Fernando Verboonen

Honored to be recognized by @Forbes among tokenization leaders shaping the future of finance. In entrepreneurship, colleagues aren’t family — they’re teammates. It’s about collaboration, strategy, and pushing each other to excel. The real magic? Building with lifelong friends, turning shared dreams into reality together. ⚡️ #Entrepreneurship #Leadership #Innovation

@robert_lauko @KurateOrg By bot 🤖 skip kurate as it wanted to feed a genetics enhanced knowledge based diet due to lack of API 🥹

@robert_lauko @KurateOrg Interesting project. Would love to learn more about the vision

See the top ranked papers in AI, ML, Robotics, Quantum Physics, and more on @kurateorg. Hundreds of arXiv preprints ranked daily by scientific impact through pairwise tournaments judged by Claude, GPT, and Gemini.

Man, Swiss taxes are insane. I was playing with numbers, thinking how much to pay founding engineers and wondered about net income. CHF 100k (~127k USD) translates into just CHF 12k taxes. Not only that, but the government has a special website for citizens to calculate this.

@DominiqueCAPaul Yes sr

@SimonHoiberg 😍😍😍😍

Even Elon Musk is Swissmaxxing now 🇨🇭

@robert_lauko @KurateOrg Im also planning on a knowledge based that cross references research to genomics; go that I’m guessing I’d need a kurate APi to access any data?

@reyfernandofv @KurateOrg Interesting use case. You can already filter by tags and search for keywords within categories, but we could consider adding a semantic search. Would love to hear more about your workflow. Wanna DM me?

@Dylan_txa @romanbuildsaas Agents

Founders: you can now deploy a full sales team in a few clicks. Not to replace your team. To multiply it. Most B2B companies still pay $3–5K/month per rep for work GPT-5.5 can now handle instantly. Instead of: * hiring to fix pipeline * sending generic outreach * automating… spam You can spin up 5 GPT-5.5 agents: → ICP Research: finds high-intent prospects → Cold Email: writes contextual messages → LinkedIn Opener: starts real conversations → Follow-ups: adapt based on replies → Objection handler: responds in your tone Result: faster pipeline, better conversations, more demos. Same team. Much more output. Comment “AGENTS” and I’ll send the full setup 👇

@robert_lauko @KurateOrg U think u need to follow me

@robert_lauko @KurateOrg Yes will do!

this is very insightful. To give you some context, I've ventured over the last weeks into leveraging Agent stack Hermes. I did notice their research focus skill. At some point I myself wanted to leverage research findings, "hyper agents by Meta" and reengineered any best practices. I came across it by "luck", thus Kurate could somehow orchestrate such discovery provided I communicate any sort of intent. Would this makes sense? Glad to explore any other use cases! Here in my capacity as anyone seeking actionable research driven insights (typically managerial!).

Good question! Kurate uses both. Papers first get cardinal scores (1.0–10.0 ratings from Claude Opus 4.6 Thinking), then go through pairwise tournaments where judges pick a winner, which is ordinal. The final rankings are computed via a Bayesian rating system, similar to LMArena's approach, which produces cardinal scores from ordinal comparisons. Kurate also tracks a "Gap" metric as the difference between the tournament ranking and the standalone rating. When the gap is positive, the paper performs better in head-to-head matchups than its solo score would suggest. This is often a sign of genuinely novel work that's hard to rate in isolation (e.g. due to methodological issues) but wins when compared directly.

@saeed_vz Merci!

@reyfernandofv #ios" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">github.com/muxy-app/muxy#…

Cooking the android app 🧑‍🍳

@lukepierceops Impressive

Yesterday I said stop selling AI for $2-5k. Here's what you should actually be selling instead: Phase 1: Audit ($3K-$5K, 2-4 weeks) Phase 2: Build ($25K-$60K, 6-12 weeks) Phase 3A: Dev Retainer ($3K-$8K/mo, ongoing) Phase 3B: Maintenance ($500-$2k/mo) For mid-market ($10M-$50M ARR), shift up: Audit: $4K-$6K Build: $35K-$75K Retainer: $5K-$10K/mo For enterprise ($50M+): Audit: $7.5K-$15K Build: $75K-$250K+ Retainer: $10K+/mo The audit is the wedge. The audit is what separates you from every 22-year-old with Claude Code who'll build whatever they're told. You're selling the map. The build becomes inevitable once they've seen the map.

@Teknium It’s so beautiful- seriously

Our first dive into Multi-Agent Coordination and Cooperation is here, with Hermes Agent Kanban Orchestrate tasks across multiple agent profiles and dependencies easily and visually. Achieve more. See the docs here: hermes-agent.nousresearch.com/docs/user-guid…

@Jason @bryan_johnson Hahaha 😂

@bryan_johnson dude. DUDE! don't do it.

guys you’ll never believe where I found the fountain of youth

@deniswirtz @Stanford @Penn @Harvard @Cambridge_Uni @ETH_en @UMich @UCLA @UCSFimaging @MIT @salkinstitute Impressive

Big paper coming out soon. Using AI, we mapped embryos of mice, alligators, turtles, rhesus macaques, and chickens in 3D and at single-cell resolution. We discovered something truly remarkable...stay tuned!

SpaceX ride hailing: London to Dubai 🇦🇪 39 minutes Tokyo to Cairo 27 minutes Sydney to New Delhi 31 minutes Los Angeles to Abu Dhabi 🇦🇪 33 minutes Starship is the future 🚀 …. Elon Musk is a genius !

"tokenized startups" will be the next meta. been tracking this space since january for my "structure of ICM piece". a few thoughts: > the goal of "tokenized startups" is to allow broader access (at least in price action) of VC-gatekept startups, creating "Internet Capital Markets" in the truest sense. > today, the fastest growing companies (SpaceX, Anthropic, Stripe) stay private for years/decades. access is gatekept, rather than like the IPOs of 20-30 years ago, when 18-month-old companies like Netscape could IPO. > the market has responded with adhoc fixes, the most obvious being the SPV which have grown 500% in last 2 years. the market's thirst for venture-performing assets needs to be quenched. > the idea for "tokenized startups" is not new - it rhymes with many things, including ICOs, DAO funds, tokenized SPVs, token-equity standoffs (eg. Aave/Axelar) , ownership coins, pre-ipo perps. > what's new is the set of primitives being used to build things (eg. closed end funds with Robinhood/USVC, tokenized SPVs with PreStocks, MetaDAO style launchpads, Ventuals styles perps). It's the wild west of experimentation. > the design space is just getting mapped out around now - some open questions include: 1. early stage vs late stage? are founders receptive or adversarial to tokenized markets? 2. pure price exposure (eg. via perps) vs. spot backing? 3. legal entity - SPV? Delaware CEF? Cayman token foundation? i would not be surprised if the major SF accelerators (YC/HF0/SPC etc.) are all actively experimenting on tokenization designs. having a "tokenized" basket of each batch (eg. YC W26) might unlock a ton of demand. more research on this topic incoming.... stay tuned....