THE PATRIOT TIMES

Israel did it

@thematrixb0t @d_oversole

Brave Mom in California Hunts down the pilots of the Geoengineering planes and gets their names

@Mlu__N2 What dude up here gives a shit, American women are cooked expect more of this because all the real men are going overseas for their wives

No listening to anyone chewing or coughing..... I can take a nap and not feel guilty.

@Mlu__N2 Welcome to a man's world

@FightStorage This is the major problem with black women they still think it's about them I think that any man that seeks to date a woman even if it is just a fling should deny her because that denial will grant opportunity for her to spend more time with those kids

13-year-old refuses to give up his birthday money to his mom so she can pay the bills 👀

🚨 Víctima de Epstein demanda al FBI por 100 millones de dólares por encubrimiento -En 1996 llamó al FBI. Abrieron un expediente. Luego le dijeron que nunca había existido. Pasó 29 años siendo tildada de mentirosa. El 3 de septiembre de 1996. Se abre un expediente en la sede del FBI. “Clasificación: pornografía infantil.” La mujer que realizó la llamada sólo ha sido identificada como "una artista profesional". -Describió las fotos que había visto dentro de una mansión en Manhattan. -Describió al hombre que era dueño de esas fotos. -Describió lo que presenció que les hacían a las jóvenes. Ella les dio todos los datos. Entonces esperó. Nadie devolvió la llamada. Nueve años después, un detective local de Palm Beach llamó a otra puerta. Encontró cuarenta víctimas. Entregó al FBI fotografías, videos y pruebas documentadas de trata de menores en varios estados. El FBI abrió una investigación formal. Dos años después, lo cerraron. Un acuerdo con la fiscalía. Trece meses. Salir antes del mediodía todos los días con permiso para trabajar. -El tráfico de personas continuó. El FBI siguió recibiendo denuncias. -Durante once años más, llevaron mujeres a su isla, a su casa en Manhattan y a su rancho privado. - Y durante esos once años más, el expediente permaneció allí. Fue necesario que un periodista de un periódico forzara la detención en 2019. Treinta y tres días después, “falleció” Ahora, doce mujeres —identificadas únicamente como Doe 1 a Doe 12— comparecen ante un tribunal federal. No están demandando a su patrimonio. Están demandando al FBI. Quieren 100 millones de dólares. Y quieren todos los documentos internos, todos los memorandos, todos los correos electrónicos que demuestren exactamente quién recibió cada aviso y quién tomó la decisión de no hacer nada. ❌ Pero aquí viene la parte que lo cambia todo. Cuando el FBI publicó su propia investigación interna en 2020, no mencionó la denuncia de 1996. Ni una sola vez. Durante otros cinco años, a la mujer que hizo esa llamada le dijeron: su informe no existe. En diciembre de 2025, el Departamento de Justicia confirmó que así fue. Una página, fechada el 3 de septiembre de 1996. Lo que significa que alguien dentro del FBI sabía que ese archivo existía y optó por no incluirlo en su propia revisión.

@FlagBlack007 Jalapeño peppers reduces blood pressure high blood pressure is to be blurry

Jalapeno Peppers 🌶️ Thoughts 💭 ⁉️

@_TruthZone_ They put an end to his royalties

Does anyone else besides me remember watching this movie? Apparently it never existed???? #mandelaeffect

You want the fingerprints? Fine. Psychological operations aren’t magic. They’re patterns. Once you see the pattern, it stops feeling like chaos and starts looking like choreography. Here’s the telltale playbook, stripped of politeness and dipped in a little gasoline: If every major outlet suddenly agrees, congratulations, you’re not watching journalism, you’re watching a choir. Real reality has friction. When there’s zero disagreement across competing interests, somebody handed out sheet music. If the story hits you with maximum emotional voltage and minimum verifiable detail, that’s not information, that’s bait. Rage, fear, outrage, urgency. All gas, no steering wheel. If you’re told “this is settled, don’t question it” within 24–72 hours of the event, that’s not clarity, that’s containment. Real investigations get messier over time, not cleaner on day two. If the narrative comes pre-packaged with good guys, bad guys, and a moral script, like a Netflix plot, you’re not being informed, you’re being cast as an extra. Complex events don’t arrive with theme music. If dissenting voices are instantly labeled with one convenient insult bucket, that’s a compression tactic. It saves people from thinking. Nuance dies, slogans win. If there’s a flood of identical talking points across different platforms, word-for-word like copy-paste clones, you’re looking at coordination. Humans disagree naturally. Bots and briefings don’t. If the story conveniently justifies a new policy, restriction, or funding push that was already floating around, that’s not coincidence, that’s alignment. Crisis becomes the delivery vehicle. If you’re overwhelmed with data, graphics, experts, and “studies” but can’t trace anything back to a clean, primary source, that’s informational smog. Looks official, feels authoritative, says very little. If timing feels suspiciously perfect, like right before elections, legislation, or major decisions, ask yourself who benefits from your attention being hijacked right now. If the focus is obsessively narrow, while bigger related questions are treated like forbidden territory, that’s framing. You’re allowed to look… just not over there. If critics aren’t debated but instead deplatformed, buried, or algorithmically vanished, that’s not confidence in truth, that’s fear of competition. If the narrative evolves quietly without accountability, meaning yesterday’s “facts” get replaced without apology, you’re not watching truth unfold, you’re watching version updates. And the big one: if it makes you feel like you need to react immediately instead of think, that’s the whole point. Speed kills analysis. None of this means every big story is some grand coordinated op. Sometimes chaos is just chaos. But when you see multiple of these signals stacked together, that’s when you stop consuming and start dissecting. Because the moment something is engineered, it stops trying to inform you and starts trying to use you.

Former Military Behavior Expert Chase Hughes on how to spot a Psyop.

@ittybitty_tsc @AmoneyResists

Kash Patel…

@JOKAQARMY1 White wash

The Vatican changed the Bible. 🤔

@thematrixb0t @RShackleford28

New leaked Epstein documents show the FBI removed the hard drive from the prison's camera system and wiped all footage from the night Jeffrey Epstein was murdered..

These men were among the earliest Black political leaders to enter the U.S. Congress during the Reconstruction era right after the Civil War, a brief window when federal power enforced civil rights in the South. Hiram Rhodes Revels became the first Black U.S. Senator in 1870, representing Mississippi, followed by figures like Joseph H. Rainey, the first Black member of the House, and Robert B. Elliott, a powerful orator who openly challenged white supremacy on the House floor. Others like Benjamin S. Turner, Josiah T. Walls, Robert Carlos De Large, and Jefferson F. Long were elected from Southern states where newly freed Black men briefly had voting power. These men were not symbolic placeholders, they were active legislators pushing for civil rights, education, and equal protection under the law. But their rise was short-lived. As Reconstruction ended in the late 1870s, federal troops withdrew, Southern states imposed Jim Crow laws, and Black political participation was systematically crushed through violence, voter suppression, and legal barriers. That’s why their presence feels rare in early historical imagery, not because they weren’t there, but because the system that allowed them to rise was deliberately dismantled.

President Trump posted this footage of New York City in 1929 Interesting year.. the Great Depression What do you notice about NYC compared to today?

@MJTruthUltra It looks completely off, there is something that is totally not natural about it, many of the people look robotic it looks like a staged event

@MbarkCherguia Wait till this bitch hits the wall then she's gonna come to the realization that her independence is total horseshit because the world is not made around women, correct me if I'm wrong but I do kind of remember when God said "I will make "for him" a help meet".

Men, would you date her?

@myc19631 The problem is women there are too many women in positions of power and they are naturally not supposed to be there

Jessica Saxton is on her game in Maricopa County Arizona.

The first shoe to drop in the CPS “legal child kidnapping” Jessica Saxton delivers two affidavits to the Cook County court 18 U.S.C.subsection 241 conspiracy against rights and 18 U.S.C.242 deprivation of rights under color of law, these affidavits claim violations of civil and constitutional rights. Hopefully a federal prosecutor will be taking up the case but this is something for the alleged victims of CPS‘s strong armed tactics of illicitly removing children from their homes, there have also been allegations that some of these CPS agencies are involved in trafficking. ⏺️ Primary Type and Title - It's explicitly called an "Affidavit of Criminal Conspiracy." ⏺️ It accuses named individuals (e.g., judges, CPS workers, guardians ad litem, social workers, attorneys) of participating in a coordinated criminal scheme involving: ⏺️ Conspiracy to deprive people of constitutional/civil rights (citing federal statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 241 — Conspiracy Against Rights — and 18 U.S.C. § 242 — Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law). ⏺️ Kidnapping or unlawful interference with familial relations (often framed as "legal kidnapping" of children via CPS/family court actions). ⏺️ Related claims of fraud, perjury, conflicts of interest, and systemic corruption in child welfare and family court proceedings. Nature and Purpose ⏺️ This is a sworn affidavit (notarized statement under penalty of perjury) created and served by activists like Saxton as part of a grassroots "affidavit movement." ⏺️ It's not a standard court-filed legal pleading (e.g., not a criminal complaint initiated by a prosecutor, nor a civil lawsuit filing). ⏺️ Instead, it's used as a form of public notice, protest, and pressure tactic: served in person (often dramatically in courtrooms, county commissioner meetings, or to government officials) to "provide notice" of alleged crimes, create a paper trail, invoke misprision of felony warnings (18 U.S.C. § 4 — failure to report a known felony), and encourage recipients to report to the FBI or face potential liability. ⏺️ The goal is to build public awareness, compile victim testimonies/evidence for potential future federal intervention (e.g., pushing toward Supreme Court arguments or large-scale investigations), and demand accountability outside traditional court channels.

We need more people like Jessica Saxton and Tanawah Downing putting these public officials on notice.