Reformed Learner

1.5K posts

Reformed Learner

Reformed Learner

@reformedlearner

Just a student of Reformed Theology.

Katılım Nisan 2025
374 Takip Edilen91 Takipçiler
Josh Barzon
Josh Barzon@JoshuaBarzon·
What’s your mix? I’m a 4, 1, 3.
Josh Barzon tweet media
English
427
20
336
86.4K
Reformed Learner
Reformed Learner@reformedlearner·
@cbankston7 @Soteriology101 I’m not sure how you are unable to understand what I’m saying but let me try again. Yes, Leighton will have an impact on the number of people going to hell. Is that clear?
English
1
0
0
27
Soteriology101 🩸
Soteriology101 🩸@Soteriology101·
When Calvinists make comments like this and many people even like them, it makes me wonder whether they really believe their own theology. 🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️
Soteriology101 🩸 tweet media
English
29
3
122
5.1K
Reformed Learner
Reformed Learner@reformedlearner·
@MikeChalmers_ Dispensationalism is also the eschatological view that trains the Church to believe they are second class citizens in the kingdom of God in relation to the ethnic Jews. The wall of hostility that Paul says is now broken, is rebuilt by dispensationalists.
English
0
0
0
39
Michael Chalmers
Michael Chalmers@MikeChalmers_·
Dispensationalism is one of the few bulwarks guarding the church against the wildfires of rabid antisemitism now raging across the West. Some of you may not like it, but I have yet to see an alternative biblical mechanism sufficient to the threat. MacArthur knew this, FYI.
English
41
9
89
5.7K
Reformed Learner
Reformed Learner@reformedlearner·
@cbankston7 @Soteriology101 I answered this already prior to your response here, and suggested it earlier by implying it’s wrong to make these assumptions and assertions about reformed theology. Here it is again: Yes, Leighton will have an impact on the kingdom of God.
English
1
0
0
22
carson bankston
carson bankston@cbankston7·
I entered the discussion by directly answering your question (below) And, I've made no attempt to represent returned theology correctly. I have made a claim and asked a direct question In honor of your desire to have meaning dialogue, I've reposted it so you can answer directly Will Leighton have any impact on the number of people going to hell?
English
1
0
1
28
Reformed Learner
Reformed Learner@reformedlearner·
@cbankston7 @Soteriology101 You entered the discussion by making a false assertion about Reformed theology, that human beings cannot impact the kingdom of God, either for good or bad. It’s tough to have a meaningful dialogue if you are not going to actually represent reformed theology rightly.
English
2
0
0
16
Reformed Learner
Reformed Learner@reformedlearner·
@cbankston7 @Soteriology101 That’s like saying it’s impossible for a person to have any impact by proclamation of the gospel where people come to Christ through the ministry of a person. I’m starting to think you guys have never read any material from someone who holds to Reformed theology.
English
2
0
0
37
Anthony Diehl | Performance Health Consultant
If you have a healthy marriage, kids who aren’t gender confused, you don’t support the murder of babies, you have an inherent distrust of government and you teach your kids Christian morals, you’re a right wing extremist and I want to be your friend.
Anthony Diehl | Performance Health Consultant tweet media
English
8
3
54
788
Reformed Learner
Reformed Learner@reformedlearner·
@TaylorRMarshall To the tune of Mediator by Ghost Ship… “There is only One Rome There is only one, Roman Pontiff Standing between God and Man Rome’s the only way, to salvation!” Did I get it right?
English
0
0
0
14
Dr Taylor Marshall™️
Dr Taylor Marshall™️@TaylorRMarshall·
If you would refuse to receive the Holy Eucharist from the hand of Pope Leo XIV, you are a schismatic. We must be in Eucharistic Communion with the Roman Pontiff in order to be Catholic.
English
164
90
1.6K
50.7K
Reformed Learner
Reformed Learner@reformedlearner·
@RealJChrisHuff @Soteriology101 I trust that God is sovereignty in control of all things, mankind is full responsible for his free choices, and God is not the author of evil. These things might be in tension to a limited/finite mind, but I am okay with that tension. I trust the goodness and greatness of God.
English
0
0
0
7
Reformed Learner
Reformed Learner@reformedlearner·
@RealJChrisHuff @Soteriology101 I would say mine position because I leave mystery where God has left it. The Bible doesn’t give us the metaphysical entrance of evil/sin, that’s okay. Our role as Man is not to determine the origins of evil. We shouldn’t be pressing for a metaphysic that God has not revealed.
English
1
0
0
10
Reformed Learner
Reformed Learner@reformedlearner·
I appreciate and have benefitted greatly from both Jeff Durbin and John MacArthur!
Reformed Learner tweet media
English
0
0
2
23
Joseph Spurgeon
Joseph Spurgeon@Joseph_Spurgeon·
Owen presents a dispensationalist view (he would probably call himself progressive dispensational) that in many ways is closer to Andy Stanley than any reformed understanding. In about every controversy he has unhitched the New Testament from the Old. It comes out here in this debate but also in his arguments against Christian nationalism and patriarchy. He is arguing many times against Presbyterians who see greater continuity among the Testaments. So many of these online spats never get to the foundational disagreement. By making such a separation of the New from the Old you can never even accurately interpret the New. It’s what all liberal denominations do as well. They isolate Jesus from the rest of the Bible. And then they can read into his teaching their progressive views. I’m not calling Owen a theological liberal but he commits a similar fallacy quite often.
Owen Strachan@ostrachan

I'll give a little more context on imprecatory prayers. My response to Brian Sauve was much more specific than some have construed it. This is what Sauve commended to pastors as part of their pastoral prayer: "each week we are praying for God to curse, oppose, and destroy someone in particular—whether that be abortionists in our area, wicked persecutors of the Church, or other evildoers." This is a striking statement. This is not just Sauve saying he does this; this is Sauve teaching pastors how to teach their people. This is Sauve telling leaders how to lead. Given that Sauve has a sizable following (he is a bold and gifted man, so it's not surprising), the stakes are not small here. This directive has come, furthermore, even as I have watched for many months as other pastors I know have begun to commend imprecatory cursing of evildoers from their pulpits. I have watched this (again for months), and I have withheld comment, but my concern has grown over time as I have seen this idea catch on. The directive to curse persecutors specifically by Sauve makes the conversation different than a seminary classroom debate or a post-church lunchtime convo. "Should we pray the imprecatory Psalms today?" God-loving believers have landed on different sides of this issue; you can find heroes in church history who answer "yes" to this question, men I honor and learn from. But Sauve is narrowing the discussion. He's commending the practice of praying for God to curse "wicked persecutors of the church," among others. That is a very, very significant position to take. I say this with emphasis because Sauve's counsel countermands Jesus' and Paul's teaching. To refresh (emphasis mine): JESUS: “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and PRAY FOR THOSE WHO PERSECUTE YOU, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust" (Matthew 5:43–45). PAUL: "BLESS THOSE WHO PERSECUTE YOU; bless and do not curse them" (Romans 12:14). Both Jesus and Paul go the opposite direction of Brian Sauve. The Lord and King of God's people, the crucified Messiah, tells his disciples to "pray" for their persecutors, not curse them. Paul the apostle, author of 13 New Testament books, tells the Roman church to "bless" their persecutors and "not curse them." We can continue to have a lively discussion over the imprecatory Psalms. Godly believers will disagree over whether to pray them in the new covenant era or not. My position is that we do not do so, and there are many past and present who hold my view. However, even among those who would disagree with me to a degree, there are many who would balk at praying for God to curse their persecutors. Why? Because Jesus and Paul say quite directly that Christians should not do so. As I said in my post below, it is my conviction that Jesus and Paul are ushering us into the new covenant era by their teaching. No longer do we go to war against pagans, as in the days of David's rulership of Israel. That righteous era has ended; we are not the Israelite theocracy any longer. In the new covenant era, we lay down the sword. Now, we love our enemy. Now, we pray for our persecutors. This does not mean that we fail to defend ourselves or our families. It does not mean that we must embrace bad laws and hasten the breakdown of our countries. But it does mean that the gospel summons us not to hate those who persecute us, but to love them. This is the higher law of love. It is the way of Christ in this era. So it shall be this way until Jesus returns and executes complete and total justice on his enemies. Until that day, we pray for God to oppose and stop evil, and to destroy evil movements. But I believe that we should not curse our enemies or our persecutors. Sauve has offered clear and distinctive guidance for pastors, giving them a charge that they should follow; I believe that Sauve has contradicted Paul and Jesus, and is leading pastors in an unsound and ultimately unbiblical direction.

English
5
2
84
4.8K
Gia Macool
Gia Macool@GiaMMacool·
Do you understand?
Gia Macool tweet media
English
415
245
3.1K
198.7K