Rahul Thakor

651 posts

Rahul Thakor banner
Rahul Thakor

Rahul Thakor

@rahthakor

Exploring AI

1:1 ➜ Katılım Ocak 2014
332 Takip Edilen242 Takipçiler
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
@NirDiamantAI Peter Steinberger told me that he wants PR to be "prompt request". His agents are perfectly capable of implementing most ideas, so there is no need to take your idea, expand it into a vibe coded mess using free tier ChatGPT and send that as a PR, which is now most PRs.
English
72
111
2.4K
271.6K
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
Wow, this tweet went very viral! I wanted share a possibly slightly improved version of the tweet in an "idea file". The idea of the idea file is that in this era of LLM agents, there is less of a point/need of sharing the specific code/app, you just share the idea, then the other person's agent customizes & builds it for your specific needs. So here's the idea in a gist format: gist.github.com/karpathy/442a6… You can give this to your agent and it can build you your own LLM wiki and guide you on how to use it etc. It's intentionally kept a little bit abstract/vague because there are so many directions to take this in. And ofc, people can adjust the idea or contribute their own in the Discussion which is cool.
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy

LLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.

English
1K
2.7K
25.7K
6.4M
Rahul Thakor
Rahul Thakor@rahthakor·
What if anthropic made separate sub plan for OC?
English
0
0
0
11
Rahul Thakor
Rahul Thakor@rahthakor·
@willahmed Decisions are not right or wrong. We make them right or wrong. Congratulations 🙌
English
0
0
0
97
Will Ahmed
Will Ahmed@willahmed·
You have no experience. You’ve never started a company. You’ve never had a full time job. Nike is going to kill you. You’re a kid. You don’t have technical skills. You shouldn’t build hardware. Apple is going to kill you. You can’t build hardware. You can’t measure heart rate non-invasively. Athletes don’t care about recovery. Under Armour is going to kill you. It won’t be accurate. You don’t listen. You’re an ineffective leader. You can’t recruit great talent. You’re going to have to pay every athlete. You can’t measure sleep non-invasively. It’s too expensive to research. Athletes are a small market. The product costs too much to make. The product costs too much to sell. Your valuation is too high. Consumers aren’t going to want it. Hardware is too hard. You should measure steps. Fitbit is going to kill you. You can’t build a marketing engine. You can’t raise enough money. You need a real CEO. Google is going to kill you. You can’t be a subscription. You can’t build a brand. You can’t do consumer in Boston. Your valuation is too high. You shouldn’t make accessories. You shouldn’t make apparel. Lululemon is going to kill you. You can’t predict Covid. Stay in your niche. You are going to run out of money. You can’t build a health platform. Amazon is going to kill you. You can’t measure blood pressure. You can’t get medical approvals. The market is too small. You don’t understand AI. The market is too competitive. It won’t work internationally. The supply chain is too complicated. You can’t build an AI. You can’t raise enough money. It’s too competitive. Healthcare isn’t going to want it. … Just keep going ✌️
Will Ahmed tweet media
English
1.1K
2.8K
22.9K
2.3M
Manthan Gupta
Manthan Gupta@manthanguptaa·
Claude Code is the 4th on the list of contributors on an OpenAI repository 😂
Manthan Gupta tweet media
English
16
0
111
8.6K
Rahul Thakor
Rahul Thakor@rahthakor·
@udayan_w Making pixel perfect design is hard. Gonna try it today.
English
1
0
2
3.2K
Udayan Walvekar
Udayan Walvekar@udayan_w·
ai SUCKS at frontend!!! taking my first step towards solving it. launching clearshot 📸 if your org doesn't truly care about design, this thread isn't for you. but for companies that truly care about design? keep reading.
Udayan Walvekar tweet media
English
25
19
725
74.4K
Jason Fried
Jason Fried@jasonfried·
Fuck it, we just made Fizzy completely free. The open source installable version was always free, but the SaaS version was pay. No more. Basecamp and HEY's largess will subsidize Fizzy for all. So go grab your account at Fizzy.do. It's Kanban the way it should be, not the way it has been. Fresh, fun, light, fast, and perfect for working with agents, too. An official CLI is coming soon as well. Stay tuned for that. The native iOS app should be out once Apple approves it (it's in approval right now...). Android is already out, you can get it on the Play store. (and BTW if you were a paying customer, you will no longer be charged moving forward)
English
149
182
2.4K
274.1K
Rahul Thakor
Rahul Thakor@rahthakor·
The only to progress now is understanding.
English
0
0
0
13
Rahul Thakor
Rahul Thakor@rahthakor·
@hey_yogini Haha that’s true. I have been victim of it too! Had to set up a workflow in cowork to do the rest and get weekly brief / todo.
English
0
0
1
24
Yogini Bende
Yogini Bende@hey_yogini·
My new hobby is saving X articles and then never reading them.
English
24
2
64
2.6K
Rahul Thakor
Rahul Thakor@rahthakor·
@aakashgupta i do like your thoughts but seems you have become content slop. Too much noise on my tl.
English
0
0
0
7
Rahul Thakor
Rahul Thakor@rahthakor·
@trq212 It was good session. Please share session notes
English
1
0
0
590
Rahul Thakor
Rahul Thakor@rahthakor·
Time management is nothing but pain management
English
0
0
0
16
Baris Akis
Baris Akis@barisakis·
Thrilled to welcome @milichab and @JasonBud to build what’s possible at XAI + SpaceX The AI products that truly transforms the world and delivers abundance for humanity won't look like today's tools. It demands first-principles rethinking, grand ambition, vastly more training compute—and crucially, 100X+ inference scale to serve billions in real time. What gets me out of bed every morning is the certainty that this future is within reach, but only possible within one ecosystem that innovates across energy, chips, data centers, AI models, space ships, internet, and humanoid robots.
English
129
168
3.5K
447.4K
Nishkarsh
Nishkarsh@contextkingceo·
We've raised $6.5M to kill vector databases. Every system today retrieves context the same way: vector search that stores everything as flat embeddings and returns whatever "feels" closest. Similar, sure. Relevant? Almost never. Embeddings can’t tell a Q3 renewal clause from a Q1 termination notice if the language is close enough. A friend of mine asked his AI about a contract last week, and it returned a detailed, perfectly crafted answer pulled from a completely different client’s file. Once you’re dealing with 10M+ documents, these mix-ups happen all the time. VectorDB accuracy goes to shit. We built @hydra_db for exactly this. HydraDB builds an ontology-first context graph over your data, maps relationships between entities, understands the 'why' behind documents, and tracks how information evolves over time. So when you ask about 'Apple,' it knows you mean the company you're serving as a customer. Not the fruit. Even when a vector DB's similarity score says 0.94. More below ⬇️
English
623
635
5.9K
3.8M
Piyush Dinde
Piyush Dinde@PiyushDinde·
Launching @open_scout_ Something I have been working for quite some time and super excited to bring it to you! OpenScout helps businesses find conversations that matter across Reddit, Hacker News, Twitter/X, and LinkedIn. Most brands miss 90% of the conversations happening about their product category online. Someone asks "what's the best tool for X?" on Reddit, a competitor gets mentioned on Hacker News, a potential customer tweets about their frustration and you never see it. OpenScout fixes this. We analyse your product, understand your customers and competitors and then surface high-value opportunities - recommendation threads, buying signals, competitor complaints. OpenScout also drafts platform-appropriate replies so you can engage while the conversation is still warm. Stop missing leads. Start showing up where it matters. Link in the comments:
English
3
3
9
290
Rahul Thakor
Rahul Thakor@rahthakor·
We ran India’s OpenClaw Buildathon this Sunday for @GrowthX_Club . 1,000 applied. 30 got in. 8 hours. No slides. All 30 demoed. Every single one. (Someone flew in from Chennai just to be in the room) That's the Pune edition of India's @OpenClaw Buildathon. One brief. Build an AI agent from scratch using OpenClaw. Demo it live. Before we started, I made one promise. You will build your agent in 4 hours. And you will show it to everyone in the room. . . . . . After silence of 8 hours... They walked out having demoed the working agent. But the real thing they walked out with? Confidence. Confidence that they can build with AI. That they can solve their own problems with it. Not someday. Today. That's harder to give someone than a certificate or a prize. You can only earn it by finishing. The difference was in the preparation. We planned for the 20th problem a builder might hit - before anyone hit it. The handbook answered questions before they became blockers. Mentors only had to show up for the hard stuff. Nobody lost flow chasing an answer. @udayan_w wrote exactly why this works. Every barrier he called out showed up in Pune and every solution did too. [link to comment] Joining GrowthX has been consistently proving one of the best decisions I've taken in 2025. Rooms like this are why. Thanks to my co-hosts @hey_yogini and @AlokBhawan72070 for holding the room right. And One2N for the space and the warmth. @OpenAI and @Hostinger - you kept 30 builders unblocked for 8 straight hours. If you compress time, raise the bar, and force demos. People don't just talk about AI. They build. They Ship. They evolve. Pune proved that. Sending love from India @steipete🦞
Rahul Thakor tweet mediaRahul Thakor tweet media
English
3
5
18
2.2K
Rahul Thakor
Rahul Thakor@rahthakor·
Are we just dog fooding for future generations to become dumb and make machines / AI more smart?
English
0
0
0
31
Sanket Nadhani
Sanket Nadhani@sanketnadhani·
Locked myself in with 30 other folks to build something with OpenClaw last Sunday. Basic stuff but at least got the confidence going.
Rahul Thakor@rahthakor

We ran India’s OpenClaw Buildathon this Sunday for @GrowthX_Club . 1,000 applied. 30 got in. 8 hours. No slides. All 30 demoed. Every single one. (Someone flew in from Chennai just to be in the room) That's the Pune edition of India's @OpenClaw Buildathon. One brief. Build an AI agent from scratch using OpenClaw. Demo it live. Before we started, I made one promise. You will build your agent in 4 hours. And you will show it to everyone in the room. . . . . . After silence of 8 hours... They walked out having demoed the working agent. But the real thing they walked out with? Confidence. Confidence that they can build with AI. That they can solve their own problems with it. Not someday. Today. That's harder to give someone than a certificate or a prize. You can only earn it by finishing. The difference was in the preparation. We planned for the 20th problem a builder might hit - before anyone hit it. The handbook answered questions before they became blockers. Mentors only had to show up for the hard stuff. Nobody lost flow chasing an answer. @udayan_w wrote exactly why this works. Every barrier he called out showed up in Pune and every solution did too. [link to comment] Joining GrowthX has been consistently proving one of the best decisions I've taken in 2025. Rooms like this are why. Thanks to my co-hosts @hey_yogini and @AlokBhawan72070 for holding the room right. And One2N for the space and the warmth. @OpenAI and @Hostinger - you kept 30 builders unblocked for 8 straight hours. If you compress time, raise the bar, and force demos. People don't just talk about AI. They build. They Ship. They evolve. Pune proved that. Sending love from India @steipete🦞

English
2
0
7
533