Rahul Thakor
651 posts




LLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.














We ran India’s OpenClaw Buildathon this Sunday for @GrowthX_Club . 1,000 applied. 30 got in. 8 hours. No slides. All 30 demoed. Every single one. (Someone flew in from Chennai just to be in the room) That's the Pune edition of India's @OpenClaw Buildathon. One brief. Build an AI agent from scratch using OpenClaw. Demo it live. Before we started, I made one promise. You will build your agent in 4 hours. And you will show it to everyone in the room. . . . . . After silence of 8 hours... They walked out having demoed the working agent. But the real thing they walked out with? Confidence. Confidence that they can build with AI. That they can solve their own problems with it. Not someday. Today. That's harder to give someone than a certificate or a prize. You can only earn it by finishing. The difference was in the preparation. We planned for the 20th problem a builder might hit - before anyone hit it. The handbook answered questions before they became blockers. Mentors only had to show up for the hard stuff. Nobody lost flow chasing an answer. @udayan_w wrote exactly why this works. Every barrier he called out showed up in Pune and every solution did too. [link to comment] Joining GrowthX has been consistently proving one of the best decisions I've taken in 2025. Rooms like this are why. Thanks to my co-hosts @hey_yogini and @AlokBhawan72070 for holding the room right. And One2N for the space and the warmth. @OpenAI and @Hostinger - you kept 30 builders unblocked for 8 straight hours. If you compress time, raise the bar, and force demos. People don't just talk about AI. They build. They Ship. They evolve. Pune proved that. Sending love from India @steipete🦞






