Riskmaxxer

@shalevhvs SCRIPTS

@charaf_ecomwize AI

STUDY THESE 4 PAGES: norseorganics.com → doing 8-figures froyaorganics.com → doing 8-figures primalviking.com → doing 8-figures arcticgoddess.com → doing 7-figures 4 different brands, same founders and same strategy. You can build similar pages in 30 minutes using @ecomwize Like + Comment "AI" and I'll dm you extra 1000 credits to try out our AI page builder (must be following)

@adamtaylorl Meta

I use Claude to build winning Meta ad creative from scratch. I put together my Meta Creative Research Vault (below) Claude is BY FAR the best tool for extracting angles, writing hooks, and briefing creators. I use my customer data combined with my prompts to go from zero to a full creative brief in under an hour. My prompts replace an entire research team. I compiled ALL my Claude prompts into one vault: ● Customer Review Angle Extraction Prompt ● Reddit ICP Pain Point Mining Prompt ● Hook Writing Prompt (5 variations from one angle) ● Awareness Level Mapping Prompt ● UGC Creator Brief Generator Prompt ● Winning Ad Breakdown Prompt ● Competitor Ad Analysis Prompt ● Post-Purchase Survey Question Generator ● Angle Bank Builder Prompt ● Full Funnel Creative Strategy Prompt Want access? → Comment "Meta" → Follow me and I'll DM you the vault

@mikefutia PROMPTS

I just built a Claude prompt library that runs your entire DTC marketing operation 🤯 100+ prompts organized by function: competitor research, creative briefs, ad copy, hooks, landing pages, performance analysis, customer review mining, and more. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are still prompting Claude from scratch every time they open a new chat, rewriting the same context, and getting generic output that sounds like every other AI-generated ad. This prompt library eliminates the entire loop: → Competitor Research: scrape and analyze competitor ads, extract winning hooks, map creative strategies, build competitive battlecards → Creative Briefs: generate data-backed briefs from ad performance, write iteration briefs, new concept briefs, test plans → Ad Copy & Hooks: 20 hooks across 10 frameworks, full ad copy variations, persona-specific angles, fatigue-busting rewrites → Landing Pages: audit any landing page against DR best practices, clone high-converting advertorial structures, write product page copy → Performance Analysis: audit Google Ads accounts, find wasted spend, build visual dashboards, weekly narrative reports → Customer Intelligence: mine reviews for ad copy language, extract objections, find unexpected use cases, build persona cards from real data → SEO & Content: find keyword gaps, write content in your brand voice, optimize product listings for AI shopping (ChatGPT, Gemini) → Email & SMS: launch sequences, weekly newsletters, abandoned cart flows, post-purchase nurture No more blank-page prompting. No more re-explaining your brand every session. No more generic AI output that sounds like a template. What you get: →100+ copy-paste prompts organized by the 8 functions DTC teams actually run →Every prompt pre-loaded with the context structure Claude needs to give you real output →Prompts that reference your brand voice, your ICPs, and your real data — not generic placeholders →A living library you can customize once and reuse across every campaign I put together the full prompt library as a single downloadable playbook: organized by section, ready to copy-paste into Claude today. Want it for free? > Like this post >Comment "PROMPTS" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

@glennwrites1 @StefanGeorgi this quiz is a killer, good shit man. im curious how they keep maintain solid trustpilot rating considering they don't disclose the subscription at all... these guys are fucking wizards.

@StefanGeorgi Check out Bioma Health

Anyone got links to good quiz funnels they can drop? Making some improvements to StefanBrain's CRO tool and need a bunch of quiz funnel examples to test it on 🙏

@JoeJMarston 2026

Our biggest resource of 2026 has been downloaded nearly 3000 times. It just got updated. The 2026 playbook now includes a full breakdown of Meta's 31 March algorithm update, the rise of persona-led creative, partnership ads, AI UGC, and how the next wave of UGC is forming. Four pillars: Meta, TikTok, AI, Creative. Built from £600M+ in revenue across the brands we run. Retweet this post and comment "2026" and I'll send it across.

@ioutbidyou @FedotOff90 wont perform. for 40+ audiences COD is basically a must. if you have CC + P24 / Blik you could potentially make it work tho.

@FedotOff90 Cc only ?

Poland is where I'd look right now if I was diversifying beyond the obvious EU markets. 38 million people. Fast-growing middle class. Health and wellness spending climbing year over year. The Facebook ad landscape looks like the US did 5 years ago. CPMs are €3-5 in health niches. Well below Western Europe. Polish consumers are skeptical but once they convert the brand loyalty is strong. Pain relief, joint supplements, sleep products are wide open. Translation matters here — Google Translate + DeepL first, then native Polish speaker proofreads. Polish is specific enough that machine translation alone will cost you conversions. Strong guarantee and return policy moves the needle significantly because these consumers research before buying. For anyone already testing Germany or the Netherlands, Poland is the natural next step. Similar consumer behavior. Lower competition. Lower ad costs. Eastern Europe in general is massively underserved right now.

@AdamHendle @mengotomars fire! do you potentially have the full screenshot with the img visible too?

This checkout upsell for @mengotomars is an absolute masterclass. So smart to save the company money on pick pack and shipping cost pushing customers to 3 bottles instead of 1 per month, while also trying to get guys locked into the three month habit before giving up. Bravo 👏@zachmstuck

@AlessandroLavis Podcast

$75k+/month supplement brands are running ads like this not polished creatives or studio voiceovers just “podcast clips” with a strong hook “3 reasons why guys regret taking this” feels like content, not an ad you stop to listen, not to buy authority setting simple claim curiosity-driven hook then they slide into the product same format reused across dozens of angles swap topic swap benefit same structure prints this is why podcast-style ads keep working low friction, high watch time, easy to scale rt + comment “podcast” and i’ll send the breakdown (follow for dm)

@TheMattBerman @Meta @HubSpot @Calendly MONEY

this cowork agent knows which ads will print money 😱 here's the system that knows what meta doesn't: step 1: pull the raw data → pulls @Meta ads, GA4 + your source of truth (ie @hubspot, @Calendly or a csv) → assumes broken UTMs, disconnected tools, no data eng step 2: map ads by angle → agent re-groups every ad by MESSAGE family (teardown, save-time, founder-led, etc.) → your best message is usually scattered across 3 campaigns + 2 audiences. meta can't see that. → now you can answer the only thing that matters: which angle is producing $ step 3: score buyers not clicks → not CTR. not CPL. not ROAS. → bookings. signups. revenue. whatever moves YOUR business. → 4 questions every day: what's real, what's fake, what's leaking, what's underfed step 4: the 4 outcome truths → REAL WINNER: strong clicks + strong buyers = scale → FAKE WINNER: strong clicks + garbage buyers = cut. no hesitation. → LEAK: good ad + broken page = rebuild page → UNDERFED: quiet crusher at 9% of budget = feed it step 5: find what's breaking → tells you exactly where it breaks: ad, page, or follow-through → last week it caught a founder-psychology ad landing on a generic SaaS page converting 34% below account average → not "something's off." but specific. actionable. step 6: 1 minute brief → 60 seconds brief. lands in cowork/telegram → every rec ships with a confidence tag. low data = no rec step 7: memory that compounds → week 1 finds the obvious fake winners → week 4 it pre-flags curiosity hooks before they become the next fake winner → every cycle is smarter than the last input: meta account + GA4 + one outcome source output: real winners. fake winners. leaks. what to do next. the old way: → triple whale: $300/mo → northbeam: $500/mo → hyros: $500/mo → data analyst: $8K/mo = $9,300/mo of "it depends" this: $0 I packaged the entire system as the Outcome Kit. 3 claude cowork agents + 12 skills: - data reader (meta + GA4 + outcomes. source truth only) - diagnostician (angle mapping + 4 outcome truths scoring) - brief writer (concrete moves + pattern memory) also works with @openclaw and hermes (@nousresearch). giving it away free. comment MONEY + like + follow (must follow so i can DM)

@kamal_razzak @binghott @iamshackelford @DenneyDara @sourfraser @MatthewGattozzi @pkennedy93 @thedennis @harrydelmege_ @heyitsalexP STRAT

I interviewed all of the best creative strategists in the world. @binghott. @iamshackelford. @DenneyDara. @sourfraser. @MatthewGattozzi. @pkennedy93 @thedennis. @harrydelmege_. @heyitsalexP. (thank you so much guys, you're all the best) If you read this document you will be able to become, train, & hire the best advertiser/creative strategist in the world. I promise you that. Hiring and training creative strategists is one of the most expensive mistakes you can make if you get it wrong. So I asked the best in the world: what separates the ones who actually produce winners from everyone else. I wrote it all up in one doc. I put a lot of time into this and there literally 0 AI, just 14 pages of straight sauce. reply "STRAT" and I'll send it over.

@MR_MRR4 is that scenario viable for non us citizens?

Not being able to get mids when running an MRR business is definitely the biggest myth in the space If you know the right agents/brokers you can easily get $300-500k caps across multiple mids on a new LLC with no processing history Then if you keep processing clean them caps can rise quickly With the right back end you can keep everything under 1% disputes and before you know it your able to process $1M+ Not only that but with the right contacts you get more control. I’ve had mids close before but because I know the right people I was able to get them re opened in no time. Going direct to the contact has so many benefits. It’s who you know in this game. We can connect you with these exact contacts

@StefanGeorgi @DreamFirms yeah i 100% agree his biggest risk by far are class action lawsuits. specially after all the hit pieces abt the fake doctor AI aff stuff im sure several lawyers started assembling for some class action shenanigans

Actually one more note that is important: let's say you're right and he gets like a $10MM fine from FTC. Do you not also agree that Medvi is a much larger target for class action lawsuits and other legal actions now than prior to that article getting published? Even if we say that he fights all those lawsuits and wins, it likely means years of stress and legal bills. So I guess, given that, I'd still ask if you'd rather be Medvi co-founder or Gruns co-founder? Personally I'd rather be the Gruns founder 10/10 times.

Gruns vs. Medvi is a fascinating case study in how two DTC Brands can both get to $1BN+, but do it in very different ways, and with very different consequences. Medvi goes viral but it exposes high-risk world of affiliates gone wild. $1.8 BN in projected revenue but questionable how much founder will get to keep (especially now). Gruns builds a brand, doesn't work with aggressive affiliates, and sells for $1 BN in under 4 years. Fascinating dichotomy here. Medvi founder likely has way more equity. Made good money along the way. But now that money is at risk. Gruns founder almost certainly has less equity than Medvi founder. Probably made significantly less money along the way too. But now stands to realize a 9 figure payout with very little risk of not getting to keep that money. And even if we remove the illegality of those Medvi affiliates, and just look at the two business models, which one is better? Hardcore, hyper-scaling DTC using aggressive direct response may actually seem less risky on the surface. After all, you're more likely to make money early on and, if you do hyper-scale, you can make a ton of money during the ride. But it also comes with a much higher risk of your business (and your personal fortune) crashing down. You risk having to give a lot (or all) of that money back. Meanwhile building a fast-scaling DTC Brand like Gruns is, in some ways, riskier. Despite what you see on X, it's hard to sell a DTC Brand. Even harder (and rarer) to get a $1 BN+ exit. Plus, the dilution of equity along the way can hurt. But where the Gruns model has the biggest advantage is this: If you're an experienced operator running a brand like Gruns, then you can sleep easy every night. Not because there isn't stress in scaling - I'm sure there were tons of stressful moments along the way - but because you know that you're not building a house of cards. There's no real risk of it all crashing down. And that peace of mind is priceless. All of which is to say that, at least personally, I'd rather build a Gruns than a Medvi.

@1ajaay fireee

@matthewuncut @pounddz idk what we used but try seedance 2.0. pretty cost-effective

@pounddz which

I just found the new organic affiliate meta I don’t see anyone pushing AI content this quality organically I made this AI UGC video in no joke 30 minuets (not including generation time) You can literally run up millions of views with videos like this pushing to brands and make 20k - 30k a month This is my exact play I’m going to run to get to $30k a month with 1 IG page using this content style > Make an IG account for a gut supplement brand offering me $2k retainer + commissions > Generate insane creatives like this with a consistent character hitting pain points, highlighting problems and teasing the solutions to them > Run a many chat comment funnel and send them a free “acne gut health guide” including my affiliate link > Also have link in bio to clean up extra conversions Honestly affiliate game is on easy mode right now

@1ajaay can you please name drop the brand behind the third advertorial or share the url?

Advertorials from Ecom Landers. Last headline is just silly lmao. But it works.

@FedotOff90 gotta CODmaxx tho

Nobody in ecom is talking about Turkey and I think that's a mistake. Friend told me it’s a 85 million people country with a Median age 32. Obsessed with beauty and health products. Social media usage is through the roof. CPMs $2-4 in health and beauty. Not easy. Not untapped. But worth testing — and for the right brand, the scale potential is significant. The thing that scares most US brands off is the lira. Currency fluctuates hard so pricing and margins get tricky. The move is pricing in USD or EUR on the storefront. Sophisticated Turkish consumers will pay it for perceived premium products. Translation is non-negotiable. Google Translate + DeepL first, then native Turkish speaker proofreads. Turkish consumers bounce hard on bad copy. The brands winning there right now are mostly European operators who got in early. US ecom entrepreneurs are barely present. Def a solid market to test.

@oliverwhudson 2026

Our 2026 playbook has been our most downloaded resource this year. We've updated it with new chapters added - including a full breakdown of Meta's algorithm update published 31 March 2026, the rise of personas, partnership ads, AI UGC and how the next wave of ugc is developing. The same frameworks behind £600M+ in revenue across the DTC brands we work with. Four pillars: Meta, TikTok, AI, and Creative. Platform mechanics. Account structures. AI workflows. The creative formats actually driving incremental growth right now. Retweet this post and comment "2026" and I'll send it over.

@mangoster PROCESS

Just recorded a full breakdown of my AI B-Roll process in this video i cover: - what i use to prompt each scene - fully trasnparent look at my iteration process - different style keywords (ready to be copy & pasted) - the trick to make AI footage look real comment 'PROCESS' + RT and i'll send it over (must be following so i can dm)