Riccardo

3.5K posts

Riccardo

Riccardo

@riccardoADA

$BTC - $IAG - $TITAN

Italia Katılım Haziran 2009
1.4K Takip Edilen857 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Riccardo
Riccardo@riccardoADA·
@Titans_Depin at $0.028. A price so small it almost feels shy. But something is already alive underneath: - Miners running 24/7 - Petabytes of storage people are actually paying for right now - Nodes quietly bringing internet to places that never had it This isn’t a roadmap. It’s happening today. Two out of every three tokens are locked in staking. Not because of hype. Because real yield arrives every month ; small, messy, true : and it compounds. The market looks and sees: a tiny Cardano token another forgettable chart just noise But the truth is colder: a machine is already printing real revenue and the entire thing is valued less than the metal and electricity keeping it alive. That mismatch doesn’t stay polite forever. When something real is priced like fiction, sooner or later perception catches up. Not with a cute little pump. With a sudden, structural snap back to reality. Until then the fans keep spinning. The drives keep filling. The connections keep carrying. They don’t care if you believe. They only need time. And time never looks away. 🫡
English
3
6
13
240
Apex
Apex@Apex_333·
Just placed a 25x ADA long on @ATLAS_DEFI_ Perps on Cardano hit different. $BTC $ETH $XRP next. NFA. 👀
Apex tweet media
English
3
12
60
1.2K
Yabba900
Yabba900@Yabba900·
$iag Whale with a 3MM stake Do they know what’s coming?
Yabba900 tweet media
English
8
19
100
5.8K
Riccardo
Riccardo@riccardoADA·
still in play btw
Riccardo@riccardoADA

B2B>B2C Würth (€20.2B revenue) didn’t choose @IagonOfficial because it’s “cool”. They chose it because it solves real enterprise pain today: - Tamper-proof IP for 3D-print files - Automated micro-royalties on every printed part GDPR-grade encrypted decentralized storage Zero-trust supply chain between 80+ countries This is why blockchain wins first in B2B, not B2C. In B2C we’re still fighting UX, volatility, and “why do I need this?”. In B2B the conversation is different: - “Save us 7 figures in licensing leakage” - “Make audits painless” - “Remove middlemen eating 15 % margins” Enterprises have: - Existing cash flow (they pay real money, not hopium) - Legal teams that understand smart contracts - Problems measured in millions, not memes Würth alone can quietly route tens of millions in real revenue to $IAG node operators and protocol, without onboarding a single retail user. Consumer adoption will come. But the silent money, the kind that actually sustains networks, is being made right now in B2B meetings, not TikTok trends. Most people still don’t get it. The ones who stayed will.

English
0
0
53
1.1K
Riccardo
Riccardo@riccardoADA·
@StumpyTh Can you explain it to my wife too? lol
English
2
0
7
176
Stumpy 🦈 $65
Stumpy 🦈 $65@StumpyTh·
I literally had to explain the $IAG drama to my dad today, i had to explain to him why my investment dropped 47%. And he understood that this is just drama, he understood the fundamentals were unchanged. Nothing really happened here except Charles started whining like a baby.
English
15
12
152
3.1K
masato_alexander
masato_alexander@masatoalexander·
friendly bit of info for charles: more than half the people yelling at you in your replies have me blocked. the people who are disappointed/done with you are your former fans, not "bots" hope that helps.
English
13
15
145
2.9K
Pablo Antonio
Pablo Antonio@PabloAntonioBG·
WTF 😂😂😂
Charles Hoskinson@IOHK_Charles

@JesseSD6 He's on my ignore list. He doesn't exist anymore. I'm never going to pay attention to anything he does or says again. But I am going to find a good way to make some money off that cyclone. Have a few ideas

1
0
12
980
Riccardo
Riccardo@riccardoADA·
@IOHK_Charles @JesseSD6 Questo è veramente a livelli imbarazzanti. 😳 Prenditi una pausa. livello di stabilità mentale = cryptoboy
Italiano
0
1
12
275
Charles Hoskinson
Charles Hoskinson@IOHK_Charles·
@JesseSD6 He's on my ignore list. He doesn't exist anymore. I'm never going to pay attention to anything he does or says again. But I am going to find a good way to make some money off that cyclone. Have a few ideas
Charles Hoskinson tweet media
English
59
9
82
12.8K
₳D₳nMark
₳D₳nMark@JesseSD6·
@IOHK_Charles respond please.
Dr. Navjit Dhaliwal@NaVi_GaT0R

Question don't equal attacking. Speaking of attacking - someone ask Charles this - did he do anything or saying anything when racial slurs were made against developers and me? - Phil called me a inbred monkey - Phil called African developers working for @FluidTokens monkey devs - Lucas called me a 3rd world scammer (I'm of Indian origin and he knows this) BTW he knows about this. EVERYBODY ignoring this - do you accept racism on Cardano? CC member Phil is using racial slurs and you guys are talking about attacking?

English
2
1
20
3.5K
Holger - Guarding our Vision!
Holger - Guarding our Vision!@HolgerCardano24·
Alright, everyone. Here comes some transparency for the people who have me as their DRep. Disclaimer: EVERYTHING I write is my personal view/opinion and has NOTHING to do with my position as CTO of @IagonOfficial -- Sad day for our Vision, but here we go: I just voted with NO on every single IO proposal. -- Why so? Because I personally deem the CEO of IO @IOHK_Charles as unfit for the job - to handle our Ecosystem in a proper way. -- Holger,..WTF? What do you mean? I could tell you a lot of stories why, and I could tell you a lot of stories where I defended him from a perspective of: "he is also just a human like all of us - humans have bad days, make mistakes, bad decision, etc." BUT (!!!) we reached a point where it is NOT funny anymore! When people ask Charles on X why he is bashing @NaVi_GaT0R (CEO of IAGON) and @IagonOfficial itself, then he answers with (i quote): "He just downvoted the IO funding proposals [...] this is objectively wrong". -- Let's get this straight: As of today it looks like the Founder of #Cardano - who "invented" and "created" the decentralised governance - will shame/blame you socially (with his more than 1 Million follower X-Account) when you vote against his proposals where he asks for over 140 Million ADA. (That is even at the current low ADA price: over $35 Million USD) Please remember that IOHK got 2,463,071,701 ADA (2.4 Billion) over the Genesis Block Distribution. So, IF you use the decentralised governance system and have a different opinion on how and/or how much money should be spent, then you or your company/Cardano project are going to be slaughtered by the Founder of the Ecosystem himself. HOW DARE YOU VOTE against the "King" himself, when he asks for money,.. you "little peasant" ?!?!! For me it does NOT matter if the topic is about IAGON, SNEK, or the holy Virgin Mary. The decentralised governance system is to vote and state your opinion - like it or not, but free speech is free speech. UNLESS you vote against the "King" then "he" sends (or at least he does not tell them to not do it) his "Soldiers" (Employees) like Riley who post more FUD to create more "uncertainty" for those $IAG holders which are not always up-2-date and only act based on the price and/or fud they see. And when the $IAG price takes a hit, because of his 1M reach + that of his "Soldiers", the Founder of #Cardano then posts a Bane video - which looks like a response to the $IAG price-crash-chart for X users. Hosky, writes under the price-crash-chart screenshot: "Let's see if it works" and tags Charles. Charles replies to Hosky with a video showing a scene with Bane (from the movie "The Dark Knight Rises") I quote what Bane says within the 15 seconds of the video: Bane: "Your punishment must be more severe" Dark Knight: "Torture?" Bane: "Yes,..But not of your body...of your soul" So, Charles requests over 140M ADA from the Cardano Treasury, because 2.4 Billion Genesis ADA is NOT enough. Then the CEO of one of the biggest Projects on Cardano (IAGON) says: nah bro, i do not like that - let me vote with: no Then Charles runs the drums to hurt IAGON, because IAGON's CEO wanted to exercise free speech in the voting-process "Charles" invented. And when he reached his goal to hurt a project within his own ecosystem, then he makes a statement and which is presented to the X community as: "The punishment must be more severe, it must be torture of the soul. " Brings me to a simple personal question - i would like to ask Charles: Are you fucking nuts, or just an asshole?! How can someone self-sabotage his own Ecosystem so hard?! OH WAIT, he created midnight - so fuck Cardano, right?! Is it that Charles? -- So long story short. I voted NO on all IO proposals, because Charles manages it. The IO employees are most likely all good people, but the fish is rotting from the head down. -- Just a no-vote, or do i also have a better idea? At a first glance - i would say - we should create a company, which hires all good IO workers, and we pay them from the treasury directly. No mad middleman who loves to shit on his own work one day and eats at the same place the next day. -- FINAL statement: Could this all be written more nice? Yes Did I instead just write down what is in my head? Yes Is it therefore maybe not perfect? Yes But does it still deliver what my opinion is? I think/hope so. And look at my X-Name: "Holger - Guarding our Vision!" That is not because it should look fancy. It is this way, because i mean it! And that also means, that the little peasant stands up when the "King" is doing some bullshit and not only salutes and says: Yes Sir! (As many DReps do, because they only follow Charles blindly - no matter what he says or does) Like what I wrote/think? Want to support it? Does it align with your thoughts? Then feel free to delegate or switch your DRep delegation to me. DRep-ID: drep1y2k8uedxj5xzymxxzf07plg0t5xd4mmckwg9lwkwhdlwyesy0eyf8 Thank you for taking the time to read till the end!🙏 p.s.: @IOHK_Charles this time you fucked it up ultra hard,... maybe today it's me with the bad mood, with a mistake, with a wrong statement - I am also just a human. But from my perspective all this feels more than wrong!
Holger - Guarding our Vision! tweet mediaHolger - Guarding our Vision! tweet mediaHolger - Guarding our Vision! tweet media
English
61
51
346
26K
Riccardo
Riccardo@riccardoADA·
Amico mio, If you’re even considering stepping back into the arena… this is the goddamn moment. Charles has gone full tyrant mode. Personal attacks on builders, spite-driven governance plays, draining focus and resources into Midnight while treating Cardano’s treasury like his personal war chest. The mask is completely off; this isn’t decentralization anymore. It’s a founder who can’t let go, lashing out at anyone who dares vote against the IOG script. Voltaire was supposed to free us. Instead we’re watching captured proposals, ego-fueled drama, and an ecosystem being quietly subordinated to one man’s side project. Come back, Cardano Whale. We need raw, unbought, independent voices. Loud ones. Incorruptible ones. Voices that aren’t on any Funding Entity payroll and aren’t afraid to call out the circus. The protocol belongs to the holders; not the Hoskinson court. Enough. Time to protect what we actually built before it’s fully hijacked.
Riccardo tweet media
English
3
2
35
439
Defi-the-Oz
Defi-the-Oz@OzDefi·
@ILikeCardano Damn dude, you can't figure out how to short on Cardano and you work for IOG. Want me to explain it to you. Have you ever made a transaction on Cardano? You need a recommended wallet?
English
7
6
64
1K
Riley🪏
Riley🪏@ILikeCardano·
What’s funny is to act as though CNTs are able to be manipulated in the same way as assets with a wide variety of derivatives. There are no financial instruments to effectively short $IAG or I would have done it a while ago. No, the recent price action is spot holders selling.
Vincent Morin@Vincent65736046

Not sure i understand @IagonOfficial and $IAG latest price action. Seems manipulated to scare small holders amongst Nav's defense of the treasury. All while Wurth revenue is about to come live (this quarter?) and @FireblocksHQ will use iagon insights?

English
26
2
30
12.5K
FluidTokens
FluidTokens@FluidTokens·
If we had one wish, this is how we'd use it: Convince @IOHK_Charles to try out the Bifrost Testnet 😮‍💨
FluidTokens tweet media
English
13
29
207
8.9K
Lorenzo
Lorenzo@lorenzoxbt·
@Italian347 my last name is rare as fuck what do I win?
Lorenzo tweet media
English
3
0
4
574
Cardano Wail
Cardano Wail@CryptoSA99·
I remember reading Open AI was 5m. -We poured 10m in Butane -10-20m in @MuesliSwapTeam scams of Opt and Lifi -1m in Kaizen Crypto Calender -300k plus into Cattle daddy trash videos -Millions into Big Pey Grifts -Millions into NMKR high school projects -Millions into cool shit by grifters. And we have less than 5k a day in fees on the entire chain
English
21
12
96
6.8K
Riccardo
Riccardo@riccardoADA·
Let me try to explain it better, maybe I wasn't clear enough before. Forget about rewards and APY for a second. If you invested in $TITAN looking for long-term passive income, you should be (like me) reasonably satisfied with how things are going. If instead you were betting on strong price action to flip it quickly, I totally get the frustration; but in my view, it's not due to weak fundamentals of the project. It's more about a temporary disconnect between market price and intrinsic value (a gap I believe won't last long). The key piece missing from your calculations is the real value of the project's owned infrastructure + the AUM. If you add up the actual value of those owned assets and managed holdings, converted to ADA, you'll see it's higher than the total funds raised in the pre-sale(s); especially considering how terribly ADA has performed price-wise lately, which obviously drags everything down. Here's a partial screenshot of the $TITAN portfolio: upload it to Grok and ask for the ADA value. Do the same with the Strongholds portfolio (you can find it in the official Discord). When you plug these real numbers into the equation, the picture changes completely: it shows the project is solid, well-backed, and fundamentally strong; even in a garbage market like this one.
Riccardo tweet media
English
4
0
1
105
Tony Soprano
Tony Soprano@FatTSoprano·
@zormtar @riccardoADA Even i slack a lot it's just that i did invest in HOT, did participate in their dream that they sold but all i got was disappointment. Seeing them again sell the same hope to our community without a working product is just too much for me, henceforth the criticism.
English
1
0
1
52
Zormtar
Zormtar@zormtar·
Well said 🙏
Apex@Apex_333

Hello Zormtar, that’s a great question and I am glad you asked. Building serious protocols is expensive. Depending on the scope and complexity, development alone can range anywhere from $300K to $1M+ before a product even reaches mainnet. On Cardano, there isn’t really a mature seed or venture capital pipeline like you see on other ecosystems. Unless you go through Catalyst, there are very limited mechanisms for early-stage funding. Because of that, most projects end up raising capital through token sales. In an ideal world, ecosystems would actively support builders who have already proven they can execute. If a team has demonstrated they can build products, generate revenue, and operate sustainably, the ecosystem should help them scale further. The reality is that strong ecosystems grow around profitable businesses. Capital flows where opportunity exists. That’s one of the reasons you’ve seen so much activity migrate toward ecosystems like Solana, where there is strong venture support and funding infrastructure. Cardano, on the other hand, has historically been very developer-focused, often prioritizing technical experimentation rather than supporting the growth of revenue-generating businesses. Ideally, mechanisms like Catalyst would focus more on backing proven teams and helping them scale successful products. When you empower builders who can already execute, you create stronger businesses, attract more capital, and ultimately grow the ecosystem. Take us as an example. Over the past few years we have built a real, profitable business in this ecosystem — which is extremely difficult to achieve in crypto, let alone on Cardano. We have deployed capital, built infrastructure, delivered products, and consistently generated revenue for our community. Despite that track record, we’ve never received Catalyst funding. In an ideal scenario, ecosystems should double down on teams that have already proven they can execute. If a project demonstrates that it can build sustainable businesses and generate real revenue, it should be supported with significant capital to scale further. That’s how you grow an ecosystem — by backing the builders who have already shown they can deliver. Hopefully that provides some clarity.

English
2
1
9
281