Rohan S

Maharashtra: In the stone-pelting incident in Garib Nagar, located in the Bandra area of ​​Mumbai, the police have arrested a total of 16 people and have detained two people so far. One of the two detained, Saddam Ansari, is the same person who allegedly attacked police officers by throwing stones during the violence. The interrogation process is ongoing, and he will soon be arrested after completing the paperwork. Source: Mumbai Police

Thank you for the gift

Bro got Brutal 😮😲

हमारा धर्म अमर है क्योंकि यह किसी पुस्तक या पैगंबर पर नहीं, बल्कि आत्मा के उन शाश्वत नियमों पर आधारित है जो कल भी सत्य थे और आज भी हैं ~ स्वामी विवेकानंद

Suvendu Adhikari has once again defeated Mamata Banerjee in a direct contest. In the 2021 elections, he defeated her in Nandigram. She then had her party’s winning candidate from Bhabanipur vacate the seat, contested the bypoll, and won. This time, Suvendu reached Bhabanipur and defeated her there as well. What a fighter and a leader!

A Hindu girl was forced to remove her Kanthi (Tulsi) mala during the NEET exam in Surat. Her father courageously protested: “I am the son of a Hindu and I am standing in Surat, not in Lahore, Karachi, or Pakistan." He said — "You people cannot remove hijab and burqa, but you have the guts to remove the Tulsi mala from my daughter’s neck!”

बाबा के नीले कबूतर जो कि -40 से डॉक्टर बना था उसने एक मरीज के सिर की चोट का इलाज करने की जगह उसका पेट ही ची*"र" दिया.... बाद में उससे जब पूछा तो तो बोला कि मुझे सिर की चोट का इलाज करना नहीं आता इसलिए पेट का कर दिया....😜 बोलो जय लंबेडकर 🔔की

घाटकोपर में 5, 7 वर्ष की दो हिन्दू बच्चियों के साथ फिरोज शेख ने किया रेप, पुलिस ने बजरंग दल एवम् अन्य पर लगाई 12 धाराएँ, क्योंकि उन्होंने उस दरिंदे को ले जाते समय गाली दी, थप्पड़ चलाया तो एक पुलिस को लग गई। फिरोज ने लालच दे कर दोनों बच्चियों को बुलाया, अपने कमरे पर ले गया। एक के साथ फिंगर कर रहा था, तब वह भाग कर अपनी माँ को बुला लाई। माँ जब आई तो फिरोज दूसरी बच्ची के गुप्तांग में मुँह लगाए था। हो-हल्ला होने पर फिरोज पकड़ा गया। पुलिस ने पॉक्सो का केस लिखा, फिरोज को ले जाने लगी तो आक्रोशित समाज ने हल्ला किया और फिरोज को पीटने की चेष्टा की। पुलिस ने बीच-बचाव करना चाहा, तो किसी पुलिसकर्मी को एकाध हाथ लग गया, पर नीयत उन्हें पीटने की नहीं थी। यह विषय बहुचर्चित मीरा रोड जुबैर चाकूबाजी प्रकरण के अगले दिन का है, अतः चर्चा में नहीं है। @MumbaiPolice पर स्थानीय लोगों और हिन्दू संस्थाओं ने यह आरोप लगाया है कि उन्होंने चार हिन्दू युवकों पर 12 धाराएँ लगा दी हैं, और उन्हें तब से डिटेन कर रखा है। जबकि किरीट सोमैया से ले कर अन्य भाजपा विधायक, मेयर आदि अपनी ही त्रि-स्तरीय सरकार में धरना पर बैठे हैं! @Dev_Fadnavis जी, थोड़ा ध्यान दीजिए। पाँच साली की बच्ची के रेपिस्ट को समाज चुंबन और आलिंगन तो नहीं ही करेगा? पुलिसकर्मी को यदि चोट लग भी गई, तो लिखित माफी ले लीजिए, या ईगो बड़ा है तो एक की जगह चार थप्पड़ मार लीजिए, पर दस धाराएँ लगाना, कहाँ से उचित है? नीचे पूरी वीडियो और नोटिस लगा रहा हूँ। सर्वसमाज से आग्रह है कि मुंबई पुलिस से टैग कर अनुरोध करें कि हिन्दू युवकों को छोड़ दिया जाए और ध्यान दरिंदे फिरोज पर हो। PS: मुझे यह सूचना किसी स्थानीय महिला ने भेजी है।

भगवान को गाली दोगे तो चलेगा लेकिन यदि अंबेडकर , ईशा मसीह , मुहम्मद को कुछ कहा तो तुरंत गिरफ्तारी । मोदी मोदी मोदी मोदी

Whosoever this woman is, extremely well done. These regular road blockings for dharnas, protests, and VIP visits are a nuisance. When will political parties realise that not a single new voter will be added through such methods? In fact, people stuck in traffic will hate you, you may lose more than you gain. Specifically to the BJP: move on from the women’s reservation issue. Nobody cares about it. No woman, except maybe the party cadre, is angry that the bill won’t be implemented right now. It’s not going to fetch you any votes. There is already too much traffic in India; don’t make it worse by blocking roads for pointless theatrics. Coming back to this woman, I’m sure the deep state experts will soon find out her political allegiance and label her a deep-state agent planted by George Soros to dilute the women’s reservation bill issue, because shooting the messanger is easier than addressing the message.

What must be the salary of those Muslim employees of TCS Nashik? You want me to believe that they managed to get SC lawyers and hearing on their own? No way.... Their community helps in this... Their community helps them in their crime as well..

Look at the size of him! At a time when it was very difficult to find anybody that was obese during that time this man was indulging in feasts that the expensive Hindu taxpayers! He was a scrounger

This is a real image of Ambedkar. He loved the British! That’s why he lived in England as long as he could. He didn’t want the British to leave. He did not want Britain to give India independence.! he never fought for India’s freedom he was not a freedom fighter. He was a puppet of the British.

PM Modi coined the term Panchteerth (five holy sites), referring to five key locations associated with Ambedkar. The govt identified, restored, and presented them as a unified pilgrimage circuit to honor his life and legacy. These are: his birthplace at Mhow (Janmabhoomi), his London residence (Shiksha Bhoomi), Nagpur, where he accepted Buddhism (Deeksha Bhoomi), his last residence in Delhi (Mahaparinirvan Bhoomi), and his cremation site in Mumbai (Chaitya Bhoomi). The initiative involves spending running into thousands of crores; for instance, about ₹800 crore was spent on purchasing and converting the London house into a museum. Now, some state govts like MP, Rajasthan have incorporated Panchteerth into their free pilgrimage schemes. The Rajasthan govt sent a group of pilgrims last year to these sites, including London, free of cost, with eligibility restricted to members of the Dalit community.

Why aren’t we talking about this enough? How could a corporate BPO office&that too a big one like TCS continue to function without any accountability despite several women complaining about the harassment and abuse besides religious conversion attempts. share.google/Pg2wJXPf5OzYQy…

Soon, reservation in the public sector will reach 100% and it could extend up to 50% in the private sector as well. My suggestion: • Work hard • Clear exams like the SAT or other international entrance tests • Pursue higher education at top universities abroad • Build a strong career and settle there if you find better opportunities Next 100 years will be disaster for General Category in India.

This is no apology for calling The Kashmir Files on Kashmiri Hindu genocide a ‘propaganda’. Does she think massacre of Sikhs in Kashmir by Islamist terrorists was also a propaganda? As a Kashmiri Sikh she should be ashamed of her statements and apologise. Not go into circles.

BSDK, I have a 10 minute call recording of the woman you beat up. The conversation was reported in 2024. Aukaat main reh katue

That is the fraud. American power on screen is “craft.” British power on screen is “heritage.” Indian power on screen is suddenly evidence of political conditioning. Same cinema. Same nationalism. Different skin colour. The Economist has a wonderfully colonial rulebook for cinema. When America straps a camera to Pentagon hardware and sells state power with a soundtrack, it is “spectacle.” When a film is made with CIA-adjacent mythology around national revenge, it is “serious storytelling.” But when India puts its own enemies and terrorist attack scars on screen, suddenly the magazine reaches for the psychiatrist’s couch. That is the real joke here. Fighter jets, spies, commandos and national vengeance are perfectly acceptable as long as the flag fluttering in the background is American or British. Then it is culture. It is craft. It is cinema doing what cinema does. The Economist has invented a very elegant little rule for cinema: Top Gun: Maverick can fly on Pentagon muscle, RAMBO & Zero Dark Thirty can ride CIA mythology, James Bond can sell six decades of British spy glamour, Dunkirk can turn wartime memory into national legend, and all of that is called storytelling. But the moment India puts terror, retaliation and national memory on screen with Dhurandhar, the magazine starts diagnosing the audience instead of reviewing the film. What @TheEconomist cannot digest is not one film. It is the fact that Indians are no longer outsourcing their memory to London’s approval. A country that has lived through decades of Pakistan-sponsored terror is apparently expected to process all that pain in whispers, with tasteful disclaimers, and preferably under the supervision of foreign editors who still think they are qualified to explain India to Indians. And that is why the review reeks. Not of sophistication, but of the old imperial tic: Western nationalism on screen is a nation telling its story; Indian nationalism on screen is a pathology requiring diagnosis. The costume has changed. The sneer has not. The funniest part is that The Economist probably thinks this is fearless criticism. It is not. It is just another imported lecture from people who never mind propaganda when it wears aviators, a tuxedo, or a CIA badge, but develop exquisite moral sensitivity the moment India stops being apologetic on its own screen. Just FYI: Decades of Pakistan-sponsored terror are apparently meant to be processed quietly, apologetically, and preferably without ever producing a mass-market cultural response. That is the old script. India is no longer following it.

The Economist basically wants Pakistani Terrorists to be shown as saints. They will criticise Dhurandhar without any logic but praise a series which failed to even give original Muslim names of IC-814 hijackers. The Economist propaganda and bias stands exposed.