
rc
12.4K posts

rc
@ripecortex
Deposed Duke of Milan. 🐸🧙♂️ Keeps the company of savages.








One thing I’ve started realizing as a Black creator…There's a specific group that doesn’t actually want Black creators to be creative. They want Black creators to create the version of Blackness THEY personally approve of. The moment your art style, characters, inspirations, or storytelling steps outside that box… suddenly you’re “not Black enough.” Full Video: youtube.com/watch?v=30ZdPT…



Interestingly I just opened up a random substack post from Hale, "Pope Leo XIV’s First Encyclical Arrives Tomorrow — Here’s What We Expect", and copy-pasted some paragraphs into Pangram. Pangram flags them as 100% AI-generated.












No, AI writing is not “too well-written.” Here are the primary tells of AI prose (no Pangram needed): -Dreamlike, languid mood, and an inability to tighten the action -General “SSRI prose” with a certain desaturation, lacking force and vitality -Shorter paragraphs, often just 2 or 3 sentences -Little sense of sequence, causality, or a logical progression from one sentence to another -Conventional sentence structure, albeit an overuse of parallelism -Figurative language that’s disconnected from the human sensory experience -Overemphasis on reminiscence and the concept of memory -Trouble arranging objects in space, especially if they’re moving around -General lack of long descriptions of places, people, or things -Inability to do subtext, inability to embed a deeper story in a surface story -Relative humorlessness


I submitted a draft of my short story to Claude for copy editing. Sometimes he’ll suggest a re-write of a particular sentence. My version: “She was just a rich girl, with a carelessness about her that could only come from being born into privilege.” Claude’s suggestion: “She was just a rich girl, careless in the way only privilege allows.” It's a matter of taste, but I personally think Claude's version is better. It's saying the same thing but more deftly. But when I swap his sentence in then plug the paragraph into Pangram, it goes from being high confidence that it's human to low confidence that it's human. If I keep doing this, will it start to read like AI slop? If I keep doing this, is it even my writing anymore? So I'm keeping my version, the one I think is worse, and I'm disquieted by the fact that there could be a better version of this story that I now need to specifically avoid.












Absolutely and necessarily brutal








