Sabitlenmiş Tweet
@ROCH_stradamas
10.7K posts

@ROCH_stradamas
@roho805702
Just don’t be an asshole 🤓
Katılım Şubat 2019
539 Takip Edilen155 Takipçiler
@ROCH_stradamas retweetledi

Our government protects powerful men who rape children. The only question is why.
Global UPDATES@GlobalUpdates24
BREAKING – US government has announced that it won't release any more Epstein files Only 3.5 million out of 6 million files have been released so far
English

@RepThomasMassie @greta @SheedomUSA @AGPamBondi You couldn’t even handle the names you got. You slandered 4 innocent men without doing your own due diligence.
You’re pathetic!
English

This is bizarre… Republican Rep Massie called for ALL the Epstein files to be released and now complains when she does? @AGPamBondi ???

English
@ROCH_stradamas retweetledi

@RepThomasMassie @HasanKhxnx When a sitting U.S. Congressman feels the need to publicly say “I am not suicidal”, you know something is deeply wrong.
Thomas Massie took a stand on the Epstein files and history shows why people are afraid to speak. Transparency shouldn’t require courage. It should be normal.

English


Can you, the people, “vote your way out of this?”
Honestly, not if you get your news from these folks.
The swamp has tricks for deceiving the public, and most even work on congressmen. Here’s an example of how Laura and Greg played along as happy tools of the swamp.
Please ask yourself why your own congressman has never talked about this. He either hasn’t gotten this far in the game (80% chance), or he likes the way the swamp obscures what’s going on (10% chance), or he dislikes the system but the price he’d pay for telling you is too high (10% chance). If a congressman sees this post and wants to debate me, I accept!
The House has rules we adopt at the beginning of each Congress. Honestly we should just use those - some go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson. Some are like Robert’s Rules of Order which branched from House rules a century ago. But we have a rules committee that modifies the rules every week. I served on the rules committee for two years. When I was on the committee, I refused to vote for rules changes if the purpose was to mislead or obscure. Every week, the rules committee bends the rules to suit the Speaker, but you can’t place the blame just on the committee or the Speaker. Every rules change must be approved by the whole House with a majority vote.
Rank and file congressmen are told to vote for these rules modifications each week for the sake of party loyalty because the rules are temporarily modified by the majority to keep the minority from using the permanent rules against us. This is partly true, so most congressmen never question beyond this.
Typically, every week the rules committee meets before other committees and writes a rules package to protect bills that will come to the floor that week. Then the whole house votes on this rules package early in the week before significant legislation comes to the floor. The vote is typically on party lines. Sometimes a block of congressmen in the majority will take the rules package hostage and withhold their vote to get something else that has nothing to do with the rules. I’m not a big fan of this, but after 13 years, my hands aren’t completely clean of this tactic.
The high-road position that I try to maintain is that if the rules package is bad, you shouldn’t vote for the rules package, and in general you shouldn’t withhold your vote from a rules package if there’s nothing wrong with the rules package… even if you disagree with the policy that is enabled to come to the floor by the rules package.
There are more details, but that’s all you need to know to understand what I’m going to explain next.
This week the Speaker wanted to do two things outside of our base rules, so he put those inside of the rules package that also had the rules for bringing bills like the popular SAVE Act to the floor, knowing members would be afraid to vote against something associated with SAVE. THIS IS INTENTIONAL.
The Speaker wanted to circumvent the National Emergencies Act of 1976 to avoid voting on tariffs and he wanted to turn off the ban on bringing a spending bill to the floor the same day it’s introduced.
The first rules package that came to the floor this week failed because myself and other republicans objected to it. The rules committee met again, wrote a new rules package without the tariff-trick, and we voted on the second rules package. I voted no but internet goons, like clockwork, characterized this as a vote against the SAVE Act.
The swamp used that second rules package to give them authority to pass a bill before anyone could read it. They hid that authority inside the rule for the SAVE act because they knew people like Laura and Greg would help them disparage anyone who didn’t go along.
If you fell for Laura and Greg’s slop you were cheering for the Pelosi doctrine that we should pass bills to see what’s in them. If the rules package had failed, the rules committee would have written a better one and SAVE Act would have still come to the floor.


English

@FBIDirectorKash This person is a dipshit, we know that much. It looks like a woman and moves like a man. It looks Hispanic. A recent worker or acquaintance/helper in her life. Store cashier? Someone who thought she had money & didn’t know who her daughter is. Dumped her and fled when he saw tv.
English

New images in the search for Nancy Guthrie:
Over the last eight days, the FBI and Pima County Sheriff’s Department have been working closely with our private sector partners to continue to recover any images or video footage from Nancy Guthrie’s home that may have been lost, corrupted, or inaccessible due to a variety of factors - including the removal of recording devices. The video was recovered from residual data located in backend systems.
Working with our partners - as of this morning, law enforcement has uncovered these previously inaccessible new images showing an armed individual appearing to have tampered with the camera at Nancy Guthrie's front door the morning of her disappearance.
Anyone with information, please contact 1-800-CALL-FBI or visit tips.fbi.gov




English
@ROCH_stradamas retweetledi

Not enough people are talking about Bannons house that was used by people to film “porn”, where witnesses saw kids going in and out, and a bathroom was ruined by “some kind of acid” in the bathtub.
From 2017:



The Intellectualist@highbrow_nobrow
Steve Bannon: “As God is my witness, if we lose the midterms and we lose 2028, some in this room are going to prison, myself included…” (November 6, 2025)
English
@ROCH_stradamas retweetledi

The President sold our most sophisticated AI chips to an Emirati company with ties to the Chinese military. Now we find out they paid hundreds of millions directly to the President’s kids.
It’s all there in plain sight. wsj.com/politics/polic…
English

@Patrick74523 @OneMeghanElinor You’re actually eligible to vote? I thought felons couldn’t vote.

English
@ROCH_stradamas retweetledi
@ROCH_stradamas retweetledi
@ROCH_stradamas retweetledi
@ROCH_stradamas retweetledi
@ROCH_stradamas retweetledi

A government coverup is happening in plain sight
Brian Krassenstein@krassenstein
BREAKING: Proof that the DOJ Is Scrubbing Epstein Files with Trump's Name in them. Today there are 1513 Results for "Donald Trump" Yesterday at 9:15 am there were 199 more files, 1712. If they are doing all of this in front of the public, just imagine what they hid behind closed doors.
English

@PaulStans1 I think so too because otherwise she wouldn’t have stooped so low with the antisemitism accusations
English

@TheGinaP It's textbook Zionist behaviour and self victimisation
English

By no means am I a Brittani fan, but the way Merideth just gaslight the whole reunion to make Brittani look like a bigot and deflect from herself was Diabolical. Merideth ain't shit for that one. #RHOSLC
GIF
English

























