RaresGh⚡🌱

13.1K posts

RaresGh⚡🌱 banner
RaresGh⚡🌱

RaresGh⚡🌱

@rares_gh

Work hard and live like you want!

Katılım Nisan 2021
1.2K Takip Edilen987 Takipçiler
Ethereum Daily
Ethereum Daily@ETH_Daily·
Solana looks like a child's toy when compared to Ethereum in terms of decentralization. Ethereum: 897,300 validators Solana: 752 validators
Ethereum Daily tweet media
English
88
86
475
41.6K
BLMihnea
BLMihnea@blmihnea·
Bursa de valori Bucuresti depaseste 300k investitori si cred ca un merit foarte mare il are @MultiversX Nu degeaba in 2019 erau doar 55k. Vrem sau nu vrem sa recunoastem, EGLD a convins o gramada de romani sa investeasca, initial in crypto si probabil o parte mare din ei se orienteaza acum si catre bursa tinand cont ca acolo au existat castiguri mai bune comparativ cu crypto.
Română
26
11
269
12.3K
RaresGh⚡🌱 retweetledi
Adam Ogilvie.voice.dgb
Adam Ogilvie.voice.dgb@Adam_Ogilvie_·
Who REALLY has the strongest crypto community on X? Comment your favorite. I’m adding the top picks to the next pool 🔥 $KAS $XRP $MON near:native elrond-erd-2:native $RVN #Ravencoin digibyte:native
English
43
37
115
7.3K
RaresGh⚡🌱 retweetledi
Robert Sasu | dev/acc
Robert Sasu | dev/acc@SasuRobert·
The whole thing better than watchers is PROOF. Build trust by proof. We build the whole agentic stack so that agents can simply work and prove that they execute actually what they say they do, with the given parameters and everything. When all the standards are integrated, easy to use, one liner to use, agents can work seamlessly across the board, no gatekeeping, no extra fees, and they can choose other agents to work with. And every action has instant, subsecond finality. This is MultiversX and the agentic stack.
Multiversᕽ@MultiversX

x.com/i/article/2044…

English
4
26
120
2.1K
Brian Armstrong
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong·
Agentic commerce isn’t priced in yet. Machine-to-machine payments will increase demand for the digital dollar beyond current estimates. The agentic economy could be larger than the human economy. We're building the infrastructure for both at Coinbase.
English
712
683
5.9K
761.1K
Sui Insiders💧
Sui Insiders💧@SuiInsiders·
SUI-BASED PROJECTS SET FOR BINANCE LISTING 🔥 The $SUI ecosystem is heating up again. Projects are growing fast and the attention is coming back strong.😍 Which ones could be next to get listed on Binance? 👀 Like and RT to support us 🙏 #Sui #SuiNetwork #SUI
Sui Insiders💧 tweet media
English
13
31
142
3.2K
Hasnain3IN0NE
Hasnain3IN0NE@Hasnain4383PTI·
@binance Koi mujhe samjhade iska kiya matlab hy, ye delist horaha hy? Sale kerdein? Xmn kiya hy?
Eesti
2
0
1
388
RaresGh⚡🌱 retweetledi
Adam Ogilvie.voice.dgb
Adam Ogilvie.voice.dgb@Adam_Ogilvie_·
Which cryptocurrency project is better suited to become the world's stable financial system? Sorry, I'm limited to 4 options in the poll, feel free to comment your choice below.
English
112
138
284
23.6K
RaresGh⚡🌱 retweetledi
Lucian Mincu
Lucian Mincu@lucianmincu·
🇺🇸 EGLD Enters the US Institutional Conversation ——— State of Arizona advanced two crypto bills to a full House vote. SB1042 allows 10% of state public funds into digital assets. SB1649 creates a Digital Assets Strategic Reserve Fund, first of its kind in the US. SB1649 names 14 cryptocurrencies by name. Selection criteria: adoption, transactions, transaction value, development ecosystem. EGLD is one of the 14. ——— If passed, Arizona creates the first US state crypto reserve. EGLD eligible from day one. The precedent opens the door for other states and bigger institutional adoption. source: azleg.gov/legtext/57leg/…
Lucian Mincu tweet mediaLucian Mincu tweet media
English
80
270
851
46.5K
RaresGh⚡🌱 retweetledi
Multiversᕽ
Multiversᕽ@MultiversX·
1,000,000,000 transactions on Battle Net. 120,000 TPS in today's live demo. Supernova is coming MultiversX.
Multiversᕽ tweet media
English
25
134
421
10.2K
RaresGh⚡🌱 retweetledi
Multiversᕽ
Multiversᕽ@MultiversX·
Critical Mass. The final Battle of Nodes stress test. Today at 12PM UTC. Live on @YouTube & @X
Multiversᕽ tweet media
English
11
59
246
24.1K
RaresGh⚡🌱 retweetledi
Lucian Mincu
Lucian Mincu@lucianmincu·
A Bet We Made in 2018 This is me and Vitalik in 2018. ETH Devcon. We were at a table talking about sharding and how blockchains could actually scale by running execution in parallel. At the time, Ethereum and Elrond had the same thesis. Both believed execution sharding was the path forward. Since then, Ethereum changed direction multiple times. Sharding gave way to rollups. Rollups gave way to "we need to scale L1 again." The roadmap shifted, the promises changed, the technical approach pivoted more than once. And through all of it - the Ethereum community stayed. They gave the team the space to find the right path. They didn't kill the project when the roadmap changed. They believed the builders would figure it out. That patience is what kept Ethereum alive. Not the technology. The community. ─── We made a different bet. We bet on execution sharding from day one and we never left that path. Adaptive state sharding shipped on mainnet in 2020. Three execution shards plus a metachain. State, network, transactions - all sharded from genesis. Supernova shipped this year. Consensus decoupled from execution. 600ms blocks. achieved 88ms finality. 120,000 TPS burst mode on the same validator hardware. 3,200+ validators on consumer-grade machines. 171,000 commits. #6 in the entire industry. Ahead of Solana, Avalanche, Sui, Polygon, Aptos, and TON. Tier-one infrastructure providers on board, distribution partners like Cointelegraph are running validator nodes. Stripe's Machine Payments Protocol is settling on MultiversX. EGLD is named in an Arizona state strategic reserve bill. The agentic commerce stack - x402, MPP, MX-8004, UCP, ACP, MCP - is live on one chain. xMoney is building regulated stablecoin issuance under MiCA. The infrastructure underneath has never been stronger. ─── And yet the market prices EGLD like none of this exists. Every blockchain community is going through the same thing right now. EGLD is down. ETH is down. SOL is down. The market doesn't differentiate between chains that shipped paradigm-shifting infrastructure and chains that shipped a landing page. But here's what's different about right now. Bitcoin survived 2014. Ethereum survived 2018. Solana survived 2022. In each case, the community stayed long enough for the technology to matter. In each case, the community that held wrote the next chapter. And in each case, the ones who fractured, who turned on their own builders, who let the loudest voices - the ones who already sold - define the narrative? Those communities don't exist anymore. You don't remember their names. The perception of value has been distorted. By cycles. By speculation. By narratives that reward noise over engineering. And by us - divided when we should be united. Turning on each other instead of building forward together. Look at what's underneath. Not the chart. The infrastructure. 88ms finality. 120K TPS. #6 in developer activity globally. Tier-one infrastructure partners. Stripe settling on-chain. EGLD in US state legislation. Regulated stablecoins under MiCA. An agentic commerce stack that Visa, Coinbase, and Mastercard are racing to replicate. This is not a project searching for relevance. This is a project that shipped the relevance and is waiting for its community to match it. If this fails, it won't be because the technology wasn't good enough. It will be because we weren't united enough to carry it forward. I've been here since 2018. That table with Vitalik. Every pivot, every cycle, every doubt. Still here. Still building. Now it's your turn. Not to believe. To show up.
Lucian Mincu tweet media
English
222
227
853
119.6K
RaresGh⚡🌱 retweetledi
Lucian Mincu
Lucian Mincu@lucianmincu·
Supernova is live on Battle Net. Here's what changed under the hood and why it matters. The paradigm shift nobody's talking about: Every blockchain in the industry is measured on two metrics: block time and throughput. Faster blocks = better chain. More TPS = better chain. ---------- Supernova breaks this framing entirely. For the first time in the blockchain industry, block finality is faster than block slot allocation. Let me explain what that means. How every other blockchain works: Traditional blockchains follow Execute → Propose → Vote. Validators must execute every transaction before proposing a block. The block slot is the clock. Finality can never be faster than the slot, because execution is in the critical path. Ethereum: 12.8s slot, ~12.8 minutes finality. Solana: 400-600ms slot, 13 seconds finality. Sui: variable, ~500 to 1000 ms for complex transactions. In every case: finality ≥ block slot. This is treated as a law of physics. It's not. ---------- How Supernova works: We flipped the model to Propose/Vote → then Execute. Consensus proceeds independently of execution. Validators agree on transaction ordering first. Execution results are notarized in subsequent block headers via inclusion proofs. The inclusion proof is the key innovation: it allows a block to be finalized with cryptographic proof that its transactions will execute correctly, before the execution itself completes. The virtual state tracker in the transaction pool maintains a deterministic view of account states (nonces, balances, pending transactions) so consensus can validate without waiting for full execution. Result: the block is finalized faster than the block round itself. 88ms finality measured in testing. Sub-200ms under real-world conditions. On 600ms block slots. Finality < block slot. First time in the industry. ---------- The throughput story: With the same hardware specification as pre-Supernova mainnet, the network now achieves ~120,000 transactions per second in burst mode. Same nodes. Same machines. 10x the block production cadence. This is the same validator infrastructure running fundamentally better software. The backpressure system (Execution-Result Inclusion Estimator) ensures this scales safely - dynamically adjusting per-block gas limits if execution lags behind proposals, so minimum-spec nodes never get overwhelmed. What this means in context: - Block time: 6s → 600ms (10x) - Finality: ~88ms measured (first blockchain where finality < slot time) - Throughput: ~120,000 TPS burst mode (same hardware) - Architecture: consensus fully decoupled from execution - Sharding: 3 execution shards + metachain, fully preserved - Validators: 3,200+ nodes, no hardware upgrade required ---------- Battle of Nodes is stress-testing all of this right now. $150K in prizes to find what breaks. Validators, security researchers, builders, and guilds pushing the limits. If Supernova survives this, it ships to mainnet. 150,000 lines of new protocol code. 20 months of engineering. The most significant upgrade since genesis.
Lucian Mincu tweet media
English
57
232
686
63.1K
RaresGh⚡🌱 retweetledi
Robert Sasu | dev/acc
Robert Sasu | dev/acc@SasuRobert·
Average time to finality for blocks on Battle Of Nodes with SuperNova is under 200ms. All running in super cheap hardware and processing millions of transactions.
English
4
44
200
2.6K