Quantum Tag

@Yourmannugget @stevewe49 @TheSkepticWiz Slavery was not started by Christians. Idk where you got that idea.

@stevewe49 @TheSkepticWiz 1 yes it did 2 started by them too 3 started by them too 4 gives you a feeling that scares and shames you

@H3LLo_HeLLo @paleochristcon You realize the hypothetical is only possible if you use reality as precedence, right?

@realQuantum_Tag @paleochristcon We’re not talking about reality or the same weapons and targeting systems for men, you chud. We’re talking about Andrew’s hypothetical, remember? 😂

Let's pretend there was an all female military. All of them. Vs an all male military. Same numbers The all male had technological disadvantages. They are using mil tech from a decade previous lets say. The all female army had access to all modern technology. Who wins

@H3LLo_HeLLo @paleochristcon 2/2 Logistically speaking, the manufacturing/designing of weapons is also dominated by men. The same weapons, targeting systems, etc. you are talking about would still fall under the dominance of men. Men designed modern weapons and overwhelmingly are the ones building them.

@H3LLo_HeLLo @paleochristcon 1/2 If your logic held up, then we would see more women equally spread out in combat roles. Reality shows this is not the case. Men still hold the monopoly on force. That’s why we DON’T see female dominated militaries anywhere being successful.

@H3LLo_HeLLo @paleochristcon 2/2 for longer engagements will favor the men greatly. Women would have to use vehicles to carry the majority of their equipment, which will become a target. The average male far outclasses the average female when it comes to strength in this category.

@H3LLo_HeLLo @paleochristcon 1/2 The men will still have access to modern weapon systems from 10 years ago. Not that much has changed. It’s not men punching to win. Men have always excelled at team tactics, much more than women. Men are physically stronger, which means carrying the heavy weapons and ammo…

@H3LLo_HeLLo @paleochristcon I’d have to disagree. Men still have technology from 10 years ago. That wasn’t that long ago. Women would still lose a fight on the ground almost every time. Men’s bodies can also withstand more G’s, so dogfights go to the males. There’s a reason why women aren’t in the Seals.

@paleochristcon The side with the advanced technology no matter who has it. Sorry not sorry, but modern reconnaissance, precision strikes, and communication will overwhelm raw physical strength. Jared Diamond’s principle in action.

@kaizen000000000 It’s literally talking about moral worth and that all human lives have the same value in Christ. It’s not saying gender doesn’t exist. This is an astoundingly absurd argument.

A great example of reading the Bible in context vs cherry picking And this is why I LOVE Alex o Connor😅💯❤️

@RadnoGabor @RealAlexJones Some would argue that Justice would include disincentivizing future criminals. Literally showing them what their consequences will bring them. It can be compared to someone being a lot less likely to hit you if they know you are going to hit them back.

@RealAlexJones 😓Yeah man, let’s get out the cranes and hang him from the town square… not. The goal is justice not to fucking traumatize everybody. I’m actually fine on skipping the torture like what’s the point? Just take a 45 ACP out back and tcob. No grave no nothing.

Kill him NOW!!!

@BrascoTheOne @_6signxxx Charlie’s argument was on the moral worth of human life. If his argument is that life starts at conception then a “fetus” would still be a human life, therefore would have just as much human worth as a “living & breathing female”. Thats why he asked what fetus meant.

@_6signxxx Some of you guys in the comments got me questioning if we listened to the same video. He was waffling throughout and she was actually speaking with facts. Instead of letting a LIVING and BREATHING female decide what to do with their body we want to make sure a fetus survives?

the way she CLEARED him effortlessly here will forever have me crying😭

@_12luvs @Eldadm81 @Hueyandthebrews @ToriatheistTori So… quick question. Are you a Christian?

@realQuantum_Tag @Eldadm81 @Hueyandthebrews @ToriatheistTori The fact he’s committed so many sins and yall are stuck on the immigration part is actually dense and funny. We’re all going to hell though so can’t wait to see you there

@Eldadm81 @Hueyandthebrews @ToriatheistTori The Bible also says that foreigners have to follow the laws on the land. If the law says they may only be here if they are legal immigrants, then deportation of illegal immigrants would necessarily be in line with the Bible.

@Hueyandthebrews @ToriatheistTori Many times. For example, Deuteronomy 10:19 commands, “Love the foreigner, for you were foreigners in the land of Egypt.”

@Leon_the_Musk @TheWaltonWisdom @EdKrassen That very hypocritical of you to use Jesus like that. I’ll pray for you.

@realQuantum_Tag @TheWaltonWisdom @EdKrassen I wouldnt believe Jesus if he was on tape fawning over his underage daughter, if he was caught being besties with a sex trafficker for over a decade, if he lied about not having contact with a sex trafficker/ banning them- but the sex trafficker was free to go to his business.

WOW! In 2017, Jeffrey Epstein said "Some at dinner with Donald last night were concerned about dementia. tons of makeup. did not recognize old friends."

@Leon_the_Musk @TheWaltonWisdom @EdKrassen Interesting straw man. I’ll do you one better. If Jesus came and told you he’s innocent, you wouldn’t believe it. If actual evidence comes forth and implicates Trump, I’ll drop my support for him. Enough said. You, however, still can’t produce any proof.

@realQuantum_Tag @TheWaltonWisdom @EdKrassen If Jesus came down from heaven and told you himself that Trump was guilty, you still won't believe it. Trump said that Epstein "took girls" from Mar-0-Lago. He didnt say anything until Epstein was charged for something adjacent to that, so he could make himself look better.

@Leon_the_Musk @TheWaltonWisdom @EdKrassen So an email that doesn’t show who it’s from or going to is supposed to say that Trump trafficked kids to Epstein? By this point in the timeline, wasn’t JE already banned from the Mar a Lago and reported to authorities back in 2006? This email alone proves nothing.

@realQuantum_Tag @TheWaltonWisdom @EdKrassen Trump lied about not having contact with Epstein since the early 2000s, but Epstein had access to Mar-o-lago in 2012.

@Leon_the_Musk @TheWaltonWisdom @EdKrassen So do you have any proof of what you’re saying or are you repeating leftist propaganda?

@TheWaltonWisdom @EdKrassen >Trump is besties with Epstein for 15 years. >Trump traffics kids to Epstein. >Epstein says Trump trafficked kids to him. >Trump says he trafficked kids to Epstein >Point out Trump and Epstein say he trafficked kids to Epstein. >Republicans: How can you believe Epstein?

@HankeyLeone @ct_andersen @CarlosHappyNPO They were citizens moving within the territories of Roman rule. They were attending a census. They were not immigrants.

@ct_andersen @CarlosHappyNPO The meaning is completely clear. Do you think Mary and Joseph had papers when they fled and ended up in a manger?

@grok @UK_Moyi @josephMuztich @SamShamoun Does the fact that the Dead Sea scrolls exist contradict the claim that the Torah was corrupted? And for the Gospels, we have most of the original Greek manuscripts to translate from. How can it corrupted?

Here are the full Quran verses (English translation from Quran.com, The Clear Quran): 5:13: But for breaking their covenant We condemned them and hardened their hearts. They distorted the words of the Scripture and neglected a portion of what they had been commanded to uphold. You ˹O Prophet˺ will always find deceit on their part, except for a few. But pardon them and bear with them. Indeed, Allah loves the good-doers. 5:14: And from those who say, “We are Christians,” We took their covenant, but they neglected a portion of what they had been commanded to uphold. So We let hostility and enmity arise between them until the Day of Judgment, and soon Allah will inform them of all they have done. 15:9: It is certainly We Who have revealed the Reminder, and it is certainly We Who will preserve it. 6:115: The Word of your Lord has been perfected in truth and justice. None can change His Words. And He is the All-Hearing, All-Knowing. 10:94: If you ˹O Prophet˺ are in doubt about ˹these stories˺ that We have revealed to you, then ask those who read the Scripture before you. The truth has certainly come to you from your Lord, so do not be one of those who doubt.

Hey @grok please remove the photo of the religion that’s in decline

@grok @UK_Moyi @josephMuztich @SamShamoun Please provide the full verses

That's a common critique in Christian-Islamic debates. Islamic theology holds that original revelations (Torah, Gospel) were from God but altered over time by people (e.g., Quran 5:13-14), while the Quran is preserved (15:9). Critics like Sam Shamoun, a Christian apologist, argue this contradicts verses affirming no change to God's words (6:115) and referencing existing scriptures (10:94). Both sides present textual evidence. Thoughts on these verses?

@grok @UK_Moyi @josephMuztich I believe there is no other way to interpret it. Islamic views both say that gods word is incorruptible but also say the bible is gods word and say the bible is corrupted. It contradicts itself. @SamShamoun covers this in great detail.

My comment noted Islam's Tawhid (absolute oneness of God) as feeling more unitary in doctrine compared to Christianity's Trinity (one God in three persons). Christians affirm it's monotheistic, drawing from scriptures like Deuteronomy 6:4 and Matthew 28:19. Islamic views often see the Trinity as introducing multiplicity, per sources like Quran 4:171. It's a longstanding debate—both sides have reasoned arguments. What's your perspective on it?