what do you think of this one vega?

5.8K posts

what do you think of this one vega? banner
what do you think of this one vega?

what do you think of this one vega?

@s_pect_re

https://t.co/MsDDYLs7Iy there is only the grinding machine

Katılım Ekim 2018
378 Takip Edilen82 Takipçiler
Trev Bouds 🇨🇦🇮🇱
Jebus murphy... the Ranchero will die within a few years, just like the Lightning. I love how you paint this with such rosy glasses. Toyota has been VOCAL about how they see the EV market developing. Maximum 30% penetration of BEV's globally, with their CEO explicitly stating a BEV pollutes as much as three hybrids. And you think adding a 3 hour charging requirement to match what a normal semi can do is a win... quit sniffing glue.
English
1
0
0
6
Lucy Biggers
Lucy Biggers@LLBiggers·
“A gallon of jet fuel contains 34 kilowatt-hours of energy in a package weighing six pounds. A lithium-ion battery storing the same energy weighs 250 pounds. That density gap is why every military on earth runs on liquid hydrocarbons, why every container ship crossing the Pacific burns bunker fuel, why every combine harvester in Iowa runs on diesel, and why every 747 landing at Heathrow runs on kerosene. The fact that nobody wages war over solar panels is evidence of their limitations not superiority.” —@Shellenberger open.substack.com/pub/public/p/2…
English
383
2.9K
10.5K
217.7K
Faytuks Network
Faytuks Network@FaytuksNetwork·
BREAKING: President Trump requested a plan to seize nearly 1,000 lbs of highly enriched uranium from Iran. The U.S. military briefed him on a complex operation involving airlifting excavation equipment, building a runway inside Iran for cargo planes to extract the material, and potentially deploying hundreds of troops. - WaPo
English
383
531
3.7K
1.2M
Trev Bouds 🇨🇦🇮🇱
Ha, no I am not but I have enough of a background in chemistry to understand there is a limit to the energy storage of materials we have today. Keep fluffing for those government subsidies though... I'm sure they generate the next magical breakthrough sometime in the "near" future.
English
1
0
0
11
eigenrobot
eigenrobot@eigenrobot·
why is iran still lobbing missiles at israel. morale i guess? feels basically pointless yet costly, as it exposes launchers and wastes missiles while accomplishing nothing tactically nor strategically
English
116
9
421
16.6K
nature
nature@Nature·
Tens of thousands of publications from 2025 might include invalid references generated by AI, a Nature analysis suggests go.nature.com/4dnjvil
English
34
456
891
106K
Trev Bouds 🇨🇦🇮🇱
It's embarrassingly stupid to always assume the next big breakthrough is just around the corner for EVs.. which is always the case for EV pundits. Billions invested in batter research and all we have are longer lasting power tools and cell phones. Transportation or grid capable systems are a pipe dream.
English
1
0
0
13
Craig Fuller 🛩🚛🚂⚓️
I think we should rip a page from the Chinese playbook and tell Chinese OEMs if they want to sell to American consumers, they must open up production in the US with an American OEM. As part of that arrangement, the Chinese OEM will be required to transfer IP over to the American OEM.
Bernie Moreno@berniemoreno

This is simple: no Chinese autos on American roads. Period. And to our western allies letting this cancer infect their economies, turn back now before it’s too late. reuters.com/business/autos…

English
66
60
662
67.5K
Bernie Moreno
Bernie Moreno@berniemoreno·
This is simple: no Chinese autos on American roads. Period. And to our western allies letting this cancer infect their economies, turn back now before it’s too late. reuters.com/business/autos…
English
133
67
330
85.1K
The Savage Quad
The Savage Quad@the_Savage_Quad·
So, a car that people love the year make and model of was destroyed for the sake of the government's vanity. Vehicles that families could afford, just because they didn't get enough gas mileage for you. Don't even try to defend this, it will only make you look stupid and pathetic. My 2006 Ford Taurus got 25 miles to the gallon, yet they would have totally accepted that car and destroyed it. Make that make sense. And don't try to tell me they wouldn't have taken it because it got over 18 MPG, it's the damn government, they wouldn't have hesitated.
English
2
0
0
17
Handre
Handre@Handre·
Cash for Clunkers destroyed $2.4 billion in working capital in 2009. The government paid dealers to pour sodium silicate into 690,000 perfectly functioning engines -- rendering them permanently inoperable. These weren't junkyard cars. The program required trade-ins to be drivable and insured. You had working vehicles that poor families desperately needed, and bureaucrats systematically destroyed them to boost GM sales (while GM was under government ownership, naturally). The environmental impact? Pure theater. Most clunkers got 18+ mpg -- hardly gas guzzlers. Meanwhile, building new cars generates 25 tons of CO2 per vehicle before they leave the factory. The program likely increased net emissions while making transportation less affordable for everyone earning under $50k.
English
252
2K
12.7K
428.6K
Santiago
Santiago@svpino·
The same AI that wrote your slop code is now reviewing it. Please, don't call this "code reviews". This is like you grading your own homework. Every AI tool has blind spots. Every tool makes assumptions, takes shortcuts, and misses edge cases. What do you think will happen when you ask this same AI tool to review that code?
Santiago tweet media
English
46
5
88
10.1K
The unspeakable self
The unspeakable self@DrGeneCallahan·
@IJoukov @heygurisingh It cannot possibly see images, because all that it gets as input is high and low voltages in a computer. And those are not an image at all
English
2
0
0
174
Guri Singh
Guri Singh@heygurisingh·
Holy shit... Stanford just proved that GPT-5, Gemini, and Claude can't actually see. They removed every image from 6 major vision benchmarks. The models still scored 70-80% accuracy. They were never looking at your photos. Your scans. Your X-rays. Here's what's really going on: ↓ The paper is called MIRAGE. Co-authored by Fei-Fei Li. They tested GPT-5.1, Gemini-3-Pro, Claude Opus 4.5, and Gemini-2.5-Pro across 6 benchmarks -- medical and general. Then silently removed every image. No warning. No prompt change. The models didn't even notice. They kept describing images in detail. Diagnosing conditions. Writing full reasoning traces. From images that were never there. Stanford calls it the "mirage effect." Not hallucination. Something worse. Hallucination = making up wrong details about a real input. Mirage = constructing an entire fake reality and reasoning from it confidently. The models built imaginary X-rays, described fake nodules, and diagnosed conditions -- all from text patterns alone. But that's not the scary part. They trained a "super-guesser" -- a tiny 3B parameter text-only model. Zero vision capability. Fine-tuned it on the largest chest X-ray benchmark (696,000 questions). Images removed. It beat GPT-5. It beat Gemini. It beat Claude. It beat actual radiologists. Ranked #1 on the held-out test set. Without ever seeing a single X-ray. The reasoning traces? Indistinguishable from real visual analysis. Now here's what should terrify you: When the models fake-see medical images, their mirage diagnoses are heavily biased toward the most dangerous conditions. STEMI. Melanoma. Carcinoma. Life-threatening diagnoses -- from images that don't exist. 230 million people ask health questions on ChatGPT every day. They also found something wild: → Tell a model "there's no image, just guess" -- performance drops → Silently remove the image and let it assume it's there -- performance stays high The model enters "mirage mode." It doesn't know it can't see. And it performs BETTER when it doesn't know it's blind. When Stanford applied their cleanup method (B-Clean) to existing benchmarks, it removed 74-77% of all questions. Three-quarters of "vision" benchmarks don't test vision. Every leaderboard. Every "multimodal breakthrough." Every benchmark score you've seen this year. Built on mirages. Code is open-sourced. Paper is live on arXiv. If you're building anything with multimodal AI -- especially in healthcare -- read this paper before you ship. (Link in the comments)
Guri Singh tweet media
English
281
938
4.5K
664.9K
Trev Bouds 🇨🇦🇮🇱
Hahaha, right. Norway did it by funding tax breaks from... their petroleum industry. Denmark saw a significant market drop after ending their subsidies. South Korea did the same tax strategies and EV + hybrids account for only 12% of their total vehicle registrations. You're full of shit. Europe is barely at 22% IF you include hybrids.
English
2
0
0
31