Quantіan

72.2K posts

Quantіan banner
Quantіan

Quantіan

@quantian1

Voted “Most Likely To Appear on Wikipedia’s ‘List of Largest Trading Losses’” among graduating class

Katılım Ocak 2015
514 Takip Edilen94.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
mfw the margin clerk taps me on the shoulder
Quantіan tweet media
English
19
35
1.1K
0
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
@ZakDavid If I ran a public company I would do earnings and conference calls on a weekend, partly for this reason but mostly to torment any analysts covering me
English
4
1
20
1.8K
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
Did Trump really tell the Japanese PM “we didn’t tell you about the Iran attack because you didn’t tell us about Pearl Harbor”?
English
12
5
210
18.9K
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
WORLDS FIRST AI POWERED JET FUCK YES OH HOLY SHIT CAN THEY MERGE WITH BOOM TOO TO MAKE IT SUPERSONIC AND AN AI POWER PLAY TOO
English
5
2
57
3.9K
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
@TheSpeculator0 What’s the deal with all the weird AI slop replies here , just farming Elonbux off a banger or what?
English
1
0
2
751
Speculator
Speculator@TheSpeculator0·
At hotel breakfast and a random toddler just walked up to me and my gf's table and went "mommy, daddy" while looking straight at us. I could hear her ovaries rumble
English
93
503
41.4K
842.1K
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
@ONAN_OUS Maybe you should try vibe coding a whole white girlfriend (b. 2004) for a change, zing
English
0
1
25
2.6K
ONAN
ONAN@ONAN_OUS·
Will have to test this out, can you vibe code hull white 2004
ONAN tweet media
English
2
0
13
1.4K
ONAN
ONAN@ONAN_OUS·
I want to start a bit where I ask every person that claims they built a new BBG whether they have a fixed income OMS or a CDS tranche pricer
coffeeshop george@coffeshopgeorge

@BluthCapital dude they literally built a new Bloomberg on perplexity it has orange ticker symbols, black background, erythang but with there is more just launched perplexity computer which can do things like this:

English
2
0
45
6.2K
Quantіan retweetledi
Circe
Circe@vocalcry·
Everything is perfectly clear. Iran could not be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, which they have been months away from developing for well over a decade. Also, Trump is the only president who could have kept us out of war with Iran, as he himself repeatedly told us. So we destroyed their nuclear capabilities, which Tulsi said they didn't have, in 2025. Then we attacked them last month because Israel was going to attack them because they were months away from developing a nuclear weapon since we destroyed their nuclear capabilities, and that would lead Iran to attack American bases. Iran has never posed a threat to the United States, but we had to attack them first, not because of Israel, but because they posed an imminent threat to the United States. Fortunately, we have won the war, which was not a war but a special operation, in Iran now several times in the last two weeks. It is basically over but might not be over for some time because we already won. We also don't need anyone to help open the Strait of Hormuz, which we knew they would close, which is why we didn't prepare, and we now need allies to help open. What are you guys not understanding?
Karoline Leavitt@PressSec

There are many false claims in this letter but let me address one specifically: that "Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation."   This is the same false claim that Democrats and some in the liberal media have been repeating over and over.   As President Trump has clearly and explicitly stated, he had strong and compelling evidence that Iran was going to attack the United States first.   This evidence was compiled from many sources and factors. President Trump would never make the decision to deploy military assets against a foreign adversary in a vacuum.   Iran is the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism. The Iranian regime is evil. It proudly killed Americans, waged war against our country, and openly threatened us all the way up to the launch of Operation Epic Fury.   Iran was aggressively expanding their short-range ballistic missiles to combine with their naval assets to give themselves immunity – meaning they would have a degree of a capabilities that would give them immunity to hold us and the rest of the world hostage.   The regime aimed to use those ballistic missiles as a shield to continue achieving their ultimate goal – nuclear weapons.   The President, through his top negotiators, gave the regime every single possible opportunity to abandon this unacceptable course by permanently giving up their nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief, free nuclear fuel, and potential economic partnerships with our country.   But they would not say yes to peace because obtaining nuclear weapons was their fundamental goal.   President Trump ultimately made the determination that a joint attack with Israel would greatly reduce the risk to American lives that would come from a first strike by the terrorist Iranian regime and address this imminent threat to America’s national security interests.   All of this led to President Trump arriving at the determination that this military operation was necessary for U.S. national security, which is why he launched the massively successful Operation Epic Fury. The Commander-in-Chief determines what does and does not constitute a threat, because he is the one constitutionally empowered to do so - and because the American people went to the ballot box and entrusted him and him alone to make such final judgments. And finally, the absurd allegation that President Trump made this decision based on the influence of others, even foreign countries, is both insulting and laughable. President Trump has been remarkably consistent and has said for DECADES that Iran can NEVER possess a nuclear weapon. As someone who actually witnesses President Trump’s decision-making process on a daily basis, I can attest to the fact that he is always looking to do what’s in the best interest of the United States of America — period. America First.

English
311
2.8K
15.8K
920K
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
@__paleologo I asked it a question and it gave me a really great answer but when I tried to follow up the AI said it was on gardening leave and I should check back in six months?
English
1
0
137
6.9K
Gappy (Giuseppe Paleologo)
Someone made an AI version of myself. Took the books, the slides of my course, the tweets, the jokes. Now you can ask questions, test portfolios, etc. I haven't checked calculations etc., but directionally this interactive web site is really neat! 1/2
Gappy (Giuseppe Paleologo) tweet mediaGappy (Giuseppe Paleologo) tweet media
English
13
24
442
46.4K
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
@VixCentral If this happens SPX is at like 3500, which is only suffering the least because every other county’s index is -75%
English
2
0
116
9.1K
Eli Mintz
Eli Mintz@VixCentral·
A likely scenario, that is ignored, is that the Strait of Hormuz will not be worth opening because the US and Iran will have demolished most of the oil and gas infrastructure there. A bad outcome for everybody, but the US suffers the least, and that is why I think it is likely.
English
12
2
54
11.5K
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
@AnonymousLeftie His own screenshot says it establishes mandarin as the state language for official business and minority languages are only used in documents if "required by relevant laws and regulations", which is more restrictive than the US (Trump's bullshit EO notwithstanding)
English
0
0
11
1.5K
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
Happy Ides of March, please enjoy one of my favorite Shakespearian monologues; Cassius’ republican incitement to Brutus to join the conspiracy against Caesar:
Quantіan tweet media
English
0
10
106
7.6K
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
A moral dilemma straight from the headlines: A man used Grok to develop a mRNA vaccine to possibly cure his dying dog of cancer. The university manufacturing it required a lengthy ethics review to give it. The vaccine appears mostly ineffective. Who, if any, is being immoral?
English
16
0
15
10.7K
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
@LogosPhilo If someone tells you “it was stupid for you to go reraise pocket sevens with an ace showing on the flop”, that doesn’t mean they want you to lose, it means they are correctly saying you made a bad decision and need to try to mitigate the damage before you make it even worse.
English
2
1
56
745
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
@LogosPhilo They can’t choose the outcome! The point of the argument is that war is a risky endeavor where a potential outcome is “you lose”, which is why the President shouldn’t be able to start one on a whim with minimal preparation, no clear strategic goal, and low domestic buy-in.
English
2
0
96
1.6K
Cassie Pritchard
Cassie Pritchard@hecubian_devil·
I was a barista for 4 years and a customer’s partisanship was strongly predicted by how complicated/sugary their order was (after adjusting for race, gender, and age). Black coffee orders at Starbucks are overwhelmingly driven by liberal white men.
Howard Mortman@HowardMortman

"This is a cup of Starbucks coffee. I checked: The most popular Starbucks coffee drink is a caramel macchiato. Caramel macchiato. Now I don't know what that is. I haven't had it. I generally don't drink coffee that takes ten or more words to order." -- @SenJohnKennedy

English
348
117
6.7K
1.6M
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
@DSteez510 @hecubian_devil @fintwit_lurker I would guess it’s more driven openness to experience correlating with both being a lib and having a desire to fully explore a set of things to determine which is the best vs. stick with what you know you like
English
0
0
3
171
Quantіan
Quantіan@quantian1·
@ridireresearch @DeepDishEnjoyer Why would I consider fragmenting liquidity to improve outcomes? I don’t want people to create the 326th venue for trading a crude-like product, I want everyone to use the 1st venue to concentrate market depth.
English
1
0
11
363