Riccardo Iaconelli

after almost 18 years here -- you'll find me as ricky.love on the decentralized blue spinoff of this website. back to the roots!

@marv1nnnnn1 Could you link the sources to your extensions?

@kepano @nico7la @johnnydevriese Also doesn’t work for me. Seems to pick up localised subs?

@nico7la @johnnydevriese it seems to work fine on my end now?

Defuddle now returns Youtube transcripts! Paste a YouTube link into defuddle.md to get a markdown transcript with timestamps, chapters, and pretty good diarization! ...or if you just want to read it, try the new Reader mode in Obsidian Web Clipper powered by Defuddle.

@thsottiaux codex high has been down for the whole day for me. i just tried to switch to medium and that seems (so far) to work a bit better

We are adding compute as fast as we can for Codex, but demand is surging faster than anticipated and service can be a little bit choppy for some. Team is working hard behind the scenes.

@thsottiaux it's down again, i keep getting disconnected...

This codex issue is now fully resolved and stable for the last couple of hours. You have come to expect it, but yes, that means we will be reseting rate limits in a bit. Enjoy.

@fortelabs I’m not sure AI is the real bottleneck solver here, but it’s a great transition indeed :) What do you use as AI poly coach? All my experiments so far have fallen rather flat

AI will inevitably lead to an explosion in polyamory I’ve talked to dozens of people about their objections to poly the last few years, and it always comes down to 3 things: 1) Logistics - the difficulty of keeping track of all the preferences, needs, scheduling, communication, dates, etc. for multiple partners simultaneously 2) Not enough time - they simply don’t have enough free time outside work to even consider such a lifestyle 3) Jealousy - the feelings and thoughts they fear would arise, and their inability to handle them productively (I’ve been amazed at how rare it is for the morality/ethics of polyamory to come up. I think we’ve essentially moved on from this view as a society) AI largely solves all 3 of these objections even with current capabilities: 1) Logistics are no longer a problem, because AI is better at this than anything. You can simply keep a chat thread for each partner/date, drop in anything of relevance, and ask it to recall or retrieve anything you might want to remember 2) Not enough time - AI is decoupling the amount of time we spend working with the value we create. For those who harness it, work will soon become much less central to their lives, thus freeing up huge amounts of time. A lot of this time will be spent doing persona dev’t, which is essential to making polyamory work 3) Jealousy - This one is more subtle, but AI can also address it quite well. You can have a 24/7 poly coach to guide you through anything you might be feeling or fearing. You can role play complex conversations, model the interpersonal dynamics, or even simulate entire new relationships before starting them As usual, the SF Bay Area is ahead of its time, but make no mistake, polyamory is coming into the mainstream with AI’s help

@steipete @adhik_Joshi @openclaw But you can't automate UI (using UIs or browser with mouse/keyboard) stuff with linux, can you?

@adhik_Joshi @openclaw easy: switch to Linux

How do i get rid of this when using openclaw? @openclaw @steipete

@thsottiaux - QA - Security research

How can codex better support the OSS community out there?

@theo I have a few bugs that multiple 5.3 attempts didn’t solve. Private repo though. Interested?

I would like to purchase a handful of code problems that modern LLMs can’t solve. Requirements: - programmatically verifiable (can be tested without human interaction) - “before” state (repo before the commit that implements the solution) - example code that actually solves the problem I am willing to pay up to $500 per problem that I can easily test locally and confirm current models (gpt-5.3-codex, opus 4.6) are unable to solve. If you can’t tell, I’m running out of “too hard for LLM” code tasks 🙃🙃🙃

@thsottiaux Proper QA capabilities to close the loop of automated development

Speed and front-end capabilities: we heard that loudly, and things are improving quickly, to the point where I think we are now highly competitive on speed, if not best-in-class. What else should we improve for Codex?

@fortelabs in 2020, Italy had: - guerrini (little war) as defense minister - speranza (hope) as health m. - costa (coast) as m. of the sea - bonafede (good faith) as m. of justice - spadafora (sword out!) as m. of sport & youth - provenzano (name of famous mafia boss) as m. of south etc...

Wait, so the founder of Anthropic is "Amodei," as in "loves god"? And he leads Anthropic, meaning "human-centered," which is being used in military strikes? And the creator of ChatGPT is "Altman," as in "an alternative to humans"? And he leads OpenAI, which is completely closed? And then there's "Gemini," meaning "two-faced," from a company that promised to do no evil? And the whole global AI arms race is being driven by people who claimed to be worried about AGI taking over the world? Either the universe is an extremely cliché writer, or has a brilliant sense of humor

@thsottiaux - Agent orchestrators - Iterative self review/reflection - Plugins (ability to bring in domain knowledge) - A model for openclawd! (Computer use & the ability to take on a nice personality)

Codex team is fairly distributed, but most of the team is gathering in person over next 48 hours to take a step back and align on what’s next this year. What should we discuss?

@jannikmeissner @linusgsebastian @eevblog In one case who paid has proof of vote. In the other, it has not.

@ruphy @linusgsebastian @eevblog What prevents someone from paying you 20 Eur to vote how they want on their behalf?

You know your political party is in trouble when the most sensible one is the one with brain damage.

@jannikmeissner @linusgsebastian @eevblog What prevents somebody from buying your letter for 20€ and mailing it on your behalf?

In Germany, when you move anywhere you have to register your address with local authorities, including proof of ownership or a letter from your land lord. But then for elections they automatically send a paper proving legibility to vote to your home and you can use that at the polling station. Added advantage: postal votes are secure and easy since you can mail the ballot to voters and they can mail it back. They have a simple and clever two envelope solution to secure against fraud and still keep the result anonymous. Of a lot of things I dislike about Germany, voting is not one of them.

@richarddeitsch @Britt_Ghiroli That’s a Turin thing. In Milan there’s Barbajada which is similar

@Britt_Ghiroli This is the greatest drink I have ever tasted. Had it covering the Turin Games. If it is part of the Milan scene...... bicerin.it/en/the-bicerin/ You are welcome.

In Milan for the Opening Ceremony (a literal dream assignment) and the hot chocolate I ordered is actually just warm chocolate frosting, I'm now dipping my chocolate biscuits with. Like Dunkaroos but a million times better. I have never been happier.

@gvy_dvpont give us the source!

Made an "analog" YouTube book for my kid so she can choose what she wants (from pre-approved list) without being exposed to a thumbnail hellscape. Also automatically cuts her off after x scans

@matt_elevenlabs 11B

We just raised $500M at an 11B valuation 🎉 To celebrate, we’re giving away 1,000 free credits so you can test our platform. For the next 6 hours, comment “11B” below and we’ll DM you the credits (must follow) 👇

Mario Draghi's important message for Europe: Out of necessity, the future of Europe must be a journey towards federalism. But, however desirable a true federation would be, it would require political conditions that do not exist today. And the challenges we face are too urgent to wait for them to emerge. A new, pragmatic federalism is therefore the only viable path forward. This is a federalism that is issue-based, flexible and able to act outside the slowest mechanisms of EU decision-making. It would be built by coalitions of the willing around shared strategic interests recognising that Europe’s diverse strengths do not require every country to move at the same pace. This is a federalism that is issue-based, flexible and able to act outside the slowest mechanisms of EU decision-making. It would be built by coalitions of the willing around shared strategic interests—recognising that Europe’s diverse strengths do not require every country to move at the same pace. Imagine countries with strong tech sectors agreeing on a common regime that enables their firms to scale rapidly. Nations with advanced defence industries pooling R&D and funding joint procurement. Industrial leaders co-investing in critical sectors such as semiconductors, or in grid infrastructure that lowers energy costs. This pragmatic federalism would allow those with higher ambitions to act with the speed, scale and intensity of other global powers. And just as importantly, it could help renew the democratic momentum of Europe itself. Because opting in would require national governments to secure democratic support for specific shared goals, it would become a bottom-up construction of common purpose—not a top-down imposition. All those who want to join could do so—while those who seek to block progress would no longer be able to hold others back. In short, it offers a confident vision of Europe—and one that citizens can believe in. A Europe where young people see their future. A Europe that refuses to be trampled on. A Europe that acts not out of fear of decline, but out of pride in what it can still achieve. We must offer this vision if Europe is to renew itself. And I am confident that we can.

@Arypigliate2 1) perché fornisce altri servizi: chatgpt.com/share/697c8a4b… 2) il vecchio modo di pagare (e.g. bollettino) conteneva commissioni ben più alte (2-5 euro) a carico della PA. con PagoPA le commissioni sono trasparenti e i PSP si possono fare concorrenza, abbassando i costi per tutti

@papinix71 @Arypigliate2 le tariffe non sono imposte da PagoPA e non sono flat ma sono lasciate alla libera competizione tra PSP. Infatti ce ne sono alcuni che fanno pagare poco o niente.

@Arypigliate2 Esatto, commissione flat. Se spendi 50, 100€ pesa meno, ma sulle piccole cifre diventa scandaloso.

@Arypigliate2 guarda che la commissione non te la fa pagare PagoPA ma il PSP che usi. Sì, anche se paghi dal loro portale. PagoPA prende sempre zero di commissione.