to live in the questions everyone else is too scared to ask.

English
1
0
1
461
Sho Kuwamoto
Sho Kuwamoto@skuwamoto·
There was a tweet that went by a few weeks ago about how some of the most effective folks out there had the ability to keep multiple options open in their head at the same time. Something about Janus something something. Does that ring a bell? Could someone point me to it? Thx
English
4
0
5
2.7K
Anh
Anh@pwign·
also a super old paper on this found the same pointing direction, and that it also applies to square? but it disagrees on the displacement I also observe when the triangle is rotated
Anh tweet media
English
0
0
0
146
Anh
Anh@pwign·
i also wondered if it could be implied motion instead of orientation, like the triangle wants to move forward. but that’s not the case for something like a raindrop where gravity would pull the perceived center down but it doesn’t.
Anh tweet media
English
1
0
0
212
Anh
Anh@pwign·
just realized the most common example given for optically centering icons is just wrong, the centroid is too far right optically
Anh tweet media
English
2
0
3
765
Nathan Tannar
Nathan Tannar@nathantannar4·
Here’s to hoping Apple fixes the zoom transition in iOS 27. Did not have the jiggle in iOS 18 when scrolling the scroll view. Is this behaviour expected?
English
18
5
197
16.5K
Anh
Anh@pwign·
splish sploosh
English
4
1
55
2.1K
Anh
Anh@pwign·
@samhenrigold ❤️ still remember the first used mac i got just so I could use @sketch and render a 5s c4d video overnight
English
1
0
4
1.6K
Anh
Anh@pwign·
chrome p3 feDisplacementMap bug defeated
Anh tweet media
English
0
0
1
486
Anh
Anh@pwign·
One of my weekend projects was creating my own LLM benchmark, and it has paid off every time there’s a new model release. (yes 5.3 codex is below haiku 4.5, no this is not a coding benchmark)
Anh tweet media
English
1
0
1
386
Anh retweetledi
Morten Just
Morten Just@mortenjust·
it got weird today, but
English
290
383
8.7K
1.6M
Anh
Anh@pwign·
@neilcybart that acquisition was worth it for the fact that siri doesn't append "my weather data is provided by the weather channel" every time
English
0
0
0
117
Neil Cybart
Neil Cybart@neilcybart·
This is pure gaslighting. Apple’s default Weather app is scary accurate when it comes to U.S. hyperlocal weather. This is the technology Apple got its hands on with Dark Sky. The technology also powers any weather app that relies on WeatherKit. As for other weather items like 10-day forecasts and precipitation forecasts, I find Apple's Weather app to be accurate as well (again, speaking of the U.S.). Very often, Apple’s Weather app will lead with the other weather apps eventually landing where Apple had been all along. Certain storms will inevitably bust or end up being different than forecasted. That’s weather. Apple’s Weather app is an all-around great app. I have no reservation in recommending it for those in the U.S.
Marques Brownlee@MKBHD

Here, I've made a handy venn diagram to understand phone weather apps 😅 If you're using Google or Apple default weather - it'll be gorgeous, but unfortunately it's not even close to accurate The big ones, like Weather Channel and Accuweather have such ugly apps... but at least the data is actually good Carrot weather on iOS might be the only actually good one right now? RIP to Dark Sky, the original king

English
22
5
85
29.3K
Anh
Anh@pwign·
@tylerangert On 1, i'm trying @linear mcp and list_issues just feels so limiting. I kinda wish the model can just write sql against the workspace instead. it'd allow questions like "which projects have the most issues with no assignee?" or "what issues keep getting reopened?"
English
0
0
0
36
Tyler Angert
Tyler Angert@tylerangert·
i like the current meta around agents with code-mode and code execution, etc. i think if i were to summarize the three large / major points about it, it's: 1. have a single "program" tool where you call your actual tools over some RPC layer, generate typed bindings based on your tool interfaces. requires a sandbox for execution. can use `eval` / `exec` for dirty prototyping 2. cache your tool results and reference them by some call id as inputs to other tool calls. dont pollute context with raw tool calls. 3. discover tools at runtime with a "search_tools" tool / use progressive disclosure. TLDR: look for your tools at runtime, cache the results and pass handles around to other tools to reference them, and just write code to actually execute. it feels elegant and scalable. i imagine this will be the standard in 2026.
English
4
2
35
5.9K
renaise
renaise@reallynaise·
Does anyone know how to work the Cadillac of archival software Filemaker Pro?
English
1
0
5
854
kostya
kostya@nstkostya·
put up this tiny personal website made with next.js, a bit of physics via matter.js
English
23
17
698
41.2K