Ryan Galloway

3.6K posts

Ryan Galloway banner
Ryan Galloway

Ryan Galloway

@rsgalloway

#VFX Software Engineer. ex ILM, Disney, MSG Sphere. Superhost.

Katılım Mayıs 2010
558 Takip Edilen206 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Ryan Galloway
Ryan Galloway@rsgalloway·
@deedydas so they're going to shut down those leet code interviews, right?
English
0
0
2
69
Deedy
Deedy@deedydas·
In ~2yrs, Google has gone from 0% code written by AI to 75% code written by AI. What an incredible transformation of how software is created.
Deedy tweet media
English
79
96
835
44.7K
Sheel Mohnot
Sheel Mohnot@pitdesi·
@TomSteyer I agree, we should overturn prop 13… but how would you do that as governor? It needs to be voted on. We tried with prop 15 in 2020 and it failed
English
16
0
64
3.9K
Tom Steyer
Tom Steyer@TomSteyer·
Billionaires like Donald Trump own commercial property in California and pay tax based on its 1970s value. Closing that corporate tax loophole will raise $20 billion a year for schools and health care, at zero cost to you.
English
519
217
1.9K
62.1K
Speaker Robert Rivas
Speaker Robert Rivas@CASpeakerRivas·
California is under threat. Everyday, the Trump Administration is coming after our healthcare, our families, and our values. There’s no time to learn on the job. We need a governor who’s ready to fight back on Day One. That’s why I’m proud to endorse @XavierBecerra for Governor.
English
775
328
834
170.6K
The Figen
The Figen@TheFigen_·
So accurate! 😂😂
Italiano
621
3.8K
31.3K
2.6M
Daniel Morgan
Daniel Morgan@dtmorgan18·
The place that I think AI will be the most disruptive: local government.
English
18
2
41
4K
Disney Parks
Disney Parks@DisneyParks·
The Force will be with you, always.💫 Join your favorite Rebels or pledge allegiance to the Empire starting April 29, 2026 at Star Wars: Galaxy’s Edge at @Disneyland.
Disney Parks tweet mediaDisney Parks tweet mediaDisney Parks tweet mediaDisney Parks tweet media
English
295
465
3.6K
379.3K
Ryan Galloway
Ryan Galloway@rsgalloway·
@devahaz CA does not have a tax revenue problem, why are you shilling for the government?
English
0
0
0
80
Deva Hazarika
Deva Hazarika@devahaz·
In 2020 a measure to eliminate prop 13 protections for large commercial properties failed in a close vote getting 48%. I think that measure would pass today and should be extended to eliminate prop 13 for all properties other than owner-occupied primary residences.
Matt Janiga@regulatorynerd

California needs a ballot measure where out-of-state property owners lose their Prop 13 benefits. Property taxes should be full freight if you live out of state.

English
36
34
422
21.8K
wanye
wanye@xwanyex·
I’m very offered a very similar explanation on here many times! The fact is that enough people defect under communism that in order to make it work you have to become increasingly authoritarian, which of course pushes more people away. Communism is the ultimate, “if everyone would just.” But since everyone isn’t going to “just,” you either have to tolerate some of the people in society developing an alternative, illegal market economy, or you have to force people to do what you want, even though some of them really, really don’t like it.
Stephen R. C. Hicks@SRCHicks

One-paragraph Reddit nailer.

English
31
76
1.6K
57.5K
Jack Posobiec
Jack Posobiec@JackPosobiec·
It would be much cheaper to simply increase self-deportations by debanking illegals, going after businesses and landlords, and heavily taxing remittences
Laura Ingraham@IngrahamAngle

“$18K PER DEPORTATION” @SecMullinDHS: “It costs about $18,225 per person to deport.” “Multiply that by MILLIONS—it’s staggering.” “Why so high? Asylum claims, attorneys, clogged courts.” “That’s the system we’re dealing with.”

English
714
2.9K
11.8K
173.4K
Nick Davidov
Nick Davidov@Nick_Davidov·
In 2021 our portfolio company Fridge No More raised $19M and opened 49 stores in NYC, employed 300 people and was able to deliver goods to your door in under 15 minutes, paying above minimum wage to couriers (they were actually so happy with their jobs they offered to work for free when the company couldn’t get funding). Unlike Mamdani’s store they had to pay rent and taxes. This is $387K per store including all the R&D, CapEX, and a central processing facility. Somehow when a socialist politician is trying to do that it’s 100x more and takes 3 years. Remember my words it will not end at $30M. Very soon they’ll ask for more.
New York Post@nypost

Mayor Zohran Mamdani that the first city-owned grocery store – which carries a whopping $30 million expected price tag – won’t open until 2029. trib.al/zJEMm8D

English
487
3.1K
19.4K
1.4M
Ryan Galloway
Ryan Galloway@rsgalloway·
@rossiadam explosion of entrepreneurs at the same time an inversion in value
English
0
0
0
45
Adam Rossi
Adam Rossi@rossiadam·
Many conversations over the past few months on AI lead me to this conclusion: AI is leading to a Cambrian explosion of entrepreneurs.
English
16
1
56
3K
Uncle Bob Martin
Uncle Bob Martin@unclebobmartin·
@rsgalloway Only statistically. At the most fundamental level, (e.g. the "position" of an electron) the universe is based entirely on probabilities.
English
3
0
15
1.5K
Uncle Bob Martin
Uncle Bob Martin@unclebobmartin·
I've seen a lot of posts complaining that AI is non-deterministic. This is true, but my experience is that AIs can be constrained to be very nearly deterministic. Some might say "very nearly" is not good enough. My response is that I believe I can crank up the constraints to reduce the uncertainty to below any given threshold. I'd also like to point out that the functioning of your body is based on the statistical non-deterministic behavior of random molecular motion. The second law of thermodynamics is statistical in nature and only approximately deterministic above a certain threshold. Indeed, our muscles and nerves would not function correctly if the second law was entirely deterministic. So, your heart beats, and your neurons fire, because of non-determinism. Non-determinism, properly constrained, is something we can all live with.
English
103
48
565
38.1K
Chris
Chris@chriswithans·
Too many people are saying the quiet part out loud with property taxes. It's not about the schools or the roads or the police. It's about lowering valuations for homes to make them affordable to new buyers; or about making it too expensive for the elderly to remain in their homes. Or it's about punishing people who stayed in a home for too long. Property taxes should be small and, by design, used for local services. They should not be a revenue source for statewide projects and they most definitely should not be a hammer for social engineering.
sonch@soncharm

Like wanye I'm not 'against' property tax per se, no more than other taxes, it's just that everyone arguing with him via 'Georgist' principles or enamored of 'land-value tax' or whatever, clearly has a background premise that Everything Is De Facto Owned By The State. And look, it's ok for that to be your starting premise, I guess, but then just admit you're a totalizing commie. Lay your cards on the table so we see clearly where we, respectively, stand; don't waste peoples' time pretending you're interested in marginal 'efficiencies' or whatever. You think the state by default owns everything, just say that.

English
14
10
105
15.7K
Ryan Galloway
Ryan Galloway@rsgalloway·
@moseskagan @pitdesi > That said, it's not a big deal in and of itself. slippery slope fallacy. we should have a flat tax to avoid this.
English
0
0
2
24
Moses Kagan
Moses Kagan@moseskagan·
@pitdesi The counter is that taxes aren't weapons for punishing a disfavored class, but rather tools for raising revenue needed by govt... and this tax will not raise very much $$. That said, it's not a big deal in and of itself.
English
5
1
20
762
nixkristall
nixkristall@nixkristall·
@rsgalloway @unclebobmartin many compiles are not *strictly* deterministic either, but you would call them deterministic. so that’s my definition.
English
2
0
3
439
Uncle Bob Martin
Uncle Bob Martin@unclebobmartin·
AIs are just another step up the semantic expression ladder. We initially expressed our semantics in binary, then assembler, then Fortran, then C, then Java, then Python, etc. AI is just the next step up that same old ladder. And when you take that step, nothing else changes. You are still expressing behavioral semantics. You still need to express structural semantics. All the old principles still apply. You still have to be concerned about design and architecture. And even though the syntax allows informal statement, you cannot abandon formalism. When you express behavior you need a formal way to enforce the behavior you want. I use Gherkin for this. It seems to work pretty well. Consider that Gherkin is written in triplets of Given/When/Then. Each of those GWT triplets is a transition of a state machine. A full suite of Gherkin triplets is a formal description of the finite state machine that represents the behavior of the application. Other formalisms that matter are things like module dependency graphs, testing constraints, complexity constraints, and many others. This step up the semantic expression ladder provides you with an enormous amount of options. But you'd better choose those options wisely!
English
56
72
659
35.1K