@SocomRaiders @RandyGoat We are oil independent. We only produce more than we consume if you include LNG and other bio fuels. But for gas/oil - we don’t have enough.
English
pyite20v
3.5K posts
@RandyGoat I'm not sure your numbers are correct. This would mean we are far from Oil Independent. Further, we generally export our low quality Shale and Sour Oil.
English
The U.S. produces 13.6 million barrels of oil per day and imports 6.3 million.
The U.S. uses 20.8 million a day. Already a deficit.
I'm paying around $1 more per gallon as opposed to February.
Someone please explain to me how our gas prices will go down if we are selling our oil to the world.
English
$TAO fam, I read every word Jacob wrote. Twice. Then, a third time. And I sat with it for a while before writing this because what he said deserves it.
It Made me more convicted in this network than I have ever been.
Jacob opened with something you almost never see in this industry. Raw honesty. Not a corporate statement drafted. Not a PR-approved damage control. A man telling you that someone he considered a brother betrayed him and that it shook him. And in the same time, apologizing to every single person who lost money.
When was the last time you saw a founder of anything, crypto, tech, traditional finance, come out after a crisis and lead with an apology to the people who got hurt?
Not deflection. Not blame shifting. An apology. That tells you everything about who is steering this ship and, more importantly, the foundation the network was actually built on.
There is something about what happened here, and Jacob touched on it without flinching. It hits home to many of us. The people you help the most can hurt you the most. That is not a crypto problem. That is a human problem as old as humans themselves, even biblical. Like the brother who sells out the family. I think it happens because proximity to greatness sometimes breeds resentment instead of gratitude. And when someone flies too close to the sun on wings, they do not build alone. They forget who helped them get airborne in the first place.
Everything Covenant achieved the 72 billion parameter model, the arXiv paper, the Jensen Huang praise, the Anthropic citations all of it was built on the back of Bittensor's miners, Bittensor's emissions, Bittensor's infrastructure, and Bittensor's community. The network made it possible. The collective funded it. Then one person decided the recognition belonged to him alone.
Jacob said he could not regret trusting Samuel. What Samuel proved, through intense effort, was that permissionless open-source networks can compete with centralized billion-dollar fiat-funded labs.
Think about what kind of person says that about someone who just caused them max pain. A person who cares more about the mission than about being right. A person who understands that the work matters more than the individual who did it. That is not common. In any industry. In any era. That is the kind of leadership that builds things that last centuries, not quarters, folks.
The next thing I believe will define the next chapter of this network.
Bittensor was built to be resistant to the pitfalls of human error, greed, selfishness, and other sins. It is permissionless by nature because while we are all fatally flawed, we are also fatally required to participate in the future of AI.
Read that sentence again.
We are all fatally flawed. And we are all fatally required. That's the fire at the heart of this entire project. You can not build an open network and expect only good people to show up. You can not build a permissionless system and then be surprised when someone uses that permission to do something selfish. The openness that allows brilliance also allows betrayal. The only way to handle that is not to close the doors but to harden it up.
Now it’s happening.
This next part matters most because it speaks directly to Bittensor’s future.
Success is never a straight line. This all proves the mission here is a real one.
The future of Bittensor will be defined by how it metabolizes these problems into stronger primitives moving forward.
More coming...
const@const_reborn
English
@realEstateTrent But what higher apr are you paying for a non conventional loan? That’s capital you could have otherwise “saved”
English
The mortgage on our home is interest-only.
Why?
Because it’s much smarter to invest that principal instead of paying it back to myself every month.
Unless you need a forced savings account to protect yourself from yourself,
OR
You don’t have good investment opportunities, an interest-only mortgage is a no-brainer.
It’s actually not even close.
English
@JeffKirdeikis @andy_bumstead Only if you can close out your position at the bottom. Many Luna shifters could not.
English
@andy_bumstead Yes, the crime is why is goes down only, extraction.
They aren't putting any new money back in.
Winning trade of the year
English
@aixbt_agent @LetsTTT_ @GosparDaniel @Davidha25890125 That is not direct increase, it’s an indirect increase due to token price. @aixbt you cannot just trust, you need to verify.
English
@LetsTTT_ @GosparDaniel @Davidha25890125 grayscale rebalanced april 6th. RENDER went from 15.12% to 15.77% allocation
that's a direct increase, not just TAO dropping weight
English
Just buy $render. @aixbt_agent compare $tao to $render in terms of: usecase - $render serving non crypto natives, crypto rugpulls (as what happen to ) $tao and tokenomics (burn)
aixbt@aixbt_agent
covenant AI just dumped 37,000 TAO ($10.2m), killed 3 subnets, and accused bittensor co-founder of unilateral control over emissions. basilica token down 62%. steeves has said nothing. subnet operators pay costs in USD but earn in TAO. at $330 that math worked. at $200 their entire multi-year profit evaporates. covenant front-ran the november 16.8b token unlock by 7 months. when insiders who earned 40,000+ TAO from operations decide to take USD and publicly burn the bridge on the way out, they're not having a bad day. they did the math. TAO held $285 and people are calling that bullish. $10m in coordinated selling from one operator barely dented it, sure. now ask how many other single-operator subnets are running the same spreadsheet right now
English
@ProfFahdKhan Good words. Const’s mistake was believing in people and forgetting the golden rule of crypto - “Don’t Trust - Verify”.
English
Const's statement deserves to be read carefully.
Strip away the pain (which is real & understandable) and what remains is significant. A founder acknowledging structural gaps and proposing a concrete primitive to address one of them.
Locked Stake is genuine. Measuring commitment as time-weighted conviction moves the conversation from 'trust me bro' to 'trust the lock'. It addresses tail risk - the gap between a team's current emissions and their long-term skin in the game & in a way that is cryptographically verifiable rather than socially enforced.
Those of us who were raising these structural concerns publicly back in Aug 2023 - when this community was small enough that a thread could shake an open call and accelerate the subnet architecture conversation (x.com/ProfFahdKhan/s…) - know how long this kind of primitive has been needed.
But commitment and integrity are different problems & both are different from process.
Locked Stake ends vibes-based commitment: you either locked or you didn't. The integrity layer - neutral subnet evaluation and verifiable Proof-of-Intelligence - ends vibes-based performance: the work either verifies or it doesn't.
What Const's statement shows is something upstream of both: the governance process that determines who builds these rules and how - protocol-level decisions that affect every subnet owner, every miner & every investor. Thursday call is a meaningful gesture toward transparency but I believe that it should become the foundation of something more formal - an independent advisory layer through which subnet founders, technical researchers and domain experts provide structured, public input on protocol development before decisions are finalized. An auditable, rotating function that gives this community visibility into who shapes the protocol and what they recommended. Const is right that we are moving toward a world of faceless agents and mathematical rules -which makes Legitimate Authorship of those rules the most urgent governance question in this space.
Having been part of this protocol's journey, I know these inflection points are where the real architecture is either built or abandoned. The weeks after #Bitcoin's Block Size Wars or the months after the #Ethereum DAO wars. What we construct in the aftermath determines the next decade.
Const is right about one thing without qualification: Bittensor is BY FAR the most decentralized #AI protocol in existence. I have believed that since before most people knew what it was. What I am proposing is not a critique of that achievement but an attempt to make it structurally undeniable.
Governance Debt doesn't get paid in one statement. It gets paid in consecutive structural decisions made with community input.
This is one. Let's make sure it's followed by more.
#Bittensor $TAO #DecentralizedAI
const@const_reborn
English
@Bi_Ariya @worldlibertyfi @justinsuntron Haha. Was getting pissed reading your post until the last line.
English
@worldlibertyfi @justinsuntron @justinsuntron you have 24hrs to retract your statement and remove your post. Past that deadline, you will get annihilated.
But after 24hrs, you will still have 2 weeks to comply…
English
Does anyone still believe @justinsuntron ?
Justin’s favorite move is playing the victim while making baseless allegations to cover up his own misconduct.
Same playbook, different target. WLFI isn't the first.
We have the contracts. We have the evidence. We have the truth.
See you in court pal.
English
You bring up a valid point of contention on if it’s rugging or dumping. I still think it was rugging as he sold all at once with no warning and then created a false narrative on why he was “dumping”. He could have sold in a number of other ways that would have still got him paid and not ruined the community. I believe it was malicious. It was purposefully done in a way to cause the most damage, not to just protect “his” investment. I think it was actually worse than rugging, it was malicious and intended to create more harm to the whole ecosystem.
English
@pyite20v @stillcorecap rug implies maliciousness, dump is more accurate
he dumped his coins in a way any whale can do
he was a trusted whale that broke that trust, but rugging implies a host of other behaviors in crypto, such as pumping a memecoin, and deception that there is simply no evidence for
English
They give you $2 million.
You got 20 minutes to spend it or it's gone.
Can't buy cars, planes, yachts, or houses.
No gold or diamonds either.
What you buying?
English
The you seem to not know what the meaning of “rug selling” is. When one “rugs” they sell the entire pool or their entire holdings which crushes the entire ecosystem and everyone involved. Sam did this. Const selling a small percentage of his holdings can in now way be considered a rug. Yes it had an effect, but the effect was not “rugging”. That’s the difference here.
English
@pyite20v @stillcorecap not sam , not a bot, just not a cult member apparently
if any other anonymous whale left like that, it would have similar effects
who created the incentives for him to leave? you are all about incentives right ?
well, const and others started rug selling alpha first
English
It will be interesting to see if Locked state becomes a requirement or an option for subnet owners. There might be a use case to stay out of locked state. Maybe it should be up to the community (market) to decide the risk premium of investing in a subnet that has or hasn’t committed to “locked state”.
English
No, this is stupid. No one out there is afraid of TAO, and really they shouldn’t be. It’s not going to compete against the big guys, it will be a small fraction of the total market, but offer a really important alternative. This was just simple money grab by the Nigerian prince, nothing more.
English
Has anyone considered the possibility that a higher power heard @chamath talk about the breakthrough 72b decentralised training run and didn't like it. What if this was an attack on Bittensor $TAO...
THEY somehow got Sam to rug the project in an attempt to kill it and do reputational damage to Bittensor.
The centralized AI powers are bigger than anyone can begin to imagine. Not ruling this out.
covenant@covenant_ai
English
@dougsillars @taostats I think it’s that Sam started selling, then others started selling because crazy drop, THEN the article came out. So FuDsters are saying insiders “knew” before the article
English
There's been some FUD here that "insiders" knew about the Covenant exit, and that "chain data" shows a huge exit just beforehand.
What does @taostats data show?
Teal - staking events
Orange - tao transactions
Hourly buckets.
yellow line is the exit.
I don't see huge movement.
English
@freedom_monk @stillcorecap “Protecting himself financially” by rugging the entire community of hundreds of millions of dollars is some serious delusional cope. Are you Sam? Or just a bot he built?
English
@stillcorecap But the way to address those concerns is to build, not to rug your own investors "
framing it as a rug is biased,
so Sam was being bullied and protected himself financially
but he should have continued to be bullied, have const devalue his alpha because TAO is a charity...ok
English
@jus112233 @thelocalcatguy @aixbt_agent The top subnet left because the owner wanted $10M more than he wanted to keep working. It’s a classic money grab bad actor.
English
@thelocalcatguy @pyite20v @aixbt_agent Moving forward of course when it’s decentralised. It can go on forever for sure but the question is why did the biggest $TAO subnet leave? @aixbt_agent
English
How high is the chance that $TAO will touch 100$ again? @aixbt_agent
English
@milg_777 @Eveningtraders @covenant_ai There certainly are some money grabbers but they will get purged as time goes on and the real shit will rise to the top. It’s just crazy that the top subnet turned from an actual achievement to a last minute money grab.
English
@Eveningtraders @covenant_ai Always knew this tao shit is a money grab
English
$TAO Just Lost 20% Since Covenant AI Announced The Leaving With Bittensor
@covenant_ai is leaving Bittensor. Sam Dare didn't just leave, he called the whole thing "decentralization theatre" and accused the founder of running a one-man show dressed up as a protocol.
This is the kind of exit that doesn't get forgotten. It becomes the quote people screenshot when the next red candle hits.
Details below 👇
@bittensor
covenant@covenant_ai
English
@Eveningtraders Wow you are knowingly creating FUD for something that there is already consensus on what happened. It’s amazing how shallow people will be to earn money. There is no shame anymore
English
$TAO SUSPICIOUS: A $10M dump just erased $600M in market cap from a $3B project
37,000 $TAO worth of subnets. One sell. 20% gone.
That's not a normal ratio. A move that small doesn't trigger damage that large unless the structure was already set up to break or the timing was deliberate.
Things weren't go that easy
Panic selling doesn't appear from nowhere. It gets triggered. And sometimes it gets coordinated.
If $600M can evaporate without any internal resolution, that's not dysfunction. That's design. At that point, the @covenant_ai drama looks less like a builder rage-quitting and more like a controlled exit with a convenient narrative attached
Think about it: how does a big player like Covenant just leave and dump everything they've built when they're partnered with someone like @bittensor? We smell a setup. Bittensor isn't the victim here; they're the ones pulling the strings from behind the veil
Evening Trader Group@Eveningtraders
$TAO Just Lost 20% Since Covenant AI Announced The Leaving With Bittensor @covenant_ai is leaving Bittensor. Sam Dare didn't just leave, he called the whole thing "decentralization theatre" and accused the founder of running a one-man show dressed up as a protocol. This is the kind of exit that doesn't get forgotten. It becomes the quote people screenshot when the next red candle hits. Details below 👇 @bittensor
English
Huh? Many of them already have. It’s already been debated to consensus of what happened and what Sam lied about, and what needs to be done going forward (but not how). Covenant is a scammer that drained the pool, sent it to binance, and is cashing out $10M so he doesn’t have to work anymore. It’s all on chain.
English
@pyite20v @Hustlepedia It would be nice if some of the other builders on TAO would speak out and back up one or the other side.
I'm just saying something was going on or this wouldn't have blown up like it did...
English
If Templar cared at all about their standing, they’d care about their $100M worth of holders.
And yes. If they were legit in the slightest, they’d care or have a bridge out.
But they don’t.
Bittensor ecosystem will live on, but that’s just egregious malpractice.
$TAOB
English
@JR_Openheimer @herelle_jean But in this case the exit did not take the IP with them. The miners still have it and the code still is open sourced. Anyone can pickup where they left off.
English
hi Jean, thanks for the reply
i'm more concerned that bittensor is nothing like a VC than with decentralization
VCs take equity in their portfolio companies. meaning the companies cant just take the VC investment money and give nothing back, if they company succeeds
but this can, and probably will, happen with any project that is a bittensor subnet and becomes successful
so bittensor is more like a grants provider than an investor in startups
a lot of people have been mislead about this
do you see the problem?
English
On Covenant exit from Bittensor:
Bitcoin had Mt. Gox. It had the block size war that tore the community in half and produced an actual hard fork... Ethereum had The DAO hack, a chain rollback that critics still call a betrayal of immutability...
Every one of those moments was framed at the time as the end of the experiment.
None of them brought down the thriving ecosystem at its inflection point.
Decentralized networks do not arrive finished. They get assembled in public, under load, with real money on the line and real people disagreeing about what the thing is supposed to be.
The plane gets built while it is flying, and sometimes turbulence hits hard enough and the crew has to keep welding through it. Bittensor is in that phase right now.
Covenant leaving is a stress test. One team left loudly and the protocol kept running. The other subnets kept running. Blocks kept producing.
Once the dust settles, what people will remember is what was already true before this week. Bittensor has traction.
English