
QU₳Z₳R
40.1K posts

QU₳Z₳R
@QuasarSure
Into the Systems and Objects and Things Gamechanger Builder discord: https://t.co/Sg3iJlb7LM











Intersect membership fee should be raise to 50-100 usd. It is too easy to game the system with 10 usd. You have voting power even dreps have to pay 500 ADA currently, Just found out about someone asking why the kyc for the 20 people he brought in was delayed. You invest 800 USD. You get 80 votes, you secure a voting seat in the committee. You get 6000 ADA as a member, 9000 ADA as a co chair and 12000 ADA as a chair. You sit in 2 committees because you are allowed to. You 4x-8x you investment. Thats literally incentivizing corruption. It may damage intersect image temporarily to accept that reality but long term it will improve its efficiency. For those that say we don’t get value for increased membership price I leave you with this message I got: Please fix this issue @JBriggsLondon and intersect team.

ONE VAULT TO POWER THEM ALL Atlas uses a unified stablecoin liquidity vault. Instead of fragmenting liquidity across separate pools for each asset, all liquidity is combined into a single shared vault that powers the entire platform. This means Atlas can support perps for: $BTC $ADA $ETH $XRP But also Cardano native assets like: $SNEK $IAG $WMTX and more over time. Most platforms require separate liquidity pools for every new market. Atlas does not. The same unified liquidity engine can support multiple markets simultaneously, creating: • Deeper liquidity • Better capital efficiency • Easier scaling • Lower LP volatility • Stronger long-term scalability Example: Launching SNEK perps on most platforms would require building an entirely separate SNEK liquidity pool. On Atlas, SNEK can simply tap into the same vault already powering BTC, ADA, and other markets. That is the power of unified liquidity. “One vault powering perpetual markets across Cardano and beyond.”





dReps need to have a North Star what we want to achieve in Cardano. Each dRep could have own north star. Ultimately what increases transaction count, more stakers (nothing wrong with buying and staking ADA), more investments, more TVL? Learning from other ecosystems looks like people want mainly smooth DeFi: - smooth UX and dApp experience (e.g. lowering minUTxO, transaction chaining) - USDC(x) supported with good exchanges support and low slippage on DEXes - at least 2 well working bridges (e.g. wormhole, wanchain, etc) - perps and yield opportunity in general - good prediction market - speed (Leios) and finality (Peras) - gasless / micro transactions of sponsored transactions New Narratives: - BTC DeFi (beaming back and forth), e.g. Bifrost. BTC collateralized loans - Formal Verification to capture unhappy people from Ethereum DeFi, others, hacks will only increase with Claude Mythos on those chains - Privacy with selective disclosure (Midnight?) - Agentic AI + blockchain, agents paying each other, transacting, having wallets - x402 (hard competition with more centralised cheaper blockchains) - attestations for AI on blockchain (@fluxpointstudio) - Automatic Yield Earning, e.g. ADAM (@fluxpointstudio), using Claude Code and AI Agents to earn yield - DeFi Kernel as alternative to AMM DEXes (more capital efficient) - Digital Product Passport (DPP) - a very serious non DeFi use case I don't think more users are coming because of (my opinion): - 10 plutus languages (Aiken is decent enough) - 10 cardano node implementations Some diversity is ok but it has limits I think. As everybody is complaining that lots of treasury requests are coming, I look at this differently, there is a lot to choose from, in fact maybe too little. Do you prefer to have less choice or more choice? Imagine in the future not only we have this amount of proposals but also some cheaper, some more expensive for the same "business problem". #Cardano



Roundtable Talk – DRep Participation in Focus: Power Is One Thing, Participation Is Another 📅 May 4, 2026 - 14:00 UTC Participation, consistency, and accountability remain key themes in recent discussions around DReps. Questions around engagement levels, voting rationale's, and DRep fatigue point to a broader challenge - one needing a public debate. This Roundtable Talk creates space for open, constructive dialogue. We’ll explore what healthy participation looks like, how accountability can be strengthened, and what’s needed to support DRePs over time. The goal is simple, better understand what’s working, what’s not, and what needs to evolve to strengthen DRep participation as intended by design. Joining the Roundtable: - @hix_coffeepool - @RodrigoPacini - @NicolasC3rny - @bhra_freezy - @Lo_Ponch - @kenerik - @tsnnst






