Rob Parker 🇬🇧🇺🇦#Team King#ThinBlueLine#NoToWar

9.4K posts

Rob Parker 🇬🇧🇺🇦#Team King#ThinBlueLine#NoToWar banner
Rob Parker 🇬🇧🇺🇦#Team King#ThinBlueLine#NoToWar

Rob Parker 🇬🇧🇺🇦#Team King#ThinBlueLine#NoToWar

@robparker100

Retired CSI D/I. RMP(TA). Flightsim nut. Area co-ordinator for local defibrillators. Supporter of all 999 Services. Don’t do woke. Love dogs and smiling.

Winchester UK Katılım Aralık 2010
876 Takip Edilen489 Takipçiler
Ken Whistance
Ken Whistance@KenWhistance·
It is odd how in a country absolutely dominated by non-muslins this would be the main thing on a board for a national chain. Not bothered as I don't use them, just odd.
Ken Whistance tweet media
English
5
0
5
187
Rob Parker 🇬🇧🇺🇦#Team King#ThinBlueLine#NoToWar retweetledi
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
Downing Street Wiped the Phone Before Anyone Could Find It Scotland Yard has reopened its investigation into the reported theft of Morgan McSweeney's phone, the device that almost certainly contained the most direct evidence of how Lord Mandelson came to be appointed as Britain's ambassador to Washington. Detectives are examining CCTV footage from the Westminster street where McSweeney claims he was robbed on the evening of October 20 last year. They fear the footage will already have been deleted. It is usually stored for only three months. The investigation, in other words, has been reopened into evidence that may no longer exist. On the evening of October 20, McSweeney called 999 from Pimlico. He gave the wrong address. He did not correct the handler when the wrong address was read back to him. He did not identify himself as the Prime Minister's chief of staff. He did not mention that the device contained sensitive government material. The following day, a police officer called to ask whether McSweeney had tracked the phone using its built-in tracker. He did not respond. At some point between the reported theft and that unanswered call, Downing Street remotely wiped the device. This destroyed the tracker. The phone could no longer be located. The messages it contained could no longer be recovered. Now consider what did not happen. The Metropolitan Police were not informed that the missing device belonged to the Prime Minister's chief of staff. MI5 was not informed. GCHQ was not informed. The Information Commissioner's Office, which must by law be notified within 72 hours of any serious data breach involving personal information, was not informed. It told The Telegraph this week that it had received no notification at any stage. Set this against what was happening inside Downing Street at the same moment. Officials had been holding meetings to discuss what they would do if the Conservatives used parliamentary process to force the disclosure of McSweeney's messages with Lord Mandelson. The phrase used in those meetings, according to reports, was coming for Morgan's messages. Days after those meetings concluded, the phone containing Morgan's messages was reported stolen. Days after that, it was wiped. A prosecutorial mind, presented with this sequence, asks one question above all others. At the point when Downing Street chose to wipe the device, did anyone consider that doing so would destroy the tracker and make recovery impossible? The answer is yes. That is what remote wiping does. It is not a passive consequence. It is the purpose. There are innocent explanations available for most of what surrounds this affair. Wrong addresses happen. Unanswered calls happen. Notification failures happen. But the decision to wipe a missing government device, knowing that doing so would render it untraceable and its contents unrecoverable, at the precise moment when those contents were the subject of active parliamentary and legal scrutiny, is not a clerical error. It is a choice. And choices have authors. Keir Starmer has said he beats himself up over the Mandelson appointment. He has not said who authorised the wipe. He has not explained why the ICO was not notified. He has not said whether anyone in Downing Street attempted to track the device before wiping it. He has not explained why MI5 and GCHQ, the agencies whose job it is to manage exactly this kind of security risk, were kept in the dark. These are not difficult questions. They have simple, factual answers. A government with nothing to hide would have provided them already. The country is still waiting. "Keir Starmer has said he beats himself up over the Mandelson appointment. [...]. He has not explained why MI5 and GCHQ, the agencies whose job it is to manage exactly this kind of security risk, were kept in the dark."
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
238
1.7K
3.9K
115.4K
Ken Whistance
Ken Whistance@KenWhistance·
I left Asda in 2014 so a while ago but some time before that, chatting to the driver of the egg delivery lorry, his next drop was to a very famous organic egg supplier because demand was outstripping supply. His were not organic eggs. All is not as it seems.
English
5
2
5
105
Sam Sparkes 💙🚔
Sam Sparkes 💙🚔@samsparkes999·
31 Years ago today I walked in to Beds HQ & thought, what the hell am doing? I’ll definitely not last 😂 I was wrong …. (standard) I’ve dedicated the past 24 years to RPU & the role of the #FLO Today I’ll be doing #FLO role & supporting an incredible family🚔 #31years✔️ #FLO💙
Sam Sparkes 💙🚔 tweet mediaSam Sparkes 💙🚔 tweet media
English
57
15
723
11.8K
Sir Rapid Rod
Sir Rapid Rod@RodRapid1784·
My timeline keeps disappearing 😒
English
8
0
18
289
Ken Whistance
Ken Whistance@KenWhistance·
I don't believe the slave trade to be the worst crime in history. The actual worst one is being perpetrated upon me at the moment.
English
1
0
1
25
Ken Whistance
Ken Whistance@KenWhistance·
It's probably illegal to call Lindsay Hoyle a plonker but in for a penny, in for a pound.
English
1
0
3
46
Service
Service@notlistenning1·
@UKLabour today announced the @hantsconnect council splits and new authorities. They have ignored local people , ignored heads of Councils as the fools in LONDON know best as they split the NEW FOREST into separate offices. DIVIDING centuries of history @newforestdc
English
1
0
1
35
Rob Parker 🇬🇧🇺🇦#Team King#ThinBlueLine#NoToWar retweetledi
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
@Keir_Starmer Cut the theatre. You talk about "crackdowns" and "securing borders" as though a few raids and headline arrests will change anything. But the boats keep coming, the hotels keep filling, and the demographic transformation of Britain rolls on. This isn't about criminal gangs. It's about a political class that opened the doors, keeps them open, and dresses it up as compassion while dismantling the very nation it claims to serve. Illegal migration isn't an accident. It isn't simply the work of gangs. It is the sharp edge of deliberate demographic engineering - the same pattern we see from Canada to France, from Germany to Australia. The boats keep coming because your government waves them in. They are housed because councils are ordered to take them. They are kept here because the courts, the NGOs, and the "human rights" industry you protect make deportation all but impossible. This isn't a failure of the system. It is the system, working exactly as designed. And what does that system deliver? A native population made to feel like strangers in their own land. British families priced out of housing while hotels are filled with migrants. Schools where the children of taxpayers are sidelined, while parallel societies entrench themselves with state blessing. A country where the most common boy's name is Muhammad, while white, Christian birth rates collapse. This isn't mismanagement. It's replacement. And you know it. You boast of raids and arrests. We see them for what they are: token gestures to pacify public anger while the real pipeline stays wide open. You can throw around percentages, but the boats still land, the hotels still fill, and the demographics still shift. It's theatre, not border security. And here's the truth: you are not loyal to Britain or the British. You are loyal to the coalition that sustains you - the Leftist–Islamist pact in the cities, the NGOs, the courts, the supranational machine in Brussels and Davos. That machine does not want borders. It does not want nations. It does not want a people confident in their own heritage. It wants a fragmented, divided population: easy to manage, impossible to unite. So no, you won't secure the borders. You'll keep importing the electorate you want, while gaslighting the people who built this country into thinking resistance is "racism." That is the real business being run here - and it is far viler than any gang in Calais. Until Britain recognises this for what it is - deliberate demographic sabotage - no slogan, no crackdown, no "priority" of yours will change a thing. Because the truth is simple: the government isn't failing to stop the boats. It is choosing not to. "A country where the most common boy's name is Muhammad, while white, Christian birth rates collapse. This isn't mismanagement. It's replacement."
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
138
758
3.1K
47.6K
Steph Morgan QPM
Steph Morgan QPM@StephJMorgan1·
Keir Starmer is the Prime Minister. He could make a decision to grant new drilling licenses in the North Sea today. Last year, Norway’s left-wing government drilled 49 new wells in the North Sea. Britain, for the first time since 1964, drilled none.
English
2
1
2
56
Steph Morgan QPM
Steph Morgan QPM@StephJMorgan1·
Reintroducing a blasphemy law to protect one religion is a backward step. I will continue to criticise those practices that I disagree with including halal and kosher slaughter, child marriage, honour killings, FGM, sharia courts and religious schools and face coverings.
spiked@spikedonline

Labour’s new definition of ‘anti-Muslim hostility’ is an insult to people of all other faiths and none. Sikhs get no special protections. Nor do Buddhists, Hindus, Christians or atheists. This will divide society, says Hardeep Singh buff.ly/szmTEJs

English
1
2
6
255
Jen k 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
Our enemies now live amongst us thanks to our politicians who have put the general public in danger. Politicians should be made accountable for what they have done to this country.
English
27
125
662
4.2K
Liza Rosen
Liza Rosen@LizaRosen0000·
t.co/SWAYW6ANBl London’s Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan, insists that all criticism against him is nothing more than “Islamophobia” and “Pakistanophobia.” As you can see in the video, he explicitly claims: “People attack me because I am Muslim and Pakistani.” No, Sadiq—people criticize you because of your disastrous leadership, skyrocketing crime rates, and your repeated defense of extremists. What’s your response to his pathetic victim card?
English
978
957
4K
85.3K