Robb Wolf

What has generally passed for "Western Liberal Democracies" will largely live or die by which approach dominates. WLD's are a once (thus far) in history event. there is nothing to guarantee they go on, nor that something like it would ever happen again.

Great Moments in Unintended Consequences: Yosemite Permits, Italy Superb... youtu.be/d8DrYt7zx78?is…

the american story: a republic if you can keep it, by @boriquagato open.substack.com/pub/boriquagat…

@RevShark @Mangan150 We cover all angles on that both in the book and film: a.co/d/0gvPFpDH

@Mangan150 It appears to me that he is embracing veganism because he is more concerned about ethics and philosophy than science and health. Is there any data that shows veganism is superior from a health perspective?

Bryan Johnson looks at massive numbers of biomarkers regularly, takes all kinds of supplements, and pays great attention to what he eats. And if he can't make veganism work, what hope is there for others making it work?

Happy 250th USA! Let’s remember this story so there might be 250 more. The Economic Lie That Brought Down a Superpower youtu.be/WIgcLbmL418?is…

My latest, at MS NOW, explaining why the majority in Chatrie v United States reached the right result using the wrong reasoning—and why that matters. At link below.

Likely more hype than substance, but directionally, a good move. Advancing Regenerative Agriculture and Strengthening American Farm Resilience whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…

@C_King_Evidence @foundmyfitness I wasn’t going to say anything….

@foundmyfitness Sounds like the Paleo diet is making a comeback lol

I'm not surprised that the popularity of the carnivore diet is losing steam. It never was a durable solution for most people. Ultimately, part of what people were experiencing were the benefits of an elimination diet. But that doesn’t mean a zero-plant diet is optimal long term. We’re already seeing that play out. Many of the loudest carnivore advocates are starting to add back fruit, vegetables, and other whole foods.

youtube.com/watch?v=r4xoOQ… This is fascinating. Why the forever war model may be winding down.

@TuckerGoodrich Color me shocked

So... He really was a pervert.

Looks like a solid event, anyone down for a Salzberg excursion!? keto-med.com

@drterrysimpson This is a degree of delusion and willful ignorance of the facts that is stunning. DARPA, Dasazk, EcoHealth alliance. Can you explain any of this?

Fauci was a hero - he didn't kill millions, but he did save millions of lives. Highest paid? Hardly - he was a civil servant getting paid much less than had he gone into private practice. People like you who don't know science are a clear and present danger to society

So, clearly we need to see what is actually in these documents, but if a fraction of what is claimed here proves to be true…. I'm Exposing Dr. Fauci youtu.be/c7JAAF0VbQI?is…

@LivThms @LiMZ69 @ValentinaForUSA Yes, and, simple demographics paint a very different picture.

@LiMZ69 @ValentinaForUSA People are overthinking this...just weird! No, I wont be surprised. Wont be surprised if it isnt either. Crimes are committed by all colours/creeds & by the mentally ill. Is having facts/evidence before judgement no longer required? Will save a lot of time & money I suppose.

A muslim threw a 3 year-old boy to be eaten alive by crocodiles You could tell because: 1- media ALWAYS turns off the comments when it’s a muslim. 2- They describe it as a “man from Norfolk” 3- If he was truly English, his identity would have already been made public

It’s not a witch hunt when it’s presented as a thesis. If this person is wrong, they will take heat for it. But when folks are consistently correct about predictive elements, this is where we run up against this stuff called “science.” If the predictive models is solid, it strengthens. None of that equals witch hunt.

@PJanL7 @ValentinaForUSA Don't be so ridiculous 🙄 How do you equate that with wanting proof of guilt before a witch hunt?

This is such absolute bollocks. It’s a modestly warm day, it is not “severe weather.”

The NYT is amazing some days. They have stumbled upon the notion that increasing housing supply by making building less onerous, will (likely) bring down housing costs. The ironic thing is both sides of the political aisle, for at least 30 years, have had the notion that various subsidies will somehow bring down prices....which they always, inevitably, increases prices as there is more money chasing the same relative number of items. nytimes.com/2026/06/15/opi…?

Regenerative ag may be one of the most under utilized technologies in existence. that said, REGENERATIVE (making thew land and associated ecosystems better, year by year) does not necessitate 100% "grass fed." In many Norther latitudes 100% "grass fed" is difficult, bordering on impossible. That said, this attached images is compelling in the improved nutrient density of animals raised on a broad forage base. It's awesome. AND, it is not the only good and viable player in this space. Some of these of the charts nutrient profiles are primarily found on spring and early summer forage. In many areas we'd see a stark difference once autumn and winter feeding ensues. that does not make the quality of meat and dairy of these later feeding times inferior, but it does reflect the natural variability of a system like this. Interest in grassfed and regenerative have grown a lot in the past decade. That's fantastic, but I've seen a tendency for both consumers and influencers to ignore this variability and set up unrealistic and frankly, harmful standards of perfection.

Cette vidéo est un véritable cauchemar éveillé pour l'écologiste décroissant. Un robot qui traque la nuit les pathogènes et les nuisibles à la lumière ultraviolette, sans un gramme de produit chimique, ce n'est pas un gadget... De quoi faire s'effondrer toute la théologie écologiste. Ici, c'est bien l'entrepreneur et le marché qui offrent une solution réellement efficace aux défis environnementaux. Pas de contrainte, pas de retour en arrière et pas de renoncement. L'entrepreneur résout le problème en créant de l'abondance là où l'on nous promettait la pénurie. Le rôle du progrès a toujours été celui-là : produire de l'abondance à partir de la rareté naturelle avec comme moyen ultime l'ingéniosité humaine. Reste alors une question : si la technologie résout réellement les problèmes que l'écologisme prétend combattre, pourquoi l'écologisme la déteste-t-il à ce point ? Tout simplement parce que ce qu'il veut, ce n'est pas une nature préservée, c'est une société administrée, dont il serait aux manettes. Comme toutes les autres idéologies constructivistes, socialistes et collectivistes, ce qui importe vraiment à l'écologiste ce n'est pas de résoudre les défis de son temps, c'est de régner sur les hommes de son temps. Le héros sera toujours l'entrepreneur, jamais celui qui le déteste.

@JKB0000000 @UlrichFY Have to look to @ThomasSowell “relative to what” and “at what cost?” “Safe” absent any context is not super helpful. And id guess far safety than herbicide/pesticide options.

@UlrichFY How safe is it? What's the unforeseen circumstance?

@UlrichFY @maxiime Likely a lot more mileage out or grass lands and ruminante than forest, but that can be divide up as to where each niche is best served.

Bien entendu que si. L'important c'est surtout de produire plus avec moins de terre. C'est de cette manière, et seulement de cette manière, que d'autres terres seront libérées pour d'autres, dont la reforestation. C'est d'ailleurs toute l'histoire récente de l'augmentation des rendements agricoles.