PaRibo the Slavin, @[email protected]

Hello CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND WARNING: This tweet is privileged and may contain confidential information only intended to be viewed by my baby, my honey, my ragtime gal. If you received this greeting in error, please notify me immediately and delete the message.

@LauraPowellEsq Because "your children" has a connotation in the English language of "your offspring," which can't necessarily be assumed.

It really grates when the school refers to my child as “your student.” I don’t have “students”—I have “children.” It reflects the deeper fact that they don’t see the parent-child relationship as substantially different and more important than the teacher-student relationship.

@MelissaRNMBA @JeffClarkUS He wasn't disbarred because of anything he did in an actual case. His actions in Texas v. Pennsylvania aren't really a factor.

@JeffClarkUS By this logic, every attorney for the defense, when the defendant is found guilty, should be disbarred. And every attorney in Congress. If they're speaking, they're lying.

This is a travesty. John represented the President in litigation challenging an election. That’s all. He lied about nothing. Reasonable minds can disagree about the 2020 election. He did what lawyers are supposed to do — represent disfavored individuals. And make no mistake, the elites, especially in bar apparatuses, disfavor and hate President Trump and anyone associated with him with a burning passion. No one representing Vice President Gore was disbarred for losing Bush v. Gore where the whole partial county-specific recount strategy Democrat lawyers devised there was ruled an unconstitutional violation of equal protection. Two-tiered system of justice and of bar discipline. Pray for John and his family and that John will speedily take his case to the U.S. Supreme Court and that they will grant cert and reverse this absolute nonsense.

@JeffClarkUS Correct me if I'm wrong, but the disbarment was not based on anything he did in his capacity as counsel in Texas v. Pennsylvania. Rather, it was based on offering input on extrajudicial processes that sought to impede the functioning of state and federal governments.

@ExcellenceToast @patriach2051 Except when a cop asks for ID when there's no need for it and no obligation to provide it, they are escalating it.

@patriach2051 no tattoos. no escalation. walks away. good cop. you're the retard, lol

Remember kids ACAB

@bauer_special @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE Human rights only exist in the context of society. Society only exists when pro-social behavior is rewarded and anti-social behavior is punished. This necessarily requires the labor or others beyond direct contracting.

@riboslavin @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE I provided as much reasoning as you did 🫡 its easy to try and obsfucate natural rights and say they all require the labor of others but all that accomplishes is arguing that we have no rights. Well done

@Nathendaniel @Dumas_Retaurde @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE Sure, how it worked for thousands of years. Is that how you think it works now? Is that how you think it should work now?

@bauer_special @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE Expertly argued.

@riboslavin @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE Not true at all

@Nathendaniel @Dumas_Retaurde @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE And so if someone else has more guns, they have a more rightful claim to your property?

@Dumas_Retaurde @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE Pro-social behaviors are labor.

@riboslavin @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE I mean I thought that was kinda the point of human rights. I thought they were the principle that allowed societies to form and exist. Because realistically there is no word of god which just determines these things

@Dumas_Retaurde @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE Because I look around and decide it's mine, and you said yourself it was abandoned. Why can't I claim it?

@riboslavin @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE What makes you think you reasonably can

@Dumas_Retaurde @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE It's happened plenty on much smaller scales than internationally. "Human rights" only exist in the context of a society. A society only exists when there are incentives for pro-social behavior and disincentives for anti-social behavior.

@riboslavin @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE yeah that's happened lots of times, but now we're getting into theories regarding international interactions rather than societal interactions

@Dumas_Retaurde @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE Why can't I reasonably claim all that land?

@riboslavin @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE and suppose you found a completely abandoned forest. Well you can't reasonably claim all that land if you wanted to so what you said doesn't matter

@Dumas_Retaurde @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE I don't care what they agreed on. It's always been my land. I was away, and now I'm here, and I have 3000 people. Are you going to give us our property back?

@riboslavin @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE ok but then consider that you're just some outsider in a forest with 1000 other people in it with their already agreed upon claims so your claims won't hold any weight in the end without coming to any agreements with the people already there

@Dumas_Retaurde @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE My point is that you don't have any property because it's all mine. Anyone who says otherwise is a criminal trying to deprive me of my property.

@riboslavin @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE go ahead and explain how you think that invalidates all of what I just said and I'll think on it

@Dumas_Retaurde @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE You're walking and set down your sharpened stick to pee. I pick it up. You took the branch from my woods, and you set it down on my land. They're all my trees, it's all my land.

@riboslavin @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE okay I made a mistake at the end there. You don't got a right to protection OF IT you just got the right TO protect it, which doesn't require the labour of others. But that doesn't mean you can't form a contract which incentivizes someone else to do it for you

@SpecksBacon @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE Find where?

@riboslavin @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE Materials you find yourself or compensate others for.

@SpecksBacon @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE Build or make them from what?

@riboslavin @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE False. You can build or make things yourself. Or you can *compensate* others for their labor.

@ErrorVtuberArt @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE That was my stick. You picked it up from my property.

@riboslavin @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE what labour do you need to perform for me to own a stick i myself picked up and sharpened with a rock?

@Dumas_Retaurde @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE How do you protect it?

@riboslavin @jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE when people say this they say it's because they think when someone mentions private property that means they're entitled to a house as a right. No, you trade for that house, and as such it becomes your property and you have the right to do what you want with it and protect it.

@jiriknesl @CHRISF0GLE Private property cannot exist without the labor of others.

@CHRISF0GLE Yes, none of that is a human right. Privacy, self ownership, private property, free speech, right of association are human rights. Education, healthcare, food, water are not.