ifudisagreeimbetter

@lost_nomad__ True with any system though

@lost_nomad__ Women’s votes would have to be worth less than men’s for that to work

Of course, I don’t approve of this negativity toward men. It’s repulsive But the effect of having a gender skew toward female might be positive. Is there a reason to believe we wouldn’t all be happier with, say, 55% women and 45% men?

@QuartzN1nja Yeah but you know a lot of people will change their mind to red right at the last second, just in case.

Even from a practical standpoint, you're absolutely more likely to get a 50% on blue than a 100% on red. Pretending otherwise is just self-deception. You're choosing security at the cost of others' lives, but you don't want to feel bad about it.

@GoJ3DaReal @ChudTheBuilder @NotBubbz You’re a retard

@rando51423 @ChudTheBuilder @NotBubbz No dumbass you just don’t understand that white trash nobodies like your ancestors didn’t own slaves it was rich people. Retarded ass doesn’t even know your recent history because you’re from a bloodline of failures. There’s a reason there’s freed slaves doing better than you rn.

They pussy honestly cuz why nobody hasn't swung on him yet?

@covie_93 Every year with you people, hallucinating racism wherever you go.

If the Black vote wasn't powerful Republicans wouldn't be trying so hard to weaken it.

@TheJFreakinC Ok so the law needs to cha he. Legality does not equal morality. The agents were in the right morally, that’s all that matters.

🚨An ICE agent illegally pulled over a car in Farmingdale, Maine… without probable cause… and tried to tell people, legally in the U.S., that they don’t have the right to stay. The agent says, on video, “Just because you came to this country and applied for asylum… doesn’t mean you get to stay here.” Except… it literally does. That’s not an opinion. That’s the law. If you apply for asylum, you have a legal right to remain in the United States while your case is processed. Period. So what just happened here? An armed federal agent pulled over a vehicle, without probable cause, misstated the law, and tried to intimidate people out of rights they legally have. That’s a constitutional violation. The Fourth Amendment requires probable cause to stop and detain someone. You don’t get to pull people over just because you feel like it or because of who they are. And Maine law enforcement has already made this clear in other cases… if there’s no probable cause, you don’t get to hold someone. That’s a basic constitutional protection. Then there’s due process… Asylum seekers are in a legal process. They are not “illegal” for being here. The government itself allowed them in while their cases are pending. So, when an ICE agent tells them they don’t have the right to stay… That’s not just wrong, that’s the government lying about your rights to your face. And when the people in the car pushed back… when they actually knew the law… The agent left. Because he never had the legal authority to begin with. This is the pattern we keep seeing… People with legal status being stopped, questioned, detained, or targeted anyway. Even recent reporting out of Maine shows asylum seekers, with no criminal records, being stopped during enforcement operations, and taken. They test the line… cross it… and hope nobody notices. That’s how intimidation works. And no one is holding them accountable.

@GoJ3DaReal @ChudTheBuilder @NotBubbz Because the generational wealth from slavery narrative is fake and retarded.

@ChudTheBuilder @NotBubbz If your ancestors owned slaves why don’t you have any generational wealth and have to resort to depending on black people to make a living weird ass nigga? You come from a long line of inadequate poor whites that line will end with you tho thankfully👌

@RossKneeDeep “Can anyone honestly say that the current movement of America hasn’t been to disenfranchise black people?” Yes, anyone who says it is honest and those who say otherwise are lying.

Can anyone honestly say that the current movement of America hasn't been to disenfranchise black people? Affirmative action, gone. DEI considerations, gone. Black military leadership, gone. Black women in government jobs, gone. Black History, erased. Voting rights, suppressed. Civil Rights, gone. Even the MAGA tap dancers are being removed. One thing for sure is that we are currently moonwalking back in time to a time that "Makes America Great Again" for some people. It's no longer a hidden agenda. The question is, why are we heading in this direction? What's the benefit?

@_ZenzenE_ @StefanMolyneux I’m only seeing people talk about saving babies because I said it yesterday and I’m getting algo’d with it. That’s a fine reason for picking blue. It’s also reasonable to intuitively set aside people in these scenarios who can’t listen to the question and make a decision.

@rando51423 @StefanMolyneux Just because you didn't think about the children when you first made your choice doesn't mean others also didn't.

I’m sorry you don’t understand the word “everyone.” Maybe grab a dictionary before debating in English

@H0und0fG0d @CheckmateSoon @StefanMolyneux That then changes the scenario in my mind, from first interpretation. “Everyone” could mean “literally every human” Or could imply some limitation “everyone (who is reading this)”

@rando51423 @CheckmateSoon @StefanMolyneux I'd include them too then. Physical capability to press a button has no slippery slope problem where new categories of people are constantly excluded lowering the selection set forever until "everyone" functionally includes a minority.

@H0und0fG0d @CheckmateSoon @StefanMolyneux You’re still including babies though. 1 year olds can identify colors and press buttons

@rando51423 @CheckmateSoon @StefanMolyneux Identification does not mean "knowing intimately what the choices of red and blue mean" Using that definition you could just arbitrarily exclude anyone from the scenario you think has stupid reasoning.

@AX4sqhGS @ChuckW84381 @StefanMolyneux So how does an infant make a decision here?

@ChuckW84381 @StefanMolyneux No, the hypothesis specifies everyone gets teleported to a magic room to push a button with no coordination possible

@H0und0fG0d @CheckmateSoon @StefanMolyneux So an infant kicking his or her legs randomly? And unborn baby kicking against the mother’s belly could physically push a button. There’s no hard line, just a matter of what you and the other debater agree on. I intuitively only included those who can read and make a choice.

@CheckmateSoon @StefanMolyneux The line is logically drawn at the physical possibility of said person pushing a button. That's an objective standard. If we limit it to some level of rationality it's a slope where we can start excluding the mentally ill, people under 100 IQ, etc.

@1776General_ Don’t run out of chicken tenders next time

What do you call this?

@Nickisbackbaby It’s because they’re antiwhite.Killing white people is tolerable while killing nonwhite people is always wrong.

Can someone explain this to me like you would a child. The majority of liberals oppose the death penalty even for horrendous crimes. But are totally fine with abortions. Why? I fail to see the logic.

@WallStreetApes Well it works 🤷‍♂️ teenage and 20 year old girls are obsessed with the experience of paying $9 for Starbucks.

Starbucks CEO defends a cup of coffee costing $9 He says the customers needs to just not think about it as a $9 cup of coffee, you’re paying for the “experience” of getting a Starbucks coffee “In some cases a $9 experience does feel like you're splurging, and then what that means is we have to make it worthwhile.” He says Starbucks customers “want to have a special experience and regardless of what your income level is, in some cases, a $9 experience does feel like you're splurging — well, this is a really affordable premium experience” How out of touch could a person possibly be…

@bAnthonYsr 20 years ago it was “underpolicing” causing all the black crime. Now it’s “overpolicing” Some may be tempted to think you’ll eventually run out of excuses and accept that blacks are more criminal, but no. We’ll soften the police, and the next generation will say “underpolicing”.

Black neighborhoods are policed at higher rates than white neighborhoods in the USA‼️🧐

@Narupiv @AcSK1LLies Troon logic.

@AcSK1LLies Even if kids WERENT voting, then Red is voting to kill EVERY SINGLE KID because red winning means "ONLY people who pressed the red button survive." and kids not voting means kids didn't press the red button. No matter how you slice it, red is the Murder button.

“most people assumed” That’s their fault for not grasping the concept of “everyone”. Or not wanting to for obvious reasons. It doesn’t mean that you get to only include 100% rational thinkers into the equation. It means everyone. Literally. That’s the crux of the issue.

@AcSK1LLies @ketsuko243 You’re a retard. This person was patiently explaining to you something that you clearly did not grasp, and you respond condescendingly. Retard.

@ketsuko243 That's a lot of words just to say you need to pretend to not know that everyone means everyone.